Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

POST-MATCH THREAD: Charlton Athletic v Reading: Saturday 4th January 2025: KO 15:00

13468912

Comments

  • Southbank said:
    Decent performance in spells, but Reading had a couple of spells of their own and 3 huge chances.

    If Thierry Small had an end product there is no doubt he'd be playing at a much higher level.

    I am bored of saying it, but how bad does Gillesphey have to be before he is dropped? He was absolutely woeful today and added being out muscled to his ever growing list of deficiencies.

    Going to moan about the bench as well. It's still ridiculously unbalanced. I don't see the need for 3 strikers and if Anderson is there, why do we need Campbell as well?

    Every time I have seen Whing play for Reading I have been impressed - would love to get him in. Knibbs was less effective than he has been against us in the past. I like Sam Smith as well, clever footballer and given his size he leads the line really well.

    No doubt things have improved and there is a level of resilience there, but the concern for me is what happens if we loose Jones again? He leads the defensive line so we'll and we don't have a replacement for that.
    Talking out of your proverbial about Gillesphey as most. No coincidence that we've been a better defensive unit with Jones next to him. A misplaced pass doesn't mark someone down always but as usual Charlton fans need a scapegoat e.g Fox/Purrington/Morgan. Let's analyse today we didn't concede of which Gillesphey wad part of our defense. How many goals did we score .......nil ! Don't see you berating others.

    Gillesphey played well and has done so recently.
    Two misplaced passes that created danger and also gave away an unnecessary corner all in the first ten. After that he was good.
    Jones and Mitchell did nothing similar.

    Who was it who got bullied by Smith for their one big chance and ended up on the floor?
    Gillesphey
  • Wasn’t able to watch today so have no opinion of my own but just wondering how Gillesphey is managing to score anything between 4 and 8 on the players marks (and not from any of our notorious WUMS!). I sometimes wonder if we all watch the same game. 
    His mother has a Charlton Life account?
  • Croydon said:
    First disgraceful Referee who wanted to kick off before we had finished paying our respects. Then his performance went down hill from there.

    Entertaining game, a little more composure in front of goal and we would have got the win.
    Playing With a bit more fluency and hope we can push on.   Good to see NJ reconnect with the fans. 
    I don't think we can blame the ref for the shambles of the remembrance. Whoever planned that within the club got it totally wrong having Wright's piece before the lost of names. 
    The club asked the ref to bring the teams out at 2.52. It was at least 2.54 when they did appear. He then wanted to start the game asap after 3pm. 
  • golfaddick said: we
    Croydon said:
    First disgraceful Referee who wanted to kick off before we had finished paying our respects. Then his performance went down hill from there.

    Entertaining game, a little more composure in front of goal and we would have got the win.
    Playing With a bit more fluency and hope we can push on.   Good to see NJ reconnect with the fans. 
    I don't think we can blame the ref for the shambles of the remembrance. Whoever planned that within the club got it totally wrong having Wright's piece before the lost of names. 
    The club asked the ref to bring the teams out at 2.52. It was at least 2.54 when they did appear. He then wanted to start the game asap after 3pm. 
    Ah right, and was that booing from the fans I could hear on the TV when he blew to end it? 
  • edited January 4
    As far as I know, if a an opposition player plays the ball (which I think he did), then TC becomes onside again.
    i was doing lino for my son's team about a month ago and gave offside for this and was overruled by the referee who said what you have above even though i didfn't and don't agree with it but would have helped today if that's the rule - the ref didn't know his arse from his elbow today
  • TelMc32 said:
    supaclive said:
    I enjoyed that today.   We were SO much better than we have been.   Gillesphey weak link.   Keeper's distribution is poor.  But we worked damn hard.

    Jones (Lloyd) brilliant.  TC worked tirelessly.  Leaburn caused them problems.  Small needs a little more composure 

    Left sided centre half
    Attacking midfielder
    Goalkeeper (Reading's preferably)

    PLEASE

    Odd view. Their keeper spilled several times, kicked the ball out several more and all our shots were straight at him. Not sure how you then want him in over AMB who made the one decent save that was needed out of him all game 🤷🏻‍♂️😏
    Gilly was excellent today in par with Mitchell and Jones 
    Odd use of the “quote” function. I was talking about AMB and their keeper, but then you are an odd fellow.

    As it happens, Gillesphey’s best game for us was last week against Wycombe. Good today, although a couple of dodgy moments and not quite to that standard*. Hopefully, these aren’t two blips and he finally settles down and performs week in, week out. 

    *just to be clear, we’re League 1, I don’t expect perfection, or even solid performances every week, but Gillesphey has been very poor since he joined. Two decent performances in a row and I really hope that continues.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Shame we couldn't win but at least we didn't lose. One point is better than none and gets us closer to safety which has to be the first target.
  • Reading missed two huge chances at the start of the 2nd half....that shouldn't be overlooked.

    After that Charlton weren't bad and gave it a go. I'd like to have seen Aneke paired with Leaburn for that last 15 mins (Campbell into Berry's spot). 

    Nothing wrong with the overall effort. Small was heavily involved but ultimately failed to capitalise on a) tons of space b) some good crossfield balls. Shame....he gave it his best shot but an almost total lack of a right foot stopped him from being the deciding factor.

    Gillesphey is another curate's egg of a player. Started very badly....the first three things he did were calamitous....but ultimately he got his headers won and played some good balls. He definitely played a big part in the clean sheet. The goalie and other CBs were generally strong.

    For a 0-0 it was good. The fact that we finished strongly, made me feel like I'd seen a game. 

    Lastly, Campbell rolling around on the deck long after being flagged was hilarious. GREAT finish but nicely comical too. One for the dressing room fines' committee, that one. Ps...he didn't have a bad game at all....very wholehearted. 
  • DOUCHER said:
    As far as I know, if a an opposition player plays the ball (which I think he did), then TC becomes onside again.
    i was doing lino for my son's team about a month ago and gave offside for this and was overruled by the referee who said what you have above even though i didfn't and don't agree with it but would have helped today if that's the rule - the ref didn't know his arse from his elbow today
    It has to be a 'deliberate play', it's not sufficient for the defender just to touch the ball (Law 11.2)
  • I thought the offside goal came off their player. Would like to see it more closely.
    Doesn't matter if he was offside when the Charlton player played the ball forward. If it deflects off a defender on the way it's still offside.
  • DOUCHER said:
    As far as I know, if a an opposition player plays the ball (which I think he did), then TC becomes onside again.
    i was doing lino for my son's team about a month ago and gave offside for this and was overruled by the referee who said what you have above even though i didfn't and don't agree with it but would have helped today if that's the rule - the ref didn't know his arse from his elbow today
    It has to be a 'deliberate play', it's not sufficient for the defender just to touch the ball (Law 11.2)
    yes - intercepting it is deliberate - my argument is that he wouldn't be trying to intercept it if the player who is offside (when the ball is kicked) wasn't there - its a ridiculous rule if intercepting overrides a player being offside - anyway, it was ruled off and that's that i guess - i enjoyed the game and we are playing much better - still need 2 or 3 more attacking pacy threats if we are to stand a chance of going up through the playoffs though - i would have put chucks on for berry last 20 - we just didn't have enough to break them in the end.    
  • DOUCHER said:
    DOUCHER said:
    As far as I know, if a an opposition player plays the ball (which I think he did), then TC becomes onside again.
    i was doing lino for my son's team about a month ago and gave offside for this and was overruled by the referee who said what you have above even though i didfn't and don't agree with it but would have helped today if that's the rule - the ref didn't know his arse from his elbow today
    It has to be a 'deliberate play', it's not sufficient for the defender just to touch the ball (Law 11.2)
    yes - intercepting it is deliberate - my argument is that he wouldn't be trying to intercept it if the player who is offside (when the ball is kicked) wasn't there - its a ridiculous rule if intercepting overrides a player being offside - anyway, it was ruled off and that's that i guess - i enjoyed the game and we are playing much better - still need 2 or 3 more attacking pacy threats if we are to stand a chance of going up through the playoffs though - i would have put chucks on for berry last 20 - we just didn't have enough to break them in the end.    
    Obviously a subjective call by the referee (rather than the AR who presumably informed him in his earpiece that it was his decision, hence kept his flag down)....think they got it right as would be harsh to call it a deliberate 'play' (implying a degree or control) when only a yard or two away
  • The lads did well, fought hard, put the effort in and second half bar the first 10 were playing like we have wanted them play all season. Bad luck and hasty decisions stopped us scoring.  Deserved a win but I enjoyed the fact they tried to play and looked to win it. Good effort
  • Sponsored links:


  • 23 games played and 34 points attained.

    Need 41 from the remaining 23 to get to the 75 mark that’s usually needed for top six.
    Brum, Wycombe, Wrexham & Stockport all away from home will be a tough ask 
    On the other end though, that means there’s plenty of poor teams still to come to the Valley where picking off three points consistently will be critical.

    We can do it. 12 points from the last six with only two goals conceded and four clean sheets so recent form is tracking the right way.
    Win all our remaining home games and pick up a point at every away equals 79 points. 

    It’s not going to happen.

    Blame first half of season for our downfall .
    Blimey. Sack the rest of the season off then. See you in August!
    Come back to me in August. 

    Anything other than a play-off finish is failure.
  • Southbank said:
    Southbank said:
    Decent performance in spells, but Reading had a couple of spells of their own and 3 huge chances.

    If Thierry Small had an end product there is no doubt he'd be playing at a much higher level.

    I am bored of saying it, but how bad does Gillesphey have to be before he is dropped? He was absolutely woeful today and added being out muscled to his ever growing list of deficiencies.

    Going to moan about the bench as well. It's still ridiculously unbalanced. I don't see the need for 3 strikers and if Anderson is there, why do we need Campbell as well?

    Every time I have seen Whing play for Reading I have been impressed - would love to get him in. Knibbs was less effective than he has been against us in the past. I like Sam Smith as well, clever footballer and given his size he leads the line really well.

    No doubt things have improved and there is a level of resilience there, but the concern for me is what happens if we loose Jones again? He leads the defensive line so we'll and we don't have a replacement for that.
    Talking out of your proverbial about Gillesphey as most. No coincidence that we've been a better defensive unit with Jones next to him. A misplaced pass doesn't mark someone down always but as usual Charlton fans need a scapegoat e.g Fox/Purrington/Morgan. Let's analyse today we didn't concede of which Gillesphey wad part of our defense. How many goals did we score .......nil ! Don't see you berating others.

    Gillesphey played well and has done so recently.
    Two misplaced passes that created danger and also gave away an unnecessary corner all in the first ten. After that he was good.
    Jones and Mitchell did nothing similar.

    Who was it who got bullied by Smith for their one big chance and ended up on the floor?
    Gillesphey
    Thought so.
    I singled him out v Wycombe as having his best game for us.
    Today, sadly, I thought he was very clearly the weak link in an overall strong defensive display by us. I hope we find a suitable replacement this month.
  • A solid performance today, we're definitely in a much better place than a couple of games ago, as while the return of Jones has tightened things up at the back, we now have much more of an attacking threat, and pose a goal threat. Unfortunately our shots were either straight at their keeper (or the player on the line) or slashed wide.

    Gillesphey had a shocking start, and while he improved after that, he was too weak at the start of the second half, giving Reading their best chance, and forcing AMB into a sharp bit of keeping.

    What the last few games have shown is that yet again we've ended up with an unbalanced squad. Usually it's because we've changed the managed, but in this case it's because the manager has changed tactics, leaving us with a glut of central strikers, and a lack of pacey wide attackers. We really needed like for like replacements for TC and Small after 70 minutes, and instead had 3 central strikers on the bench. 
  • This morning I was telling myself, no way are we good enough to win four on the bounce, when two of the four are against teams in the top 6, but we came mighty close and deserved to win. Hard to fault anyone, we forget how young Small and TC still are, with the right coaching both will improve their end product and be Champ- level players. 

    I mainly have the hump with the fact that due to this shoddy Sky deal I have no idea whether TC was off or not. Last season they’d have had the playbacks in the post match analysis. We’d also know if Mbengue should have had a red for his tackle on Edwards, as Clare should have done. And we’d have a series of clips showing that the ref thought he was reffing an ice-hockey game. 

    But anyway, compared to where we were a month ago, night and day, so now we have to see what we can do in the window. As Brownie says, why not try for a couple of loans of good FAPL youngsters with pace? All of a sudden we look like a good place to send such a player.
    I’m not sure Mbengue deserved a red, in my opinion it was nowhere near as dangerous as Clare’s tackle. I think he was helped too by having been challenged from behind by Docherty, for which Reading were awarded a free kick, which took him into the tackle on Edwards. Without having seen it again I think a yellow was probably correct.
  • msomerton said:
    a comment on Small, that was a decent all round performance. Yes his decision making in and around the opposition area has to improve. But this comes about because of his ability to run past defenders, or trick his way past them , also today he did the defensive role bloody well. there must have been at least 3 occasions that with his pace he ran 30 or 40 yards to get a tackle in on a Reading player who had broken forward and looked like he may have the beating of Gillesphy or Mitchel.
    Agree. Tackle of the day though was Charlie Savage on TC.
  • For a 0-0 it was an entertaining game. The sort of game that Charlton fans want to see. Energy, endevour, front footed football. The hoofball has been decreasing, and passing through midfield increasing. Jones and Mitchell were demanding the ball from AMB to give them the ball to build attacks. There appeared to be a lack of communication sometimes, and the goalie was hesitant to roll it out to them, resulting in some long spells where AMB had the ball, but eventually waived the backline forward to allow him to punt the ball downfield. Work on the training ground is needed to sort out when to build from the back and when to play it short to the defenders.
    It was a good watch overall, even though we didn't see Charlton score.
    My only criticism is the delivery from corners and free kicks. Berry took them from the left and Josh Edwards from the right, to create inswinging corners. All of them were poor, and a couple led to dangerous breakaway counter attacks. We didn't have many free kicks, but those were invariably poor. It does amase me, that in a decent league 1 team we don't have anyone who can deliver a deadball accurately. Arsenal and others have shown that corners and free kicks can be a potent attacking weapon, work needs to be done in this area.
  • I suspect he'll be here in February but not in August. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!