None of our strikers are exactly prolific, and I don't see Brad as being worse than the rest.
If you extrapolate their current goals:appearances ratios from Scoham's stats our strikers would have (theroretically) scored the following. Haynes and Kermorgant are both doing quite well, shame they've both had sells out injured.
Haynes: 12 Kermorgant: 9 Fuller: 5 Hulse: 5 BWP: 2 (5 if you take into account disallowed goals).
Those numbers are obviously only theoretical and also count all appearances as equal. They would probably change if you calculated using minutes on the pitch, but BWP has actually made the most first team appearances and scored the least goals.
His stats look much better if those goals were allowed (as would our points total) but even then are they good enough for a supposedly 'natural goalscorer'?
Comments
Haynes: 12
Kermorgant: 9
Fuller: 5
Hulse: 5
BWP: 2 (5 if you take into account disallowed goals).
Those numbers are obviously only theoretical and also count all appearances as equal. They would probably change if you calculated using minutes on the pitch, but BWP has actually made the most first team appearances and scored the least goals.
His stats look much better if those goals were allowed (as would our points total) but even then are they good enough for a supposedly 'natural goalscorer'?