Lee Bowyer charged by FA
Comments
-
You seem to be outwardly projecting your insecurities on to me. There's professional help out there, should you so wish to seek it out.
1 -
Just a tip - if you find yourself in an Internet argument, just stop. It's effort that is going to be wasted. Literally no one on the planet benefits7
-
That's not what he said post match, live on SKY, when he was interviewed on the pitch by Mino, with Taylor and Powell standing next to himAddickFC81 said:Addickted said:
Can't remember his exact words on SKY- it was about the offside goal and wasn't exactly diplomatic. As soon as he said them I thought 'he'll be in trouble for that'.AddickFC81 said:Ok he may have swron at the ref on the pitch or in the tunnel. But what were wrong with his post match comments?"Referees have the hardest job in the world, I think," Bowyer said in his news conference.
"If he'd have given it, their manager would have said it wasn't a penalty. So, I don't know. It's one of those things.
"We didn't get the decision go our way today but big decisions start evening themselves out. A lot of times today 50/50 things we didn't get for whatever reason so it's disappointing, but if we keep working like that and playing like that, we'll be okay."
Not too much wrong with that I don't think.
0 -
Oi.jacob_CAFC said:Just a tip - if you find yourself in an Internet argument, just stop. It's effort that is going to be wasted. Literally no one on the planet benefits
I was enjoying their little exchanges 😌4 -
Me too, for some reason I kept thinking it reminded me of the riot at Kennilworth Road in 85blackpool72 said:
Oi.jacob_CAFC said:Just a tip - if you find yourself in an Internet argument, just stop. It's effort that is going to be wasted. Literally no one on the planet benefits
I was enjoying their little exchanges 😌0 -
I think it means he was busy having it off and missed the game, no?AddicksAddict said:
To the tune of Rod Stewarts' "Sailing"?Dazzler21 said:I was screwing. Bowyer was screwing. We are Bowyer. Bowyer is Charlton.
Seriously, I haven't a clue what this means.
0 -
No, as Dazzler was at the game.Major said:
I think it means he was busy having it off and missed the game, no?AddicksAddict said:
To the tune of Rod Stewarts' "Sailing"?Dazzler21 said:I was screwing. Bowyer was screwing. We are Bowyer. Bowyer is Charlton.
Seriously, I haven't a clue what this means.
I doubt there's many that know what Dazzler meant.
Very strange.2 -
I think we've got a case of crossed wires here. You're talking about the Fulham game, and I assume @AddickFC81 is talking about the Swansea game, which is the one he got done for. Maybe they've not got round to watching the Fulham post match coverage yet :-)Addickted said:
That's not what he said post match, live on SKY, when he was interviewed on the pitch by Mino, with Taylor and Powell standing next to himAddickFC81 said:Addickted said:
Can't remember his exact words on SKY- it was about the offside goal and wasn't exactly diplomatic. As soon as he said them I thought 'he'll be in trouble for that'.AddickFC81 said:Ok he may have swron at the ref on the pitch or in the tunnel. But what were wrong with his post match comments?"Referees have the hardest job in the world, I think," Bowyer said in his news conference.
"If he'd have given it, their manager would have said it wasn't a penalty. So, I don't know. It's one of those things.
"We didn't get the decision go our way today but big decisions start evening themselves out. A lot of times today 50/50 things we didn't get for whatever reason so it's disappointing, but if we keep working like that and playing like that, we'll be okay."
Not too much wrong with that I don't think.
0 -
In the meantime what has happened to the racist allegation?0
-
any news on the LB decison?0
-
Sponsored links:
-
He has requested a personal hearing.2
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Lee Bowyer's personal hearing over his FA charge - relating to the Swansea game - is happening today. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/cafc?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc^tfw">#cafc</a></p>— Richard Cawley (@RichCawleySLP) <a href="">October 14, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
1 -
Bowyer should face no charges.
The ref should be dropped to league one for being a prick.9 -
No news......is he still there arguing his case...? Or did he just tell them.to f** k off & walked out....3
-
Athletico Charlton said:I was surprised there was little upset on here about the ref missing 2-3 penalty calls. Not sutprised Bowyer was upset; so was I.
In relation to the above post. I just meant that we could see Bowyer was screwing at the penalty shouts as I was at the same time screwing.Dazzler21 said:I was screwing. Bowyer was screwing. We are Bowyer. Bowyer is Charlton.
I then insinuated that Bowyer and Charlton fans exist in a hive mind.0 -
What ?Dazzler21 said:Athletico Charlton said:I was surprised there was little upset on here about the ref missing 2-3 penalty calls. Not sutprised Bowyer was upset; so was I.
In relation to the above post. I just meant that we could see Bowyer was screwing at the penalty shouts as I was at the same time screwing.Dazzler21 said:I was screwing. Bowyer was screwing. We are Bowyer. Bowyer is Charlton.
I then insinuated that Bowyer and Charlton fans exist in a hive mind.2 -
The Swansea ref in the main was very poor but in regards to the Chuks penalty it pains me to say that the ref got that one right. Chuks did use a bit too much muscle to win the ball so that was a foul and Chuks was fouled in the area but the foul by Chuks happened first so the ref has to honour the first incident so I can see why he made that decision. But other than that ref just gave us no 50/50s for whatever reason and maybe another day we would have had a penalty for a fould on Chuks. But it is what it is.0
-
Never mind, just a weird way my brain sometimes works I guess.Covered End said:
What ?Dazzler21 said:Athletico Charlton said:I was surprised there was little upset on here about the ref missing 2-3 penalty calls. Not sutprised Bowyer was upset; so was I.
In relation to the above post. I just meant that we could see Bowyer was screwing at the penalty shouts as I was at the same time screwing.Dazzler21 said:I was screwing. Bowyer was screwing. We are Bowyer. Bowyer is Charlton.
I then insinuated that Bowyer and Charlton fans exist in a hive mind.1 -
3 games and a £4,000 fine is ridiculous1
-
Sponsored links:
-
So this has somehow been resolved before the Kiko Casilla racism probe?
Well done, FA, you monumental bunch of arseholes.6 -
Nicely time to protect "Livingston" that shit ref against peterborough. FA. Your refs and linesman are shit. It's a mans game FFS. Not only they are shit but too bloody sensitive.0
-
Bowyer himself in response has said: “I’m surprised and disappointed with the ban. I didn’t shout or swear in my discussion with the referee but it is what it is."
"The FA had charged Bowyer with improper conduct and/or questioning the integrity of a match official."
Okay, Bow ...... tell us, what did you actually say?
0 -
A 3 game touchline ban sounds like quite a big punishment. In practice it doesn't make that much difference as Jacko can do the touchline stuff just as well, as long as his legs haven't gone.Oggy Red said:
Bowyer himself in response has said: “I’m surprised and disappointed with the ban. I didn’t shout or swear in my discussion with the referee but it is what it is."
"The FA had charged Bowyer with improper conduct and/or questioning the integrity of a match official."
Okay, Bow ...... tell us, what did you actually say?
1 -
Take the long view.
Bowyer's reputation and bans mean that the FA won't offer him the England job in a few years time, by when he'll had got Charlton in the premier and Europe.2 -
But it won't be the same unless Jacko wears a Bowyer style jumperCallumcafc said:7 -
Oh well. It is what it is.1
-
Never understood the touch line ban as a form of punishment. It does absolutely nothing but give Bowyer a better view when watching the game0
-
Agreed, at least make it restricted view...ElliotCAFC said:Never understood the touch line ban as a form of punishment. It does absolutely nothing but give Bowyer a better view when watching the game
7
















