I notice both Chris Markham at Bolton and Ben Strang at Cambridge have both also left their technical / sporting director roles in the last seven days.
Interestingly, based on social media engagement, it seems all three fanbases are happy to see the back of their club directors.
I notice both Chris Markham at Bolton and Ben Strang at Cambridge have both also left their technical / sporting director roles in the last seven days.
Interestingly, based on social media engagement, it seems all three fanbases are happy to see the back of their club directors.
Ben Strang started out in our academy 👀 Believe he left when he was 16.
I notice both Chris Markham at Bolton and Ben Strang at Cambridge have both also left their technical / sporting director roles in the last seven days.
Interestingly, based on social media engagement, it seems all three fanbases are happy to see the back of their club directors.
Well, there’s a few of the “new opportunities” that Scott spoke about. It seems that “Technical Director” is as much of a merry go round job now as Manager has been over the years for those who fail miserably at their jobs.
Well, there’s a few of the “new opportunities” that Scott spoke about. It seems that “Technical Director” is as much of a merry go round job now as Manager has been over the years for those who fail miserably at their jobs.
Odd isn't it. We're told constantly that football is 100% a results business. But those that have never ever achieved anything resembling a result continue to slosh around in the pool.
People are rightly stating he was the one who gave us Appleton. But We'd also do well to remember he single handedly cast Holden upon us. A bizarre choice who's obvious lack of experience shone through once the nice bloke,new manager bounce wore off.
Come on, Charlie’s must’ve been involved in the Appleton appointment too, especially with the Oxford connection. The gutless way Methven tries to distance himself from any of his decisions is worrying. We need strong leaders to get us out of this league.
CM has no say in the footballing side of the club, he looks after the business side
In Politics and in the house of Commons Ronnie, they simply say:
I have never understood what Scott, Rodwell and Methven would be doing all day (apart from collecting a wage from our season ticket money). Is there a compelling argument as to why any of them are at the club at all? If, say, Rodwell arrives at work at 9am, and is totally absorbed in club business until 5pm (with time off in lieu to cover extra hours on match days) with a lunch break and two other breaks in the day then fair enough. I am prepared to work shadow (whilst taking notes) either Methven or Rodwell for a week and will report back here on Charlton life what the work is like.
I have never understood what Scott, Rodwell and Methven would be doing all day (apart from collecting a wage from our season ticket money). Is there a compelling argument as to why any of them are at the club at all? If, say, Rodwell arrives at work at 9am, and is totally absorbed in club business until 5pm (with time off in lieu to cover extra hours on match days) with a lunch break and two other breaks in the day then fair enough. I am prepared to work shadow (whilst taking notes) either Methven or Rodwell for a week and will report back here on Charlton life what the work is like.
Comments
Interestingly, based on social media engagement, it seems all three fanbases are happy to see the back of their club directors.
http://www.ex-canaries.co.uk/players/strang.htm
https://www.stokecityfc.com/news/2025/february/13/lee-darnbrough-to-depart-potters-role/
Stokes head of recruitment has gone too. Seems like a few people paying the price for bad managerial choices or poor summer/winter recruitment.
We're told constantly that football is 100% a results business.
But those that have never ever achieved anything resembling a result continue to slosh around in the pool.
How do you think NJ would take it, if the board slipped in above him, a retiree who has his name on one of the stands at The Valley?
I don't know about all of you, but if it was me, I'd take it as the writing being on the wall...
And a bit of a kick in the 'nads...
In Politics and in the house of Commons Ronnie, they simply say:
I refer you to my earlier Answer.
Apologies for mentioning Politics on CL 😄
Is there a compelling argument as to why any of them are at the club at all?
If, say, Rodwell arrives at work at 9am, and is totally absorbed in club business until 5pm (with time off in lieu to cover extra hours on match days) with a lunch break and two other breaks in the day then fair enough.
I am prepared to work shadow (whilst taking notes) either Methven or Rodwell for a week and will report back here on Charlton life what the work is like.