Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

MATCH THREAD: Cambridge v Charlton Ath: BSMTrophy: Tues 17th Sept 2024: KO 19.10 +post-match p20

11920212325

Comments

  • Don't want to get too carried away as it's 1) a cup game and 2) "only" Cambridge but it does look like we've fixed the perennial issue of "decent 11, terrible squad" that's plagued us for a few seasons where one or two bad injuries absolutely guts the squad.

    I don't think that any of the players last night have forced themselves into the 1st 11 but if we did have injuries we look like having depth across the squad in terms of both energy and ability which will be vital to Jones' system 
  • Karoy with two silly fouls. 
  • Jones a fan of BSM Trophy, "This is a really good trophy, I like this trophy. We’ve come away, our first game in this one, and we’ve won the game.”
  • thenewbie said:
    Don't want to get too carried away as it's 1) a cup game and 2) "only" Cambridge but it does look like we've fixed the perennial issue of "decent 11, terrible squad" that's plagued us for a few seasons where one or two bad injuries absolutely guts the squad.

    I don't think that any of the players last night have forced themselves into the 1st 11 but if we did have injuries we look like having depth across the squad in terms of both energy and ability which will be vital to Jones' system 
    I think you are right but it also gives options off the bench, Taylor could be a very good option with that dead ball delivery and Edun perhaps to replace a tiring Luke Berry in a game and still give us an attacking threat is not beyond a possibility.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Could Coventry and Taylor work as a double-pivot in a 3-4-3 formation? 
  • The only reason we've not seen Taylor is because it appears that he plays in the exact position that Coventry does. 
  • Hoping that Zach Mitchell is OK.
    I believe the reason Nathan Jones is so perky after that, is because if he has to drop anybody he can say to the player that he has other options justified in playing, because the talent and ability clearly doesn’t only rest with the current first eleven.

  • edited September 18
    mendonca said:
    The only reason we've not seen Taylor is because it appears that he plays in the exact position that Coventry does. 
    Indeed, his free kicks and corners are better but he is not as imposing or front foot  as Coventry. Doubt there is room for both in the same 11.
  • And kudos to NJ for getting this team up for a game which most people wrote off. With the exception of Campbell they all looked really up for it, and it was an enjoyable front foot game, unlike our league matches.
  • People are being very harsh on Anderson here. He didn't have a good game yesterday. He's often careless on the ball and I get the impression last night he was a player who had lost his place and was trying to make up for it by showing off the attributes that saw him be a key part of Jones' team last season and start the first game of this season. He's aggressive, quick into a tackle and has the energy to keep up a strong press for the whole game. Last night he was extra that and it worked against him because it tipped over into some silly challenges. He tends to panic in possession trying to play the ball too quickly. Sometimes that works, he pulls off a nice pass round the corner and gets things moving on quickly, but more often he gives the ball away which can be frustrating. His involvement in the second goal against Bolton, pouncing on the loose ball after Coventry tackled their player and shifting it quickly on to Chuks set that opportunity up but moments like that are too rare. To be fair to him though I'd currently say the same about Docherty and Berry. We're really careless on the ball throughout the team and it feels like there's an inability so far to work through the ideals of being constantly on the move aggressively pressing the opposition's space whenever we're off the ball and then being 'relaxed' on it. Hopefully that will come with a bit more time and I wouldn't write off Anderson the same. He's got the attributes to be a very significant part of this team if he can settle on the ball a bit more, and given that he's only 19 there's plenty of time for him.
    I think a league 2 loan would be the right strategy for him
  • Anderson is probably having a bit of second season syndrome. He had a breakthrough season but now he's back to being "just" a squad player and he's trying maybe a little bit too hard, as well as having to adapt to Jones' system/methods.

    He's still very young and inexperienced, I think he can and will be a good player in time but it's a good thing overall that he's not a regular starter right now.
  • Stoke conceding in the 91st minute cost me £450! Otherwise a good evening!
  • edited September 18
    Southbank said:
    And kudos to NJ for getting this team up for a game which most people wrote off. With the exception of Campbell they all looked really up for it, and it was an enjoyable front foot game, unlike our league matches.
    I suspect there was more of a case of the penny dropping for the players. The first half was a tough watch. The goals helped me stick it out until half time. I was tempted to not put the game on for the second half but did anyway. TBF, with wholesale changes in the first half we were never going to look like a team that was used to playing along side each other so credit to the players getting through that 45 minutes and finishing ahead. Second half we looked like a team and all the players seemed to be making a good case for a place on Saturdays team sheet. Nathan said in his interview that he likes this Trophy. So he should, using the games like he did last night is what is going win us promotion. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • People are being very harsh on Anderson here. He didn't have a good game yesterday. He's often careless on the ball and I get the impression last night he was a player who had lost his place and was trying to make up for it by showing off the attributes that saw him be a key part of Jones' team last season and start the first game of this season. He's aggressive, quick into a tackle and has the energy to keep up a strong press for the whole game. Last night he was extra that and it worked against him because it tipped over into some silly challenges. He tends to panic in possession trying to play the ball too quickly. Sometimes that works, he pulls off a nice pass round the corner and gets things moving on quickly, but more often he gives the ball away which can be frustrating. His involvement in the second goal against Bolton, pouncing on the loose ball after Coventry tackled their player and shifting it quickly on to Chuks set that opportunity up but moments like that are too rare. To be fair to him though I'd currently say the same about Docherty and Berry. We're really careless on the ball throughout the team and it feels like there's an inability so far to work through the ideals of being constantly on the move aggressively pressing the opposition's space whenever we're off the ball and then being 'relaxed' on it. Hopefully that will come with a bit more time and I wouldn't write off Anderson the same. He's got the attributes to be a very significant part of this team if he can settle on the ball a bit more, and given that he's only 19 there's plenty of time for him.
    I think a league 2 loan would be the right strategy for him
    I don't think it would. He's a player who is part of our first team squad. Depending on what player needs a break it's between him and ACampbell to come in if we get an injury or need to rotate. Sending him down a division to play a different style of football to the one Jones is trying to hammer into the players will teach him nothing. He's exactly where he needs to be; training with the first team, getting coached in his deficiencies and getting enough football to make sure he's developing on the pitch. There's no value to us in a loan
  • Haven't read any comments, so forgive me if this has been discussed.  I know it's one match but any chance that Taylor has played his way into contention?
  • wmcf123 said:
    Haven't read any comments, so forgive me if this has been discussed.  I know it's one match but any chance that Taylor has played his way into contention?
    I think he played well but his issue is a lack of versatility. He's great in the holding role that Coventry plays but wouldn't be as good in the 8 role that Berry and Doc play. A Campbell can probably play both so is more likely to get that space on the bench
  • Southbank said:
    mendonca said:
    The only reason we've not seen Taylor is because it appears that he plays in the exact position that Coventry does. 
    Indeed, his free kicks and corners are better but he is not as imposing or front foot  as Coventry. Doubt there is room for both in the same 11.
    Might be controversial, but I'd be looking at dropping either Docherty or Berry for Taylor, probably Berry. Neither of those two have looked creative enough imo, and where we lack the creativity, Taylors dead balls could really help us in tight games. 

    I think he's earned a start in the league, at the very least a place on the bench. 

    Very glad we didn't sell him as I think he could genuinely sneak his way into the starting XI and find himself remaining there. 

    Might be jumping the gun a bit, but that's just my gut instinct about him. 
    Berry for me. No major with him as such but if he Taylor was given a chance initially, I would'nt grumble! 
  • edited September 18
    I'm not sure Taylor can play CM in our system. He did alright yesterday but it's a very different role. 

    Remember all the talk about Dobson & Coventry getting in each other's way last season. Taylor & Coventry is unlikely to be an improvement. Anyway it's all moot because it's highly unlikely that we'll see it.

    There also must be a reason that Jones was happy to let him go.
  • I know we should always be looking to improve but nothing says recency bias to me more than people looking to shoe horn either Taylor or Coventry into a position they don’t play based of one good performance from Taylor against arguably the worst team in our league.

    I thought Taylor did very well last night, but ultimately he is Coventry’s competition and you are not going to drop Coventry on current form. 

    The current set up and way we are playing currently has us second in the league. If Taylor or Coventry could play the roles Docherty or Berry are playing then I think we would have seen that already. 
  • edited September 18
    Basically we're looking at Coventry vs Taylor - Docherty vs Campbell - Berry vs Anderson as the main midfield match ups, with Edun as the versatile option.

    Although  its not as "simple" as that

    I still liked the look of the mobility of Kanu and Godden up top, especially as Kanu is probably our best Striker for putting in the leg work if nothing else... Id like to see them together in more away games, as teams haven't been sitting back against us on the road, and we saw vs Shrewsbury there was space to exploit.

    But then it probably helped last night, that we did pass the ball through Cambridge more than what we've seen this season, if we resort to type on Saturday with long balls to Kanu and Godden, its not going to stick. 

    Kanu's ability to hold the ball up is drastically underrated too - The boy has definitely bulked up since this time last year 
  • I don’t really see Taylor and Coventry playing together in the team, they compete with each other.
  • Southbank said:
    mendonca said:
    The only reason we've not seen Taylor is because it appears that he plays in the exact position that Coventry does. 
    Indeed, his free kicks and corners are better but he is not as imposing or front foot  as Coventry. Doubt there is room for both in the same 11.
    I must have been watching a different game to everyone else. Second half Taylor started to play his corners along the ground to our player on the near post. Whether the idea is to then play it back to Taylor for a cross back into the box we'll never know as it never got back to Taylor.

    Why cant we just stick the ball into the box for a player to thump in a header ala Arsenal against Spurs on Sunday. Haven't seen that in years. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!