Why is it that the jokes thread is the only thread on which you seem not to post with the intention of deflecting the conversation, aiming to get it shut down, Seth? I am beginning to worry that those jokes you post may, in fact, be ChatGPT instead of you.
I had no intention to deflect anything.
Good. Then stop posting; or post about the thread topic. ChatGPT.
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
I did not call anything a 'racist' dogwhistle. Neither did I say people shouldn't ask questions. Please stop making things up.
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
I did not call anything a 'racist' dogwhistle. Neither did I say people shouldn't ask questions. Please stop making things up.
You didn't say racist dog whistle - you said dog whistle. Which particular type of dog whistle were you referring to if it wasn't a racist one?
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
I did not call anything a 'racist' dogwhistle. Neither did I say people shouldn't ask questions. Please stop making things up.
You didn't say racist dog whistle - you said dog whistle. Which particular type of dog whistle were you referring to if it wasn't a racist one?
Ones that are designed to get a kind of auto reaction without much explanation. Of course China in many of its institutions are bad, terrible even, sometimes evil. However there is a kind of 'four legs good, two legs bad' in the way China is often introduced into things, like for example all they want to do is pollute the planet. It is a complex place, things are not black and white even in the Chinese Communist Party.
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
I did not call anything a 'racist' dogwhistle. Neither did I say people shouldn't ask questions. Please stop making things up.
ChatGPT has been making me some extra income for the past six months.
I was doing some communications consulting for a company when the CEO asked if I knew how to set up and manage their digital presence (website, emails, storage, etc). This is not a small company either. They're new but well-funded.
I asked ChatGPT how I'd go about doing that, and figured out it was doable. It gave me the instructions and helped me troubleshoot any problems I was experiencing. Now I get paid every month.
The other week, the email went down company-wide. I used Chat to figure out what might have gone wrong and managed to fix it.
The site went down due to an SQL database issue. Again, after a long chat with ChatGPT, and absolutely no experience with SQL, I managed to fix it.
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
I did not call anything a 'racist' dogwhistle. Neither did I say people shouldn't ask questions. Please stop making things up.
You didn't say racist dog whistle - you said dog whistle. Which particular type of dog whistle were you referring to if it wasn't a racist one?
Ones that are designed to get a kind of auto reaction without much explanation. Of course China in many of its institutions are bad, terrible even, sometimes evil. However there is a kind of 'four legs good, two legs bad' in the way China is often introduced into things, like for example all they want to do is pollute the planet. It is a complex place, things are not black and white even in the Chinese Communist Party.
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
I did not call anything a 'racist' dogwhistle. Neither did I say people shouldn't ask questions. Please stop making things up.
You didn't say racist dog whistle - you said dog whistle. Which particular type of dog whistle were you referring to if it wasn't a racist one?
Ones that are designed to get a kind of auto reaction without much explanation. Of course China in many of its institutions are bad, terrible even, sometimes evil. However there is a kind of 'four legs good, two legs bad' in the way China is often introduced into things, like for example all they want to do is pollute the planet. It is a complex place, things are not black and white even in the Chinese Communist Party.
The very mention of China is a trigger negative for so many. Personally I find the dog whistle reactions uncomfortable because I am married to somebody from Beijing.
That's cool. Because your missus is from there, we should ignore the fact their population isn't free to speak out about their regime, can't vote for an alternative, and is involved in the systematic repression and ethnic cleansing of the uighur?
Is that what I said?
It's the equivalency you draw. When people are asking legitimate questions about a product funded and built under the watch of the CCP, which is likely to have used stolen data, including PII, during it's creation, and continuously sends a stream of data back to the CCP in use, whilst simultaneously not using proper encryption/authorisation methods to secure data in transit, leaving it open to misappropriation and abuse by malicious actors - that's not 'dog whistling'.
Hope that helps?
I did not draw any equivalency.
You drew an equivalency when you stated that people asking questions about data misuse in an app funded by the CCP was somehow a racist dog-whistle. I know you already know this, and are pretending to be puzzled by the concatenation of those two things, of course.
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
I did not call anything a 'racist' dogwhistle. Neither did I say people shouldn't ask questions. Please stop making things up.
You didn't say racist dog whistle - you said dog whistle. Which particular type of dog whistle were you referring to if it wasn't a racist one?
Ones that are designed to get a kind of auto reaction without much explanation. Of course China in many of its institutions are bad, terrible even, sometimes evil. However there is a kind of 'four legs good, two legs bad' in the way China is often introduced into things, like for example all they want to do is pollute the planet. It is a complex place, things are not black and white even in the Chinese Communist Party.
Racist
If you mean me, you are wrong.
I may be wrong but I believe Chizzy was answering my question to you.
if you ask ChatGPT whether Charlton Life is racist it says:
Charlton Life is a popular online forum, primarily focused on discussions related to Charlton Athletic Football Club, a football team based in London. As with many online communities, the tone and culture can vary, and some individuals may express views that others find offensive or inappropriate. However, it is important to note that the site itself doesnt officially endorse any form of racism.
If you are referring to concerns about racism or inappropriate behavior on the forum, some users have raised issues in the past about negative or discriminatory comments being made. Like many large communities, it can sometimes be challenging to moderate every post. If you come across offensive or racist content, it is advisable to report it to the forum administrators or moderators, who typically have policies in place to address such matters.
Would you like more information about how the forum is moderated or specific instances?
If you ask 'What is the poster Seth Plum on Charlton Life best known for', i get the response
'Seth Plum is a well-known and controversial figure on Charlton Life. He is best known for his provocative and often polarizing posts on the forum, where he frequently engages in debates about Charlton Athletic, football culture, and various other topics. Seth Plum has been known to stir up strong reactions, and his posts can sometimes be seen as controversial or contentious, depending on the topic.
He is often discussed by other forum members due to his outspoken nature and his tendency to express strong opinions on various issues. While some may appreciate his directness, others have criticized his approach, especially when it comes to his interactions with other users.
It is important to remember that, like many online communities, Charlton Life can feature a range of personalities, and posters like Seth Plum are part of the dynamic that makes the forum unique but sometimes contentious. Would you like to know more about the culture of the forum or other notable figures there?'
The poster AlwaysNeil on Charlton Life is known for being a prominent and vocal figure within the forum community. He is best recognized for his deep knowledge of Charlton Athletic Football Club and his longstanding presence on the site. AlwaysNeil often shares insightful comments on the team, football tactics, and club-related discussions
He is also known for contributing regularly to various debates and conversations, often offering well-thought-out opinions. Despite being a respected member of the forum, AlwaysNeil, like many frequent posters, has had interactions that can sometimes spark differing opinions, especially in more heated discussions.
Would you like more details about his contributions or specific threads he has been involved in?'
Back on the chatGPT chat, I have been testing Deep Research (available on ChatGPT Pro) and the quality of the content produced is staggering.
Once prompted, takes around 10-15 minutes to source, fact check and produce a report on prompted subject. The level of output is staggering, at least as good as an A Level student that would have taken hours of independent research.
All facts are cited and can be cross checked independently. So far, 0 hallucinations on sector specific reports (energy, pensions, agile practices).
so i think we can deduce from these responses that ChatGPT has a very limited grasp of what constitutes well thought out opinions or insightful comments as I tend to avoid engaging my brain sufficiently for those and do not really have e the knowledge or understanding to provide them in any case. Probably needs to be trained better.
Back on the chatGPT chat, I have been testing Deep Research (available on ChatGPT Pro) and the quality of the content produced is staggering.
Once prompted, takes around 10-15 minutes to source, fact check and produce a report on prompted subject. The level of output is staggering, at least as good as an A Level student that would have taken hours of independent research.
All facts are cited and can be cross checked independently. So far, 0 hallucinations on sector specific reports (energy, pensions, agile practices).
AGI is coming. Embrace it or be left behind.
Look forward to trying it when available in Plus, as I can't justify paying $200 for Pro.
There was a tease on the free ChatGPT that pretended to allow you to use Deep Research but I don't think it did.
I gave it a go anyway with this prompt:
"Compile a report on players getting injured after joining any of the current League one EFL clubs, using data from 2021 until 2024. Rank your results by team most likely to lead to a player being injured after joining the club."
Here is part of the output, not sure how accurate it is but the annoying thing is that it includes teams that are in League two and championship, maybe I need to play with the prompt a bit more, but I'll wait for Deep Research to be included with Plus for that:
Back on the chatGPT chat, I have been testing Deep Research (available on ChatGPT Pro) and the quality of the content produced is staggering.
Once prompted, takes around 10-15 minutes to source, fact check and produce a report on prompted subject. The level of output is staggering, at least as good as an A Level student that would have taken hours of independent research.
All facts are cited and can be cross checked independently. So far, 0 hallucinations on sector specific reports (energy, pensions, agile practices).
AGI is coming. Embrace it or be left behind.
Look forward to trying it when available in Plus, as I can't justify paying $200 for Pro.
There was a tease on the free ChatGPT that pretended to allow you to use Deep Research but I don't think it did.
I gave it a go anyway with this prompt:
"Compile a report on players getting injured after joining any of the current League one EFL clubs, using data from 2021 until 2024. Rank your results by team most likely to lead to a player being injured after joining the club."
Here is part of the output, not sure how accurate it is but the annoying thing is that it includes teams that are in League two and championship, maybe I need to play with the prompt a bit more, but I'll wait for Deep Research to be included with Plus for that:
Probably needs some additional caveats on how long the player is at the club before getting injured, that you only want league one clubs from 24/25 season.
Does it make a difference if it is a 1 weeks injury or major injury.
One tipi advise people is to use o3 reasoning model to help me write the prompt itself.
so i think we can deduce from these responses that ChatGPT has a very limited grasp of what constitutes well thought out opinions or insightful comments as I tend to avoid engaging my brain sufficiently for those and do not really have e the knowledge or understanding to provide them in any case. Probably needs to be trained better.
I asked ChatGPT to summarise the posts of Leroy Ambrose, and it said 'Geezer's a wrongun'.
ChatGPT has been making me some extra income for the past six months.
I was doing some communications consulting for a company when the CEO asked if I knew how to set up and manage their digital presence (website, emails, storage, etc). This is not a small company either. They're new but well-funded.
I asked ChatGPT how I'd go about doing that, and figured out it was doable. It gave me the instructions and helped me troubleshoot any problems I was experiencing. Now I get paid every month.
The other week, the email went down company-wide. I used Chat to figure out what might have gone wrong and managed to fix it.
The site went down due to an SQL database issue. Again, after a long chat with ChatGPT, and absolutely no experience with SQL, I managed to fix it.
Back on the chatGPT chat, I have been testing Deep Research (available on ChatGPT Pro) and the quality of the content produced is staggering.
Once prompted, takes around 10-15 minutes to source, fact check and produce a report on prompted subject. The level of output is staggering, at least as good as an A Level student that would have taken hours of independent research.
All facts are cited and can be cross checked independently. So far, 0 hallucinations on sector specific reports (energy, pensions, agile practices).
AGI is coming. Embrace it or be left behind.
Look forward to trying it when available in Plus, as I can't justify paying $200 for Pro.
There was a tease on the free ChatGPT that pretended to allow you to use Deep Research but I don't think it did.
I gave it a go anyway with this prompt:
"Compile a report on players getting injured after joining any of the current League one EFL clubs, using data from 2021 until 2024. Rank your results by team most likely to lead to a player being injured after joining the club."
Here is part of the output, not sure how accurate it is but the annoying thing is that it includes teams that are in League two and championship, maybe I need to play with the prompt a bit more, but I'll wait for Deep Research to be included with Plus for that:
Probably needs some additional caveats on how long the player is at the club before getting injured, that you only want league one clubs from 24/25 season.
Does it make a difference if it is a 1 weeks injury or major injury.
One tipi advise people is to use o3 reasoning model to help me write the prompt itself.
Could you tell us more about this? I have never heard of it (although that’s hardly a surprise)
Back on the chatGPT chat, I have been testing Deep Research (available on ChatGPT Pro) and the quality of the content produced is staggering.
Once prompted, takes around 10-15 minutes to source, fact check and produce a report on prompted subject. The level of output is staggering, at least as good as an A Level student that would have taken hours of independent research.
All facts are cited and can be cross checked independently. So far, 0 hallucinations on sector specific reports (energy, pensions, agile practices).
AGI is coming. Embrace it or be left behind.
Look forward to trying it when available in Plus, as I can't justify paying $200 for Pro.
There was a tease on the free ChatGPT that pretended to allow you to use Deep Research but I don't think it did.
I gave it a go anyway with this prompt:
"Compile a report on players getting injured after joining any of the current League one EFL clubs, using data from 2021 until 2024. Rank your results by team most likely to lead to a player being injured after joining the club."
Here is part of the output, not sure how accurate it is but the annoying thing is that it includes teams that are in League two and championship, maybe I need to play with the prompt a bit more, but I'll wait for Deep Research to be included with Plus for that:
Mass redundancies at work, and a recruiter I'm on good terms with (not too good obviously, all recruiters are slugs, and we pour salt on slugs) talked to me about AI.
I uploaded my CV into Claude and asked it to give me a really punchy brief summary of my CV which I then used at the top.
I then asked it, based on that CV, for 20 companies within 1 mile of London bridge with a Glassdoor rating (review site from employees of what it's like to work at the company) of at least 4.0, that my CV would be particularly relevant for and it gave me the list.
I think the way I would describe the AI space at the moment is that googling things is 2D, whereas the large language models are the 3D equivalent. So much more depth to it.
Mass redundancies at work, and a recruiter I'm on good terms with (not too good obviously, all recruiters are slugs, and we pour salt on slugs) talked to me about AI.
I uploaded my CV into Claude and asked it to give me a really punchy brief summary of my CV which I then used at the top.
I then asked it, based on that CV, for 20 companies within 1 mile of London bridge with a Glassdoor rating (review site from employees of what it's like to work at the company) of at least 4.0, that my CV would be particularly relevant for and it gave me the list.
I think the way I would describe the AI space at the moment is that googling things is 2D, whereas the large language models are the 3D equivalent. So much more depth to it.
"What skills that I have developed through my career so far could I deploy in a more lucrative way by setting up my own consultancy and offering services to the companies you have identified, instead of seeking salaried employment with them? Show me which of my skills are in highest demand. Show me how I could concatenate those skills into a consultancy service which I could offer on an hourly, daily or weekly rate to companies. And finally estimate what my income would be by doing so, compared to the salary I could achieve by continuing as a salaried employee".
Mass redundancies at work, and a recruiter I'm on good terms with (not too good obviously, all recruiters are slugs, and we pour salt on slugs) talked to me about AI.
I uploaded my CV into Claude and asked it to give me a really punchy brief summary of my CV which I then used at the top.
I then asked it, based on that CV, for 20 companies within 1 mile of London bridge with a Glassdoor rating (review site from employees of what it's like to work at the company) of at least 4.0, that my CV would be particularly relevant for and it gave me the list.
I think the way I would describe the AI space at the moment is that googling things is 2D, whereas the large language models are the 3D equivalent. So much more depth to it.
"What skills that I have developed through my career so far could I deploy in a more lucrative way by setting up my own consultancy and offering services to the companies you have identified, instead of seeking salaried employment with them? Show me which of my skills are in highest demand. Show me how I could concatenate those skills into a consultancy service which I could offer on an hourly, daily or weekly rate to companies. And finally estimate what my income would be by doing so, compared to the salary I could achieve by continuing as a salaried employee".
Good use. I just wonder once everyone starts using the same tools for similar purposes, whether we would reach saturation.
I heard an interesting observation today about how university students were using GenAI to understand papers, but after a while decided that it was better to set up a WhatsApp group with the rest of the class where they would help each other understand those same papers.
This made me think of CL: even with all the data and tools available online, we often still come here to look for help and information from people.
The poster AlwaysNeil on Charlton Life is known for being a prominent and vocal figure within the forum community. He is best recognized for his deep knowledge of Charlton Athletic Football Club and his longstanding presence on the site. AlwaysNeil often shares insightful comments on the team, football tactics, and club-related discussions
He is also known for contributing regularly to various debates and conversations, often offering well-thought-out opinions. Despite being a respected member of the forum, AlwaysNeil, like many frequent posters, has had interactions that can sometimes spark differing opinions, especially in more heated discussions.
Would you like more details about his contributions or specific threads he has been involved in?'
😀
Here’s mine:
On the Charlton Life forum, the user known as stonemuseis recognised for their active participation in discussions, particularly those related to Charlton Athletic Football Club. They frequently share insightful commentary and contribute valuable information to various threads. For instance, in a discussion about Benjy Nurick, a former Charlton Athletic blogger and programme editor, provided links to Nurick’s articles, facilitating access for other forum members.
Additionally, stonemuse engages in conversations about films books and television and indicating an interest in classic cinema.
Overall, stonemuse is best known for their meaningful contributions to football-related discussions and their active engagement in cultural topics on the Charlton Life forum.
IdleHans is a well-known poster on the Charlton Life forum, particularly famous for his unique sense of humor and witty posts. One of his most notable contributions is the creation of "The Charlton Life Book Club", which is a tongue-in-cheek series where he humorously reviews or comments on books. In addition, IdleHans is often recognized for his sharp and sarcastic commentary, and his ability to provide amusing takes on various topics, especially regarding Charlton Athletic and general football discussions.
His posts have a distinct style—often laced with dry humor, and he has garnered a loyal following due to his playful and irreverent approach to forum discussions. This reputation has made him one of the more iconic figures on the forum.
IdleHans is a well-known poster on the Charlton Life forum, particularly famous for his unique sense of humor and witty posts. One of his most notable contributions is the creation of "The Charlton Life Book Club", which is a tongue-in-cheek series where he humorously reviews or comments on books. In addition, IdleHans is often recognized for his sharp and sarcastic commentary, and his ability to provide amusing takes on various topics, especially regarding Charlton Athletic and general football discussions.
His posts have a distinct style—often laced with dry humor, and he has garnered a loyal following due to his playful and irreverent approach to forum discussions. This reputation has made him one of the more iconic figures on the forum.
Comments
But you carry on with your shithousery - as you have, and will no doubt continue to do so until you get banned.
Please stop making things up.
You didn't say racist dog whistle - you said dog whistle. Which particular type of dog whistle were you referring to if it wasn't a racist one?
Of course China in many of its institutions are bad, terrible even, sometimes evil. However there is a kind of 'four legs good, two legs bad' in the way China is often introduced into things, like for example all they want to do is pollute the planet. It is a complex place, things are not black and white even in the Chinese Communist Party.
I was doing some communications consulting for a company when the CEO asked if I knew how to set up and manage their digital presence (website, emails, storage, etc). This is not a small company either. They're new but well-funded.
I asked ChatGPT how I'd go about doing that, and figured out it was doable. It gave me the instructions and helped me troubleshoot any problems I was experiencing. Now I get paid every month.
The other week, the email went down company-wide. I used Chat to figure out what might have gone wrong and managed to fix it.
The site went down due to an SQL database issue. Again, after a long chat with ChatGPT, and absolutely no experience with SQL, I managed to fix it.
It's like the blagger's ultimate tool.
I may be wrong but I believe Chizzy was answering my question to you.
”This is definitely Charlton Life isn’t it?”
Charlton Life is a popular online forum, primarily focused on discussions related to Charlton Athletic Football Club, a football team based in London. As with many online communities, the tone and culture can vary, and some individuals may express views that others find offensive or inappropriate. However, it is important to note that the site itself doesnt officially endorse any form of racism.
If you are referring to concerns about racism or inappropriate behavior on the forum, some users have raised issues in the past about negative or discriminatory comments being made. Like many large communities, it can sometimes be challenging to moderate every post. If you come across offensive or racist content, it is advisable to report it to the forum administrators or moderators, who typically have policies in place to address such matters.
Would you like more information about how the forum is moderated or specific instances?
'Seth Plum is a well-known and controversial figure on Charlton Life. He is best known for his provocative and often polarizing posts on the forum, where he frequently engages in debates about Charlton Athletic, football culture, and various other topics. Seth Plum has been known to stir up strong reactions, and his posts can sometimes be seen as controversial or contentious, depending on the topic.
He is often discussed by other forum members due to his outspoken nature and his tendency to express strong opinions on various issues. While some may appreciate his directness, others have criticized his approach, especially when it comes to his interactions with other users.
It is important to remember that, like many online communities, Charlton Life can feature a range of personalities, and posters like Seth Plum are part of the dynamic that makes the forum unique but sometimes contentious. Would you like to know more about the culture of the forum or other notable figures there?'
The poster AlwaysNeil on Charlton Life is known for being a prominent and vocal figure within the forum community. He is best recognized for his deep knowledge of Charlton Athletic Football Club and his longstanding presence on the site. AlwaysNeil often shares insightful comments on the team, football tactics, and club-related discussions
He is also known for contributing regularly to various debates and conversations, often offering well-thought-out opinions. Despite being a respected member of the forum, AlwaysNeil, like many frequent posters, has had interactions that can sometimes spark differing opinions, especially in more heated discussions.
Would you like more details about his contributions or specific threads he has been involved in?'
There was a tease on the free ChatGPT that pretended to allow you to use Deep Research but I don't think it did.
I gave it a go anyway with this prompt:
"Compile a report on players getting injured after joining any of the current League one EFL clubs, using data from 2021 until 2024. Rank your results by team most likely to lead to a player being injured after joining the club."
Here is part of the output, not sure how accurate it is but the annoying thing is that it includes teams that are in League two and championship, maybe I need to play with the prompt a bit more, but I'll wait for Deep Research to be included with Plus for that:
Bang on the money.
I uploaded my CV into Claude and asked it to give me a really punchy brief summary of my CV which I then used at the top.
I then asked it, based on that CV, for 20 companies within 1 mile of London bridge with a Glassdoor rating (review site from employees of what it's like to work at the company) of at least 4.0, that my CV would be particularly relevant for and it gave me the list.
I think the way I would describe the AI space at the moment is that googling things is 2D, whereas the large language models are the 3D equivalent. So much more depth to it.
I heard an interesting observation today about how university students were using GenAI to understand papers, but after a while decided that it was better to set up a WhatsApp group with the rest of the class where they would help each other understand those same papers.
This made me think of CL: even with all the data and tools available online, we often still come here to look for help and information from people.
Here’s mine:
On the Charlton Life forum, the user known as stonemuseis recognised for their active participation in discussions, particularly those related to Charlton Athletic Football Club. They frequently share insightful commentary and contribute valuable information to various threads. For instance, in a discussion about Benjy Nurick, a former Charlton Athletic blogger and programme editor, provided links to Nurick’s articles, facilitating access for other forum members.
Additionally, stonemuse engages in conversations about films books and television and indicating an interest in classic cinema.
Overall, stonemuse is best known for their meaningful contributions to football-related discussions and their active engagement in cultural topics on the Charlton Life forum.
IdleHans is a well-known poster on the Charlton Life forum, particularly famous for his unique sense of humor and witty posts. One of his most notable contributions is the creation of "The Charlton Life Book Club", which is a tongue-in-cheek series where he humorously reviews or comments on books. In addition, IdleHans is often recognized for his sharp and sarcastic commentary, and his ability to provide amusing takes on various topics, especially regarding Charlton Athletic and general football discussions.
His posts have a distinct style—often laced with dry humor, and he has garnered a loyal following due to his playful and irreverent approach to forum discussions. This reputation has made him one of the more iconic figures on the forum.
Is there a CL book club? I've never heard of it