Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Wilder close (DEAL OFF - page 31)

14648505152

Comments

  • The rat is now cornered. He could waste more time trying to con some British has been manager into accepting his terms and risk getting rejected again. He could risk appointing Nobby or another Karel and continue down into League Two, or he could do the sensible thing and pick up the phone to Peter Varney.
  • Perhaps we should give Roland another chance
    [removes tongue from cheek in case there are any doubters]

    The worrying/sad/sickening thing is as soon as CWs name was mentioned some on here were saying exactly that !!!!
    That is not entirely correct, the statements were around if they appointed Wilder and made other changes - essentially changed tack. The word IF is a subtle one but there is a discussion to be had around what should happen IF the owner completely changed is strategy. That doesn't look like it is going to happen anytime soon but misinterpreting what is still a valid point, whether you agree with it or not, is not helpful!
  • Looking on Sky Bet and Steve Evans is 25/1....the fact that he is even on the list is worrying!

    Hate to say it but I'd rather Salt and Vinegar in charge rather than Mr Tomato
  • Has anyone done a Google search on KAtrien again recently?

    I think I've found what she does all day which is to contact Google and have items removed as a result of them being 'excessive'.

    The profile is now looking cleaner than it has for months.

    strange - yes it does ... getting ready to present her CV to a new company?

    If only!
  • The rat is now cornered. He could waste more time trying to con some British has been manager into accepting his terms and risk getting rejected again. He could risk appointing Nobby or another Karel and continue down into League Two, or he could do the sensible thing and pick up the phone to Peter Varney.

    He's not cornered. Someone will take the job and it could be an internal promotion for Simon Clark.
  • edited May 2016
    Why would Simon Clark take the role on he knows that Jason Euell turned down the position he was offered and probably knows why
  • Why would Simon Clark take the role on he knows that Jason Euell turned down the position he was offered and probably knows why

    Euell couldn't agree terms in the coaching role involved with the first team not as head coach. There's a huge difference and if Clark or for that matter Euell were offered it they would be mad to refuse.



  • edited May 2016
    We will all have views on what we think needs to happen at our beloved club - If Duchatelet changed his ways and started doing positive things, he might be as good an owner as any other - it would be a question on whether we could forgive him. There was an indication that that might be the case with this news of Wilder about to sign as we realised that he would have had to have been given certain assurances that would have been contrary to the way the club has been run up to now. He is the sort of manager I would appoint if I owned the club in its current position, so I'm not going to be negative about it when it looks like happening. I never thought that solely the appointment of Wilder was enough, but it could have been a step in a new direction.

    Of course the owner, like a leppard, seems unable to change his spots and we can see that he can't give up on his flawed systems -He said he intended to learn from the mistakes, but he never explained what he thought the mistakes were - I assumed, as these mistakes were repeated, that he didn't really understand them fully! It seems clear that this is the case. Now it is difficult to see how any decent manager is going to come to us - we will have our pick from the useless and desperate. The other important thing here, is that we need a manager soon - there are a lot of big decisions to be made in preparation for next season. This club is a total shambles!!!
  • Sponsored links:


  • The rat is now cornered. He could waste more time trying to con some British has been manager into accepting his terms and risk getting rejected again. He could risk appointing Nobby or another Karel and continue down into League Two, or he could do the sensible thing and pick up the phone to Peter Varney.

    He's not cornered. Someone will take the job and it could be an internal promotion for Simon Clark.
    I'd be very interested to see how fans would react to such an appointment. No experience in management and will have agreed to have his strings pulled by Roland. If he didn't get off to a flying start, I could only see the anger ramping up to new levels. If I were Simon or Jason, I'd steer well clear.
  • I don't doubt that the club made errors regarding this appointment but I don't think we should underestimate the influence that Sheffield United giving Wilder a ring will have had on his decision.

    My feeling is that everything was fine until Sheffield Utd contacted him and he was forced to delay while his agent made enquiries. Once it became clear they were very interested there was ever only one outcome.

    In this instance I'm of the opinion it was more about bad timing as anything else.
  • The problem is that knowing Wilder declined the job because of control, not money, will now undermine any manager who subsequently takes the job!
  • I don't doubt that the club made errors regarding this appointment but I don't think we should underestimate the influence that Sheffield United giving Wilder a ring will have had on his decision.

    My feeling is that everything was fine until Sheffield Utd contacted him and he was forced to delay while his agent made enquiries. Once it became clear they were very interested there was ever only one outcome.

    In this instance I'm of the opinion it was more about bad timing as anything else.

    Listen, they would have already known about Wilder's demands. They could have had a contract drawn up before they even met with him and had it signed on Monday. He'd already met Duchatelet the previous week so there was plenty of time to get this done. The Sheffield United situation wouldn't have been a consideration if they'd moved quickly, but they didn't.
  • edited May 2016
    The would have known them because they were willing to verbally agree to them. It was when he wanted verbal assurances written in, they backed off! There is only one conclusion to be drawn - they were lying to him - now that can't be possible! Not them!
  • The would have known them because they were willing to verbally agree to them. It was when he wanted verbal assurances written in, they backed off! There is only one conclusion to be drawn - they were lying to him - now that can't be possible! Not them!

    In other words they only lie verbally, not in black & white.
  • They lie verbally as they will then claim they were misinterpretated.
  • This content has been removed.
  • I think both sides have been played to mutual 'benefit'
  • Sponsored links:


  • boggzy said:

    I think both sides have been played to mutual 'benefit'

    Only Wilder was - unsurprisingly - better at it than Roland and Daisy
  • I don't doubt that the club made errors regarding this appointment but I don't think we should underestimate the influence that Sheffield United giving Wilder a ring will have had on his decision.

    My feeling is that everything was fine until Sheffield Utd contacted him and he was forced to delay while his agent made enquiries. Once it became clear they were very interested there was ever only one outcome.

    In this instance I'm of the opinion it was more about bad timing as anything else.

    Listen, they would have already known about Wilder's demands. They could have had a contract drawn up before they even met with him and had it signed on Monday. He'd already met Duchatelet the previous week so there was plenty of time to get this done. The Sheffield United situation wouldn't have been a consideration if they'd moved quickly, but they didn't.
    Well maybe but I think it's nieve to think that this could all be tied up in a couple of days.

    Like I said I don't doubt there were mistakes and possibly the biggest of those was not to realise the possibility that another club was lurking in the shadows.

    Do we know for certain that the "snag" was regarding written assurances or are we now perhaps rightly so cynical of the regime that we just assume that was the problem.

    Purely my speculation but is it possible that Wilder dragged his feet while the Sheffield United situation became clear to him.





  • This content has been removed.
  • If for instance say we have been played by Chris wilder.....a league 2 manager as of a month ago...

    Doesn't that further indicate that the club is even more of a complete joke?

    So we've been played by wilder even though we approached him and his club for his services? He saw it coming all along?
  • Dave2l said:

    colin1961 said:

    Adkins set to be sacked by Sheff Utd

    Looks like we been played .....

    So wilder went all the way to Belgian...to say look at me look at me Sheffield I'm available....before the managers position was vacant....so your suggesting that Sheffield united made an approach for wilder before Adkins was sacked (if he gets the chop)...and that prompted wilder to meet with RD in Belgium to furthermore encourage the sacking of Nigel Adkins....

    Or wilder expected united to sack Adkins simply because wilder has declared that he might be more ambitious then Northampton so that automatically makes him an attractive prospect?

    It may well end up that wilder goes Sheffield united, I wouldn't rule it out...I would however rule out the accusation that "we have been played" by Chris wilder.
    If only things were that straightforward. I'm confident that Wilder wanted to come right throughout the process right up until he was made aware (by Sheffield Utd) ? that they were interested. Yes they have a manager in place but if the SU board have already decided Adkins was to be replaced I don't doubt that they would contact Wilder. That for him would be a huge "snag" in his decision.

    It's hard not too pour all the blame onto Charlton but in this case I think there is enough evidence to cut them some slack until we know more.


  • Dave2l said:

    If for instance say we have been played by Chris wilder.....a league 2 manager as of a month ago...

    Doesn't that further indicate that the club is even more of a complete joke?

    So we've been played by wilder even though we approached him and his club for his services? He saw it coming all along?

    Indeed, it's ridiculous. This has been rumbling on for some time. It was mooted a number of weeks ago that we were interested in Wilder.
  • Dave2l said:

    colin1961 said:

    Adkins set to be sacked by Sheff Utd

    Looks like we been played .....

    So wilder went all the way to Belgian...to say look at me look at me Sheffield I'm available....before the managers position was vacant....so your suggesting that Sheffield united made an approach for wilder before Adkins was sacked (if he gets the chop)...and that prompted wilder to meet with RD in Belgium to furthermore encourage the sacking of Nigel Adkins....

    Or wilder expected united to sack Adkins simply because wilder has declared that he might be more ambitious then Northampton so that automatically makes him an attractive prospect?

    It may well end up that wilder goes Sheffield united, I wouldn't rule it out...I would however rule out the accusation that "we have been played" by Chris wilder.
    well we approached Wilder before Riga had resigned. Wilder met RD in Belgium last week and if RD had agreed the assurances Wilder wanted then and had then followed it up in writing I have no doubt that Wilder would be our new manager now. By lying to him and prevaricating RD & KM allowed Sheff Utd into the frame and gave Wilder another, better option. It's RD's and Daisy's fault entirely. Amateurish.
    Do we know for certain that Wilder was lied to ?

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!