Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

1147114721474147614772265

Comments

  • garfield said:

    This Mike Ashley rumor has no foundation right? Is it purely based on the fact he is British man looking to sell one club?

    He has seen how we have been with RD and Newcastle fans have give him some shit over his tenure so why would he bother with fans who take it either? Not saying we are problem because we have been wronged! But from his perspective are we worth the hassle?

    We have NO idea who the brits are do we? All we have been told is that they are about but no clue who is involved.

    Please tell me if I am wrong of course.

    If & when the Newcastle sale goes through, my understanding is that he will look to purchase a club in the London area.
    Which one that is of course, is open to speculation, but the interest is there.
    And where does your understanding come from?
  • Off_it said:

    I still find it bizarre, or “weird” if you like, that the British interest has evidently been around for as long (longer?) as the Aussie interest, and yet it’s only the Aussies that seem to have come in for stick (eg “fuck off”, “move aside”, “they haven’t got the money”, etc) when it seems to me all they have done is try to be a bit more open about their involvement and intentions.

    The Brits must be laughing their tits off, staying under the radar and letting the Aussies cop the flak.

    Either way, I say it again, if the price is agreed and the money is in place - as we have been repeatedly told - then there must be a reason why neither party has completed the deal yet.

    Maybe it’s the same reason for both. Maybe each has a different reason - but that surely seems less likely as that would be a particularly unlucky (for us) coincidence. But then again, knowing our luck .....

    This.
  • Off_it said:

    I still find it bizarre, or “weird” if you like, that the British interest has evidently been around for as long (longer?) as the Aussie interest, and yet it’s only the Aussies that seem to have come in for stick (eg “fuck off”, “move aside”, “they haven’t got the money”, etc) when it seems to me all they have done is try to be a bit more open about their involvement and intentions.

    The Brits must be laughing their tits off, staying under the radar and letting the Aussies cop the flak.

    Either way, I say it again, if the price is agreed and the money is in place - as we have been reprleatedly told - then there must be a reason why neither party has completed the deal yet.

    Maybe it’s the same reason for both. Maybe each has a different reason - but that surely seems less likely as that would be a particularly unlucky (for us) coincidence. But then again, knowing our luck .....

    garfield said:

    This Mike Ashley rumor has no foundation right? Is it purely based on the fact he is British man looking to sell one club?

    He has seen how we have been with RD and Newcastle fans have give him some shit over his tenure so why would he bother with fans who take it either? Not saying we are problem because we have been wronged! But from his perspective are we worth the hassle?

    We have NO idea who the brits are do we? All we have been told is that they are about but no clue who is involved.

    Please tell me if I am wrong of course.

    If & when the Newcastle sale goes through, my understanding is that he will look to purchase a club in the London area.
    Which one that is of course, is open to speculation, but the interest is there.
    Latest on the Newcastle takeover, former Man Utd and Chelsea CEO Peter Kenyon is trying to put a consortium together.

    https://talksport.com/football/472179/newcastle-united-kenyon-investors-takeover/

    The Newcastle equaivlant of our Aussie takeover. I wonder if Newcastle fans right now are saying "fuck off”, “move aside”, “they haven’t got the money”.
  • Off_it said:

    I still find it bizarre, or “weird” if you like, that the British interest has evidently been around for as long (longer?) as the Aussie interest, and yet it’s only the Aussies that seem to have come in for stick (eg “fuck off”, “move aside”, “they haven’t got the money”, etc) when it seems to me all they have done is try to be a bit more open about their involvement and intentions.

    The Brits must be laughing their tits off, staying under the radar and letting the Aussies cop the flak.

    Either way, I say it again, if the price is agreed and the money is in place - as we have been reprleatedly told - then there must be a reason why neither party has completed the deal yet.

    Maybe it’s the same reason for both. Maybe each has a different reason - but that surely seems less likely as that would be a particularly unlucky (for us) coincidence. But then again, knowing our luck .....

    If it's two parties struggling to get the deal over the line then all trouble points to Roland. Shock.
    Unless the Aussies really don't have the money and the British bid involes Mike Ashley.
  • edited January 2019

    JamesSeed said:

    Is there any reason why the interested parties wont go a bit more public? Not by walking around the ground in scarves on match day, but just to release a small statement to say something along the lines of 'we're in the mix and we hope to complete soon'. At least the fans would know there is something going on

    The scarves were just an honest expression of their enthusiasm for the project, (days from what they thought was the completion).
    Muir also wanted to meet Charlton fans and get a sense of the atmosphere. Obviously they won’t do that again until the sale if it happens.

    If they released a statement saying ‘we're in the mix and we hope to complete soon' they’d be widely ridiculed, unfortunately.

    Damned if they do, damned if they don’t really.
    You're very good at putting people into groups mate ain't you. Getting a few people behind you, ridiculing the 'opposition', then playing the victim when you get a bit back.

    My question wasn't a dig at anyone in particular, it was just to ask if there was a genuine reason why all the parties, with RD's say so, can't each put out small official statements** just to say they are involved, no more than that.

    ** Official Statement - Via their legal teams and not by walking round the ground with scarves on. Which also goes for any other buyer who might do it prematurely, in the future.
    Ah but now you have done what you accuse @ShootersHillGuru of. What is wrong with @JamesSeed response there? Absolutely nothing, as far as I can see.

    Maybe if you if you review how your post would have read by taking out the phrase Not by walking around the ground in scarves on match day
    you might realise that you are accusing others of that which you yourself are guilty.

    In particular while I think James sometimes has made mistakes in his phrasing here (and who does not???) I think it is manifestly unfair to suggest he is "putting people into groups".
    I didn't accuse Shootie of anything, I asked if he though his question was a bit sharp in the first place. Re' JS's post, it depends what context you read it in and if you know that as soon as you write something on this thread in relation to the Aussies, it'll get quoted and twisted in few minutes.
    This is literally a forum for debate. The pro and anti Aussies seem pretty evenly matched, but there's no evidence that the pro Aussie mob are any worse than the anti Aussie mob. Personally I'd say it's the other way round, but then I'm biased.
    This isn't the plaice for vitriol, and I think you cod do batter ;-)
  • page 1475 is here.

    Forward, forward
  • garfield said:

    This Mike Ashley rumor has no foundation right? Is it purely based on the fact he is British man looking to sell one club?

    He has seen how we have been with RD and Newcastle fans have give him some shit over his tenure so why would he bother with fans who take it either? Not saying we are problem because we have been wronged! But from his perspective are we worth the hassle?

    We have NO idea who the brits are do we? All we have been told is that they are about but no clue who is involved.

    Please tell me if I am wrong of course.

    If & when the Newcastle sale goes through, my understanding is that he will look to purchase a club in the London area.
    Which one that is of course, is open to speculation, but the interest is there.
    Ashley from Newcastle to Charlton LOL.

    Businessman of century if he sells 50k home shirts, 50k away kit and 50k 2nd strip at Charlton.

    I could handle the yo-yo between Premier and Champ but why would he see CAFC as worthwhile ?

    We just don't have the fans. Even 26k wouldn't interest him.
  • Sponsored links:


  • No what I’m saying is

    bobmunro said:

    Can someone ask Lieven tonight just 4 questions
    1. Why are you persisting with Australians after 1 year of no deal.
    2. What price does Roland want
    3. How many buyers have proven funds and cleared EFL?
    4. How many buyers are still negotiating

    I just e mailed them to the the Trust Secretary for you (as they requested).
    Well that is most kind I thank you, let’s see if he has decent answers 🤨

    There is no British bid. There is only the Aussies.

    There is a British Bid and they are one of three buyers who approached Ex Directors, Aussies never approached them, so Who is real?
    Were they one of the groups who offered to buy out the ex-directors loans at a heavy discount?
    No Roland made the low ball bid. My guess is they told him they wanted loans cleared as did the others.
    Aussies? Who knows what they wanted, did they get that far?
    You’re being far to cryptic for me I’m afraid. Are you saying there is no Australian consortium currently in the running ? It won’t hurt you to stop talking in riddles.

    No what I’m saying is The Ex Directors have no idea if Aussies exist as they have never been in touch while 3 other parties including Brits have. Is that clear enough ?
    You come across as very aggressive. That’s me done.
    Don't you think your post was a bit curt, before you asked the question mate?

    Considering the amount of posturing on this thread, I find DS's, along with RedHenry's contributions, the most informative and unbiased, I'm not looking for smiley faces, just what they know.
    How dare you
  • Which reminds me of this thread, people regurgitating the same old shit and arguments but expecting a different answer.

    I refer to @Henry Irving WIOTOS
  • Last weeks unlock the solution meeting to be followed up with another one early next week. Expect Jim to drop it into his show.
  • garfield said:

    A

    garfield said:

    This Mike Ashley rumor has no foundation right? Is it purely based on the fact he is British man looking to sell one club?

    He has seen how we have been with RD and Newcastle fans have give him some shit over his tenure so why would he bother with fans who take it either? Not saying we are problem because we have been wronged! But from his perspective are we worth the hassle?

    We have NO idea who the brits are do we? All we have been told is that they are about but no clue who is involved.

    Please tell me if I am wrong of course.

    If & when the Newcastle sale goes through, my understanding is that he will look to purchase a club in the London area.
    Which one that is of course, is open to speculation, but the interest is there.
    And where does your understanding come from?
    A former member of the NUFC SMT, who is still close to Mike Ashley, for obvious reasons, I will not name him, however I have no reason to disbelieve him.
    Fair enough. I'll be cheering the Aussies on in that case. I don't want Ashley anywhere near Charlton.
  • I'm beginning to see this 'contest' between the Aussies and the Brits like two cricketers playing the straightest of bats.

    You've got Bill Lawry for the Aussies and Geoff Boycott for the Brits. Neither is prepared to take a chance and each is trying to bore the other into submission. Something has to give, but its best not to hold your breath.

    We're in the corridor of uncertainty.
    Yep, it’s the one at CERN
  • Which reminds me of this thread, people regurgitating the same old shit and arguments but expecting a different answer.

    I refer to @Henry Irving WIOTOS

    If you keep waiting for it to be on the OS you'll always be waiting for it to be on the OS
  • Dazzler21 said:

    Which reminds me of this thread, people regurgitating the same old shit and arguments but expecting a different answer.

    I refer to @Henry Irving WIOTOS

    If you keep waiting for it to be on the OS you'll always be waiting for it to be on the OS
    Touché! @Dazzler21
  • Sponsored links:


  • cabbles said:

    JamesSeed said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Is there any reason why the interested parties wont go a bit more public? Not by walking around the ground in scarves on match day, but just to release a small statement to say something along the lines of 'we're in the mix and we hope to complete soon'. At least the fans would know there is something going on

    The scarves were just an honest expression of their enthusiasm for the project, (days from what they thought was the completion).
    Muir also wanted to meet Charlton fans and get a sense of the atmosphere. Obviously they won’t do that again until the sale if it happens.

    If they released a statement saying ‘we're in the mix and we hope to complete soon' they’d be widely ridiculed, unfortunately.

    Damned if they do, damned if they don’t really.
    You're very good at putting people into groups mate ain't you. Getting a few people behind you, ridiculing the 'opposition', then playing the victim when you get a bit back.

    My question wasn't a dig at anyone in particular, it was just to ask if there was a genuine reason why all the parties, with RD's say so, can't each put out small official statements** just to say they are involved, no more than that.

    ** Official Statement - Via their legal teams and not by walking round the ground with scarves on. Which also goes for any other buyer who might do it prematurely, in the future.
    What an extraordinary statement, particularly from a mod. How can you possibly extrapolate that from my comment above.

    Firstly I didn’t say you were having a dig at all.

    There have been comments above about the aggressive tone of some posts, and it’s worth bearing in mind that plain text can be read in different ways by different people depending on their mindset. But your post aimed at me can only be seen as aggressive mate.

    Where have I put people into groups, and what groups are you referring to? Where have I ridiculed anybody? I was just giving my view of the scarf wearing, as have many others, but I don’t see you jumping down their throats.

    One of the great things about CL is the way people use humour to diffuse situations. Perhaps you’ve misconstrued my attempts at humour as something else, I really don’t know. For example I said recently something like ‘does that get me off (or on?) the scapegoat list’. It was an attempt at humour, not trying to portray myself as a victim.

    Of course people have a pop at each other here, but I don’t want to get involved.

    I’m more than happy to get involved in an honest debate without malice, however.
    Assistant to the Mods, maybe
    French/Grove park Ambassador to Admin. ;)
  • edited January 2019
    This thread also reminds me of this but without the groove, funk and Afro! Actually I did have a rather pathetic Afro back in the 70’s, what a twat I must have been!

    https://youtu.be/LDehYXKI31g
  • This Mike Ashley rumor has no foundation right? Is it purely based on the fact he is British man looking to sell one club?

    He has seen how we have been with RD and Newcastle fans have give him some shit over his tenure so why would he bother with fans who take it either? Not saying we are problem because we have been wronged! But from his perspective are we worth the hassle?

    We have NO idea who the brits are do we? All we have been told is that they are about but no clue who is involved.

    Please tell me if I am wrong of course.

    Ashley must be fully aware that his name is at the very least being strongly touted as a ‘possible’ future owner.
    One would have thought he would have come out and denied it by now were it not the case.
    That’s not to say I believe the rumour, one way or the other.

  • This Mike Ashley rumor has no foundation right? Is it purely based on the fact he is British man looking to sell one club?

    He has seen how we have been with RD and Newcastle fans have give him some shit over his tenure so why would he bother with fans who take it either? Not saying we are problem because we have been wronged! But from his perspective are we worth the hassle?

    We have NO idea who the brits are do we? All we have been told is that they are about but no clue who is involved.

    Please tell me if I am wrong of course.

    Ashley must be fully aware that his name is at the very least being strongly touted as a ‘possible’ future owner.
    One would have thought he would have come out and denied it by now were it not the case.
    That’s not to say I believe the rumour, one way or the other.

    Having heard about the way Mike Ashley is, I honestly dont think he would give a monkeys! Mike Ashley is only concerned about Mike Ashley.

    Also he has alot going on with his own club, doesnt need to worry about little ol' Charlton.
  • It's Mark Kleinman of Sky that's reporting the Kenyon and Newcastle link. Isn't he a Charlton fan? Would he know more on our situation?
  • It's Mark Kleinman of Sky that's reporting the Kenyon and Newcastle link. Isn't he a Charlton fan? Would he know more on our situation?

    Yes he is. No he wouldn't.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!