Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton Athletic vs Pre-Season Friendlies | Preview & Match Threads (Welling p59, Swansea p67 )

1464749515283

Comments

  • Scoham said:
    Looks like 4-3-3. As has been said before the biggest question is how the three CMs set up. I’d be surprised if the others line up differently.

                 Wollacott

    Clare Inniss O’Connell Sessegnon

                     Dobson

                JFC        Fraser

    CBT                                   Kirk

                    Stockley

    Second half if we sub on entire team

                      CM

    Ness Lavelle Elerewe Clayden

              Gilbey Morgan

    Davison       Aneke      DJ

                  Leaburn
    You’re not gonna like this if you’re one of the negative Norris’ but the fact that the latter is our second XI shows we are stronger than we have been for a good few years, could we even fill a second XI in the last five years or so. 
    Not sure about that. How many of those players in the second XI would you be happy with playing 25+ games. Aneke is the only proven decent player 
    Ideally none of them because it’s our second XI.

    When did we last have a stronger second XI, in league one?
    On paper 2 years ago was stronger. I think the opposite, that second XI looks weak. Ness and Claydon out of position, Leaburn young and Gilbey, Morgan, Davison and DJ not particularly good. 
  • sam3110 said:
    ozaddick said:
    I know it's only 10 minutes in, but I've seen a bit of our pre season games and I just can't see how Stockley will suit garner ball. 
    He wont. Stockley needs the ball in the air. You don't see Liverpool & Man City playing with 6ft 4 strikers. 

    Bringing Garner in should have meant Stockley leaving. Sad but necessary. 
    Apart from the fact Man City have just signed Haaland.... Guess how tall he is?!
    I thought someone would say that.

    But Haarland is a goalscorer & is good with his feet. Stockley is neither.


    How many goals did Stockley get last season, refresh my memory please, and the three months he was out doesn't count. 
  • Scoham said:
    Looks like 4-3-3. As has been said before the biggest question is how the three CMs set up. I’d be surprised if the others line up differently.

                 Wollacott

    Clare Inniss O’Connell Sessegnon

                     Dobson

                JFC        Fraser

    CBT                                   Kirk

                    Stockley

    Second half if we sub on entire team

                      CM

    Ness Lavelle Elerewe Clayden

              Gilbey Morgan

    Davison       Aneke      DJ

                  Leaburn
    You’re not gonna like this if you’re one of the negative Norris’ but the fact that the latter is our second XI shows we are stronger than we have been for a good few years, could we even fill a second XI in the last five years or so. 
    Not sure about that. How many of those players in the second XI would you be happy with playing 25+ games. Aneke is the only proven decent player 
    Ideally none of them because it’s our second XI.

    When did we last have a stronger second XI, in league one?
    On paper 2 years ago was stronger. I think the opposite, that second XI looks weak. Ness and Claydon out of position, Leaburn young and Gilbey, Morgan, Davison and DJ not particularly good. 
    It’s our second XI, as I said we’ve barely been able to make one in recent times.  And Gilbey, Morgan and DJ whatever you think of them are decent for a reserve XI.  
  • Scoham said:
    FAVADDICK said:
    Scoham said:
    FAVADDICK said:
    For the 4th game of preseason were looking very poor, generally can't see this formation/ style of play lasting long as we just haven't got the players to play it properly 
    Or we could give them time to adapt for the style and grow into the game before writing them off?
    Listen I aint writing anyone off but can you honestly say we have the players to play this formation, stockly looks like a lost puppy running around so does dobson 
    I think it’s too early to be so certain. We play in a league in which Hull were promoted with Magennis as a lone striker. You don’t need every player to be a perfect fit for every role.
    What style of football did they play/ want to play? 
    I don’t know but whatever it was he’d have been required to hold up the ball despite not being a technical player.
  • Randell looks lively. 
  • Scoham said:
    Looks like 4-3-3. As has been said before the biggest question is how the three CMs set up. I’d be surprised if the others line up differently.

                 Wollacott

    Clare Inniss O’Connell Sessegnon

                     Dobson

                JFC        Fraser

    CBT                                   Kirk

                    Stockley

    Second half if we sub on entire team

                      CM

    Ness Lavelle Elerewe Clayden

              Gilbey Morgan

    Davison       Aneke      DJ

                  Leaburn
    You’re not gonna like this if you’re one of the negative Norris’ but the fact that the latter is our second XI shows we are stronger than we have been for a good few years, could we even fill a second XI in the last five years or so. 
    Not sure about that. How many of those players in the second XI would you be happy with playing 25+ games. Aneke is the only proven decent player 
    Ideally none of them because it’s our second XI.

    When did we last have a stronger second XI, in league one?
    On paper 2 years ago was stronger. I think the opposite, that second XI looks weak. Ness and Claydon out of position, Leaburn young and Gilbey, Morgan, Davison and DJ not particularly good. 
    It’s our second XI, as I said we’ve barely been able to make one in recent times.  And Gilbey, Morgan and DJ whatever you think of them are decent for a reserve XI.  
    Depends on injuries really. All well and good saying it’s a reserve XI but it’s a long old season. Need a core group of about 14/15 at least, and I’m not sure we’ve got that yet. 

  • Interesting that JFC has been told he can listen to offers, but Garner clearly sees him as ahead of Morgan and Gilbey even with McGrandles injured. 
    Or get this... We already announced that those that started last game would not start this game.
  • edited July 2022
    ozaddick said:
    Randell looks lively. 
    Yes but what about Hopkirk any ghosting in?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Bailey said:
    sam3110 said:
    ozaddick said:
    I know it's only 10 minutes in, but I've seen a bit of our pre season games and I just can't see how Stockley will suit garner ball. 
    He wont. Stockley needs the ball in the air. You don't see Liverpool & Man City playing with 6ft 4 strikers. 

    Bringing Garner in should have meant Stockley leaving. Sad but necessary. 
    Apart from the fact Man City have just signed Haaland.... Guess how tall he is?!
    I thought someone would say that.

    But Haarland is a goalscorer & is good with his feet. Stockley is neither.


    How many goals did Stockley get last season, refresh my memory please, and the three months he was out doesn't count. 
    13
  • Bailey said:
    sam3110 said:
    ozaddick said:
    I know it's only 10 minutes in, but I've seen a bit of our pre season games and I just can't see how Stockley will suit garner ball. 
    He wont. Stockley needs the ball in the air. You don't see Liverpool & Man City playing with 6ft 4 strikers. 

    Bringing Garner in should have meant Stockley leaving. Sad but necessary. 
    Apart from the fact Man City have just signed Haaland.... Guess how tall he is?!
    I thought someone would say that.

    But Haarland is a goalscorer & is good with his feet. Stockley is neither.


    How many goals did Stockley get last season, refresh my memory please, and the three months he was out doesn't count. 
    13
    Why dont you discount the goals he scored with his head if you're going to cherry pick?
  • Bailey said:
    sam3110 said:
    ozaddick said:
    I know it's only 10 minutes in, but I've seen a bit of our pre season games and I just can't see how Stockley will suit garner ball. 
    He wont. Stockley needs the ball in the air. You don't see Liverpool & Man City playing with 6ft 4 strikers. 

    Bringing Garner in should have meant Stockley leaving. Sad but necessary. 
    Apart from the fact Man City have just signed Haaland.... Guess how tall he is?!
    I thought someone would say that.

    But Haarland is a goalscorer & is good with his feet. Stockley is neither.


    How many goals did Stockley get last season, refresh my memory please, and the three months he was out doesn't count. 
    13 league goals in 33 games
  • Shocking piece of play between Stockley and Kirk that resulted in a lovely save from the Goalkeeper

    Terrible play from Stockley with his feet
  • Sessegnon has looked good
    He’s about the only one, nothing to get excited about so far, I know it’s all about “minutes” but overall a disappointing first half from a pattern of play and creating chances point of view.
  • Bailey said:
    sam3110 said:
    ozaddick said:
    I know it's only 10 minutes in, but I've seen a bit of our pre season games and I just can't see how Stockley will suit garner ball. 
    He wont. Stockley needs the ball in the air. You don't see Liverpool & Man City playing with 6ft 4 strikers. 

    Bringing Garner in should have meant Stockley leaving. Sad but necessary. 
    Apart from the fact Man City have just signed Haaland.... Guess how tall he is?!
    I thought someone would say that.

    But Haarland is a goalscorer & is good with his feet. Stockley is neither.


    How many goals did Stockley get last season, refresh my memory please, and the three months he was out doesn't count. 
    13
    From 33 games in league one, is that nearly but not quite a goal every other game ?

  • Great chip from Kirk from an equally good pass from Stockley, tipped over for a corner
  • Dazzler21 said:

    Interesting that JFC has been told he can listen to offers, but Garner clearly sees him as ahead of Morgan and Gilbey even with McGrandles injured. 
    Or get this... We already announced that those that started last game would not start this game.
    No need for the wanky ‘or get this’ is there Dazzler!

    I completely understand this XI were announced to start this game because they didn’t start the last one. And that’s not my point at all. My point is that this XI is clearly, if you look at the players, Garners preferred starting line up. 

    In pre-season when you want you players to gain understanding of playing with each other, especially when introducing a new system, if JFC was going to be gone, surely you would prefer to have another player who will be there gaining that understanding with the players who will play the most.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Bailey said:
    sam3110 said:
    ozaddick said:
    I know it's only 10 minutes in, but I've seen a bit of our pre season games and I just can't see how Stockley will suit garner ball. 
    He wont. Stockley needs the ball in the air. You don't see Liverpool & Man City playing with 6ft 4 strikers. 

    Bringing Garner in should have meant Stockley leaving. Sad but necessary. 
    Apart from the fact Man City have just signed Haaland.... Guess how tall he is?!
    I thought someone would say that.

    But Haarland is a goalscorer & is good with his feet. Stockley is neither.


    How many goals did Stockley get last season, refresh my memory please, and the three months he was out doesn't count. 
    13
    Why dont you discount the goals he scored with his head if you're going to cherry pick?
    I'm not sure what you're referencing when you mentioned cherry picking.  I compare strikers against their peers in the League. Not against non League clubs in the cup oflr U23's in the Pizza trophy. 
  • Shocking piece of play between Stockley and Kirk that resulted in a lovely save from the Goalkeeper

    Terrible play from Stockley with his feet
    😅😅😅😅
  • Forster-Caskey looks very out of place, and unsure of what he needs to be doing.

    lots of space in the middle, Dobson not seemingly continuing with his CDM role as much as he used to with Fraser covering there at times.

    kirk looks good but not getting much service, home and sessegnon could work well together.

    id be keep to see Leaburn up top with stockley second half, replacing JFC
  • Sessegnon has looked good
    Disagree 

    Positionally he's wandered into the centre too much, leaving us really vulnerable down his side. Much prefers his right foot too
  • edited July 2022
    So HT 0-0, now for the half time "chat" from BG, and on comes the second half "team" and the win we all know is on the cards... ;)
  • This style of football is not exactly making me look forward to the season. Their first instinct seems to be to pass back, even when we get a free kick. The build up is so slow and then a lump forward. Feels like a lot like last season to me.
  • Sessegnon has looked good
    Disagree 

    Positionally he's wandered into the centre too much, leaving us really vulnerable down his side. Much prefers his right foot too
    Yes.   Despite our best CL protestations, he ISN'T a left back but a right back or centre back who can play on the left.

    CAFC appear to hate left backs who naturally play left back. 
  • Too hot.

    We look ordinary and no one is busting a gut in this heat.
  • edited July 2022
    Few players seemingly wandering around postions, we´ve had Dobson, JFC, Fraser, Sessegnon and even Stockley end up in the CDM spot, few balls up to Stockley to hold up or flick on, hasnt really been anyone around him (when hes been up there to receive it) 

    Sutton seem to be treating it more serious, have sussed out that CB´s splitting either side the gk at goal kicks means its likely to be a short ball out. 

    SOme nice passing but none too many incisive or threatening,  havent really got going much tbh.
  • The centre backs have been solid, but not great how busy they've had to be. Very weak defensively down both flanks.

    And whisper, it without Morgan and Gilbey our midfield has looked a bit static
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!