Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
New kit and sponsor (P108, 2021 new 3rd kit)
Comments
-
When he accessed them, where did they go? What was inside? So many questions!ricky_otto said:
And one of Lockyer’s first jobs was to access the pot holes in the car park. Williams is upset he wasn’t asked - this is why he hasn’t decided if he wants to sign up again.Charltonparklane said:
Yeah course, and they also get a say on catering options including the Vegan options.sillav nitram said:
Point being, did they really approve it!Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Seriously?sillav nitram said:Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
0 -
250 square cm? as in 2.5 square meters that can be HUGE lolstackitsteve said:From the FA website:The following Advertising is permitted:
(i) Playing kit
(a) On the Clothing of a Player on the field of play, the following areas shall be permitted to be used for Advertising
- One single area not exceeding 250 square centimetres on the front of the shirt (see Fig 10);
- One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on the back of the shirt (see Fig 13);
- One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on each sleeve of the shirt, between the shoulder seam and the elbow (provided Affiliated Association or Competition Rules so permit) (see Fig 12);
- One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on the back of the shorts (see Fig 14); and
- Once only on each sock tie-up providing it does not exceed an area of 100 square centimetres (see Fig 11).
2 -
It would be 0.025m2Dazzler21 said:
250 square cm? as in 2.5 square meters that can be HUGE lolstackitsteve said:From the FA website:The following Advertising is permitted:
(i) Playing kit
(a) On the Clothing of a Player on the field of play, the following areas shall be permitted to be used for Advertising
- One single area not exceeding 250 square centimetres on the front of the shirt (see Fig 10);
- One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on the back of the shirt (see Fig 13);
- One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on each sleeve of the shirt, between the shoulder seam and the elbow (provided Affiliated Association or Competition Rules so permit) (see Fig 12);
- One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on the back of the shorts (see Fig 14); and
- Once only on each sock tie-up providing it does not exceed an area of 100 square centimetres (see Fig 11).
1 -
250cm2 is a patch 25x10 or 20x12.5
2.5m2 would be 25,000cm22 -
Glad someone else paid attention in school!randy andy said:250cm2 is a patch 25x10 or 20x12.5
2.5m2 would be 25,000cm20 -
Exactly this. Not a chance it isn't a wind up.cafctom said:Considering who the sponsor is, there’s no way this isn’t a windup.
Already gone viral and got the publicity they wanted.0 -
And we worry about our kits. 18 -
Doh!0
-
Definitely a wind up!0
-
The kit has been unveiled on the official Huddersfield site, though. So is it still a wind-up?0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Yes, a windup Hudds are in on, they'll be the real sponsor I imagine.hawksmoor said:The kit has been unveiled on the official Huddersfield site, though. So is it still a wind-up?0 -
We cant really talk about false stories though can we
After all it was Charlton who quietly allowed the whole media to think that two people had broken into the Valley for a quickie on the pitch1 -
May have missed it but when is the new away kit revealed?0
-
Love the third kit, don't like the home kit. When's the away kit being shown?0
-
I like the new kit and the fact that the new sponsorship is for a very worthwhile cause2
-
Nothing to do with the new kit, but I'm in that photo - the only time I ever stood on the East Terrace.Addickted said:Proper pinstriped kit.
5 -
That was the day I got that kit for my 7 birthday.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Nope, he asked for Black as he was such a fat bugger he wanted a slimmer look.To_Be_Franck said:
Not such a stupid question.sillav nitram said:Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
Sure I read somewhere that Neville Southall had the yellow(?) Everton keeper kit changed to black as he thought he was too visible to strikers in yellow. Black meant he blended in to crowd a bit more.2 -
Tbf, the best keeper I have ever seen.Charltonparklane said:
yeah that and the fact yellow put 3 stone on him just standing there trying to breath in.To_Be_Franck said:
Not such a stupid question.sillav nitram said:Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
Sure I read somewhere that Neville Southall had the yellow(?) Everton keeper kit changed to black as he thought he was too visible to strikers in yellow. Black meant he blended in to crowd a bit more.0 -
Seems the Huddersfield kit is genuine!?
Apparently the FA have piped up about it.
0 -
Paddy must have known that it wouldnt have stuck and must know that the FA will enforce the kit being changed... they've just had a ton of free advertising so if this was the only game they could have it, its done its job for them14
-
Don’t like the home kit at all. Love the third kit. Hoping the away doesn’t have those pinstripes but it most likely will. Like that Hudds away kit minus the stunt sponsorship though.0
-
Exactly. Not a chance the FA will let them wear it in official matches, it's clearly just a publicity stunt which Huddersfield are in on and no doubt being well paid for.ForeverAddickted said:Paddy must have known that it wouldnt have stuck and must know that the FA will enforce the kit being changed... they've just had a ton of free advertising so if this was the only game they could have it, its done its job for them
The 'huge logo' kits will probably be auctioned off with money going to charity.
Plus on the Huddersfield site there is just an image of the kit and it says kit on sale Saturday 20 July. So no doubt at some point in the next couple of days, the real kit will be revealed and then put on sale at the weekend.3 -
That “temporary” white kit used last night at daggers would be ideal as the away/change/2nd kit. Classic uncluttered stylish. Black shorts or socks could be used for partial clashes with hosts’ kits. The sponsor’s logo will work fine. No chance of course. The actual result will be some cluttered committee concoction of three too many ideas “echoing this, tributing that, honouring someotherbollox” when all that’s needed is a not red shirt to wear in a dozen or so away fixtures. Commercially it’ll be a non-event cos of low demand, obscene price and the heinous twunt factor
not a penny more4 -
Looked into adding a name to a shirt... is someone taking the piss ?
8 -
Just been to buy a new home shirt for my son. Looks better in real life,than online.The front of the shirt is a lighter shade of red than the back which gives it a nice contrast.
I can also confirm that pinstripes do not look good on middle aged men with beer guts.4 -
The childrens sizing online is baffling. The size guide has sizes for children but the options do not relate. What size has anyone with an average build 6 year old got? I cant get to the valley in person for a while. Thanks in advance.0
