Let's remind ourselves that my Miele vacuum cleaner comes with a no questions asked 2 year guarantee which I can activate anywhere in the EU. Your vacuum cleaner sadly only comes with a one year guarantee. This is because the U.K. has chosen to ignore this particular part of the EU directive, even while the politicians persist with the fiction that UK citizens are all buckling under the onerous weight of EU laws dictated by unelected little green men.
Usually @Dippenhall chips in at this point to assert that EU citizens pay for this because the manufacturers slap a price hike on the continental prices to cover the extra year. He has never, however, presented any evidence to back up this assertion. In fact I regularly compare and find the opposite situation. For example yesterday I bought a Philips hair trimmer as a prezzie. Amazon UK proposed to charge me £52 for it, while helpfully warning me that I could have a newer model in Jan which would cost me £60. I then checked the same model on the local market, and a reliable little Czech e shop was one of several to offer it for the equivalent of £38. It's not the £ devaluation to blame for the difference as it would still have been only £42 pre the vote.
So I think this is an admirable example of what is to come for U.K. consumers. Of course I can forgive @Dippenhall for now going round his house looking for every item he might replace in the next 2-3 years, sourcing a friend in Germany and then putting in a massive bulk order from Amazon.de for all that stuff before March 2019. Of course back in Brexit Britain he won't get any help with warranty after 12 months but if he sticks with German brands that won't matter.
You're welcome, Dipps....actually if you need anything cheap from the Continent which can fit in hand lugggage, give me a shout and I will bring it over for you. I ask only for your public recorded admission that this is evidence that your assertion above is not susbstantiated by real market evidence :-)
Just spent 5 days in Germany and had the last couple of days to myself. Certainly didn't notice anything that was cheaper over there than here.
Transport was more expensive,, eating out more expensive , electrical goods and clothes more expensive. 85 euros for a fc nuremberg shirt. Next time i am over there in a few months time, give me a shout and i will bring some stuff over to you from the UK and give it to you.
You forget some of us have detached duty in europe. Projecrt fear rears its ugly head again.
And you forget that I live here. Just coming up to my 25th anni, as it was a week after we went back to the Valley.
Transport was more expensive Pull the other one. Example? eating out more expensive I wonder how you compare like for like, but that is emphatically not my experience. Today at my usual lunchtime place I enjoyed an excellent borstch soup followed by grilled salmon steak with grilled veg, and a sparkling mineral water, for £7. And it was proper home cooked by a chef. You'd struggle to get that in Eltham High Street for less than £10, and it would likely be pre-cooked. I went in the M&S cafe and had a turkey pie plus soup, and mineral water and that alone was £10. electrical goods and clothes more expensive. Well then how do you explain that pretty much at random I bought a regular Philips razor thing for just under 30% less than Amazon UK wanted? At least you had the good sense not to mention the relative cost of alcohol.
Seriously you ought to know that any tourist can never get a handle on the best prices for anything, anywhere. That's why when you come over to Prague, Mad Vincent and I will make sure you don't get mugged off in a tourist trap pub, even though the British mugs in those pubs will still be twatting on about how cheap the Stella is (Stella, ffs.)
I have taken public transport in the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Czechia, Russia, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand and several others. I can say without a doubt the British is the most expensive per mile and definitely one of the worst in terms of overall service quality.
Hong Kong is by far the best. Clean, efficient, on time, safe, and I could get about all day for around 2 quid. You can't even go one stop on the Tube for that.
I have taken public transport in the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Czechia, Russia, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand and several others. I can say without a doubt the British is the most expensive per mile and definitely one of the worst in terms of overall service quality.
Hong Kong is by far the best. Clean, efficient, on time, safe, and I could get about all day for around 2 quid. You can't even go one stop on the Tube for that.
You must have some super heat resistance.
Air conditioned taxi's are the ONLY way to travel in HK!
I have taken public transport in the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Czechia, Russia, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand and several others. I can say without a doubt the British is the most expensive per mile and definitely one of the worst in terms of overall service quality.
Hong Kong is by far the best. Clean, efficient, on time, safe, and I could get about all day for around 2 quid. You can't even go one stop on the Tube for that.
You must have some super heat resistance.
Air conditioned taxi's are the ONLY way to travel in HK!
No hotter than travelling in the Northern Line midwinter where is still manages to achieve temperatures approaching 40 degrees.
Without going into great and boring detail I think people are getting themselves confused between the "legal guarantee" and the manufacturers/suppliers "commercial guarantee" period which are different things and explained here...
For those saying the Consumer Rights Act trumps EU law anyway...no it doesn't. It's the result of the EU Consumer Rights Directive being implemented across the whole single market and addressing issues like unfair contract terms, digital content, doorstep contracts and a lot more.
Did we play an important and active role in the design of the Directive? Of course we bloody well did. As others have pointed out we've long since had domestic laws addressing faulty goods, etc. and, despite what others might say, the EU respects our knowlege and expertese in these matters.
Those laws were made in 1979 and 1982 btw. How reflective of the way we shop and the modern marketplace do you think they were by the time the Directive was developed earlier this decade? We could have updated them any time we wished in the intervening 30 odd years but funnily enough the UK chose not to.
Again, it took 40 years for the woefully out of date Trade Descriptions Act 1968 to be replaced as result of a much more fit for purpose EU Directive.
Consumers are benefiting significantly from these changes of law, yet our governments, over decades, weren't interested in updating them for fear of being labelled anti-business imo and it took the intervention of the EU as a whole to ensure we eventually did undertake the modernisation so obviously required on behalf of consumers.
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to guess which way the US in particular is going to want the UK to move post-Brexit either.
The debate in Parliament today has been fascinating if one can sustain focus. There will be Labour politicians voting against the main tide of Labour MP's and the same goes for the Tories. If the sovereignty of Parliament in the form of MP's legislating serious matters in the house is what brexiters voted for in the referendum, then logic suggests that they would support a government defeat in the vote later.
Let's remind ourselves that my Miele vacuum cleaner comes with a no questions asked 2 year guarantee which I can activate anywhere in the EU. Your vacuum cleaner sadly only comes with a one year guarantee. This is because the U.K. has chosen to ignore this particular part of the EU directive, even while the politicians persist with the fiction that UK citizens are all buckling under the onerous weight of EU laws dictated by unelected little green men.
Usually @Dippenhall chips in at this point to assert that EU citizens pay for this because the manufacturers slap a price hike on the continental prices to cover the extra year. He has never, however, presented any evidence to back up this assertion. In fact I regularly compare and find the opposite situation. For example yesterday I bought a Philips hair trimmer as a prezzie. Amazon UK proposed to charge me £52 for it, while helpfully warning me that I could have a newer model in Jan which would cost me £60. I then checked the same model on the local market, and a reliable little Czech e shop was one of several to offer it for the equivalent of £38. It's not the £ devaluation to blame for the difference as it would still have been only £42 pre the vote.
So I think this is an admirable example of what is to come for U.K. consumers. Of course I can forgive @Dippenhall for now going round his house looking for every item he might replace in the next 2-3 years, sourcing a friend in Germany and then putting in a massive bulk order from Amazon.de for all that stuff before March 2019. Of course back in Brexit Britain he won't get any help with warranty after 12 months but if he sticks with German brands that won't matter.
You're welcome, Dipps....actually if you need anything cheap from the Continent which can fit in hand lugggage, give me a shout and I will bring it over for you. I ask only for your public recorded admission that this is evidence that your assertion above is not susbstantiated by real market evidence :-)
Just spent 5 days in Germany and had the last couple of days to myself. Certainly didn't notice anything that was cheaper over there than here.
Transport was more expensive,, eating out more expensive , electrical goods and clothes more expensive. 85 euros for a fc nuremberg shirt. Next time i am over there in a few months time, give me a shout and i will bring some stuff over to you from the UK and give it to you.
You forget some of us have detached duty in europe. Projecrt fear rears its ugly head again.
And you forget that I live here. Just coming up to my 25th anni, as it was a week after we went back to the Valley.
Transport was more expensive Pull the other one. Example? eating out more expensive I wonder how you compare like for like, but that is emphatically not my experience. Today at my usual lunchtime place I enjoyed an excellent borstch soup followed by grilled salmon steak with grilled veg, and a sparkling mineral water, for £7. And it was proper home cooked by a chef. You'd struggle to get that in Eltham High Street for less than £10, and it would likely be pre-cooked. I went in the M&S cafe and had a turkey pie plus soup, and mineral water and that alone was £10. electrical goods and clothes more expensive. Well then how do you explain that pretty much at random I bought a regular Philips razor thing for just under 30% less than Amazon UK wanted? At least you had the good sense not to mention the relative cost of alcohol.
Seriously you ought to know that any tourist can never get a handle on the best prices for anything, anywhere. That's why when you come over to Prague, Mad Vincent and I will make sure you don't get mugged off in a tourist trap pub, even though the British mugs in those pubs will still be twatting on about how cheap the Stella is (Stella, ffs.)
Project fact, then, now and next.
Thought you lived in Prague not Germany, i know my way round enough to know where to eat and drink and shop. last week for example on the trams and s bahn you cant buy a return ticket you have to buy two singles, you can buy an all day ticket which is cheaper but the zones are restricted. On the flight home i was sitting next to a german couple who lived in Nuremburg and they couldn't understand their own travel system and stated it is very expensive.
I have had a full english in Edinburgh for £3 next to Waverley station...whats the point, I know where to get a bacon roll and a sausage roll in blackpool for a £1 for both, in Basingstoke market I can get a bacon baguette for a £1.
I was comparing Germany with UK, i am sure i could if i wanted to buy things cheaper than you can ie china for example.
Alcohol was very much like for like some cheaper places some more expensive for example a bottle of weissbeer was 6 euros but about 4 in the town.
Let's remind ourselves that my Miele vacuum cleaner comes with a no questions asked 2 year guarantee which I can activate anywhere in the EU. Your vacuum cleaner sadly only comes with a one year guarantee. This is because the U.K. has chosen to ignore this particular part of the EU directive, even while the politicians persist with the fiction that UK citizens are all buckling under the onerous weight of EU laws dictated by unelected little green men.
Usually @Dippenhall chips in at this point to assert that EU citizens pay for this because the manufacturers slap a price hike on the continental prices to cover the extra year. He has never, however, presented any evidence to back up this assertion. In fact I regularly compare and find the opposite situation. For example yesterday I bought a Philips hair trimmer as a prezzie. Amazon UK proposed to charge me £52 for it, while helpfully warning me that I could have a newer model in Jan which would cost me £60. I then checked the same model on the local market, and a reliable little Czech e shop was one of several to offer it for the equivalent of £38. It's not the £ devaluation to blame for the difference as it would still have been only £42 pre the vote.
So I think this is an admirable example of what is to come for U.K. consumers. Of course I can forgive @Dippenhall for now going round his house looking for every item he might replace in the next 2-3 years, sourcing a friend in Germany and then putting in a massive bulk order from Amazon.de for all that stuff before March 2019. Of course back in Brexit Britain he won't get any help with warranty after 12 months but if he sticks with German brands that won't matter.
You're welcome, Dipps....actually if you need anything cheap from the Continent which can fit in hand lugggage, give me a shout and I will bring it over for you. I ask only for your public recorded admission that this is evidence that your assertion above is not susbstantiated by real market evidence :-)
Just spent 5 days in Germany and had the last couple of days to myself. Certainly didn't notice anything that was cheaper over there than here.
Transport was more expensive,, eating out more expensive , electrical goods and clothes more expensive. 85 euros for a fc nuremberg shirt. Next time i am over there in a few months time, give me a shout and i will bring some stuff over to you from the UK and give it to you.
You forget some of us have detached duty in europe. Projecrt fear rears its ugly head again.
And you forget that I live here. Just coming up to my 25th anni, as it was a week after we went back to the Valley.
Transport was more expensive Pull the other one. Example? eating out more expensive I wonder how you compare like for like, but that is emphatically not my experience. Today at my usual lunchtime place I enjoyed an excellent borstch soup followed by grilled salmon steak with grilled veg, and a sparkling mineral water, for £7. And it was proper home cooked by a chef. You'd struggle to get that in Eltham High Street for less than £10, and it would likely be pre-cooked. I went in the M&S cafe and had a turkey pie plus soup, and mineral water and that alone was £10. electrical goods and clothes more expensive. Well then how do you explain that pretty much at random I bought a regular Philips razor thing for just under 30% less than Amazon UK wanted? At least you had the good sense not to mention the relative cost of alcohol.
Seriously you ought to know that any tourist can never get a handle on the best prices for anything, anywhere. That's why when you come over to Prague, Mad Vincent and I will make sure you don't get mugged off in a tourist trap pub, even though the British mugs in those pubs will still be twatting on about how cheap the Stella is (Stella, ffs.)
Project fact, then, now and next.
Thought you lived in Prague not Germany, i know my way round enough to know where to eat and drink and shop. last week for example on the trams and s bahn you cant buy a return ticket you have to buy two singles, you can buy an all day ticket which is cheaper but the zones are restricted. On the flight home i was sitting next to a german couple who lived in Nuremburg and they couldn't understand their own travel system and stated it is very expensive.
I have had a full english in Edinburgh for £3 next to Waverley station...whats the point, I know where to get a bacon roll and a sausage roll in blackpool for a £1 for both, in Basingstoke market I can get a bacon baguette for a £1.
I was comparing Germany with UK, i am sure i could if i wanted to buy things cheaper than you can ie china for example.
Alcohol was very much like for like some cheaper places some more expensive for example a bottle of weissbeer was 6 euros but about 4 in the town.
Let's remind ourselves that my Miele vacuum cleaner comes with a no questions asked 2 year guarantee which I can activate anywhere in the EU. Your vacuum cleaner sadly only comes with a one year guarantee. This is because the U.K. has chosen to ignore this particular part of the EU directive, even while the politicians persist with the fiction that UK citizens are all buckling under the onerous weight of EU laws dictated by unelected little green men.
Usually @Dippenhall chips in at this point to assert that EU citizens pay for this because the manufacturers slap a price hike on the continental prices to cover the extra year. He has never, however, presented any evidence to back up this assertion. In fact I regularly compare and find the opposite situation. For example yesterday I bought a Philips hair trimmer as a prezzie. Amazon UK proposed to charge me £52 for it, while helpfully warning me that I could have a newer model in Jan which would cost me £60. I then checked the same model on the local market, and a reliable little Czech e shop was one of several to offer it for the equivalent of £38. It's not the £ devaluation to blame for the difference as it would still have been only £42 pre the vote.
So I think this is an admirable example of what is to come for U.K. consumers. Of course I can forgive @Dippenhall for now going round his house looking for every item he might replace in the next 2-3 years, sourcing a friend in Germany and then putting in a massive bulk order from Amazon.de for all that stuff before March 2019. Of course back in Brexit Britain he won't get any help with warranty after 12 months but if he sticks with German brands that won't matter.
You're welcome, Dipps....actually if you need anything cheap from the Continent which can fit in hand lugggage, give me a shout and I will bring it over for you. I ask only for your public recorded admission that this is evidence that your assertion above is not susbstantiated by real market evidence :-)</blockquote
In the last ##%% Years I cant recall ever cashing in on a guarantee beyond a month for something that clearly doesn’t work.
Except for an expensive fly rod bought in the U.K.and manufactured in Canada. Was replaced under lifetime replacement guarantee, even if broken by accident, shut car door on it.
If you voted Remain on the basis of where you could exercise the guarantee on your £30 shaver after 6 years fine, do you file 6 years of your til receipts in date or alphabetical order?
So Grieve will definitely vote against the government, I wonder how many of his colleagues will follow him?
Estimates range between 10 and 14 which is the number required to pass the amendment and defeat the government. Or perhaps there will be a deal at the last minute?
Well Raab tried to offer something but Grieve has stated "too late!"
The amendment itself doesn't do that much but it's a subtle way of "taking back control" from an executive that clearly needs boundaries.
For me the fundamental issue is that if the prospects in 12 months time are that bad then Parliament should be in a position to mandate a single market / CU option. Or...
Apologies if this is a distraction from the price of a cup of soup etc.
This is quite interesting. I've been watching BBC Parliament live for an hour and they're just voting now. Result due in 10 minutes.
FWIW I voted for Leave in the referendum and immediately regretted my decision. I completely admit that I didn't really understand what I was voting for. I have been hoping that we stay in ever since. Therefore I hope this amendment passes so that it's more likely we do (like what @seriously_red has just suggested).
This is quite interesting. I've been watching BBC Parliament live for an hour and they're just voting now. Result due in 10 minutes.
FWIW I voted for Leave in the referendum and immediately regretted my decision. I completely admit that I didn't really understand what I was voting for. I have been hoping that we stay in ever since. Therefore I hope this amendment passes so that it's more likely we do (like what @seriously_red has just suggested).
I really don't think there's any chance of us staying in, none of the major parties are advocating that.
Most likely outcome will be some halfway house where we have decent access to the single market but have to abide by all of the rules and everyone, on both sides, will moan about it evermore.
Fair play for admitting you should've voted the other way, I fear too many people are now so entrenched in their view that they could never do that even if they know it deep down.
The vote on Amendment 7 of the European Union (withdrawal) Bill, which would mean that the final deal with the EU would need a Statute of Parliament has happened. The Government lost by 4 votes.
So the SoG doesn't "trump" the EU directive, @cafcpolo, because it is not a guarantee. You can freely test that proposition when your mobile phone screen cracks after 18 months. Good luck trying to throw the SoG at Apple and Samsung. If you are in Europe, and didn't buy it on the company, Apple and Samsung have to cough up.
I've freely tested it thanks. Worked a treat when my dishwasher packed up after 2.5yrs. Went to Curry's, got it replaced.
p.s If you're going to try and get clever by responding to people quoting places like Which with a copy and paste job. At least do some research first. The Sale of Goods act was replaced over 2yrs ago.
The defeat tonight, if i understand it correctly, is that MP's have said that MP's have to have serious control and scrutiny over brexit, and not hand powers over to just the members of the Cabinet who might be inclined to nod through, or not nod through, stuff on a whim, or without the whole of parliament agreeing. Can there be anything wrong with that, why would the government oppose it?
Another issue is the one of a hung parliament, which is something that is going to hang around until the next General Election.
The defeat tonight, if i understand it correctly, is that MP's have said that MP's have to have serious control and scrutiny over brexit, and not hand powers over to just the members of the Cabinet who might be inclined to nod through, or not nod through, stuff on a whim, or without the whole of parliament agreeing. Can there be anything wrong with that, why would the government oppose it?
Another issue is the one of a hung parliament, which is something that is going to hang around until the next General Election.
They think it weakens their hand at the negotiating table as it's not in the gift of the people doing the negotiating to make a deal as everything has to be agreed by a majority of 650 odd MPs.
The defeat tonight, if i understand it correctly, is that MP's have said that MP's have to have serious control and scrutiny over brexit, and not hand powers over to just the members of the Cabinet who might be inclined to nod through, or not nod through, stuff on a whim, or without the whole of parliament agreeing. Can there be anything wrong with that, why would the government oppose it?
Another issue is the one of a hung parliament, which is something that is going to hang around until the next General Election.
They think it weakens their hand at the negotiating table as it's not in the gift of the people doing the negotiating to make a deal as everything has to be agreed by a majority of 650 odd MPs.
Don't worry about that. Those who voted brexit knew what they were voting for, so they knew full well that it would depend on the vote of a majority of 650 MP's in the end. It was anticipated.
The whole point is that one cannot trust the executive to always do what's best for the UK when the political stakes are so high. And when the conservative base is demonstrably out of kilter with the electorate.
The headlines and subsequent analysis will shed light on the impact of this defeat on the process... And on May's next move. It appears that 12 Tories voted against the government whilst some abstained at the last minute.
In contrast the Lib Dem amendment yesterday attempted to prescribe a single market solution and failed. Now is not to tie the hands of "negotiators" for it will become clear what is within the appetite of the EU27 soon enough.
Those who are staunch leavers might argue that this plays to the EU27 who might be less inclined to compromise. Does it weaken our hand... we will see soon enough what's on offer in the first half of 2018. Though of course it's May and Davis to move first.
The defeat tonight, if i understand it correctly, is that MP's have said that MP's have to have serious control and scrutiny over brexit, and not hand powers over to just the members of the Cabinet who might be inclined to nod through, or not nod through, stuff on a whim, or without the whole of parliament agreeing. Can there be anything wrong with that, why would the government oppose it?
Another issue is the one of a hung parliament, which is something that is going to hang around until the next General Election.
Close, but it's actually that MPs have said that MPs have to have serious control and scrutiny over brexit, and not hand powers over to just the members of the Cabinet who might be inclined to nod through, or not nod through, stuff on a whim, or without the whole of parliament agreeing.
No need to pretend, guys. You did not give a toss about parliamentary sovereignty in all the years that EU legislation has been imposed on us. You only care now because you know that this vote is anti Brexit.
No need to pretend, guys. You did not give a toss about parliamentary sovereignty in all the years that EU legislation has been imposed on us. You only care now because you know that this vote is anti Brexit.
I agree that I care because this vote is annoying brexiters. I disagree that we had any years at all when 'EU legislation has been imposed on us', because it simply didn't happen, although you might be able to put me right by giving a couple of examples.
Comments
Transport was more expensive Pull the other one. Example?
eating out more expensive I wonder how you compare like for like, but that is emphatically not my experience. Today at my usual lunchtime place I enjoyed an excellent borstch soup followed by grilled salmon steak with grilled veg, and a sparkling mineral water, for £7. And it was proper home cooked by a chef. You'd struggle to get that in Eltham High Street for less than £10, and it would likely be pre-cooked. I went in the M&S cafe and had a turkey pie plus soup, and mineral water and that alone was £10.
electrical goods and clothes more expensive. Well then how do you explain that pretty much at random I bought a regular Philips razor thing for just under 30% less than Amazon UK wanted?
At least you had the good sense not to mention the relative cost of alcohol.
Seriously you ought to know that any tourist can never get a handle on the best prices for anything, anywhere.
That's why when you come over to Prague, Mad Vincent and I will make sure you don't get mugged off in a tourist trap pub, even though the British mugs in those pubs will still be twatting on about how cheap the Stella is (Stella, ffs.)
Project fact, then, now and next.
Hong Kong is by far the best. Clean, efficient, on time, safe, and I could get about all day for around 2 quid. You can't even go one stop on the Tube for that.
Air conditioned taxi's are the ONLY way to travel in HK!
https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/sell-abroad/client-guarantee-redress/index_en.htm#
For those saying the Consumer Rights Act trumps EU law anyway...no it doesn't. It's the result of the EU Consumer Rights Directive being implemented across the whole single market and addressing issues like unfair contract terms, digital content, doorstep contracts and a lot more.
Did we play an important and active role in the design of the Directive? Of course we bloody well did. As others have pointed out we've long since had domestic laws addressing faulty goods, etc. and, despite what others might say, the EU respects our knowlege and expertese in these matters.
Those laws were made in 1979 and 1982 btw. How reflective of the way we shop and the modern marketplace do you think they were by the time the Directive was developed earlier this decade? We could have updated them any time we wished in the intervening 30 odd years but funnily enough the UK chose not to.
Again, it took 40 years for the woefully out of date Trade Descriptions Act 1968 to be replaced as result of a much more fit for purpose EU Directive.
Consumers are benefiting significantly from these changes of law, yet our governments, over decades, weren't interested in updating them for fear of being labelled anti-business imo and it took the intervention of the EU as a whole to ensure we eventually did undertake the modernisation so obviously required on behalf of consumers.
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to guess which way the US in particular is going to want the UK to move post-Brexit either.
There will be Labour politicians voting against the main tide of Labour MP's and the same goes for the Tories.
If the sovereignty of Parliament in the form of MP's legislating serious matters in the house is what brexiters voted for in the referendum, then logic suggests that they would support a government defeat in the vote later.
I have had a full english in Edinburgh for £3 next to Waverley station...whats the point, I know where to get a bacon roll and a sausage roll in blackpool for a £1 for both, in Basingstoke market I can get a bacon baguette for a £1.
I was comparing Germany with UK, i am sure i could if i wanted to buy things cheaper than you can ie china for example.
Alcohol was very much like for like some cheaper places some more expensive for example a bottle of weissbeer was 6 euros but about 4 in the town.
Well Raab tried to offer something but Grieve has stated "too late!"
The amendment itself doesn't do that much but it's a subtle way of "taking back control" from an executive that clearly needs boundaries.
For me the fundamental issue is that if the prospects in 12 months time are that bad then Parliament should be in a position to mandate a single market / CU option. Or...
Apologies if this is a distraction from the price of a cup of soup etc.
FWIW I voted for Leave in the referendum and immediately regretted my decision. I completely admit that I didn't really understand what I was voting for.
I have been hoping that we stay in ever since.
Therefore I hope this amendment passes so that it's more likely we do (like what @seriously_red has just suggested).
Most likely outcome will be some halfway house where we have decent access to the single market but have to abide by all of the rules and everyone, on both sides, will moan about it evermore.
Fair play for admitting you should've voted the other way, I fear too many people are now so entrenched in their view that they could never do that even if they know it deep down.
The Government lost by 4 votes.
p.s If you're going to try and get clever by responding to people quoting places like Which with a copy and paste job. At least do some research first. The Sale of Goods act was replaced over 2yrs ago.
Can there be anything wrong with that, why would the government oppose it?
Another issue is the one of a hung parliament, which is something that is going to hang around until the next General Election.
The headlines and subsequent analysis will shed light on the impact of this defeat on the process... And on May's next move. It appears that 12 Tories voted against the government whilst some abstained at the last minute.
In contrast the Lib Dem amendment yesterday attempted to prescribe a single market solution and failed. Now is not to tie the hands of "negotiators" for it will become clear what is within the appetite of the EU27 soon enough.
Those who are staunch leavers might argue that this plays to the EU27 who might be less inclined to compromise. Does it weaken our hand... we will see soon enough what's on offer in the first half of 2018. Though of course it's May and Davis to move first.
% who want to abandon Brexit completely:
nationally: 15%
middle/upper class: 19%
18-24 yr olds: 21%
London: 21%
Labour: 24%
Remainers: 29%
Lib Dems: 37%
YouGov, Dec 10-11
I disagree that we had any years at all when 'EU legislation has been imposed on us', because it simply didn't happen, although you might be able to put me right by giving a couple of examples.