All Corporate packages are very negotiable at the moment. Still would not want to give them any more of my cash.
If you have a spare hour or two you could waste their time negotiating a package you have no intention of taking up.
Ravi, who has done chaff all wrong, would enjoy that - inspired idea
You really don't get the point of a lot of these protests, do you?
I have to agree with PL54, I have sent e-mails to almost everyone at the club, including Pinnochio, and the only one who bothered to reply was Ravi, he explained that he is a fan as well as an employee and promised to pass on my concerns, all I could have asked of him in the circumstances. All credit to him and although I realise the comment was made tongue in cheek, to suggest that we deliberately waste the time of overworked regular employees is somewhat shortsighted. If you want to waste anyone's time do it to KM, perhaps e-mail her pretending that she is on the shortlist for 'female football boss of the year' or something, she's bound to answer that!
All Corporate packages are very negotiable at the moment. Still would not want to give them any more of my cash.
If you have a spare hour or two you could waste their time negotiating a package you have no intention of taking up.
Ravi, who has done chaff all wrong, would enjoy that - inspired idea
You really don't get the point of a lot of these protests, do you?
I have to agree with PL54, I have sent e-mails to almost everyone at the club, including Pinnochio, and the only one who bothered to reply was Ravi, he explained that he is a fan as well as an employee and promised to pass on my concerns, all I could have asked of him in the circumstances. All credit to him and although I realise the comment was made tongue in cheek, to suggest that we deliberately waste the time of overworked regular employees is somewhat shortsighted. If you want to waste anyone's time do it to KM, perhaps e-mail her pretending that she is on the shortlist for 'female football boss of the year' or something, she's bound to answer that!
I agree. Whilst I agree making life uncomfortable may force certain people to leave at what level do you target employees?
I think nearly everyone agrees to leave the playing staff alone and they don't obstruct them from their daily business; similarly the board and 'officers' are probably fair game in most peoples eyes.
But what of the others? MickE? ticket office staff? cleaners? Ravi? Head ticketing woman? (well maybe in her case...). All of these people have little or no input into the strategic direction of the club and are just trying to make an honest crust. Is it really fair to give them grief from our end when they are probably going to get grief and maybe even the tin tack from the high priestess for not meeting their targets/quotas? We can stop using the club services without being nasty about it.
All Corporate packages are very negotiable at the moment. Still would not want to give them any more of my cash.
If you have a spare hour or two you could waste their time negotiating a package you have no intention of taking up.
Ravi, who has done chaff all wrong, would enjoy that - inspired idea
You really don't get the point of a lot of these protests, do you?
I have to agree with PL54, I have sent e-mails to almost everyone at the club, including Pinnochio, and the only one who bothered to reply was Ravi, he explained that he is a fan as well as an employee and promised to pass on my concerns, all I could have asked of him in the circumstances. All credit to him and although I realise the comment was made tongue in cheek, to suggest that we deliberately waste the time of overworked regular employees is somewhat shortsighted. If you want to waste anyone's time do it to KM, perhaps e-mail her pretending that she is on the shortlist for 'female football boss of the year' or something, she's bound to answer that!
I agree. Whilst I agree making life uncomfortable may force certain people to leave at what level do you target employees?
I think nearly everyone agrees to leave the playing staff alone and they don't obstruct them from their daily business; similarly the board and 'officers' are probably fair game in most peoples eyes.
But what of the others? MickE? ticket office staff? cleaners? Ravi? Head ticketing woman? (well maybe in her case...). All of these people have little or no input into the strategic direction of the club and are just trying to make an honest crust. Is it really fair to give them grief from our end when they are probably going to get grief and maybe even the tin tack from the high priestess for not meeting their targets/quotas? We can stop using the club services without being nasty about it.
Not sure who's targeting them but realistically protests will make their lives difficult because the aim as I understand it is to make the club hard to manage.
Relegation is a much bigger threat to their jobs than protest action, and that will be down to player and management recruitment alone.
I had to browse using my phone to see what the last 9 posts were about. It didn't seem to make a great deal of sense:
I'd actually forgotten how much more enjoyable it is to browse CharltonLife with his posts automatically filtered out by a little Chrome Extension. It took 10 minutes to knock up the filter and it's been worth every second.
That said, it is a bit sad that it had to come to that, and as mentioned several times by other posters - I really can't understand why he's not just banned. He contributes zero other than the occasional inflammatory one liners aimed at winding up other users, or loaded question to incite long explanations of things that have already been discussed at length.
A bit peculiar and sad all around, I can't help but think a ban would also be quite healthy for him. At least the likes of NathanPrior had some amusement attached to them.
All Corporate packages are very negotiable at the moment. Still would not want to give them any more of my cash.
If you have a spare hour or two you could waste their time negotiating a package you have no intention of taking up.
Ravi, who has done chaff all wrong, would enjoy that - inspired idea
You really don't get the point of a lot of Charlton Life, do you?
to go out of my way to be awkward and potentially obnoxious towards every other poster ?
He/she should get a ban as contributes zero to this forum.
You talking about me?
PL/54
@iainment, I don't want to say I told you so but........
Also I wonder why PL54 isn't banned. So many flags and as
.....what ?
Not defending her, this is a forum where you can say, within reason, what you like....... Even the cobblers @PL54 comes out with.
More than happy for people to say WITHIN REASON what they like but a large amount of what PL54 says is just troll stuff or offensive for a reaction. Sad but true
Have I got this wrong ? This little spat at midnight last night was because I said I didn't think it was a good idea to give Ravi the run around about false bookings and then several people agreed he shouldn't be 'targeted'. And this was all a few days ago.
Comments
Mmm, I keep seeing new posts on this thread but I can't see them?edit: nemmind, just looked on my phone - makes sense now.
I think nearly everyone agrees to leave the playing staff alone and they don't obstruct them from their daily business; similarly the board and 'officers' are probably fair game in most peoples eyes.
But what of the others? MickE? ticket office staff? cleaners? Ravi? Head ticketing woman? (well maybe in her case...). All of these people have little or no input into the strategic direction of the club and are just trying to make an honest crust. Is it really fair to give them grief from our end when they are probably going to get grief and maybe even the tin tack from the high priestess for not meeting their targets/quotas? We can stop using the club services without being nasty about it.
Relegation is a much bigger threat to their jobs than protest action, and that will be down to player and management recruitment alone.
;-)
But the thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about!!!
Also I wonder why PL54 isn't banned. So many flags and as
Not defending her, this is a forum where you can say, within reason, what you like.......
Even the cobblers @PL54 comes out with.
I'd actually forgotten how much more enjoyable it is to browse CharltonLife with his posts automatically filtered out by a little Chrome Extension. It took 10 minutes to knock up the filter and it's been worth every second.
That said, it is a bit sad that it had to come to that, and as mentioned several times by other posters - I really can't understand why he's not just banned. He contributes zero other than the occasional inflammatory one liners aimed at winding up other users, or loaded question to incite long explanations of things that have already been discussed at length.
A bit peculiar and sad all around, I can't help but think a ban would also be quite healthy for him. At least the likes of NathanPrior had some amusement attached to them.
Excellent.