Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Ipswich vs Charlton 2014 | Post Match Views

12346»

Comments

  • Viewfinder
    Viewfinder Posts: 4,914
    Both look like pens to me - Stewart's being blatant. The defender came hurtling across and stuck his foot in; Stewart was hardly likely to dive when bearing down on goal like that.
  • andynelson
    andynelson Posts: 1,951
    I think he got all 3 penalty decisions wrong.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,385
    both should have been penalties .. it's alright for the ref to 'level things up' but booking Stewart was a tad too generous to Ipswich .. I was not at the game so can't comment on his overall performance, however, whenever I have seen Atwell previously, I have thought him to be a decent referee .. we are all entitled to a bad day.... EXCEPT FOR BLOODY REFEREES !!
  • bromleyjohn
    bromleyjohn Posts: 5,987
    The thing I got from being there yesterday was when sh1t happens never give up and never is that more true of Captain Johnnie Jackson. He is now probably going to become the impact player with his age because he really is the only player we have who I would put money on to hit the target. The more we obsess about ref this and penalty that we miss the point that this happens to both sides and when players obsess about wrong decisions and forget about playing to the whistle then the only winner is the opposition. Good points from yesterday; Stewart is gone (talented but lazy) hopefully Sordell gone (just was never going to happen at Charlton) Wiggins Solly, Wood Stephens, Wilson, Kermorgant and Alnwick all offer hope for the remainder of the season. I really really like Alnwick because he does not play the glory boy. Ipswich was like a morgue yesterday except for the Charlton fans who played there role throughout. It felt good driving back.
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    both pens
  • Nicholas
    Nicholas Posts: 7,640
    Both pens and both red cards according to the letter of the law.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,773
    edited January 2014
    I think both were pens. The first one is excusable to miss, but Wood was beaten so the only option was to stumble into the Ipswich player and he seems to have done a reasonable job of it. As for our penalty shout, the Ipswich player went through Stewart. There was definitely contact and booking Stewart compounded a truly awful call.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,205
    I'm clearly (well not clearly) seeing the Stewart penalty claim different to everyone else , i see it as Stewart is cutting across the defender moving the ball parallel to the goal line and the defender a fraction of a second after Stewart nudges the ball across toe pokes the ball back to the keeper , they then collide ..... and to me no penalty and no booking either
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,773
    oohaahmortimer said:

    I'm clearly (well not clearly) seeing the Stewart penalty claim different to everyone else , i see it as Stewart is cutting across the defender moving the ball parallel to the goal line and the defender a fraction of a second after Stewart nudges the ball across toe pokes the ball back to the keeper , they then collide ..... and to me no penalty and no booking either

    You passed stage one of the Attwell refs entrance exam but failed with the no booking answer - hard luck, try again soon.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,205
    edited January 2014
    what are you seeing different to me then Muttley ..... i see the Ipswich player made contact with Stewart but after playing the ball back to the keeper

  • Sponsored links:



  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,773
    You cant go through a player to win the ball
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,205
    he played the ball first with a toe poke then they collide
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,773
    but that is not what happened - the ref didn't even see your version of events as he booked Stewart for diving - implying he recieved no contact
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,205
    I'm saying what i saw , i believe the defender toe pokes the ball first before the collision , the ref may have got the right no penalty shout but for the wrong reasons
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,773
    You cant challenge for the ball in the manner the defender did without it being a foul......well you can with Atwell in charge but you can't normally.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,205
    he stuck his leg out and as Stewart knocks it across a fraction of a second later the outstretched toe poke guides the ball back to keeper then they collide , can't see what you're saying
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,773
    It isn't just me Oohaah, you cant see what everybody else is saying either.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,205
    i don't think anyones looking that hard , seriously Stewart is moving across the goal and the ball diverts the other way doesn't it ??
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,773
    He gets some ball and he gets some man - Find somebody who agrees with you. I'm out.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,205
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    He gets some ball and he gets some man - Find somebody who agrees with you. I'm out.

    understand , thats what i'm seeing but in a different order to you ..... and everyone else lol ... although only you and me have prolly bothered to try and study it !

  • Sponsored links:



  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    Study what ?
    The blatant CAFC penalty ?
    ;-)

Categories

“Marketplace”