Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1227228230232233867

Comments

  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,575
    That photo doesnt flatter Ben in the slightest

    Makes him look like he's spent the summer on the sofa with a big bag of crisps
  • Vfrf
    Vfrf Posts: 797
    Reading that Amos article, it will absolutely trigger me if their manager 'Leam Richardson' is pronounced 'Liam Richardson'.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Vfrf said:
    Reading that Amos article, it will absolutely trigger me if their manager 'Leam Richardson' is pronounced 'Liam Richardson'.
    It triggers me that he was at Blackburn with Southall 
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,370
    edited June 2021
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    I’m guessing they didn’t throw that scarf at him from 20 yards away.

    It it's only posted on here 10 hours after it was announced because Ben Watson delivered it.....

    ...... You know cos he is old and slow 🙄🙄
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,903
    That photo doesnt flatter Ben in the slightest

    Makes him look like he's spent the summer on the sofa with a big bag of crisps
    It was the pies that attracted him to Wigan  ;)
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    Rather mullin all day long !
  • Ferryman
    Ferryman Posts: 2,921
    MattF said:

    I honestly didn't see much pedigree there.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,370
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    Why would that matter? Last season we had Chuks, Ronnie, Washington, most seasons we have 3-4 strikers, as long as he could be fit into the budget I don't see the harm. It could have finally clicked for him and we could reap the rewards or he's a one season wonder, we take the risk and send him out. For a fee I would say no but on a free and what you would imagine would be low wages I don't see why not 
  • 995632
    995632 Posts: 319
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Screams of Luke Varney/Nicky Ajose, one good season and then struggled to replicate the form. Being on a free usually means big signing fee. Also, this reminds me of Bogle after his "prolific season" which earned him his move into the football league. 
  • Valley27000
    Valley27000 Posts: 3,417
    Mikael Mandron worth signing?.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    edited June 2021
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    Why would that matter? Last season we had Chuks, Ronnie, Washington, most seasons we have 3-4 strikers, as long as he could be fit into the budget I don't see the harm. It could have finally clicked for him and we could reap the rewards or he's a one season wonder, we take the risk and send him out. For a fee I would say no but on a free and what you would imagine would be low wages I don't see why not 
    So you would happily go into the season with

    Stockley
    Washington
    Massive gamble
    Ronnie

    As your 4 strikers? 
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    Why would that matter? Last season we had Chuks, Ronnie, Washington, most seasons we have 3-4 strikers, as long as he could be fit into the budget I don't see the harm. It could have finally clicked for him and we could reap the rewards or he's a one season wonder, we take the risk and send him out. For a fee I would say no but on a free and what you would imagine would be low wages I don't see why not 
    So you would happily go into the season with

    Stockley
    Wasgington
    Massive gamble
    Ronnie

    As your 4 strikers? 

    Definitely not, Massive gamble would cost too much to put on the back of the shirt.
  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,213
    Cafc43v3r said:


    👀👀👀
    Another one for the list Dazzler if nothing by Friday. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,805
    I suppose technically it could be the first of one...
  • king addick
    king addick Posts: 3,714
    Cafc43v3r said:


    👀👀👀
     On the booze when you did those lines...😂
  • _MrDick
    _MrDick Posts: 13,113
    Call that a scarf … Pah #ScarfyRulesOK
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Cafc43v3r said:


    👀👀👀
     On the booze when you did those lines...😂
    Normally am when I do lines 😉😉

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    So 2 year deal, not 3.
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,370
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    Why would that matter? Last season we had Chuks, Ronnie, Washington, most seasons we have 3-4 strikers, as long as he could be fit into the budget I don't see the harm. It could have finally clicked for him and we could reap the rewards or he's a one season wonder, we take the risk and send him out. For a fee I would say no but on a free and what you would imagine would be low wages I don't see why not 
    So you would happily go into the season with

    Stockley
    Washington
    Massive gamble
    Ronnie

    As your 4 strikers? 
    That would entirely depend on the rest of the team, but yes probably. Provided we have some decent attacking mids and all round mids I think it would be capable of promotion. 

    No one could say for sure though how many goals that lot would get, could be anywhere between 10-20 for all of them over the course of the season, anyone's guess.

    I am far more concerned about our midfield, we are gonna get played off the park again a few times next season if we don't get the right players in
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,678
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    Why would that matter? Last season we had Chuks, Ronnie, Washington, most seasons we have 3-4 strikers, as long as he could be fit into the budget I don't see the harm. It could have finally clicked for him and we could reap the rewards or he's a one season wonder, we take the risk and send him out. For a fee I would say no but on a free and what you would imagine would be low wages I don't see why not 
    So you would happily go into the season with

    Stockley
    Washington
    Massive gamble
    Ronnie

    As your 4 strikers? 
    No, I'd be adding a fifth striker. A young, fast  whippersnapper (akin to Karlan Grant). 

    At the moment we only have 3 strikers, one of which (Schwartz) is untried & untested. I think Ronnie will come good but there is no certainty and we need a proven goalscorer, especially one that is not over 6ft tall 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    Why would that matter? Last season we had Chuks, Ronnie, Washington, most seasons we have 3-4 strikers, as long as he could be fit into the budget I don't see the harm. It could have finally clicked for him and we could reap the rewards or he's a one season wonder, we take the risk and send him out. For a fee I would say no but on a free and what you would imagine would be low wages I don't see why not 
    So you would happily go into the season with

    Stockley
    Washington
    Massive gamble
    Ronnie

    As your 4 strikers? 
    No, I'd be adding a fifth striker. A young, fast  whippersnapper (akin to Karlan Grant). 

    At the moment we only have 3 strikers, one of which (Schwartz) is untried & untested. I think Ronnie will come good but there is no certainty and we need a proven goalscorer, especially one that is not over 6ft tall 
    Out of a squad of 20 you would have 5 strikers?  Doesn't leave much wiggle room, when have we ever had 5 first team strikers?

    @Braziliance of course we need midfielders, wingers, defenders etc as well.  But this is why losing Chuks was such a big deal, much more than I think people realise yet.  To get someone like Lapado or Eisa (who people have said would be good signings) you have to pay good money and good wages, else it's a gamble on someone totally unproven.  

    If anything happened to Stockley in that scenario we would be absolutely screwed. 
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Tbf I think Paul Mullin is worth a punt on a free and for the right wage, if we could get him on a 2-3 year contract I would take him. He could either replicate last season's form and storm the league or be an option off of the bench, if we go up or stay in the division I am sure he would have takers. 


    Certainly not if we still have Ronnie.  
    I agree with this. I'd definitely take a punt on Mullin but having him and Schwartz as two of the four is a risk I wouldn't want to take. If we're serious about winning this league, or even fighting for promotion, we need someone a bit more proven to compete with Stockley. I personally want someone who can hold the ball up if we're going to play 433. Mullin would be a decent replacement for Schwartz though if he goes. 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    edited June 2021
    https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/60d9f306a2dee/behind-the-scenes-at-sparrows-lane-28062021

    I notice there are no wide angle group shots this season, maybe after previous faux pas.  Bulot springs to mind, I am sure there have been others. 
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,513

    Gallen also spoke of the domino effect that can occur as a result of incoming transfers, admitting he anticipates plenty more to come where that is concerned.

    “We need a few more as you know. Don’t worry, I know about it and I’m working on that every day. So I expect players to be coming in, I won’t put any timeline on it just yet, because I don’t want people to be disappointed, but it’s all in motion.”

    “It has been a challenge. A lot of people talk about, in the Championship in particular it’s been a bit slow so all the representatives of players I’m talking to are saying Championship clubs are not moving, and in some ways if they’re not moving it filters down to us. So I’m pleased to get two important bits of business done before the start of pre-season - obviously we’re back in this morning training. 

    “There’s going to be some more happening now, and I thought this even a week or so ago. Once you get one or two then one or two more will start happening so it’s been a little bit frustrating of course, I’m sure also for the fans, but we’ll get it moving now.”

  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,632
    Hard to believe that we haven’t had somebody confirm the identity of the player at Sparrows today. Unless there wasn’t.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,251
    edited June 2021
    Pleased with the new keeper.

    As ever Steve Gallen is the man to listen to 

    For all the moneyball bollox spouted on here what did he do? He spoke to two people who actually worked with the guy as well as having watched him play.

    Data has its place and I'm pleased we're using it but the human, unquantifiable, element is vital.

    The trick is balancing the two, not seeing often subjective data as somehow pure or better.
This discussion has been closed.