Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
JOHNNIE JACKSON - managed AFC Wimbledon to 2025 League 2 Play-off Final victory(p46)
Comments
-
https://x.com/afcwimbledon/status/1755671273991008285?s=46&t=mEmS51nyCqmemhJshcDkBAA well-earned new 2 year contract for Jackson. His existing deal was expiring this summer35
-
NabySarr said:https://x.com/afcwimbledon/status/1755671273991008285?s=46&t=mEmS51nyCqmemhJshcDkBAA well-earned new 2 year contract for Jackson. His existing deal was expiring this summer2
-
Excellent is stretching it a bit, to be honest.1
-
balham red said:Excellent is stretching it a bit, to be honest.3
-
He’s done a great job there. Had a rebuild on his hands when he took over.4
-
Addick Addict said:balham red said:Excellent is stretching it a bit, to be honest.0
-
JJ's record as our Manager was W 20, D 6 and L 15. That would equate to 74 points over the course of a season. We would have to win 15 of our final 16 matches this season to beat that.
I'm certainly not saying that I would have had him back instead of Jones but we have to accept that he didn't do an awful job and was a young manager learning his trade. Look at someone like Russell Martin. He's doing a fantastic job at Southampton but, actually, he lost more games at MK Dons and Swansea than he won. Perhaps our mistake was giving him the job too soon and not allowing to him to learn his craft and make those mistakes elsewhere, in the same way as we sent the likes of keepers such as Pope, Elliott and Randolph on loan. I'm sure that had we then looked to appoint him he and we would be in a much better position than we were and are now.9 -
He was miles ahead of Appleton both as a coach and a human being.6
-
Hartleypete said:He was miles ahead of Appleton both as a coach and a human being.2
-
Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.11
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Gribbo said:Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.112 -
Gribbo said:
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.112 -
FishCostaFortune said:Addick Addict said:balham red said:Excellent is stretching it a bit, to be honest.1
-
golfaddick said:Gribbo said:
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.110 -
JJ was on a hiding to nothing with us. TS set him a very stretchy target to keep his job beyond season's end and further hampered his chances by insisting on a style of play which was not the pragmatic solution required to gain enough points to meet the finishing place in the league that he needed to.
He was far from perfect but if supported in the summer window we might well have avoided the shitshow of the last couple of years.6 -
Addick Addict said:FishCostaFortune said:Addick Addict said:balham red said:Excellent is stretching it a bit, to be honest.7
-
ForeverAddickted said:Addick Addict said:FishCostaFortune said:Addick Addict said:balham red said:Excellent is stretching it a bit, to be honest.
Bugiel - 45 goals in 250 appearances
Bogle - 95 goals in 274 appearances
1 -
RC_CAFC said:Gribbo said:Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.11
wimbledon claim the small club and poverty card but they have their own stadium, relatively big crowds for that league and have sold a couple of players for biggish fees and invested it well. They are where I would expect them to be1 -
Great to see JJ turn it around. Said it before but we set ourselves back by replacing him with Garner and in the process lumped ourselves with a load of lower L1/L2 players in the process5
-
Todds_right_hook said:RC_CAFC said:Gribbo said:Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.11
wimbledon claim the small club and poverty card but they have their own stadium, relatively big crowds for that league and have sold a couple of players for biggish fees and invested it well. They are where I would expect them to be
Yes Jacko has done a decent job this season, but nothing outstanding.0 - Sponsored links:
-
killerandflash said:Todds_right_hook said:RC_CAFC said:Gribbo said:Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.11
wimbledon claim the small club and poverty card but they have their own stadium, relatively big crowds for that league and have sold a couple of players for biggish fees and invested it well. They are where I would expect them to be
Yes Jacko has done a decent job this season, but nothing outstanding.
Remind me which oligarch or multi-national corporation owns AFCW.
They stayed in L1 for six seasons while all the time remaining fan-owned. Who built their new stadium? The fans. Even at this level that is a towering achievement. Portsmouth tried it but threw in the towel. Now they are dependent on Mr Disney.Portsmouth fans are generally a pretty bone-headed and entitled bunch. It’s one reason why we do well there, we know how easily they turn. (I’ve witnessed it since the mid 70s when I was at Poly there, two of my best mates were die-hards)
Are we as a fanbase becoming more like Pompey and less like AFCW? These two comments suggest so, and I think that is sad. I guess thats what happens when people forget the lessons of history.6 -
PragueAddick said:killerandflash said:Todds_right_hook said:RC_CAFC said:Gribbo said:Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.11
wimbledon claim the small club and poverty card but they have their own stadium, relatively big crowds for that league and have sold a couple of players for biggish fees and invested it well. They are where I would expect them to be
Yes Jacko has done a decent job this season, but nothing outstanding.
Remind me which oligarch or multi-national corporation owns AFCW.
They stayed in L1 for six seasons while all the time remaining fan-owned. Who built their new stadium? The fans. Even at this level that is a towering achievement. Portsmouth tried it but threw in the towel. Now they are dependent on Mr Disney.Portsmouth fans are generally a pretty bone-headed and entitled bunch. It’s one reason why we do well there, we know how easily they turn. (I’ve witnessed it since the mid 70s when I was at Poly there, two of my best mates were die-hards)
Are we as a fanbase becoming more like Pompey and less like AFCW? These two comments suggest so, and I think that is sad. I guess thats what happens when people forget the lessons of history.
I never knocked the amazing achievement in getting back to Plough Lane, though Kingstonian supporters might feel less charitable, after the sale of Kingsmeadow to Chelsea kicked them out. And the horrible language aimed at Karl Robinson when he was our manager left a sour taste too.
https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/league-two/attendances
While it clearly isn't the only factor, Wimbledon have the 6th highest average attendances in L2, so you'd expect them to be competitive. The 2 teams either side of them in the table, Harrogate and Accrington, have the 22nd and 23rd highest attendances. Hence as I said, Jacko is doing a decent job, but not outstanding.1 -
Wimbeldon fans booing the side of tonight after another poor home performance and there are calls for Jackson head as well0
-
killerandflash said:PragueAddick said:killerandflash said:Todds_right_hook said:RC_CAFC said:Gribbo said:Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.11
wimbledon claim the small club and poverty card but they have their own stadium, relatively big crowds for that league and have sold a couple of players for biggish fees and invested it well. They are where I would expect them to be
Yes Jacko has done a decent job this season, but nothing outstanding.
Remind me which oligarch or multi-national corporation owns AFCW.
They stayed in L1 for six seasons while all the time remaining fan-owned. Who built their new stadium? The fans. Even at this level that is a towering achievement. Portsmouth tried it but threw in the towel. Now they are dependent on Mr Disney.Portsmouth fans are generally a pretty bone-headed and entitled bunch. It’s one reason why we do well there, we know how easily they turn. (I’ve witnessed it since the mid 70s when I was at Poly there, two of my best mates were die-hards)
Are we as a fanbase becoming more like Pompey and less like AFCW? These two comments suggest so, and I think that is sad. I guess thats what happens when people forget the lessons of history.
I never knocked the amazing achievement in getting back to Plough Lane, though Kingstonian supporters might feel less charitable, after the sale of Kingsmeadow to Chelsea kicked them out. And the horrible language aimed at Karl Robinson when he was our manager left a sour taste too.
https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/league-two/attendances
While it clearly isn't the only factor, Wimbledon have the 6th highest average attendances in L2, so you'd expect them to be competitive. The 2 teams either side of them in the table, Harrogate and Accrington, have the 22nd and 23rd highest attendances. Hence as I said, Jacko is doing a decent job, but not outstanding.0 -
RonnieMoore said:Wimbeldon fans booing the side of tonight after another poor home performance and there are calls for Jackson head as well2
-
MrOneLung said:killerandflash said:PragueAddick said:killerandflash said:Todds_right_hook said:RC_CAFC said:Gribbo said:Strange this; my brother in law is an AFC Wimbledon supporter and he's not too keen on Jacko.
Find it interesting looking at his PPM stats though. Jackos at AFC Wimbledon is 1.32. His average as permanent manager at Charlton was 1.53, which obviously got him sacked.
Nathan Jones managerial career PPM is 1.55, but some of that was in the Prem.
For comparison -
1st. Pep = 2.34
2nd. Ferguson = 2.16
3rd. Klopp = 2.11
wimbledon claim the small club and poverty card but they have their own stadium, relatively big crowds for that league and have sold a couple of players for biggish fees and invested it well. They are where I would expect them to be
Yes Jacko has done a decent job this season, but nothing outstanding.
Remind me which oligarch or multi-national corporation owns AFCW.
They stayed in L1 for six seasons while all the time remaining fan-owned. Who built their new stadium? The fans. Even at this level that is a towering achievement. Portsmouth tried it but threw in the towel. Now they are dependent on Mr Disney.Portsmouth fans are generally a pretty bone-headed and entitled bunch. It’s one reason why we do well there, we know how easily they turn. (I’ve witnessed it since the mid 70s when I was at Poly there, two of my best mates were die-hards)
Are we as a fanbase becoming more like Pompey and less like AFCW? These two comments suggest so, and I think that is sad. I guess thats what happens when people forget the lessons of history.
I never knocked the amazing achievement in getting back to Plough Lane, though Kingstonian supporters might feel less charitable, after the sale of Kingsmeadow to Chelsea kicked them out. And the horrible language aimed at Karl Robinson when he was our manager left a sour taste too.
https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/league-two/attendances
While it clearly isn't the only factor, Wimbledon have the 6th highest average attendances in L2, so you'd expect them to be competitive. The 2 teams either side of them in the table, Harrogate and Accrington, have the 22nd and 23rd highest attendances. Hence as I said, Jacko is doing a decent job, but not outstanding.
Of course it doesn’t necessarily mean they also have the 6th highest wage budget in the league.
0 -
RonnieMoore said:Wimbeldon fans booing the side of tonight after another poor home performance and there are calls for Jackson head as well3
-
Winning their BIG game will do Jacko a lot of good9
-
I have said it before and will say it again
Jacko is not a good manager
He is a Charlton legend and whilst I get everyone wants him to do well
But as I say IMO he isn't a good manager
He is a great player motivator, which is why when he first took over us he had that great run because he was able to get into the players, put an arm around them, get some passion.
Games like yesterday are perfect for him, I knew AFC would win because that's the type of game he can win(especially as they lost to MK a month ago) but before today they had won 2 of their last 10(both wins against 10 men) tactically he doesn't have what it takes and again just my opinion but he makes the perfect number 2, doesn't have to make the tactical decisions, but at the same time can be the passionate one to get the players going
Would love to be proved wrong but personally don't think he will succeed long term as a manager(i know this will annoy some people as they have an attachment to him still, but as I said just because he is a CAFC legend which he is, i try to look at things with an open mind)
Anyway football is all about opinions and thats just mine0