Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
England Cricket 2024
Comments
-
Thank you Moeen0
-
MarcusH26 said:Mark Wood out for the rest of the year with a stress fracture to his elbow.0
-
AddicksAddict said:MarcusH26 said:Mark Wood out for the rest of the year with a stress fracture to his elbow.
Feels like anyone we have nowadays that bowls genuine 90mph+ spends half their career with various injuries from the excertions of fast bowling.0 -
MarcusH26 said:AddicksAddict said:MarcusH26 said:Mark Wood out for the rest of the year with a stress fracture to his elbow.
Feels like anyone we have nowadays that bowls genuine 90mph+ spends half their career with various injuries from the excertions of fast bowling.0 -
Yet another slightly soft dismissal in this match.
In such overcast conditions you'd have expected most of the wickets to have been nicks to the keeper and slips.0 -
I must have missed the memo re making this Test just a 3-dayer.
I take it the players do know we have another 2 days after today.0 -
England's batting in this match has made Zak Crawley look like Alastair Cook.3
-
Playing like idiots today3
-
killerandflash said:England's batting in this match has made Zak Crawley look like Alastair Cook.0
-
A couple of brain dead reviews by England1
- Sponsored links:
-
Yesteday Michael Vaughan said that England needed to take all Test matches seriously as they were starting to take the Mickey.
100% agree. I'm all for bazball but perhaps when you are only leading by 100 its not the time to start teeing off without being set.
I know Winviz doesn't agree but anything less than a 200 run lead I can see this Test being lost quite easily.2 -
golfaddick said:Yesteday Michael Vaughan said that England needed to take all Test matches seriously as they were starting to take the Mickey.
100% agree. I'm all for bazball but perhaps when you are only leading by 100 its not the time to start teeing off without being set.
I know Winviz doesn't agree but anything less than a 200 run lead I can see this Test being lost quite easily.
Forget Winviz. The true chances of winning are reflected by the current odds available - England 45% & Sri Lanka 55%1 -
Another brain dead shit. Last ball before tea. Smith had wrestled the match back to 50/50 and then slaps one to mid wicket.
How about just letting it go or patting it back to the bowler.
202 ahead. 2 wickets left. Might leave them 220 to chase, but wouldn't bet against all out in the first over back. Hull's batting record is that of a rabbit.0 -
golfaddick said:Another brain dead shit. Last ball before tea. Smith had wrestled the match back to 50/50 and then slaps one to mid wicket.
How about just letting it go or patting it back to the bowler.
202 ahead. 2 wickets left. Might leave them 220 to chase, but wouldn't bet against all out in the first over back. Hull's batting record is that of a rabbit.2 -
Sri Lanka needing 219 are 47-1. Bloody annoying. Whatever the result ends up I doubt there will be much more than a session / session and a half tomorrow and I have tickets0
-
Sri Lanka trying to win it tonight0
-
Hull bowling like a club second XI player here0
-
England played like it was a 20/20 match and are now rueing that decision. Having got Sri Lanka all out this morning & having a 62 run lead we really should have gone on to get at least 250-300 in our 2nd innings.
Nothing worse than throwing a Test match away when you are on top. And its not as if time was a factor.1 -
Kap10 said:Sri Lanka needing 219 are 47-1. Bloody annoying. Whatever the result ends up I doubt there will be much more than a session / session and a half tomorrow and I have tickets1
-
It’s obviously very disappointing batting but I am glad the bowling attack is having to try and figure this out with massive scoreboard pressure.
No use going into an Ashes series without any prior experience of adversity at this level.3 - Sponsored links:
-
glorified pie throwing from Hull0
-
kinveachyaddick said:Hull bowling like a club second XI player here1
-
Paul Collingwood doing the media duties shows how bad things have been today.2
-
Last summer, we had Moeen, Stokes, Bairstow, Anderson, Wood and Broad in the side. Of those, only Stokes and Wood should be going forward but that's 665 worth of Tests missing from our current side. That sort of experience really isn't easy to replace, especially not in one go and it's going have to be a super fast learning curve for many of our replacements.1
-
Kap10 said:Sri Lanka needing 219 are 47-1. Bloody annoying. Whatever the result ends up I doubt there will be much more than a session / session and a half tomorrow and I have tickets0
-
Addick Addict said:cantersaddick said:Addick Addict said:cantersaddick said:Addick Addict said:If Jacks is Surrey's number one spinner then they don't really have a frontline spinner at all because he's taken 7 wickets this season and has, at the age of 25 (some 9 years older than Farhan Ahmed), just 44 wickets from 54 matches to his name. Bashir has 47 wickets and he's five years younger at 20 and has only played 18 matches. But I agree that, as he can't bat, Surrey probably isn't the place for Bashir and it was probably the best thing that could have happened to him when Surrey dropped him. He would probably have ended up like Moriarty or Virdi and going nowhere fast. Presumably, Bashir was let go not just because of Jacks, Moriarty and Virdi but because they also had in the same age group as Bashir, Tommy Ealham, who is still at Surrey but can't get near the red ball side.
You also say that I'm "presenting Jacks wickets in 2 matches as figures for the season" but that is all I have for this season and is a small representation which is why I looked at his career, one where he is averaging less than one wicket a match. That is awful for someone who is meant to be a county number one spinner. In fact, Jacks has less wickets in the last four seasons (37 in total) than Dawson has taken this year. Which is why I concluded that Surrey do not have a number one spinner in the true sense. They play a batsman that can bowl spin which is why they pick the likes of Jacks and Steel and often, even when Jacks isn't available, don't bother with playing a spinner at all.
So we are both agreed. Surrey have stifled the careers of both Moriarty and Virid and had Bashir not been shown the door, he would be no way near the first team simply because, as you confirmed, Surrey wouldn't have played him due to his lack of ability with the bat. Which is why I concluded that as Bashir needs to leave Somerset (who already have a proper spinner) there would be absolutely no point him going back to them. In fact, Tommy Ealham should go back to Kent because he would get a game there and probably never will at Surrey unless he starts to average 50 plus with the bat in their 2s.0 -
What a fucking joke lmao0
-
I see us losing this test which will be very disappointing.
We know the bowlers in this match are inexperienced at test level so even more reason to bat properly and set a meaningful target on the road that is The Oval.3 -
LenGlover said:I see us losing this test which will be very disappointing.
We know the bowlers in this match are inexperienced at test level so even more reason to bat properly and set a meaningful target on the road that is The Oval.0 -
The last day of the Test summer, and weather wise it feels it too. Still got the Australia white ball series to come, the 2 evening T20 matches this week will be freezing!0