Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
New Charlton kit 2013/14
Comments
-
Yep yep (twice blondie) no yep0
-
Anybody saying no to any of those needs a serious word.0
-
Dunno, baldy looks a bit of a clean shirt.0
-
So Natwest doesn't exist, just a brand that rbs use.kitchenchef said:
Woolwich is the brand of the mortgage. Barclays are the lender. a woolwich mortgage is now merely the name of a product.TEL said:My mortgage statements from Barclays are headed Woolwich......confusion reigns
0 -
4, 2, 1, 30
-
couldn't tell you mate. I only know about Woolwich/Barclays as I work for Barclays, and used to specifically deal with woolwich mortgages.MrOneLung said:
So Natwest doesn't exist, just a brand that rbs use.kitchenchef said:
Woolwich is the brand of the mortgage. Barclays are the lender. a woolwich mortgage is now merely the name of a product.TEL said:My mortgage statements from Barclays are headed Woolwich......confusion reigns
0 -
is that how many times you'd go throug each of them?Dizzle said:4, 2, 1, 3
0 -
Haha no. That is the order id choose.cafcdave123 said:
is that how many times you'd go throug each of them?Dizzle said:4, 2, 1, 3
I.e Left to right - number 4 first, the number 2 etc
0 -
Glad we haven't got Macron anymore if this is the kind of thing they're coming up with
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
thats a retro villa kit form when they won the European Cup I believe, I quite like it0
-
i wouldnt mind a retro charlton kit to be honest, i like the white one with the red at the top that Nug mocked up.0
-
Why is it we are never leaked, is our board that slow and guarded about our kits? Man Ure and Arsehole's kits are usually leaked in January/Feb and confirmed by April/May....
This Goes the same for Orient and even Cardiff... I mean come on!
0 -
-
Dazzler21 said:
Why is it we are never leaked, is our board that slow and guarded about our kits? Man Ure and Arsehole's kits are usually leaked in January/Feb and confirmed by April/May....
This Goes the same for Orient and even Cardiff... I mean come on!
Not sure why "leaking" is a good thing.
Anyway, maybe the shirt has been leaked but only to people who can be trusted not to post the picture on Charlton Life, ain't that right Steve? : -)
0 -
So you would choose number 3?Dizzle said:
Haha no. That is the order id choose.cafcdave123 said:
is that how many times you'd go throug each of them?Dizzle said:4, 2, 1, 3
I.e Left to right - number 4 first, the number 2 etc
0 -
Yeah. I've seen it, both with the sponsors logo on it, and about a month ago without the sponsors logo.
I just assumed we'd all see it. Are there, really, any CL members that haven't seen it?0 -
Very Melchester RoversAdTheAddicK said:What's everyones opinion on the barcelona away kit ? (I assume)
0 -
That was part of the joke to be fair. You are the only one that noticed it. Fair playValleyGary said:
So you would choose number 3?Dizzle said:
Haha no. That is the order id choose.cafcdave123 said:
is that how many times you'd go throug each of them?Dizzle said:4, 2, 1, 3
I.e Left to right - number 4 first, the number 2 etc
0 -
At the risk of dragging this on for too long is anyone suggesting that the fact that some people have had the employer name on their payslips change from Woolwich to Barclays constitutes any evidence that sponsoring Charlton is bad for a company's health?kitchenchef said:
couldn't tell you mate. I only know about Woolwich/Barclays as I work for Barclays, and used to specifically deal with woolwich mortgages.MrOneLung said:
So Natwest doesn't exist, just a brand that rbs use.kitchenchef said:
Woolwich is the brand of the mortgage. Barclays are the lender. a woolwich mortgage is now merely the name of a product.TEL said:My mortgage statements from Barclays are headed Woolwich......confusion reigns
If anything one could suggest that the advertising Woolwich got by sponsoring a top flight football club for four seasons helped make their brand worth saving when Barclays bought them.
I'd certainly rather have bought shares in Woolwich in 1989 than in Llanera in 2006!0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Seems so. Some people just not looking hard enough.kings hill addick said:Yeah. I've seen it, both with the sponsors logo on it, and about a month ago without the sponsors logo.
I just assumed we'd all see it. Are there, really, any CL members that haven't seen it?0 -
0 -
At the risk of dragging this on for too long is anyone suggesting that the fact that some people have had the employer name on their payslips change from Woolwich to Barclays constitutes any evidence that sponsoring Charlton is bad for a company's health?
If anything one could suggest that the advertising Woolwich got by sponsoring a top flight football club for four seasons helped make their brand worth saving when Barclays bought them.
But there is no company only on paper! The company only exists on letterheads as the mortgage brand of Barclays, everything else ie the HO at bexleyheath, 350 of the 400 offices and probably 80 percent of the staff have gone. So the majority of the Woolwich people had their payslips switched not to Barclays but to the equivalent of the p45! In our area there were 17 Woolwich branch managers before amalgamation, one month after there were three! With their branches being closed.
Just because the name still remains as a header on a mortgage statement doesn't mean the company and employees are still around.
Barclays bought Woolwich for their mortgage book, their investment/ savings business (including the independent advice service and Unit Trust Managers), because they could save money by consolidating the two businesses, and benefit from the good reputation of the Woolwich in the South. This reputation may have been enhanced by sponsoring Charlton but ultimately I don't think the company, the staff or the customers benefited by takeover, apart from the money received from shares.0 -
At the risk of dragging this on for too long is anyone suggesting that the fact that some people have had the employer name on their payslips change from Woolwich to Barclays constitutes any evidence that sponsoring Charlton is bad for a company's health?
I'm certainly not. I think its just an unfortunate co-inkydink that a couple have not done so well after or whilst sponsoring us. I don't believe sponsoring charlton had any impact on the Barclays/Woolwich situation.0 -
Lol not even a whole leaked image even their teasers were entertaining... Kind of. I still remember the horror of the carbrini ''we'll be relegated in this shirt" episode... Turned out we were!0
-
Ive seen the CAFC kits for the next five seasons...Henry Irving said:
Seems so. Some people just not looking hard enough.kings hill addick said:Yeah. I've seen it, both with the sponsors logo on it, and about a month ago without the sponsors logo.
I just assumed we'd all see it. Are there, really, any CL members that haven't seen it?
Oh...you telling me you guys havent seen those either???0 -
-
I'd take the one on the left - provided tripod hasn't already been there0
-
Thats a Surridge kit not Nike. The arm bands at the bottom go half way round.POSLCAFC said:The new Mansfield Town kit...?
0
