Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Naby Sarr.
Comments
-
Rananegra, which player would you have had marking the 6'6" 15 stone Smith?rananegra said:Big_Bad_World said:It's a doggy dog world out there and people will always look for escape goats.
Naby being a pacific example.
I'm on tender hooks to see how this one pans out.
Onto Naby - I didn't think Millwall away was the right game for him. Has he made a mistake? Yes. Does that mean we should over-react and get rid as some have been saying? No.0 -
Sensible post. People seem to have forgotten that he was runner up in last season's Player of the Year, no mean feat. His performances have dipped since last season's playoffs though, which to me shows he has a major problem with nerves. Do we have a sports psychologist, because perhaps he'd benefit from seeing one?Scoham said:
Millwall away isn’t a game I’d have played Sarr in. Clearly Leuth overrates him, but neither is he a complete liability who should never play for us again. He’s had good games this season and his passing out from the back has given us something our other CBs don’t have.Addickted2TheReds said:Sorry Leuth but people have been saying for weeks that he was looking like a disaster waiting to happen. All you had to offer was that he looked to get the ball moving from the back and nothing he had done lead to goals conceded.
After watching Saturday’s performance, were the majority right or were you?
He’ll play again and he’ll have good games as he had before. I’d leave him on the bench for now though and return to a back four.1 -
I don't understand what you mean by trolling? I thought that's when you're aggressive and rude towards someone online, and Leuth doesn't seem to be like that.Covered End said:
I would have thought you may have stopped the trolling bearing in mind the criticism you've had this week.Leuth said:Again, that is a really facile comment. He's played well until the last couple of games and shown he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brainfreeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard. There's so much to work with
But you obviously revel it.0 -
That isn't trolling is it? He might be wrong, but you're implying he's only saying it in order to wind everyone up. And even if he is, then that's different from trolling.Covered End said:
It's not your defence, it's more the actual wording of your defence.Leuth said:
Defending a player Bowyer himself has praised within the last few weeks is 'trolling' is it?Covered End said:
I would have thought you may have stopped the trolling bearing in mind the criticism you've had this week.Leuth said:Again, that is a really facile comment. He's played well until the last couple of games and shown he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brainfreeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard. There's so much to work with
But you obviously revel it.
The vast majority of us want him to do well and have been and will continue, to back him the length and breadth of the country.
But you say "he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brain freeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard."
That's just my opinion anyway.0 -
Is Sarr a bit like Carl Tyler? Awesome in the Championship but shit in the premier. Where Sarr ain’t great in Championship but great in league 10
-
But if you look at Player Marks he was going really pretty well until the last two games.
Wonder how his Senegal debut is going - is it tonight? Tomorrow?1 -
They played yesterday - don’t know if he was involved . They won 2 -0 so I doubt he playedLeuth said:But if you look at Player Marks he was going really pretty well until the last two games.
Wonder how his Senegal debut is going - is it tonight? Tomorrow?
.
Next game is on Sunday.1 -
He is saying it to wind every one up.JamesSeed said:
That isn't trolling is it? He might be wrong, but you're implying he's only saying it in order to wind everyone up. And even if he is, then that's different from trolling.Covered End said:
It's not your defence, it's more the actual wording of your defence.Leuth said:
Defending a player Bowyer himself has praised within the last few weeks is 'trolling' is it?Covered End said:
I would have thought you may have stopped the trolling bearing in mind the criticism you've had this week.Leuth said:Again, that is a really facile comment. He's played well until the last couple of games and shown he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brainfreeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard. There's so much to work with
But you obviously revel it.
The vast majority of us want him to do well and have been and will continue, to back him the length and breadth of the country.
But you say "he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brain freeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard."
That's just my opinion anyway.
He listed the next few players he will "defend" when he's had enough of defending Naby.
It's all a big game, his form of fun/entertainment.
Anyway, we need to move on it's all rather sad.3 -
Sarr was on the bench, but has immediately adopted the no.4 shirt.ricky_otto said:
They played yesterday - don’t know if he was involved . They won 2 -0 so I doubt he playedLeuth said:But if you look at Player Marks he was going really pretty well until the last two games.
Wonder how his Senegal debut is going - is it tonight? Tomorrow?.
Next game is on Sunday.0 -
Come on mate. You know better than that. Leuth has his view and he means it. The comment you refer to was him trying to make light of the fact that he has basically become Naby's PR company.Covered End said:
He is saying it to wind every one up.JamesSeed said:
That isn't trolling is it? He might be wrong, but you're implying he's only saying it in order to wind everyone up. And even if he is, then that's different from trolling.Covered End said:
It's not your defence, it's more the actual wording of your defence.Leuth said:
Defending a player Bowyer himself has praised within the last few weeks is 'trolling' is it?Covered End said:
I would have thought you may have stopped the trolling bearing in mind the criticism you've had this week.Leuth said:Again, that is a really facile comment. He's played well until the last couple of games and shown he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brainfreeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard. There's so much to work with
But you obviously revel it.
The vast majority of us want him to do well and have been and will continue, to back him the length and breadth of the country.
But you say "he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brain freeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard."
That's just my opinion anyway.
He listed the next few players he will "defend" when he's had enough of defending Naby.
It's all a big game, his form of fun/entertainment.
Anyway, we need to move on it's all rather sad.
Whilst I don't completely agree with him he does make some good points. Naby hasn't suddenly become a bad player, he has strengths that our other defenders don't have and some games will suit him more than others. The reaction on here to his performance on Saturday is way OTT.4 -
Sponsored links:
-
I will be defending Tomer Hemed though1
-
There you go.Leuth said:I will be defending Tomer Hemed though
Game plan already in place0 -
To be fair his (Hemed's) incredible goal-saving tackle vs Brentford is more or less the best thing a Charlton player has done all season!0
-
That's exactly what trolling is.JamesSeed said:
That isn't trolling is it? He might be wrong, but you're implying he's only saying it in order to wind everyone up. And even if he is, then that's different from trolling.Covered End said:
It's not your defence, it's more the actual wording of your defence.Leuth said:
Defending a player Bowyer himself has praised within the last few weeks is 'trolling' is it?Covered End said:
I would have thought you may have stopped the trolling bearing in mind the criticism you've had this week.Leuth said:Again, that is a really facile comment. He's played well until the last couple of games and shown he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brainfreeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard. There's so much to work with
But you obviously revel it.
The vast majority of us want him to do well and have been and will continue, to back him the length and breadth of the country.
But you say "he easily belongs at this level, and if he didn't have the odd brain freeze he'd be borderline Premiership standard."
That's just my opinion anyway.
Leuth is an expert at it.2 -
clive said:
Good work by Bowyer. Gives the player a way back after his two clangers that lead to goals, as the article states.
Lets hope Naby improves and cuts outs the errors.5 -
That quiet sound you can hear on the wind... thats the sound of Leuth quietly sobbing into his dinner
Jokes aside that would be disappointing - He's certainly good enough to be an option ar CBs at the very least
Question is... Where would he go to get similar terms to what he's on now - Maybe if he had carried on from last season in similar form then he'd have teams higher in the Championship chasing him, the fact he's rotated more makes me doubtful4 -
Is he on THAT much for a championship player? I would assume he is one of the best payed players at the club but if his wages would be the problem (not that Bowyer wants to keep him or not) it doesn't sound positive.0
-
We can do much much better.1
-
Sponsored links:
-
At his salary, I expect I'd agree.bolloxbolder said:We can do much much better.
Would love to know what our intended pay structure is, but where would you see that elsewhere?1 -
I reckon there is a potential top player in there. The question at this time is who will match his current contract though.6
-
At an estimated guess I would say the model is likely to be along the lines of - a few star players on 10-12k, first teamers 8-10k and fringe/squad players 6-8k. I could be wrong but would be surprised if that is miles out.Dazzler21 said:
At his salary, I expect I'd agree.bolloxbolder said:We can do much much better.
Would love to know what our intended pay structure is, but where would you see that elsewhere?2 -
On his salary we can do better, but the question is, is that salary available to another player? I suspect those wages will be split between a couple of squad players, but personally I'd keep Naby over Pearce right now4
-
I know I love a football manager stat, but I think it’s somewhat close. They have Naby as second highest earner on 7k p/w.Dazzler21 said:
At his salary, I expect I'd agree.bolloxbolder said:We can do much much better.
Would love to know what our intended pay structure is, but where would you see that elsewhere?Edit: think I quoted the wrong post there0 -
I think Rotherham's average wage last season was about 4k a week. And by far the lowest in the league.Covered_End_Lad said:
At an estimated guess I would say the model is likely to be along the lines of - a few star players on 10-12k, first teamers 8-10k and fringe/squad players 6-8k. I could be wrong but would be surprised if that is miles out.Dazzler21 said:
At his salary, I expect I'd agree.bolloxbolder said:We can do much much better.
Would love to know what our intended pay structure is, but where would you see that elsewhere?
Rumour has it ours is even lower, but I think it includes all professional players and we think we have more "young professionals" who are on much less than that.
If your basing that all a 23 odd man squad we would be "surviving" at best IMO.0 -
In that case I'm not sure I agree with BB afterall.DoctorCharlton said:
I know I love a football manager stat, but I think it’s somewhat close. They have Naby as second highest earner on 7k p/w.Dazzler21 said:
At his salary, I expect I'd agree.bolloxbolder said:We can do much much better.
Would love to know what our intended pay structure is, but where would you see that elsewhere?0 -
If we ask naby to take a pay cut on 7k then we ain’t that far evolved from the Roland days.5
-
Get rid and get two really reliable centre halves in , ie ones that make fewer mistakes and can play every gamestop_shouting said:If we ask naby to take a pay cut on 7k then we ain’t that far evolved from the Roland days.1 -
It's probably more to do with the fact he doesn't deserve to be top earner, and you can get better for the moneystop_shouting said:If we ask naby to take a pay cut on 7k then we ain’t that far evolved from the Roland days.2
