[cite]Posted By: E=mc2[/cite]I believe most of your mothers could tell you what pants he wears, if they have been there, they will probably tell you he don't wear any!
Check U out wiv da mum-cussing - U is 1 bwad boi, init bruv.
[quote][cite]Posted By: nolly[/cite]is it really worth a ban??[/quote]
That would no doubt be shallow. That is my honest opinion if that is worth a ban with so many rude comments directed by most then go for it. Is this a Peacock thing!!!
Blimey, massive over-reaction.
He post states:
Peacock is a legend but probably not what the club needs going forward.
We could be ten points adirft if we lose many more games.
The board need to appoint a new manager soon.
Micheal Slater has lied before.
Now maybe I'm missing something but this is hardly Mein Kampf.
how about the personal insults? Bringing mothers into this is a bad idea. My mother, I'll have you know, is a saint and wouldn't dream of lookng at Slater's undergarments!
[cite]Posted By: nolly[/cite]fair point offy and i think your childlike comic profile pictures would have you teetering on the edge touch creepy that...
If I knew what you meant I would probably agree - or disagree. One of the two.
[cite]Posted By: sam3110[/cite]how about the personal insults? Bringing mothers into this is a bad idea. My mother, I'll have you know, is a saint and wouldn't dream of lookng at Slater's undergarments!
What has Slaters Pant got to do with me bar me calling him pants? Ask him, maybe like a few of you he bats for the other side!
[cite]Posted By: sam3110[/cite]how about the personal insults? Bringing mothers into this is a bad idea. My mother, I'll have you know, is a saint and wouldn't dream of lookng at Slater's undergarments!
What has Slaters Pant got to do with me bar me calling him pants? Ask him, maybe like a few of you he bats for the other side!
How about you stop with the personal insults? And maybe proper grammar and proof-reading is a thing of the past, but personally I find a lack of punctuation incredibly annoying....
[cite]Posted By: E=mc2[/cite]
maybe like a few of you he bats for the other side!
[cite]Posted By: E=mc2[/cite]believe most of your mothers could tell you what pants he wears, if they have been there, they will probably tell you he don't wear any!
!
You won't get banned for talking rubbish, but you are likely to if you continue to make yourself look silly.
[cite]Posted By: E=mc2[/cite]It does seem if anyone on here posts more than a paragraph whole hell is let loose?
Only if more than one paragraph makes no sense, or is complete garbage.
I find it impossible to contain my posts to one paragraph.
Even really short ones.
So tell use with your extensive knowledge what the truth is.
1, Do you really believe Peacock can get the results until someone is found?
2, Michael Slater interview after the takeover did he not say, he will see Parkinson and ask him what he NEEDS.
3, Was that the case The Truth, or instead did he not give Parkinson his marching orders!
[cite]Posted By: E=mc2[/cite]It does seem if anyone on here posts more than a paragraph whole hell is let loose?
Only if more than one paragraph makes no sense, or is complete garbage.
I find it impossible to contain my posts to one paragraph.
Even really short ones.
So tell use with your extensive knowledge what the truth is.
1, Do you really believe Peacock can get the results until someone is found?
2, Michael Slater interview after the takeover did he not say, he will see Parkinson and ask him what he NEEDS.
3, Was that the case The Truth, or instead did he not give Parkinson his marching orders!
You certainly know how to take the bait, i'll give you that much. Regarding slater's underwear, as mentioned before this is due to your heading "slater so far your pants" which should really say "Slater, so far you're pants". I know it's trivial, but it reads for a good double meaning, and without having a dig, i find it annoying when people struggle with their (not there) native language. So chill out, don't rise to them, keep YOUR pants on and spellcheck if you have to. :-)
Comments
Check U out wiv da mum-cussing - U is 1 bwad boi, init bruv.
You're right. If bad spelling and a "crazy" personality is all it takes then you should've walked years ago.
;o)
Nope - I'm going to resist this.
That would no doubt be shallow. That is my honest opinion if that is worth a ban with so many rude comments directed by most then go for it.
Is this a Peacock thing!!!
He post states:
Peacock is a legend but probably not what the club needs going forward.
We could be ten points adirft if we lose many more games.
The board need to appoint a new manager soon.
Micheal Slater has lied before.
Now maybe I'm missing something but this is hardly Mein Kampf.
Or is this still a Peacock Thing!!!
If I knew what you meant I would probably agree - or disagree. One of the two.
Only if more than one paragraph makes no sense, or is complete garbage.
I find it impossible to contain my posts to one paragraph.
Even really short ones.
Find me the organ grinder ,and a larger than life cardboard cut out of the Hoff could be winging it your way. ;-)
How about you stop with the personal insults? And maybe proper grammar and proof-reading is a thing of the past, but personally I find a lack of punctuation incredibly annoying....
You won't get banned for talking rubbish, but you are likely to if you continue to make yourself look silly.
So tell use with your extensive knowledge what the truth is.
1, Do you really believe Peacock can get the results until someone is found?
2, Michael Slater interview after the takeover did he not say, he will see Parkinson and ask him what he NEEDS.
3, Was that the case The Truth, or instead did he not give Parkinson his marching orders!
If nobody hears it or is able to hear it then technically has a noise been made at all? Deep man!
You can't handle the truth.
You certainly know how to take the bait, i'll give you that much. Regarding slater's underwear, as mentioned before this is due to your heading "slater so far your pants" which should really say "Slater, so far you're pants". I know it's trivial, but it reads for a good double meaning, and without having a dig, i find it annoying when people struggle with their (not there) native language. So chill out, don't rise to them, keep YOUR pants on and spellcheck if you have to. :-)
Yer <misspelling Sure, best ask the mrs after your night of passion she to may get a mouth full of your Dribble is what i meant.
I cant hear a fckg <misspelling thing !
Schluurrpp!