Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket - Summer of 2018

1313234363787

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    Suicidal second run, great fielding by Kohli, Root yet again misses the century
  • AllHailTheHen
    AllHailTheHen Posts: 3,063
    Kohli really is a prick
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816

    Kohli really is a prick

    Great player, but really hard to like
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    224-6 all suddenly going very wrong
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    9 down, 4 for Ashwin
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,734
    285-9 at close of play.

    Curran 24*
    Anderson 0*
  • Hartleypete
    Hartleypete Posts: 4,699
    Same old same old
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    Hard to judge the pitch after today, some strange/unlucky dismissals today.

    A lot of people at the game on my train home, I think Edgbaston gets a lot of people from London as it's fairly near and tickets are cheaper and easier to get than at Lord's.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,599
    edited August 2018

    Suicidal second run, great fielding by Kohli, Root yet again misses the century

    Never a 2nd run there. Could have been 300 for 4/5 at the close & looking at 380-400. Now we are 100 runs shy of where we should be.

    more numpties.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350
  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,956

    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350

    I'll be surprised if they don't get closer to 450.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,734
    Root run out changed the day. Him and Bairstow could've put on a monster partnership together.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811

    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350

    I'll be surprised if they don't get closer to 450.
    time will tell, our bowling side doesn't look the strongest but I hope 1/2 of them can surprise.
  • Riviera
    Riviera Posts: 8,167

    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350

    I'll be surprised if they don't get closer to 450.
    time will tell, our bowling side doesn't look the strongest but I hope 1/2 of them can surprise.
    Our bowling is heading for a low not seen for many years. I am seriously concerned about next years Ashes. Broad and Anderson have been brilliant of course but they will be too old this time next year and what I see behind worries me. Why are we playing Curren before Plunkett?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    Riviera said:

    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350

    I'll be surprised if they don't get closer to 450.
    time will tell, our bowling side doesn't look the strongest but I hope 1/2 of them can surprise.
    Our bowling is heading for a low not seen for many years. I am seriously concerned about next years Ashes. Broad and Anderson have been brilliant of course but they will be too old this time next year and what I see behind worries me. Why are we playing Curren before Plunkett?
    I think Plunkett these days is more of a while ball bowler. He's getting on a bit too.

    I wonder when Jamie Overten will be considered, seeing that he is back playing now?
  • Riviera
    Riviera Posts: 8,167
    edited August 2018

    Riviera said:

    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350

    I'll be surprised if they don't get closer to 450.
    time will tell, our bowling side doesn't look the strongest but I hope 1/2 of them can surprise.
    Our bowling is heading for a low not seen for many years. I am seriously concerned about next years Ashes. Broad and Anderson have been brilliant of course but they will be too old this time next year and what I see behind worries me. Why are we playing Curren before Plunkett?
    I think Plunkett these days is more of a while ball bowler. He's getting on a bit too.

    I wonder when Jamie Overten will be considered, seeing that he is back playing now?
    Please mate don't give me that Red/White ball shit! It's cricket. Plunkett is 33, Anderson is 36. He bowls FAST. We do not have a fast bowler faster or more aggressive than him. He should have gone to Australia last winter.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    Riviera said:

    Riviera said:

    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350

    I'll be surprised if they don't get closer to 450.
    time will tell, our bowling side doesn't look the strongest but I hope 1/2 of them can surprise.
    Our bowling is heading for a low not seen for many years. I am seriously concerned about next years Ashes. Broad and Anderson have been brilliant of course but they will be too old this time next year and what I see behind worries me. Why are we playing Curren before Plunkett?
    I think Plunkett these days is more of a while ball bowler. He's getting on a bit too.

    I wonder when Jamie Overten will be considered, seeing that he is back playing now?
    Please mate don't give me that Red/White ball shit! It's cricket. Plunkett is 33, Anderson is 36. He bowls FAST. We do not have a fast bowler faster or more aggressive than him. He should have gone to Australia last winter.
    There is a lot of difference now between red and white ball bowling though

    In Test matches, you want a consistent line and length, whereas in white ball bowling it's all about variations, as if you bowl it on a length you get smacked. White ball bowlers rely on variety, changes of pace etc
  • Riviera
    Riviera Posts: 8,167
    edited August 2018

    Riviera said:

    Riviera said:

    Don't think 300 is the worst score in the world, but will be surprised if India don't score at least 350

    I'll be surprised if they don't get closer to 450.
    time will tell, our bowling side doesn't look the strongest but I hope 1/2 of them can surprise.
    Our bowling is heading for a low not seen for many years. I am seriously concerned about next years Ashes. Broad and Anderson have been brilliant of course but they will be too old this time next year and what I see behind worries me. Why are we playing Curren before Plunkett?
    I think Plunkett these days is more of a while ball bowler. He's getting on a bit too.

    I wonder when Jamie Overten will be considered, seeing that he is back playing now?
    Please mate don't give me that Red/White ball shit! It's cricket. Plunkett is 33, Anderson is 36. He bowls FAST. We do not have a fast bowler faster or more aggressive than him. He should have gone to Australia last winter.
    There is a lot of difference now between red and white ball bowling though

    In Test matches, you want a consistent line and length, whereas in white ball bowling it's all about variations, as if you bowl it on a length you get smacked. White ball bowlers rely on variety, changes of pace etc
    Of course there is a difference!!! They are two totally different games. BUT THE PLAYERS CAN PLAY ALL TYPES OF CRICKET!!!!! Especially bowlers. Plunkett is a better fast bowler than anyone around save Anderson and Broad and HE SHOULD BE PLAYING TEST CRICKET FOR ENGLAND!
    There are plenty of batsmen around that don't have the technique, ability or aptitude for Test cricket and have been for years - Neil Fairbrother and Michael Bevan are two that spring to mind. There are international T20 players who have never played a 1st Class game, that's fine, but plenty can play all formats and Plunkett is one of them, just ask him! It's the idiots in charge of our Test team that don't understand. Thankfully Ed Smith has questioned their ideas and hopefully he will continue.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    All out for 287

    Curran the man out
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,599
    edited August 2018
    215-3 to 287 all out. Not good. Its alright having swashbuckling batsmen like Stokes & Butler coming in when you are 380 odd but not if you need to steady the ship.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,308
    England have fucked this by having worse players than India
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,956
    Yesss

    50-1
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    2 down, 2 for Curran!
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,308
    Cue the Surrey wankfest ;)
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    Curran is on fire, now a 3rd!
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,308
    India have fucked this with arrogant batting
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,308
    Leuth said:

    Curran selected ahead of Porter. I think the Indians will maul him tbh.

    Nobody's fucked this more than me though
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,818

    Curran is on fire, now a 3rd!

    Wicket taking is always a good trait to have.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,308
    Rashid gets an over, over contains three full tosses. Leuth-esque

    I fully expect the Indians to maul him after lunch ;)
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,816
    I see Surrey have signed Plunkett for next season. A replacement for Curran when he gets his dream move to Kent.