Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Summer 2022 transfer rumours (Gilbey loan confirmed p513, a signing falls through last minute p541)

1461462464466467569

Comments

  • The CB we should be looking at (albeit unlikely) is Yoann Barbet. Left-footed, can also play LB. For those concerned about fitness, in the 20/21 season he played every single minute of the league campaign. Don't think QPR wanted to get rid of him so it is audacious but he's lived in London for the last 7 years so worth a look. 
    Would be an incredible signing but I can’t see him dropping to league 1 or to our budget unfortunately 
  • edited August 2022
    FAVADDICK said:
    Well with 2 days to go and for players to move on, its very quite on our front !!
    Just like all but 1 of our signings so far 
  • mendonca said:
    I'm just happy I don't have to see Oshilaja playing in our midfield any more.
    But have we seen him playing up front?
  • Can Bonne play centre back?

    I reckon he could cover Stockley and Innis (but not both at the same time, obviously)
  • Says a lot when @BarnsleyFC aren’t willing to activate a release clause when we are so desperate for firepower. “Judge us by our actions” or lack thereof

    Every fan wants the same and moans the same lol 😂 
  • We don't need another lump like Bonne up front, we need a mobile forward like Taylor (but not him)
  • Can Bonne play centre back?

    I reckon he could cover Stockley and Innis (but not both at the same time, obviously)
    He could if he was quick enough.
  • Says a lot when @BarnsleyFC aren’t willing to activate a release clause when we are so desperate for firepower. “Judge us by our actions” or lack thereof

    Every fan wants the same and moans the same lol 😂 
    £300k for Asante? Suggests we aren’t in for him at that price then, if we were we could have activated it in June.
  • edited August 2022
    Southbank said:
    We don't need another lump like Bonne up front, we need a mobile forward like Taylor (but not him)
    Bonne is mobile, he doesn’t perfectly fit the system but we can’t be too picky at this level and he’s a decent all-round striker which is what we need. His link up play and passing isn’t quite good enough but he’s more mobile and good at pressing. He was dreadful against us in the cup recently but I’m sure given a few more minutes he’d get back to his old self. His style is a lot closer to Taylor (but not as good) than it is to Stockley 

    I know it wouldn’t be a popular signing but he would definitely score more than Stockley in league 1 with this team. He got double figures in the championship for us and that was his first season playing above non-league level. When Taylor was injured he was sometimes playing up front on his own as well. I’d take him back and I bet whoever we do end up signing isn’t as good as Bonne 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Uboat said:
    How would people react if Macauley Bonne fired us to promotion and then peeled off a mask to reveal that he was Lyle Taylor? 
    I’d be very surprised that nobody noticed the skin tone of his arms and legs. 
  • Uboat said:
    How would people react if Macauley Bonne fired us to promotion and then peeled off a mask to reveal that he was Lyle Taylor? 
    Then peeled off a mask to reveal he was actually Scott Parker…
  • Valley11 said:
    Uboat said:
    How would people react if Macauley Bonne fired us to promotion and then peeled off a mask to reveal that he was Lyle Taylor? 
    Then peeled off a mask to reveal he was actually Scott Parker…
    And then peeled a further one off to reveal he was Roland Duchatalet. 
  • Valley11 said:
    Uboat said:
    How would people react if Macauley Bonne fired us to promotion and then peeled off a mask to reveal that he was Lyle Taylor? 
    Then peeled off a mask to reveal he was actually Scott Parker…
    And then peeled a further one off to reveal he was Roland Duchatalet. 
    who the turned out to be the caretaker at the fun fair 
  • Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
  • Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    I personally think a finisher is exactly what we need, seen as Garnerball is about creating loads of chances.  
  • It must surely have been said before, and I haven’t looked on the other thread so apologies, but a striker with all the attributes we want would cost £30 million. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    Didn't Bonne miss as many chances as he scored?? No-one was particularly bothered about him going at the time for that reason I think! 
  • edited August 2022
    Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    I personally think a finisher is exactly what we need, seen as Garnerball is about creating loads of chances.  
    We need a finisher, who is quick, hard-working, has stamina and willingness to press high and ideally who is comfortable positionally and technically to switch position, or at least play, with the wide players up top.

    That is a lot to ask of a league 1 (or PL/champ youth) forward.

    When you're trying to live a possession/high press philosophy on a tight budget and in the 3rd tier, the number of players it's worth being interested in is not big.
  • Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    Didn't Bonne miss as many chances as he scored?? No-one was particularly bothered about him going at the time for that reason I think! 
    Yes was quite washington-like in that sense
  • Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    I personally think a finisher is exactly what we need, seen as Garnerball is about creating loads of chances.  
    We need a finisher, who is quick, hard-working, has stamina and willingness to press high and ideally who is comfortable positionally and technically to switch position, or at least play, with the wide players up top.

    That is a lot to ask of a league 1 (or PL/champ youth) forward.

    When you're trying to live a possession/high press philosophy on a tight budget and in the 3rd tier, the number of players it's worth being interested in is not big.
    I don’t disagree (regarding what we need).

    So did we let the wrong forward go then?  Would many of been happier had Washington been given a new deal and Stockley went, I’m not sure this would have gone down well back in July.  
  • Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    I personally think a finisher is exactly what we need, seen as Garnerball is about creating loads of chances.  
    We need a finisher, who is quick, hard-working, has stamina and willingness to press high and ideally who is comfortable positionally and technically to switch position, or at least play, with the wide players up top.

    That is a lot to ask of a league 1 (or PL/champ youth) forward.

    When you're trying to live a possession/high press philosophy on a tight budget and in the 3rd tier, the number of players it's worth being interested in is not big.
    I don’t disagree (regarding what we need).

    So did we let the wrong forward go then?  Would many of been happier had Washington been given a new deal and Stockley went, I’m not sure this would have gone down well back in July.  
    Definitely rather have Washington than Stockley now, though he’d probably still be finding it impossible to get the ball past the keeper.
  • Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    I personally think a finisher is exactly what we need, seen as Garnerball is about creating loads of chances.  
    We need a finisher, who is quick, hard-working, has stamina and willingness to press high and ideally who is comfortable positionally and technically to switch position, or at least play, with the wide players up top.

    That is a lot to ask of a league 1 (or PL/champ youth) forward.

    When you're trying to live a possession/high press philosophy on a tight budget and in the 3rd tier, the number of players it's worth being interested in is not big.
    I don’t disagree (regarding what we need).

    So did we let the wrong forward go then?  Would many of been happier had Washington been given a new deal and Stockley went, I’m not sure this would have gone down well back in July.  
    Definitely rather have Washington than Stockley now, though he’d probably still be finding it impossible to get the ball past the keeper.
    Only “Now”, as you say, as much as we can’t see it now, there’s still a chance Stockley starts banging in goals again, 6 games of not scoring from open play is bad form, it doesn’t make you a bad player.  But we do need a forward any way.  
  • People are obsessed by ex-players.

    We're not signing Taylor, we were never getting Naby Sarr, we shouldn't sign Bonne,

    There's plenty of other fish in the sea, as it were.
    Its so weird isnt it. Every few days people start talking about signing ex players. Freaks.
  • Leuth said:
    Bonne is a pure finisher. We need someone who can hold the ball and make play. Absolute non-starter
    I personally think a finisher is exactly what we need, seen as Garnerball is about creating loads of chances.  
    We need a finisher, who is quick, hard-working, has stamina and willingness to press high and ideally who is comfortable positionally and technically to switch position, or at least play, with the wide players up top.

    That is a lot to ask of a league 1 (or PL/champ youth) forward.

    When you're trying to live a possession/high press philosophy on a tight budget and in the 3rd tier, the number of players it's worth being interested in is not big.
    I don’t disagree (regarding what we need).

    So did we let the wrong forward go then?  Would many of been happier had Washington been given a new deal and Stockley went, I’m not sure this would have gone down well back in July.  
    Definitely rather have Washington than Stockley now, though he’d probably still be finding it impossible to get the ball past the keeper.
    Only “Now”, as you say, as much as we can’t see it now, there’s still a chance Stockley starts banging in goals again, 6 games of not scoring from open play is bad form, it doesn’t make you a bad player.  But we do need a forward any way.  
    Suppose it just shows how desperate we are for a goal scorer 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!