Talk about an open door to push at, and the irony meter is at maximum.
From the SLP article:
'The South London Press contacted Companies House press office and went sent the following response: "In accordance with The Companies Act 2006, Companies House receives filings in good faith and records these on the database accordingly. In all respects the paper documentation satisfied the required checks.
From the fans forum document:
Why have there been so many changes of head coach?
With the exception of Jose Riga’s departure in the summer of 2014, the on-pitch performances of our head coaches have been below expectations. However, these appointments have been made in good faith.
Northern Irish chap --whats your point ? and are your working for Dear Kat ?
My only point is that the authorities often take a dim view of threats that are made, and that the forces of order have been known to take a slightly more draconian view of pranks than might you or I.
I have no association with the regime, and fully support all lawful acts of protest.
I have no idea what Duchatelet's aim is, but I worry that he sees our football club as another kind of component manufacturer, a faceless and interchangeable part of his empire.
However, we note that the company has not signed up to our PROOF scheme, which adds a security layer to such filings that would prevent false or fraudulent submissions being made.
Essentially, this free service lets you protect your company from unauthorised changes to records
Surprised everyone doesnt sign up to the Service if its free then... Because the club didnt take up this option then for me, its their own fault, the options are there to stop people from doing this sort of thing so if you dont take it up you cant really complain
where has this statement from Companies House been picked up from?
However, we note that the company has not signed up to our PROOF scheme, which adds a security layer to such filings that would prevent false or fraudulent submissions being made.
Essentially, this free service lets you protect your company from unauthorised changes to records
Surprised everyone doesnt sign up to the Service if its free then... Because the club didnt take up this option then for me, its their own fault, the options are there to stop people from doing this sort of thing so if you dont take it up you cant really complain
where has this statement from Companies House been picked up from?
The tragedy here is the fundamental principle which is blatantly enshrined in the executive of the club.
Their conceit pervades every action and every word. It is all about me, me, me!
Why would anybody involved at a senior level in the club or involved in anyway with communications for and on behalf of the club allow this anywhere near the Official Site?
Once again there is a rush to judgement. It is like dealing with a group of petulant and pompous teenagers who have absolutely no ability to understand the consequences of their actions. Is there nobody in the club who possesses any ounce of common sense? When are these people going to grow up?
I appreciate the profile of the Chief Executive of any company nowadays is higher than ever but it does not mean you have to act like it especially against the background of the appalling results delivered to this point.
The most effective CEO's are those who let their actions and results speak for themselves. Of course when there are major issues for the business they have a responsibility to the business to comment, to clarify, to inform, to communicate, to challenge, to inspire and to lead by action and or word.
This is beyond tiresome. It is never ever about you! It is about the job you do and your ability to do it!
You have displayed palpably little understanding of the role, seem completely unable to explain to inform, to clarify, to communicate in any meaningful way exactly what you are trying to achieve and exactly how you propose to achieve it.
Katrien, no matter your CV, the only place in which you retain any status, in the industry you chose to work, is in your own head and apparently within the surreal world of an eccentric multi millionaire electronics investor who seemingly has less understanding of the value of meaningful communication than you.
You appear to work to a completely distorted and inappropriate value set and have allowed yourself and the club to be once again distracted from the job in hand.
Just to refresh your memory the club is, was and always will be of far greater importance than any individual who chooses to work for it.
Self esteem is important self importance is delusional.
Blimey, two badly written sentences on the Charlton website and this embarrassment gets splattered all over the national press. The new comms manager must be loving her job so far!
However, we note that the company has not signed up to our PROOF scheme, which adds a security layer to such filings that would prevent false or fraudulent submissions being made.
Essentially, this free service lets you protect your company from unauthorised changes to records
Surprised everyone doesnt sign up to the Service if its free then... Because the club didnt take up this option then for me, its their own fault, the options are there to stop people from doing this sort of thing so if you dont take it up you cant really complain
where has this statement from Companies House been picked up from?
Katrien I know either you or one of your minions keeps an eye on this site, for goodness sake take a step back and think before you act. To be a lawyer, you must be an intelligent person, one who should realise that 14,700 (98% of 15k) heads are better than 1 or even 5 if you include your 'senior' management team.
Give it up, do yourself a favour and resign officially, you know it makes sense.
FootballLeaguePaper @TheLeaguePaper 1h1 hour ago A hoaxer has managed to forge the resignation of Charlton's chief executive Katrien Meire to Companies House #cafc
'Under the Companies Act 2006, an individual found guilty of filing false documents to Companies House could receive a prison term of up to two years, a fine, or both.'
I will be as pleased as the next man if nothing is done about this but there is, obviously, a law in place to attempt to prevent it from happening.
This is becoming better and better by the minute! That Daily Mail article also has a great picture of a load of banners from Saturday.
BBC Sport and Daily Mail have got to be two of the biggest online news platforms in the UK and thanks to her stupidity Katrien has ensured she's made it onto both!
'Under the Companies Act 2006, an individual found guilty of filing false documents to Companies House could receive a prison term of up to two years, a fine, or both.'
I will be as pleased as the next man if nothing is done about this but there is, obviously, a law in place to attempt to prevent it from happening.
I don't think the perp will be too disheartened by 2 years of no Two Chalet Regime
Katrien I know either you or one of your minions keeps an eye on this site, for goodness sake take a step back and think before you act. To be a lawyer, you must be an intelligent person, one who should realise that 14,700 (98% of 15k) heads are better than 1 or even 5 if you include your 'senior' management team.
Give it up, do yourself a favour and resign officially, you know it makes sense.
If my understanding of Matt Wright's article in the latest VOTV is correct, the salary on offer for HoC, which they have struggled to fill, was increased by c£20k to £60k!
My immediate thoughts are if MB was responsible for drafting or overseeing the OS announcement this could be another poor signing. If not and KM insisted on the content, despite best advice to the contrary, then she could have saved herself a lot of money and disestablished the job.
Comments
From the SLP article:
'The South London Press contacted Companies House press office and went sent the following response: "In accordance with The Companies Act 2006, Companies House receives filings in good faith and records these on the database accordingly. In all respects the paper documentation satisfied the required checks.
From the fans forum document:
Why have there been so many changes of head coach?
With the exception of Jose Riga’s departure in the summer of 2014, the on-pitch performances of our head coaches have been below expectations. However, these appointments have been made in good faith.
Need I add anything?
I have no association with the regime, and fully support all lawful acts of protest.
I have no idea what Duchatelet's aim is, but I worry that he sees our football club as another kind of component manufacturer, a faceless and interchangeable part of his empire.
http://bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35532068
It is on the main "football" page of the website.
Plus, it links to CARD.
It also includes the quotes from Companies House.
All of this would categorically not have happened if she had kept her mouth shut with the statement.
Another wonderful own-goal.
Maybe Katrien, just maybe, this whole football thing isn't really for you.
Does that mean that the site is actually called Companies House and it shouldn't be referred to as the Companies House Website ?
Their conceit pervades every action and every word. It is all about me, me, me!
Why would anybody involved at a senior level in the club or involved in anyway with communications for and on behalf of the club allow this anywhere near the Official Site?
Once again there is a rush to judgement. It is like dealing with a group of petulant and pompous teenagers who have absolutely no ability to understand the consequences of their actions. Is there nobody in the club who possesses any ounce of common sense? When are these people going to grow up?
I appreciate the profile of the Chief Executive of any company nowadays is higher than ever but it does not mean you have to act like it especially against the background of the appalling results delivered to this point.
The most effective CEO's are those who let their actions and results speak for themselves. Of course when there are major issues for the business they have a responsibility to the business to comment, to clarify, to inform, to communicate, to challenge, to inspire and to lead by action and or word.
This is beyond tiresome. It is never ever about you! It is about the job you do and your ability to do it!
You have displayed palpably little understanding of the role, seem completely unable to explain to inform, to clarify, to communicate in any meaningful way exactly what you are trying to achieve and exactly how you propose to achieve it.
Katrien, no matter your CV, the only place in which you retain any status, in the industry you chose to work, is in your own head and apparently within the surreal world of an eccentric multi millionaire electronics investor who seemingly has less understanding of the value of meaningful communication than you.
You appear to work to a completely distorted and inappropriate value set and have allowed yourself and the club to be once again distracted from the job in hand.
Just to refresh your memory the club is, was and always will be of far greater importance than any individual who chooses to work for it.
Self esteem is important self importance is delusional.
Zzzzzzzz, boring.
http://www.southlondonpress.co.uk/article.cfm?id=116063&headline=Charlton launch investigation after Companies House list termination of director&sectionIs=sport&searchyear=2016
You are shite at it!
Give it up, do yourself a favour and resign officially, you know it makes sense.
That is Scary for her prospects.
A hoaxer has managed to forge the resignation of Charlton's chief executive Katrien Meire to Companies House #cafc
Now picked up by the Daily Mail
'Under the Companies Act 2006, an individual found guilty of filing false documents to Companies House could receive a prison term of up to two years, a fine, or both.'
I will be as pleased as the next man if nothing is done about this but there is, obviously, a law in place to attempt to prevent it from happening.
BBC Sport and Daily Mail have got to be two of the biggest online news platforms in the UK and thanks to her stupidity Katrien has ensured she's made it onto both!
Step forward squirrel face.
My immediate thoughts are if MB was responsible for drafting or overseeing the OS announcement this could be another poor signing. If not and KM insisted on the content, despite best advice to the contrary, then she could have saved herself a lot of money and disestablished the job.