Surely has to be a deal where he signs an extra year on a much improved salary hence benefitting him financially immediately, removing the risk to him of getting injured whilst winding his contract down (which must be on his mind) and giving us the chance to keep him to the summer and sell him for good money then whilst keeping it short he knows he realistically holds the cards.
Obvs would hope for a longer deal but the above seems realistic to me, maybe even a +1 year at the end in our favour but only if we are promoted to the Championship and with a further wage boost or something..
If previous behaviour is anything to go by, I can see the board looking to cash in on him in January if a new contract is not close to being signed.
Call me mental too, but I think he’s a better all round player than Stansfield, he’s a year younger than him too, and look how much Birmingham paid for him. Leaburn under a decent length contract is worth millions to us and just the same with how our chances of success on the pitch improves with Miles in the team.
Can I ask what previous behaviour?
I assume this is a reference to the board actively looking to sell CBT and Dobson when it became clear that neither were going to sign new deals with the club last year.
I think it is also a distinct possibility, like the sale of Karlan Grant... Compensation would only apply if he stayed in England, so if there's a cash offer in Jan it would be hard to turn down...
Compensation would still apply abroad I think (like Aribo in Scotland), it would just be less. We would then get solidarity payments if he moved on though
I had to google this because I was sure that Aribo went for basically nothing, but you are correct.
Looks like the amount would be somewhere in the region of 300k-400k Euros compensation. So from a purely financial perspective, at what point does it become better to take the money and lose him 4 months early? £750k-£1M? Maybe more if we're actually pushing for promotion?
I don't think it's worth it until you're in multiple millions which won't happen. It's far too hard to sell to the fans otherwise
As fans we'd likely always want to keep the player, but the club (and Jones) might feel differently if we can get a 1m and put it towards a couple of decent January signings.
IF, and it’s a big if, he won’t sign a new contract then it would be sensible to entertain offers in January and then decide if a decent enough offer comes in.
If previous behaviour is anything to go by, I can see the board looking to cash in on him in January if a new contract is not close to being signed.
Call me mental too, but I think he’s a better all round player than Stansfield, he’s a year younger than him too, and look how much Birmingham paid for him. Leaburn under a decent length contract is worth millions to us and just the same with how our chances of success on the pitch improves with Miles in the team.
Can I ask what previous behaviour?
I assume this is a reference to the board actively looking to sell CBT and Dobson when it became clear that neither were going to sign new deals with the club last year.
I think it is also a distinct possibility, like the sale of Karlan Grant... Compensation would only apply if he stayed in England, so if there's a cash offer in Jan it would be hard to turn down...
Compensation would still apply abroad I think (like Aribo in Scotland), it would just be less. We would then get solidarity payments if he moved on though
I had to google this because I was sure that Aribo went for basically nothing, but you are correct.
Looks like the amount would be somewhere in the region of 300k-400k Euros compensation. So from a purely financial perspective, at what point does it become better to take the money and lose him 4 months early? £750k-£1M? Maybe more if we're actually pushing for promotion?
I don't think it's worth it until you're in multiple millions which won't happen. It's far too hard to sell to the fans otherwise
As fans we'd likely always want to keep the player, but the club (and Jones) might feel differently if we can get a 1m and put it towards a couple of decent January signings.
I sort of don't disagree with you but the May and Dobson situations might loom large in decision makers minds. I think if we're even in with a sniff of promotion he will be here all season though
IF, and it’s a big if, he won’t sign a new contract then it would be sensible to entertain offers in January and then decide if a decent enough offer comes in.
What sort of offer in January do you think would be "sufficient"?
IF, and it’s a big if, he won’t sign a new contract then it would be sensible to entertain offers in January and then decide if a decent enough offer comes in.
Won't that be at a massively reduced price anyway given his contract would be up in 6 months anyway. Miles could be the difference maker in us potentially making the playoffs this year so I wouldn't want to let him go unless we can get him back on loan. Ideally we tie him up to a contract with guarantees we will let him leave if he wants in the summer.
IF, and it’s a big if, he won’t sign a new contract then it would be sensible to entertain offers in January and then decide if a decent enough offer comes in.
What sort of offer in January do you think would be "sufficient"?
However much is needed to reinvest in 2-3 top quality players at this level. We’d need a striker to replace Miles and a creative midfielder at a minimum for it to feel like a fair exchange in terms of on field contribution.
If previous behaviour is anything to go by, I can see the board looking to cash in on him in January if a new contract is not close to being signed.
Call me mental too, but I think he’s a better all round player than Stansfield, he’s a year younger than him too, and look how much Birmingham paid for him. Leaburn under a decent length contract is worth millions to us and just the same with how our chances of success on the pitch improves with Miles in the team.
That's a pretty wild take. Stansfield has a handful of PL appearances, almost 50 Championship appearances, and has been capped by England at U18, U20 and U21 level.
Leaburn has done none of that yet.
It's not wild at all. Players are signed based on potential all the time. Off the top of the head, Shelvey, Jenkinson and Gomez were all signed for big money off the back of arguably less achievement or impressive performances or CVs than Leaburn has now. Theo Walcott. There are I'm sure other more extreme examples than any of those.
And, even if you are doing it based on actual CVs, I think you're grossly exaggerating Stansfield's CV Vs Leaburn anyway...
1) a few england youth caps don't necessarily mean much at all - at youth level you are probably largely picked based on the club you're playing for (i.e. prem or not). The current England U21 squad contains 1 Lg 1 player, the 3rd goalie, + Stansfield - then basically all players from Premier league clubs. There are millions of players with loads of youth England caps who achieved absolutely nothing in the game (see Osei Sankofa).
2) Stansfield managed 12 Champ goals last season in 43 appearances. He did this at the same age as Miles Leaburn is now (20). Miles Leaburn scored 12 League 1 goals in 35 appearances aged just 18, and quite frankly I would be pretty confident of him managing similar at Champ Level if he was playing there right now.
A fan had spoken to Methven who, among other things, had said both sides want to get a deal done for Miles to sign. To be taken with a pinch of salt of course
If previous behaviour is anything to go by, I can see the board looking to cash in on him in January if a new contract is not close to being signed.
Call me mental too, but I think he’s a better all round player than Stansfield, he’s a year younger than him too, and look how much Birmingham paid for him. Leaburn under a decent length contract is worth millions to us and just the same with how our chances of success on the pitch improves with Miles in the team.
That's a pretty wild take. Stansfield has a handful of PL appearances, almost 50 Championship appearances, and has been capped by England at U18, U20 and U21 level.
Leaburn has done none of that yet.
It's not wild at all. Players are signed based on potential all the time. Off the top of the head, Shelvey, Jenkinson and Gomez were all signed for big money off the back of arguably less achievement or impressive performances or CVs than Leaburn has now. Theo Walcott. There are I'm sure other more extreme examples than any of those.
And, even if you are doing it based on actual CVs, I think you're grossly exaggerating Stansfield's CV Vs Leaburn anyway...
1) a few england youth caps don't necessarily mean much at all - at youth level you are probably largely picked based on the club you're playing for (i.e. prem or not). The current England U21 squad contains 1 Lg 1 player, the 3rd goalie, + Stansfield - then basically all players from Premier league clubs. There are millions of players with loads of youth England caps who achieved absolutely nothing in the game (see Osei Sankofa).
2) Stansfield managed 12 Champ goals last season in 43 appearances. He did this at the same age as Miles Leaburn is now (20). Miles Leaburn scored 12 League 1 goals in 35 appearances aged just 18, and quite frankly I would be pretty confident of him managing similar at Champ Level if he was playing there right now.
I'll give you Jenkinson but both Shelvey and Gomez had played for us in the championship and both had England youth caps. I don't think many people would agree with you they looked less impressive than Leaburn. It was clear to anyone they would both go to the very top level.
Not sure Walcott is the best example. He had a 15-16 year Premier league career and got almost 50 England caps. If Leaburn manages even half of that then he will have had a very good career.
In any case i'm not arguing that Leaburn isn't a good player, my point was in response to Sage saying he's a better player than Stansfield. One day he might be, right now he's not.
He's rusty but still looked acres ahead of Ahadme and Kanu.
His problem tonight was trying to take everyone on in the box instead of just passing or hitting a shot.
Harsh on Kanu. Although over the course of a season I think Leaburn would score more every time I see Kanu play he adds something to the team usually thanks to his work rate. He was superb against Birmingham.
He's rusty but still looked acres ahead of Ahadme and Kanu.
His problem tonight was trying to take everyone on in the box instead of just passing or hitting a shot.
Harsh on Kanu. Although over the course of a season I think Leaburn would score more every time I see Kanu play he adds something to the team usually thanks to his work rate. He was superb against Birmingham.
How about the two easy chances he missed? I get that he works hard for the team but ultimately his job description is to score goals. Against Birmingham, he managed to miss the target from 3 yards
He's rusty but still looked acres ahead of Ahadme and Kanu.
His problem tonight was trying to take everyone on in the box instead of just passing or hitting a shot.
Harsh on Kanu. Although over the course of a season I think Leaburn would score more every time I see Kanu play he adds something to the team usually thanks to his work rate. He was superb against Birmingham.
How about the two easy chances he missed? I get that he works hard for the team but ultimately his job description is to score goals. Against Birmingham, he managed to miss the target from 3 yards
Like I said I think Leaburn will score more and yes obviously he should of scored there but I feel like he gives us something none of the other forwards do with his work rate and press. With Leaburn and Godden up top last night neither run into the channels and stretch the defence. Kanu does this all the time. Kanu has been on a different trajectory to Leaburn and is having to adapt to the physical side of this league. He only scored the goals he did in the academy because of raw pace but he can't get away with that in pro football. I'd have him in the team all day along with either Godden or Leaburn because the work he has creates space for them
Kanu is an athlete with a great attitude and work ethic but I’ve seen minimal footballing ability in him , never feel he’s comfortable and in control of the ball , Leaburn is on another level and looks like he has much more potential
Comments
Obvs would hope for a longer deal but the above seems realistic to me, maybe even a +1 year at the end in our favour but only if we are promoted to the Championship and with a further wage boost or something..
It's not wild at all. Players are signed based on potential all the time. Off the top of the head, Shelvey, Jenkinson and Gomez were all signed for big money off the back of arguably less achievement or impressive performances or CVs than Leaburn has now. Theo Walcott. There are I'm sure other more extreme examples than any of those.
And, even if you are doing it based on actual CVs, I think you're grossly exaggerating Stansfield's CV Vs Leaburn anyway...
1) a few england youth caps don't necessarily mean much at all - at youth level you are probably largely picked based on the club you're playing for (i.e. prem or not). The current England U21 squad contains 1 Lg 1 player, the 3rd goalie, + Stansfield - then basically all players from Premier league clubs. There are millions of players with loads of youth England caps who achieved absolutely nothing in the game (see Osei Sankofa).
2) Stansfield managed 12 Champ goals last season in 43 appearances. He did this at the same age as Miles Leaburn is now (20). Miles Leaburn scored 12 League 1 goals in 35 appearances aged just 18, and quite frankly I would be pretty confident of him managing similar at Champ Level if he was playing there right now.
https://x.com/AlstonCall56923/status/1848840408589340941
His problem tonight was trying to take everyone on in the box instead of just passing or hitting a shot.
He was out for 11 months and had a couple of good dribbles including the 1st minute. Miles has an hour under his belt and will get sharper.
Not sure Walcott is the best example. He had a 15-16 year Premier league career and got almost 50 England caps. If Leaburn manages even half of that then he will have had a very good career.
In any case i'm not arguing that Leaburn isn't a good player, my point was in response to Sage saying he's a better player than Stansfield. One day he might be, right now he's not.