Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

MATCH THREAD: Southend Utd v Charlton Athletic: FACR1 Saturday 2nd Nov 2024: KO 15:00 [+post p24]

1272830323335

Comments

  • Just watched highlights and my conclusion is that our defence is fecking clueless.
  • fenaddick said:
    Couldn't watch it of course due to the world-class fuckwits at the FA, but that Tweet  of the Gas goal courtesy of @Bedsaddick has made my evening. Like most people on here, I'd given up on any idea that he had a goal like that in his locker, and I duly apologise, Gas. To produce it in those circs, and in front of your own fans packed behind the goal, whom you save from the indignity of a penalty shootout with an NL side, I imagine you're feeling a bit good tonight. 

    Well we all know strikers need goals, and that's a great goal to build on. But I'm also wondering about his injury, and whether in fact it was something he arrived with? As I recall he was signed with an injury, which may have been different but as we know if we spend 10 minutes talking to a physio, it's all related. Anyway, if he kicks on from this, that could be a game-changer.
    Think the injury he came with was knee related and this recent absence has been chest related which is part of why we’ve been very cautious bringing him back
    Yes I understood they were different and this was an "unusual" one, but it also sounded like they didn't know where it came from. Maybe one to ask Dr Will about at the CAST AGM.
  • fenaddick said:
    Couldn't watch it of course due to the world-class fuckwits at the FA, but that Tweet  of the Gas goal courtesy of @Bedsaddick has made my evening. Like most people on here, I'd given up on any idea that he had a goal like that in his locker, and I duly apologise, Gas. To produce it in those circs, and in front of your own fans packed behind the goal, whom you save from the indignity of a penalty shootout with an NL side, I imagine you're feeling a bit good tonight. 

    Well we all know strikers need goals, and that's a great goal to build on. But I'm also wondering about his injury, and whether in fact it was something he arrived with? As I recall he was signed with an injury, which may have been different but as we know if we spend 10 minutes talking to a physio, it's all related. Anyway, if he kicks on from this, that could be a game-changer.
    Think the injury he came with was knee related and this recent absence has been chest related which is part of why we’ve been very cautious bringing him back
    Yes I understood they were different and this was an "unusual" one, but it also sounded like they didn't know where it came from. Maybe one to ask Dr Will about at the CAST AGM.
    He got hit very hard with a ball in the chest I think. Potential you’re getting confused with Lloyd Jones who felt something, got scanned and then they found a mysterious stress fracture?
  • What I recall when we learned about the Aneke and Jones injuries after the break, how the official site made of point of playing them down. This always ends badly from my experience.
  • edited November 2
    Just watched highlights and my conclusion is that our defence is fecking clueless.
     Our midfield is non f*******g existent more like!

    Bullied about again by a bunch of part timers this time.
    And when you look to the bench it's much of the same.
    How did Jones get this paramount part of the jigsaw so wrong??
  • Hmm not in my location they're not. Where am I Papua New Guinea ? Timbuktu ? No exotic Greenwich & I can't watch  the BBC highlights  :/ 

    You sure you've not left your VPN on Bob?
  • We made hard work of that. Watching it, it was like we were the National League team and they were league one. They moved it around pretty nicely but we, in general, could barely string 2 or 3 passes together unless it was across the back. We were lucky that their defence was pretty weak Otherwise we would have lost that for sure. We weren’t good for large periods of that game. That’s a worry. We just seem to lack any flair. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited November 3
    .
  • edited November 3
    We saw last night with Huddersfield and Tamworth that these games aren't easy. Not sure why Northampton at home to Kettering is a better tie than this one was to put on tv. Surely you have to look at the lower league side playing at home.
    Why? They did their research and realized a local derby not played in earnest for 35 years, between rivals separated by several divisions, made for a good atmosphere being a sell out, and with Kettering going well in their league, the ingredients for a potential upset, which they got. Good choice
  • Is there an FA Cup highlights programme on TV tonight….I can’t find one?
  • Is there an FA Cup highlights programme on TV tonight….I can’t find one?
    Tomorrow, 6:15 BBC2
  • Ben18 said:
    Just watched the highlights, I thought the penalty decision was fine.

    Taylor throws his arm up behind him, and in a very unnatural position as it blocks the ball.
    I don't think it's intentional but if that was a Southend player in his area I would definitely want a penalty.
  • fenaddick said:
    Is there an FA Cup highlights programme on TV tonight….I can’t find one?
    Tomorrow, 6:15 BBC2
    Cheers fen.👍
  • they have stated on MoTD that cup highlights are now on the red button
  • Sponsored links:


  • The press facilities at Southend are extremely tight. Four different commentary teams all sat on top of each other, behind a glass window. 
  • edited November 2
    aliwibble said:
    Hmm not in my location they're not. Where am I Papua New Guinea ? Timbuktu ? No exotic Greenwich & I can't watch  the BBC highlights  :/ 

    You sure you've not left your VPN on Bob?
    Thanks ali but as an old technophobe I'm not even sure what that means but I've made no alterations to settings on thee old computer. I just get the message "fuck off you old git not available in your location"  :)
  • A good day out, which started very pleasantly drinking with Chippy in the Trout. Cheers mate.

    Despite the win, for the most part we just weren't good enough. The difference between the two sides was that we took our chances better. They created more than us though, so I don't think we should take too much comfort from the fact they scored from a couple of deflections. The bottom line is that we gave them them too much space and too many opportunities. Still, it's nice to be through to the second round. Here's hoping we can get through that to the big rounds.
  • Scoham said:
    I've watched that and then am commenting straight away without reading others' posts....

    ... listening to NJ, I  am heartened by the fact that - as in previous weeks - he really goes in strong on the fact that the team aren't performing to the standards he expects 

    I've read a fair few people on here saying that we arent good enough and that he is the wrong manager for us and/or he isn't doing a good job. Hopefully, those people see value in the fact that he isn't trying to make excuses or sugar coat. He knows it isn't good enough. Given time and support, I think he'll get us to the levels we aspire to. 
  • Ben18 said:
    Just watched the highlights, I thought the penalty decision was fine.

    Taylor throws his arm up behind him, and in a very unnatural position as it blocks the ball.
    Well I agree he’s got good vision,  but he’s literally got his back to the ball, how did he know to put that arm up? 
  • edited November 3
    Just watched highlights and my conclusion is that our defence is fecking clueless.
    It really highlights the difference between our back four defence today, and our best back four:
    Ramsay - A. Mitchell - Jones - Edwards. 
    Our best back four is a Top 6 back four, today’s wasn’t.
    Wishful thinking, but we need another dominant CB in the January window, and two proper midfielders who can create chances. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!