Av a look at the table RD and KM FFS U need advice b cos u ain't football people .
We have no manager knowledge and no authority out on the training ground. Proper clown dealings on the football side. Luzon took training Thursday and Friday.
Sack manager, get crap new manager, no work permit, get beat 5-0.
Exactly we don't av anyone at the club giving us Direction total shambles, clear out from top to bottom needed ASAP.
Unfortunately, the only person with any authority is in Belgium. No one at the club has any, which is in effect, just a branch office.
Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager. We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
Of course she lied - she suggested we would undertake a proper process -then when the mad dictator decided not to, she was in a spot. All this rubbish about 20 applicants coming in and interviewing three - what sort of process is that? It may have happened, but that is not a recruitment process, it is a shambles. Duchatelet may be the problem, but she is not the solution and if we can get her out the club will be none the poorer and he may be irritated. Maybe we should try to take every opportunity we can to irritate him.
Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager. We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)
RD does not watch the games, probably thought the club was going to make money and then make a quck buck, he will not make the investment, will not choose an englishmen to manage the club, KM imo is just a puppet for RD, the passion has disappeared and was last seem when CP was their, and prior to that AC.
You need people of the calibre of Jack Hayward (RIP) who put his heart and soul into Wolves, something this club has been missing for years.
Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager. We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)
Why people feel they were lied to is not the same as were lied to.
Again,who can substantiate this accusation with actual proof?
I'll tell you who:no-one,and rumour,probability and conjecture don't count as proof.
RD does not watch the games, probably thought the club was going to make money and then make a quck buck, he will not make the investment, will not choose an englishmen to manage the club, KM imo is just a puppet for RD, the passion has disappeared and was last seem when CP was their, and prior to that AC.
You need people of the calibre of Jack Hayward (RIP) who put his heart and soul into Wolves, something this club has been missing for years.
But...but...they are streamed directly to Belgium!!!
Agree re: Hayward, a REAL owner, old school style. Sadly people like Sir Jack are a thing of the past.
Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager. We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)
Why people feel they were lied to is not the same as were lied to.
Again,who can substantiate this accusation with actual proof?
I'll tell you who:no-one,and rumour,probability and conjecture don't count as proof.
Sure but as we said in the Trust statement, football is a purchase driven by emotion. In this case, perceptions, what people feel, are more important than a legal definition.
Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager. We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)
Why people feel they were lied to is not the same as were lied to.
Again,who can substantiate this accusation with actual proof?
I'll tell you who:no-one,and rumour,probability and conjecture don't count as proof.
Sure but as we said in the Trust statement, football is a purchase driven by emotion. In this case, perceptions, what people feel, are more important than a legal definition.
Forget about 'legal definition' here,that's glib; what you are suggesting is that because football is emotive, people's 'perceptions' are more important than the truth.
Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
Just because she smiles and talks to you, doesn't mean that she is informing you. Get real she is Roland's puppet (no doubt a well paid one). This great club of ours is being dragged down by this crazy experiment. Why can't you see it.
Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
Yes Matthew, Roberts, and Fraeye.
No lie there...
Didn't she say on SSN that no Brits were considered for the post?
Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
Yes Matthew, Roberts, and Fraeye.
No lie there...
Didn't she say on SSN that no Brits were considered for the post?
It was hard to tell. The question went something like 'can you tell us if any of those considered were British' her reply was 'no'. So was that 'no' I can't tell you or 'no' there were none considered.
Comments
No lie there...
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
You need people of the calibre of Jack Hayward (RIP) who put his heart and soul into Wolves, something this club has been missing for years.
Haahaha i saw it before it went.
Again,who can substantiate this accusation with actual proof?
I'll tell you who:no-one,and rumour,probability and conjecture don't count as proof.
Agree re: Hayward, a REAL owner, old school style. Sadly people like Sir Jack are a thing of the past.
Informed? she completely misinformed.