Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.1 -
2.3 If at any time after a Club makes the submission of Declarations referred to in Rule 2.1 another person proposes to become a Relevant Person of that Club (including for the avoidance of doubt by virtue of being a shadow director or acquiring Control of the Club):PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.(a) the Club shall no later than 10 Normal Working Days prior to the date on which it is anticipated that such person shall become a Relevant Person submit to The League a duly completed Declaration in respect of that person, at which point that person shall be bound by and subject to the Regulations;
(b) within 5 Normal Working Days of receipt thereof The League shall advise the Club of the time-frame within which The League, acting reasonably, expects to be able to finalise its enquiries in respect of that person; and
(c) following completion of those enquiries, The League shall advise the Club in accordance with Rule 3.1 whether or not The League considers that the person is subject to a Disqualifying Condition.
2.4 A person who proposes to be a Relevant Person may not do anything that brings him within the definition of a Relevant Person, and the Club may not permit him to do anything that brings him within that definition, unless and until the Club has received confirmation from The League in accordance with Rule 2.3(c) that as far as The League is aware the person is not subject to any Disqualifying Condition.
2.5 A Relevant Person shall, within 14 days of any change in any of the particulars set out within his Declaration, provide an updated Declaration to his Club.
2.6 A Club shall, within 14 days of becoming aware of any change to any of the particulars previously submitted by the Club to The League, provide an updated Declaration to The League.
2.7 The Board may, after consultation with Clubs, levy fees (payable by Member Clubs) for the processing of Declarations.
3 Decision
3.1 Where The League decides (whether based on a Declaration or otherwise) that a person who is or wishes to become a Relevant Person is subject to a Disqualifying Condition, The League shall notify the person and his Club in writing of that decision (with reasons).
3.2 Where the person is a Relevant Person when the decision is made:
0 -
If you have never spoken up against it, especially when you were in a position of real power and influence, you are more complicit than mostHenry Irving said:
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.
But I am on my second espresso and in a foul mood after absorbing the morning's political news from the UK
0 -
Even for you that is amazing bollocks. Go and sit in a dark room for a while.PragueAddick said:
If you have never spoken up against it, especially when you were in a position of real power and influence, you are more complicit than mostHenry Irving said:
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.
But I am on my second espresso and in a foul mood after absorbing the morning's political news from the UK6 -
I can see a 3rd espresso being consumedHenry Irving said:
Even for you that is amazing bollocks. Go and sit in a dark room for a while.PragueAddick said:
If you have never spoken up against it, especially when you were in a position of real power and influence, you are more complicit than mostHenry Irving said:
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.
But I am on my second espresso and in a foul mood after absorbing the morning's political news from the UK
4 -
Not if he's in a dark room you cantcafc999 said:
I can see a 3rd espresso being consumedHenry Irving said:
Even for you that is amazing bollocks. Go and sit in a dark room for a while.PragueAddick said:
If you have never spoken up against it, especially when you were in a position of real power and influence, you are more complicit than mostHenry Irving said:
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.
But I am on my second espresso and in a foul mood after absorbing the morning's political news from the UK29 -
I knew it. It's been the fault of that Irving geyser all along.PragueAddick said:
If you have never spoken up against it, especially when you were in a position of real power and influence, you are more complicit than mostHenry Irving said:
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.
But I am on my second espresso and in a foul mood after absorbing the morning's political news from the UK6 -
I don’t know why we don’t pay an extra £115k a week and get Maguire.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Not to worry, he can just follow Acworth on twitter instead.Henry Irving said:
While reading Charlton Life for hints on who to buy until admin banned him.Sage said:
Yeah of course, heard someone caught Gallen playing a game of snakes and ladders and another game of twister, all in the same day. Light work for him between transfer windows.Henry Irving said:Sage said:
The work has started. They know the budget we will have once it goes through, they’ve already started working on targets.razil said:What’s eating me is we need to start work on transfers pronto
That can't be true. Everyone knows that they sit around doing nothing for months and then just buy a player (whole thing takes 30 seconds on Football Manager so about the same in real life) at the last minute.
His latest tip on who we should go for.............Phil Jones. Yes, that's Phil Jones who has 3 years left on his United contract and earns a reported 75k a week.1 -
ricky_otto said:
I don’t know why we don’t pay an extra £115k a week and get Maguire.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Not to worry, he can just follow Acworth on twitter instead.Henry Irving said:
While reading Charlton Life for hints on who to buy until admin banned him.Sage said:
Yeah of course, heard someone caught Gallen playing a game of snakes and ladders and another game of twister, all in the same day. Light work for him between transfer windows.Henry Irving said:Sage said:
The work has started. They know the budget we will have once it goes through, they’ve already started working on targets.razil said:What’s eating me is we need to start work on transfers pronto
That can't be true. Everyone knows that they sit around doing nothing for months and then just buy a player (whole thing takes 30 seconds on Football Manager so about the same in real life) at the last minute.
His latest tip on who we should go for.............Phil Jones. Yes, that's Phil Jones who has 3 years left on his United contract and earns a reported 75k a week.
Because Oshilaja has his song.
4 -
I was thinking how we could get around that. Rather than paying 90m for Maguire we could offer them £50m + Oshilaja and make it a £100m deal. But only if they agree to do a loan swap between Rashford and Hemed.bristoladdick said:ricky_otto said:
I don’t know why we don’t pay an extra £115k a week and get Maguire.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Not to worry, he can just follow Acworth on twitter instead.Henry Irving said:
While reading Charlton Life for hints on who to buy until admin banned him.Sage said:
Yeah of course, heard someone caught Gallen playing a game of snakes and ladders and another game of twister, all in the same day. Light work for him between transfer windows.Henry Irving said:Sage said:
The work has started. They know the budget we will have once it goes through, they’ve already started working on targets.razil said:What’s eating me is we need to start work on transfers pronto
That can't be true. Everyone knows that they sit around doing nothing for months and then just buy a player (whole thing takes 30 seconds on Football Manager so about the same in real life) at the last minute.
His latest tip on who we should go for.............Phil Jones. Yes, that's Phil Jones who has 3 years left on his United contract and earns a reported 75k a week.
Because Oshilaja has his song.4 - Sponsored links:
-
Take away his promotebobmunro said:
I knew it. It's been the fault of that Irving geyser all along.PragueAddick said:
If you have never spoken up against it, especially when you were in a position of real power and influence, you are more complicit than mostHenry Irving said:
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.
But I am on my second espresso and in a foul mood after absorbing the morning's political news from the UK6 -
All this sitting around, waiting, enough to give ya crabs.0
-
He's full of hot air...bobmunro said:
I knew it. It's been the fault of that Irving geyser all along.PragueAddick said:
If you have never spoken up against it, especially when you were in a position of real power and influence, you are more complicit than mostHenry Irving said:
Wow, how am I complicit?PragueAddick said:
I don't see how they can have a "set" timescale. They can have a target, but hitting it depends on the clarity and thoroughness of the information provided to them. It is precisely the most dodgy ones that will give them the most trouble, and we want them to clamp down on the dodgy ones.carly burn said:
I'm pretty sure they are obliged to set a timescale and will have. You and I just don't know what it is. Those directly involved in the transaction will.LargeAddick said:Think the EFL should have more transparency over the process and a set timescale to work to for various stages.
If English football were preperly run, you would have ONE body supervising all such scrutiny, for the whole professional game, and they would all be full time staff, enough of them, paid the market rate from the humungous amonts of money sloshing around the game. That doesnt happen because the majority of fans tolerate the situation of the FAPL existing as a separate entity, and holding onto most of the money.
The EFL is a two bob outfit, but we are all complicit in the factors why that is so.
But I am on my second espresso and in a foul mood after absorbing the morning's political news from the UK
Sadly the jokes wrong as geysers are full of hot water... Still it's done. I have made the joke.2 -
Mid table Championship holding mid at best IMO.Sage said:
My reaction to this suggestion and that he earns that amount of moneyChris_from_Sidcup said:
Not to worry, he can just follow Acworth on twitter instead.Henry Irving said:
While reading Charlton Life for hints on who to buy until admin banned him.Sage said:
Yeah of course, heard someone caught Gallen playing a game of snakes and ladders and another game of twister, all in the same day. Light work for him between transfer windows.Henry Irving said:Sage said:
The work has started. They know the budget we will have once it goes through, they’ve already started working on targets.razil said:What’s eating me is we need to start work on transfers pronto
That can't be true. Everyone knows that they sit around doing nothing for months and then just buy a player (whole thing takes 30 seconds on Football Manager so about the same in real life) at the last minute.
His latest tip on who we should go for.............Phil Jones. Yes, that's Phil Jones who has 3 years left on his United contract and earns a reported 75k a week.
1 -
I’ve just had a missed call from a phone number in Belgium!!!! Maybe Roland will be telling me about the sale personally
2 -
John of the efl?Addickjohn said:I’ve just had a missed call from a phone number in Belgium!!!! Maybe Roland will be telling me about the sale personally
Wrong number huh?
1 -
Can't wait to see what Golfie posts when it turns out his prediction is completely correct, but that the new owner is spotted on Sky...golfaddick said:Some of you need to lighten up & chill out. All be done & dusted this week. Both RD & JC will be history by Friday.
9 -
In London just in case anything got announced today and could end the boycott tonight. Guess I need to start thinking about cancelling my Friday plans. Fingers crossed.0
-
Macclesfield just agreed a sale to a new owner.
He's saying it should be wrapped up within a week.
What's the chance of it being completed before ours.0 -
Another reason for @Goonerhater to not vote Labour 😬Chizz said:
Can't wait to see what Golfie posts when it turns out his prediction is completely correct, but that the new owner is spotted on Sky...golfaddick said:Some of you need to lighten up & chill out. All be done & dusted this week. Both RD & JC will be history by Friday.2 - Sponsored links:
-
Not what has been said, this from Sky, he hasn't even proved funds.blackpool72 said:Macclesfield just agreed a sale to a new owner.
He's saying it should be wrapped up within a week.
What's the chance of it being completed before ours.
1 -
I’m picking up Amanda Staveley later. I’ll try to glean some info about our friends from the Middle East15
-
If anyone is likely to know.....Taxi_Lad said:I’m picking up Amanda Staveley later. I’ll try to glean some info about our friends from the Middle East0 -
@Taxi_Lad is our leader2
-
Bloody hell. That champagne is never going to get opened. Maybe we should prepare ourselves for disappointment again.0
-
Patientez, Jimmy.jimmymelrose said:Bloody hell. That champagne is never going to get opened. Maybe we should prepare ourselves for disappointment again.
We've waited nearly 6 years for this to happen. We can wait another week or so.
3 -
An addick's mottojimmymelrose said:Maybe we should prepare ourselves for disappointment again. 2 -
In that case, give the EFL a call, explain the situation and I’m sure they will push it through.RDG said:In London just in case anything got announced today and could end the boycott tonight. Guess I need to start thinking about cancelling my Friday plans. Fingers crossed. 0 -
3
-
Come on EFL lots of fans still waiting before they buy half a season ticket.2
This discussion has been closed.
