Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

The Woolwich Ferry

2

Comments

  • Options
    I took my car across on one a couple of months ago. Wasnt terrible.
  • Options
    Were these boats ordered as a job lot with the London Stadium?
  • Options
    I could see and hear this from my balcony in East Greenwich last night. Could only see it above buildings obscuring the river though so looked bizarre.
  • Options
    It'll break down now.
  • Options
    It'll break down now.

    I think that was the problem - it already had. You can hear the skipper shouting "why the f*ck won't this thing go straight??"
  • Options

    Woolwich Ferry resumes one-boat service

    The Woolwich Ferry has resumed a one-boat service, after it had been suspended when crew members tested positive for coronavirus.

    The service, which links Woolwich and North Woolwich, was stopped on 4 December after some staff members needed to self-isolate.

    The ferry will continue to run between 07:00 and 19:00 Monday to Saturday, and 11:30 to 19:30 on Sundays, with a service approximately every 20-25 minutes.

    An enhanced deep cleaning regime is in place, in line with Covid-19 secure guidelines, said current operator Briggs Marine.

    Transport for London is set to take over the management at the end of the month.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/england/london

  • Options
    I thought it was because of the fog they stopped.
  • Options
    Fog, mechanical problems, Coronavirus, staff shortages, plague of locusts...
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Fog, mechanical problems, Coronavirus, staff shortages, plague of locusts...
    Just a winter of despair really.
  • Options
    encountered this on youtube today (as usual found it while trying to find something else) - 1961 version of the woolwich ferry (the paddle steamers had a couple of years to go before the diesel boats replaced them)
  • Options
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
  • Options
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    Seems cheap as opposed to the cable car at £60 million. That’s just a pointless waste of money.
  • Options
    I was told by a guy controlling the queue at the Woolwich end that one captain is currently off sick and this means one ferry can't operate. 

    If TfL only have 2 captains there is no way that the service can run 7 days a week which it should do.
  • Options
    Apparently one boat will be off to Chatham for repairs during this period 
  • Options
    edited February 2023
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    Seems cheap as opposed to the cable car at £60 million. That’s just a pointless waste of money.
    I thought you weren't a fan of whataboutery?
    At least there's an income from the cable car.
  • Options
    MrWalker said:
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    Seems cheap as opposed to the cable car at £60 million. That’s just a pointless waste of money.
    I thought you weren't a fan of whataboutery?
    At least there's an income from the cable car.
    I’d argue that that pales into insignificance compared to the value that the Ferry provides as a key crossing point for traffic.  That doesn’t mean that TfL haven’t cocked up here, or that they need to get it sorted quickly. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Never been on the ferry. 
    How many cars does it take across each day ? 
  • Options
    edited February 2023
    MrOneLung said:
    Never been on the ferry. 
    How many cars does it take across each day ? 
    From today until 9th March, it's approximately 0 cars per day.

    Over 7000 passengers a weekday, usually.
  • Options
    TelMc32 said:
    MrWalker said:
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    Seems cheap as opposed to the cable car at £60 million. That’s just a pointless waste of money.
    I thought you weren't a fan of whataboutery?
    At least there's an income from the cable car.
    I’d argue that that pales into insignificance compared to the value that the Ferry provides as a key crossing point for traffic.  That doesn’t mean that TfL haven’t cocked up here, or that they need to get it sorted quickly. 
    Net cost of the cable car, after Emirates sponsorship  was, i believe, £24 million and it apparently operates at a profit. Sure it has a use but the ferry is vital for loads that are not allowed to use the Dartford Crossing and avoids them having to go around the M25. Not sure about the danger of these loads going through Woolwich and Beckton though.
  • Options
    TelMc32 said:
    MrWalker said:
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    Seems cheap as opposed to the cable car at £60 million. That’s just a pointless waste of money.
    I thought you weren't a fan of whataboutery?
    At least there's an income from the cable car.
    I’d argue that that pales into insignificance compared to the value that the Ferry provides as a key crossing point for traffic.  That doesn’t mean that TfL haven’t cocked up here, or that they need to get it sorted quickly. 
    Net cost of the cable car, after Emirates sponsorship  was, i believe, £24 million and it apparently operates at a profit. Sure it has a use but the ferry is vital for loads that are not allowed to use the Dartford Crossing and avoids them having to go around the M25. Not sure about the danger of these loads going through Woolwich and Beckton though.
    You make a good point BG but I am struggling to think of something that is not allowed through the tunnel yet is allowed on a ferry boat. What are we talking about explosive material?
  • Options
    edited February 2023
    TelMc32 said:
    MrWalker said:
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    Seems cheap as opposed to the cable car at £60 million. That’s just a pointless waste of money.
    I thought you weren't a fan of whataboutery?
    At least there's an income from the cable car.
    I’d argue that that pales into insignificance compared to the value that the Ferry provides as a key crossing point for traffic.  That doesn’t mean that TfL haven’t cocked up here, or that they need to get it sorted quickly. 
    Net cost of the cable car, after Emirates sponsorship  was, i believe, £24 million and it apparently operates at a profit. Sure it has a use but the ferry is vital for loads that are not allowed to use the Dartford Crossing and avoids them having to go around the M25. Not sure about the danger of these loads going through Woolwich and Beckton though.
    You make a good point BG but I am struggling to think of something that is not allowed through the tunnel yet is allowed on a ferry boat. What are we talking about explosive material?
    Height/width restrictions most likely rather than type of cargo. 
  • Options
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    £20m is hardly anything in the grand schemes of things. I like how the Mayor gets personally blamed for all of the London's problems!  :)
    Coz he's a mayor init!


  • Options
    bobmunro said:
    TelMc32 said:
    MrWalker said:
    MrWalker said:
    Khan's done well there. £20 million well spent
    Seems cheap as opposed to the cable car at £60 million. That’s just a pointless waste of money.
    I thought you weren't a fan of whataboutery?
    At least there's an income from the cable car.
    I’d argue that that pales into insignificance compared to the value that the Ferry provides as a key crossing point for traffic.  That doesn’t mean that TfL haven’t cocked up here, or that they need to get it sorted quickly. 
    Net cost of the cable car, after Emirates sponsorship  was, i believe, £24 million and it apparently operates at a profit. Sure it has a use but the ferry is vital for loads that are not allowed to use the Dartford Crossing and avoids them having to go around the M25. Not sure about the danger of these loads going through Woolwich and Beckton though.
    You make a good point BG but I am struggling to think of something that is not allowed through the tunnel yet is allowed on a ferry boat. What are we talking about explosive material?
    Height/width restrictions most likely rather than type of cargo. 
    Used to be explosives or toxic materials. Not allowed in the Blackwall or Rotherhithe and at Dartford back in the day. So such traffic had Tower Bridge or the Woolwich ferry. Height/width loads would struggle to fit a  ferry, especially the old ones with the 'fly over' bridge. Think Dartford escort this traffic now, stop other traffic to take these loads through the tunnel like petrol tankers.
  • Options
    That cafe in the overspill at Woolwich done a cracking bacon roll.
    Quite a pleasurable way to cross the Thames.
  • Options
    R0TW said:
    That cafe in the overspill at Woolwich done a cracking bacon roll.
    Quite a pleasurable way to cross the Thames.
    That has long gone.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!