Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New kit and sponsor (P108, 2021 new 3rd kit)

12526283031138

Comments

  • I don’t like it on first online look. Looks a bit cheap. Always prefer a collar on the shirt and the sponsor logo doesn’t go well with it. Give two washes before those letters start peeling.

    my least favourite Hummel effort so far
    Letters peeling.... a very good nod to the OSCA kit then!
  • Its decent, prefer the two previous efforts from Hummel however. Still better than anything Nike would've given us. 

    Would've bought any of the Hummel kits had RD not been here. Looking forward to the away offering. 
  • edited July 2019
    Hoops, Yes. Stripes, No.
    The club badge sits on a stripe. I think it looks wrong.
    Duchatelet's CAFC won't see a penny of my money, so I won't see this kit in action.

  • Am I the only one on here who finds it strange that grown men want to wear replica football (or even cricket) shirts? It's even worse when you see them somewhere away from a football game, e.g. on a beach, or Oxford Street.

    I know I will be in a very small minority but please someone on here tell me I am not the only one.
    Why though?
  • Farking pin stripes?! I guess that's what happens when kit design is left to 'fan feedback'.....
  • Am I the only one on here who finds it strange that grown men want to wear replica football (or even cricket) shirts? It's even worse when you see them somewhere away from a football game, e.g. on a beach, or Oxford Street.

    I know I will be in a very small minority but please someone on here tell me I am not the only one.
    No you’re not, I don’t get it either.

    I’ve never liked that tribal thang.
  • Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
  • Dont like the pin stripes, reminds me of an old Forest kit. 
  • Am I the only one on here who finds it strange that grown men want to wear replica football (or even cricket) shirts? It's even worse when you see them somewhere away from a football game, e.g. on a beach, or Oxford Street.

    I know I will be in a very small minority but please someone on here tell me I am not the only one.
    I buy them and I play in them as well as attending games in them.

    Wouldn't wear one out casually though.. that's a bit too cringe.
  • Is that stripe around the end of the sleeve both black and white? I like that.
  • Sponsored links:


  • did the original eighties one have like a white/grey stubble all over it that you could pull and and reduce the kit in size , like pulling a thread on a jumper and watching it unravel 

    or have I reached Roland’s level of wibbleness and just need to place a couple of pencils up my nose to complete the look
  • Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
    Seriously?
  • Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
    Seriously?
    Point being, did they really approve it!
  • Some strange people use this forum
    See above.
  • Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
    Seriously?
    Point being, did they really approve it!
    Yeah course, and they also get a say on catering options including the Vegan options. 

    And one of Lockyer’s first jobs was to access the pot holes in the car park. Williams is upset he wasn’t asked - this is why he hasn’t decided if he wants to sign up again.
  • Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
    Not such a stupid question.
    Sure I read somewhere that Neville Southall had the yellow(?) Everton keeper kit changed to black as he thought he was too visible to strikers in yellow. Black meant he blended in to crowd a bit more.
  • Having designed a few playing shirts (not football related by the way), I was happy to allow player's input into the comfort/fabric used, but it was a no-no where the actual design was concerned.
    If they had input into the design, then half would have liked the finished garment, and half would have hated it.
    With no player input, they all would have hated it - which helped with the unity in the dressing room!
  • edited July 2019
    I'm really hoping for Huddersfield's sake this is a joke... surely it can't be real (PaddyPower are known for their publicity stunts).
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited July 2019
    It's on their official site.
  • Nug said:
    For those complaining that the sponsor doesn't look great on the new shirt (whilst being a great cause), remember the grass isn't always greener....
    Pretty sure there are size restrictions on sponsor logos so considering the company it’s got to be a wind up.
    That's what I was thinking. 

    Typical Paddy Power, everyone retweets this giving them lots of publicity...then the real shirt is unveiled!
  • Out of interest do the players have a say on the kit?
    Not such a stupid question.
    Sure I read somewhere that Neville Southall had the yellow(?) Everton keeper kit changed to black as he thought he was too visible to strikers in yellow. Black meant he blended in to crowd a bit more.
    yeah that and the fact yellow put 3 stone on him just standing there trying to breath in.
  • I'll be amazed if it isn't a wind up. 
  • For those complaining that the sponsor doesn't look great on the new shirt (whilst being a great cause), remember the grass isn't always greener....
    That's horrible!! Poor Huddersfield fans!
  • From the FA website:

    The following Advertising is permitted:

    (i)            Playing kit

    (a)                    On the Clothing of a Player on the field of play, the following areas shall be permitted to be used for Advertising

    • One single area not exceeding 250 square centimetres on the front of the shirt (see Fig 10);
    • One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on the back of the shirt (see Fig 13);
    • One single area not exceeding  100  square  centimetres  on each sleeve of the shirt, between the shoulder seam and the elbow (provided Affiliated Association or Competition Rules so permit) (see Fig 12);
    • One single area not exceeding 100 square centimetres on the back of the shorts (see Fig 14); and
    • Once only on each sock tie-up providing it does not exceed an area of 100 square centimetres (see Fig 11).
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!