Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Mason Burstow - on loan to Bolton from Hull (p53)

1131416181954

Comments

  • If he goes and it is for a huge fee that is then used to build a squad to get us back into the championship and kick on there then it will be gutting but worth it and the reality of football nowdays.

    If he goes and real investment isn't then pumped into the squad because the fee isn't all that or the appetite not there and we are still languishing down here for next couple of seasons then it really begs the question of what the point of it all and what Sandgaard's ambitions are.

    We will see no doubt.

    Hopefully if he does go tonight we still have enough firepower available up top to avoid the unthinkable this season.
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,918
    This transfer, assuming it happens, will show our other academy prospects the value (in every sense) of first team football exposure. Should make getting them to sign their contacts that much easier.
    This
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,259
    £10m. He isn't worth that but if we are under no pressure to sell, why not


    Maybe we are, Sandgaard will want to balance the books
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    Just seen this news. It explains TS' comments to Cawley. I wonder if selling Burstow is a way of offsetting our spending this window. It's such a shame that it's to the point where we only see our promising youngsters for two months.

    I usually try to be pretty realistic about these things. We're a League One club, we're always going to sell. And j don't rate Burstow the way I did Gomez or Lookman or Konsa. But it's still just...deflating. And it leaves us one light up front. 
  • James86
    James86 Posts: 329
    Selfish point of view it’s deflating. 
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,968
    edited January 2022
    Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    We’ve been doing this for decades. Way before Roland. Parker and Reid come immediately to mind, albeit Reid wasn’t a “prospect”. 
    Thats not correct in Parker’s case. Chelsea moved in early. The entire club fought tooth and nail for almost the entire window to keep Parker, and at least finally got Putin, sorry, Abramovic to pay full whack. 
    We still sold him at the end of the transfer window. 
    After he refused point blank to play any more. And let's remember he was way older and more experienced than Burstow at the time, and had already thrown his toys out of the pram a season earlier when there was talk of a bid. 

    234 minutes of League One football. That's all we will have seen of Mason Burstow. What's the point of the academy system when this shit happens? 

    Well the Q&A with Thomas will make for interesting listening. I'll certainly have questions....
    I take your point, but it's league one economics, as you're well aware. Selling a Burstow every couple of years will fund the academy and subsidise the running of an otherwise loss-making club, enabling modest investment in the squad. Twas ever thus at Charlton. As long as we are extracting full value and substantially reinvesting then I don't have a problem with it, frustrating as it is.



  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,371
    Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    We’ve been doing this for decades. Way before Roland. Parker and Reid come immediately to mind, albeit Reid wasn’t a “prospect”. 
    Thats not correct in Parker’s case. Chelsea moved in early. The entire club fought tooth and nail for almost the entire window to keep Parker, and at least finally got Putin, sorry, Abramovic to pay full whack. 
    We still sold him at the end of the transfer window. 
    After he refused point blank to play any more. And let's remember he was way older and more experienced than Burstow at the time, and had already thrown his toys out of the pram a season earlier when there was talk of a bid. 

    234 minutes of League One football. That's all we will have seen of Mason Burstow. What's the point of the academy system when this shit happens? 

    Well the Q&A with Thomas will make for interesting listening. I'll certainly have questions....
    For every Mason Burstow who might get sold early, there are the likes of Albie Morgan, Chris Solly, Anfernee Dijksteel, Scott Wagstaff and Jordan Cousins who do go on to play a significant amount of games for the club.

    We shouldn’t fall into the trap of just dismissing the importance of the academy off the back of a player leaving to go to one of the biggest clubs in the world. 
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    James86 said:
    Selfish point of view it’s deflating. 
    Is that aimed at me? 
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    Also, they just added him on FIFA ffs. I was really enjoying using him as a super sub. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • CAFCTrev
    CAFCTrev Posts: 5,978
    edited January 2022
    cafctom said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    We’ve been doing this for decades. Way before Roland. Parker and Reid come immediately to mind, albeit Reid wasn’t a “prospect”. 
    Thats not correct in Parker’s case. Chelsea moved in early. The entire club fought tooth and nail for almost the entire window to keep Parker, and at least finally got Putin, sorry, Abramovic to pay full whack. 
    We still sold him at the end of the transfer window. 
    After he refused point blank to play any more. And let's remember he was way older and more experienced than Burstow at the time, and had already thrown his toys out of the pram a season earlier when there was talk of a bid. 

    234 minutes of League One football. That's all we will have seen of Mason Burstow. What's the point of the academy system when this shit happens? 

    Well the Q&A with Thomas will make for interesting listening. I'll certainly have questions....

    We shouldn’t fall into the trap of just dismissing the importance of the academy off the back of a player leaving to go to one of the biggest clubs in the world
    Its Burnley again isn't it.....
  • SDAddick said:
    James86 said:
    Selfish point of view it’s deflating. 
    Is that aimed at me? 

    I read it as the poster selfhsihly feeling deflated
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    CAFCTrev said:
    cafctom said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    We’ve been doing this for decades. Way before Roland. Parker and Reid come immediately to mind, albeit Reid wasn’t a “prospect”. 
    Thats not correct in Parker’s case. Chelsea moved in early. The entire club fought tooth and nail for almost the entire window to keep Parker, and at least finally got Putin, sorry, Abramovic to pay full whack. 
    We still sold him at the end of the transfer window. 
    After he refused point blank to play any more. And let's remember he was way older and more experienced than Burstow at the time, and had already thrown his toys out of the pram a season earlier when there was talk of a bid. 

    234 minutes of League One football. That's all we will have seen of Mason Burstow. What's the point of the academy system when this shit happens? 

    Well the Q&A with Thomas will make for interesting listening. I'll certainly have questions....

    We shouldn’t fall into the trap of just dismissing the importance of the academy off the back of a player leaving to go to one of the biggest clubs in the world
    Its Burnley again isn't it.....
    He’s going to Watford. Will be player-manager in 3 weeks when Hodgson gets the boot.  
  • James86
    James86 Posts: 329
    SDAddick said:
    James86 said:
    Selfish point of view it’s deflating. 
    Is that aimed at me? 
    No course not. Just realised you’d said the same thing. My point of view mate. Deflating. 
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,259
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    Let's wait to see: 1. if he actually leaves, 2. what the fee is, shall we?

    The last time someone made that promise was Richard Murray when Duchatelet bought the club. If anyone past, present or future ever makes a promise that Charlton won't sell players, they are bullshitters.

    Like 98% of the football pyramid, we are a selling club, and bar a Newcastle or Man City style takeover, will always be a selling club.
    2 isn't going to happen, it will be undisclosed.
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,561
    So Jackson tells Sky that Burstow is talking to a club but Sandgaard tells Jim White they haven't met our valuation.

    How's he allowed to talk to a club if we haven't accepted a bid?
    Because a deal may be close and the clubs can keep negotiating whilst Barstow agrees terms. If a deal is then agreed Barstow has already agreed his part.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,807
    Just to that point of Premier League clubs sniffing around at our level, it’s because their usual hunting grounds in Europe have been taken away 

    https://theathletic.com/3099992/2022/01/30/theyre-looking-in-places-they-werent-before-how-brexit-has-affected-academy-recruitment/?source=user_shared_article
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,514
    So Jackson tells Sky that Burstow is talking to a club but Sandgaard tells Jim White they haven't met our valuation.

    How's he allowed to talk to a club if we haven't accepted a bid?
    Because a deal may be close and the clubs can keep negotiating whilst Barstow agrees terms. If a deal is then agreed Barstow has already agreed his part.
    BURSTOW!

  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,259
    Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    Depends if Sandgaard also puts the transfer fee in his pocket or whether he invests back into the squad though doesnt it?
    He may think that he's already invested in the squad, Fraser, Aneke, Kirk etc & selling Burstow will just balance the books.
  • Sponsored links:



  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,561
    supaclive said:
    So Jackson tells Sky that Burstow is talking to a club but Sandgaard tells Jim White they haven't met our valuation.

    How's he allowed to talk to a club if we haven't accepted a bid?
    Because a deal may be close and the clubs can keep negotiating whilst Barstow agrees terms. If a deal is then agreed Barstow has already agreed his part.
    BURSTOW!

    predictive text
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    James86 said:
    SDAddick said:
    James86 said:
    Selfish point of view it’s deflating. 
    Is that aimed at me? 
    No course not. Just realised you’d said the same thing. My point of view mate. Deflating. 
    Gotcha, thought that was the case, just wanted to make sure. We're in the same boat. 
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,037
    supaclive said:
    So Jackson tells Sky that Burstow is talking to a club but Sandgaard tells Jim White they haven't met our valuation.

    How's he allowed to talk to a club if we haven't accepted a bid?
    Because a deal may be close and the clubs can keep negotiating whilst Barstow agrees terms. If a deal is then agreed Barstow has already agreed his part.
    BURSTOW!

    predictive text
    Just proves that most predictions turn out to be wrong! 
  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,212
    edited January 2022
    Rothko said:
    Just to that point of Premier League clubs sniffing around at our level, it’s because their usual hunting grounds in Europe have been taken away 

    https://theathletic.com/3099992/2022/01/30/theyre-looking-in-places-they-werent-before-how-brexit-has-affected-academy-recruitment/?source=user_shared_article
    “Babe, get the popcorn out”

    ”Why?  Someone mentioned brexit outside of the politics area of charlton life again hun?”
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,807
    Rothko said:
    Just to that point of Premier League clubs sniffing around at our level, it’s because their usual hunting grounds in Europe have been taken away 

    https://theathletic.com/3099992/2022/01/30/theyre-looking-in-places-they-werent-before-how-brexit-has-affected-academy-recruitment/?source=user_shared_article
    “Babe, get the popcorn out”

    ”Someone mentioned brexit outside the politics area of charlton life again hun?”
    Haha, but that’s just the way it is
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,037
    edited January 2022
    In the last few mins this site have reported that we’ve rejected Chelsea’s bid

    https://www.newsdaily.com.ng/chelsea-have-substantial-transfer-bid-rejected-for-wonderkid-striker-mason-burstow-from-league-one-charlton/

    Edit - think they may just be recycling old quotes 
  • Addick_8
    Addick_8 Posts: 687
    ButtleJR said:
    Mother of god.  

    This feels like the “Sandgaard is skint” brigade have just equalised last minute.  
    This is one of the best ever posts I’ve seen on here. Brilliant 😂
  • CAFCTrev
    CAFCTrev Posts: 5,978
    The TS press conference to announce Burstow leaving....


  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,765
    se9addick said:
    In the last few mins this site have reported that we’ve rejected Chelsea’s bid

    https://www.newsdaily.com.ng/chelsea-have-substantial-transfer-bid-rejected-for-wonderkid-striker-mason-burstow-from-league-one-charlton/

    Edit - think they may just be recycling old quotes 
    Yes they've taken the words from Alex Crook's (Talksport) tweet where he said TS has said that two bids received and neither match our valuation.
  • Ffs I looked at the time and thought there was only 15 mins left, then remembered I’m two hours ahead 😂