Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Talk Sport - Jim White (ed. Page 21 - Grapevine destroys Roland)

1121315171833

Comments

  • The price isn't a problem.

    When asked what the price was responded it didn't matter.

    Guy is a moron.
  • edited October 2018
    So he got rid of Powell because Powell wasn’t enthusiastic enough about the players sent by Roland’s analysts. Yet when Riga came in, he didn’t use those players either.

    And he decided not to keep Riga because he wanted to bring in someone who knew the English game (Peeters) and Riga is a family man who was away from his family when managing Charlton.
  • Rudders22 said:

    Credit to JW as he went to the game after RD not responding to JW's asking for a reply and JW took the trouble of coming down to the Valley, speaking to fans and getting a full understanding of some of what the issues were long before interviewing RD.

    And with that knowledge and background I’m a tad disappointed White didn’t take the clear bait in challenging and dubunking with more intensity what Duchâtelet was providing.

    However, learning that they had what seemed like a pre-arranged lunch together post interview suggests this was always going to be more of platform interview than a ‘take to task’.
  • Only just caught up with the update re the Trust's response to the Rat's drivel.

    Look forward to reading/hearing Heather's piece.

    Go Weegie !
  • Also notice how quick he was to side step Jim’s question of what the asking price is...couldn’t wait to clam up and move the conversation on.

    Whenever ROT spoke to him, he would refuse to discuss finances.
  • edited October 2018

    Rudders22 said:

    Credit to JW as he went to the game after RD not responding to JW's asking for a reply and JW took the trouble of coming down to the Valley, speaking to fans and getting a full understanding of some of what the issues were long before interviewing RD.

    And with that knowledge and background I’m a tad disappointed White didn’t take the clear bait in challenging and dubunking with more intensity what Duchâtelet was providing.

    However, learning that they had what seemed like a pre-arranged lunch together post interview suggests this was always going to be more of platform interview than a ‘take to task’.
    I did think this, but after sleeping on it, it was probably best to let Roland hang himself with his own words. Intentional or not. Make no mistake, he has done so. The big issue is, he is so deluded, he may not realise. He has lost the experienced staff who would be able to tell him so.

    As for the players brought in under Powell - Riga didn't use them as correctly stated above, but Duchatelet went on Belgian TV to say they kept us up! Now, you might get a liar telling his lies when it is hard to prove otherwise, but this compulsive liar says things that can be checked and disproved easily. He probably relies on nobody, outside of Charlton fans, being that interested in Charlton to check the truth behind his lies.

    But we are not even talking interpretation here - we are talking bare faced lies. Not sure how anybody would want to do business with such a personality!
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited October 2018
    Finally got round to listening to the interview and what a load of old tosh. The bloke is totally deluded and completely out of touch with the truth. And to blame it all on poor communication well, excuse the pun, I'm lost for words.

    As always it was everybody else's fault the communications team, the record breaking coach who wouldn't take advice from a nerd lols, the protests where we beat teams as the underdog, the fans who put Wilder off coming, yeah righto.

    Meanwhile back in the real world the old scrote has just shown himself up for what he is, a weird, failed visionary who cant swallow his pride and just walk away from a disastrous venture into English football due to an insufficient hands on approach. Thereby delegating abdicating his responsibilities to a SMT not fit for purpose.

    I know your minions feed you snippets from here Roland so my best advice is stop lingering like a bad smell, sell the club at the turn of the year at whatever you can get for it as the price doesn't matter (your words not mine) does it?

    Enough is enough 😡.
  • edited October 2018

    Rudders22 said:

    Credit to JW as he went to the game after RD not responding to JW's asking for a reply and JW took the trouble of coming down to the Valley, speaking to fans and getting a full understanding of some of what the issues were long before interviewing RD.

    And with that knowledge and background I’m a tad disappointed White didn’t take the clear bait in challenging and dubunking with more intensity what Duchâtelet was providing.

    However, learning that they had what seemed like a pre-arranged lunch together post interview suggests this was always going to be more of platform interview than a ‘take to task’.
    I did think this, but after sleeping on it, it was probably best to let Roland hang himself with his own words. Intentional or not. Make no mistake, he has done so. The big issue is, he is so deluded, he may not realise. He has lost the experienced staff who would be able to tell him so.

    As for the players brought in under Powell - Riga didn't use them as correctly stated above, but Duchatelet went on Belgian TV to say they kept us up! Now, you might get a liar telling his lies when it is hard to prove otherwise, but this compulsive liar says things that can be checked and disproved easily. He probably relies on nobody, outside of Charlton fans, being that interested in Charlton to check the truth behind his lies.

    But we are not even talking interpretation here - we are talking bare faced lies. Not sure how anybody would want to do business with such a personality!
    Sadly he's probably right though, how many non-CAFC fans will bother to fact check what they heard yesterday?

    To those who don't know the facts, I imagine RD came across quite well.
  • Jim White was never going to do a probing interview - he's a presenter not an investigative journalist.

  • I think Heather did brilliantly last night - and she was given a chance to respond to be fair. It felt she was being rushed but she nailed every point she could in the time given with applomb. It was like I say rushed and on Talk Sport 2 though. Having put the Duchatelet interview out there, and I think it is a positive development that it is out there, and there being facts to prove the lies. I think the next step for Jim White is to make an item that provides the evidence debunking every point Duchatelet made. Not hearsay, but facts that are avialable and we can help by providing him.

    That wouldn't be taking sides - the evidence is there. Whether he does it or not remains to be seen - but I feel he is on our side (to be honest, who wouldn't be given the facts). I think it then adds extra weight to the interview. I mean everything Roland said was a lie - not 50% of it, everything! If Jim had asked him his name he would have probably have said Tom! Maybe we could request he reads a short statement from us, which debunks every point. That would close it off nicely.
  • edited October 2018
    These were the main points he made - have I missed any?

    No interference with managers - leaked E-mail evidence proves this is a blatant lie
    Protests relegated the team - Statistical evidence
    We only got relegated by a few points - Statistical evidence
    Wilder didn't join us because of the fans - Would be good to put that question directly to Wilder - we have statements from the press and a friend of his showing this is wrong
    The comms team were to blame - For not wanting to put out incendiary comments that would anger fans - isn't that what they are there to do. An experienced head of Comms resigned because he wouldn't listen to her - this created an even bigger wedge between owner and fans!
    The price isn't an issue - We all know the price, which is significantly more than what he paid for the club, despite all the damage he has done to it.
    The bonus issue - He may be correct legally - that is for a court to decide, not us. But if you are led to believe you have performance targets that relate to a bonus that you believe you have met - surely it is a big management breakdown if that is suddenly not the case. It only serves to use something designed to incentivise staff, to demoralise them!


  • Personally I would like to hear from Wilder directly if he was scared of the fans, I don't know if this can be arranged.
  • Somebody has to ask him
  • I don't think wilder will speak on this, why would he? He can't exactly say, 'I was using Charlton as a stalking horse to get interest stoked up from Sheff Utd.' He doesn't come out of speaking about this looking well to anyone but us.

    As said above, Jim White is not an investigative journalist so it's not in his interest to probe, but that does beg the question - why? Again, outside Charlton fans, and a handful of sympathetic fans like those of Blackpool and Cov, who cares about a bland interview with RD other than us?

    He didn't do it for the ratings, so in my mind he had no reason not to push and refute some of the more obvious lies.

    How anyone listens to talksport regularly with those ads is beyond me, you must be very patient!
  • We don't need a statement from Wilder - somebody just needs to ask him whether the fans had anything to do with him not joining Charlton. He only has to say yes or no. I think he might manage to do that if asked the question.
  • Sponsored links:


  • I don't think wilder will speak on this, why would he? He can't exactly say, 'I was using Charlton as a stalking horse to get interest stoked up from Sheff Utd.' He doesn't come out of speaking about this looking well to anyone but us.

    As said above, Jim White is not an investigative journalist so it's not in his interest to probe, but that does beg the question - why? Again, outside Charlton fans, and a handful of sympathetic fans like those of Blackpool and Cov, who cares about a bland interview with RD other than us?

    He didn't do it for the ratings, so in my mind he had no reason not to push and refute some of the more obvious lies.

    How anyone listens to talksport regularly with those ads is beyond me, you must be very patient!

    Talksport is in love with the Premiership and celebrity.
  • RD revealed he will sell if the club get promoted to the Championship:

    He also revealed buyers are still interested in the club and that he would happily walk away from Charlton THIS YEAR, if they gain promotion back to the Championship.

    So it all sort of makes sense now. The Aussies came over for the play-offs last season, we lost, and therefore they haven't bought the club. Mystery solved.

    So the twunt is not selling (because the price wont be met) until we get promotion , I mean seriously did they really expect promotion from the play offs, even our numerous deluded blinnkered fans would have had their doubts .

    Even my optimistic pre first leg numbers had us as a near 1 in 3 chance

    Semi final losers 30%
    Final losers 35%
    Promoted from this shit heap of a league 35%

    100% Roland Out

    before reality set in and League One beckoned


    77% semi final play off losers
    11% play off final losers
    12% a footballing miracle of promotion happens

  • We don't need a statement from Wilder - somebody just needs to ask him whether the fans had anything to do with him not joining Charlton. He only has to say yes or no. I think he might manage to do that if asked the question.

    Why would Wilder want to get involved at all? We ain't his problem.
    Duchatelet was probably fed some old guff by Meire, when the manager he "discovered" joined up with SheffU. and didn't want to manage us because of the fans. This was probably substantiated with a few cut and paste screen shots sent to her by some of the more odd people of our fan base.
  • I'm sure he wouldn't seek to get involved, but if asked the question, he may answer it. He may not, but it isn't an unreasonable assumption he might give a yes or no answer.
  • Jim didnt really pin him down on any of the claims RD threw at him. He only needed to have the stats for 2016 relegation to see the protests were never a factor on how the season panned out, for example winning 2 of the games which had active protests.

    It was likely a stipulation of the interview that JW wasnt allowed to force any points he made back at him or something.
  • Wow. was anybody at all expecting a different result? Even after a leaked soundbite in which he said he was sorry, there was never a moment when I expected anything other than more lies from RD. I had no intention of listening to the interview - why would I waste my time when the guy can't give an honest answer to anything at all. the only thing I want to hear about RD is that he is leaving, and even then, I'd prefer a different source than the man who gave us Katrien and Karel, and still thinks relegation was because of the fans.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!