Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket Tour of New Zealand, 2017/18 (with no cricket in 2017)

1151618202131

Comments

  • McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Quite.

    Doesn't compare to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_attack_on_the_Sri_Lanka_national_cricket_team
  • Aussie struggling at 86-6. Shame.
  • 7 down now
  • al over tonight methinks.
  • now 7 for 29 in 13 overs.
  • 94-8 ha ha ha
  • Aussies now lost eight wickets for 37 runs.
  • edited March 2018
    Even funnier followed by a run out!

    94-9
  • Riviera said:

    Aussie struggling at 86-6. Shame.

    Riv, i thought you were a closet Australia fan?
  • 37-9....
  • Sponsored links:


  • So the Aussies are, effectively, 47-9. Even we made 52 to lose our last 10 wickets!
  • So the Aussies are, effectively, 4737-9. Even we made 52 to lose our last 10 wickets!

    37-9....

    Edit - maths was never my strong point!
  • 95 all out.

    Lost ten wickets for 38 runs.
  • 95 all out.

    Lost ten wickets for 38 runs.

    It's almost as if they had something on their minds
  • Laugh.
    Couldnt happen to a nicer team.
  • McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Is there a worse case of cheating - ie a captain transgressing the laws in order to improve his chances of winning - any time since, say, the war?

    I can't think of any.
  • Shame the Aussies had a review left - it would have been good for an English umpire to do them an injustice.
  • Let hope the other Aussies supposedly announced tomorrow dont collape in the same way.
  • edited March 2018
    Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Is there a worse case of cheating - ie a captain transgressing the laws in order to improve his chances of winning - any time since, say, the war?

    I can't think of any.
    Maybe trying to fix the game might be right up there. However, the 'winning' bit might not be relevant.
  • Reviewed and overturned. Injustice... Aussies have eight more runs since then.
  • Sponsored links:


  • That is it!!!!!!!!
  • 107 all out this time. Caught out so no review.

    Still lost 10 wickets for 50 runs.
  • Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Is there a worse case of cheating - ie a captain transgressing the laws in order to improve his chances of winning - any time since, say, the war?

    I can't think of any.
    Atherton?

    And match fixing is worse. Cronje for example

    Wasn't there an incident between England and India with jelly beans? Weren't they for the same reason
  • My kids told me today that Cape Town is 'overrun' with Aussies at moment - not quite Barmy Army levels - but i bet they dont have the same dark humour that the BA have come to adopt following England.
  • McBobbin said:

    Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Is there a worse case of cheating - ie a captain transgressing the laws in order to improve his chances of winning - any time since, say, the war?

    I can't think of any.
    Atherton?

    And match fixing is worse. Cronje for example

    Wasn't there an incident between England and India with jelly beans? Weren't they for the same reason
    Match fixing is deplorable, but it falls outside the definition I gave. Atherton's dirt-in-pocket was wrong, but is a lesser offence (in my opinion) than what Smith and co did in this match.
  • Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Is there a worse case of cheating - ie a captain transgressing the laws in order to improve his chances of winning - any time since, say, the war?

    I can't think of any.
    Atherton?

    And match fixing is worse. Cronje for example

    Wasn't there an incident between England and India with jelly beans? Weren't they for the same reason
    Match fixing is deplorable, but it falls outside the definition I gave. Atherton's dirt-in-pocket was wrong, but is a lesser offence (in my opinion) than what Smith and co did in this match.
    I agree, this was a root and branch senior team decision to cheat, and lump it on the least experienced batsman.

    Who used the bottle top to damage the ball?
  • What seams so bad to me in this instance is that it was not the action of an individual.
    It would appear the whole team agreed to it.
    I would like to believe that someone would have said something to stop it happening but apparently not.
  • Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Is there a worse case of cheating - ie a captain transgressing the laws in order to improve his chances of winning - any time since, say, the war?

    I can't think of any.
    Atherton?

    And match fixing is worse. Cronje for example

    Wasn't there an incident between England and India with jelly beans? Weren't they for the same reason
    Match fixing is deplorable, but it falls outside the definition I gave. Atherton's dirt-in-pocket was wrong, but is a lesser offence (in my opinion) than what Smith and co did in this match.
    I agree, this was a root and branch senior team decision to cheat, and lump it on the least experienced batsman.

    Who used the bottle top to damage the ball?
    McBobbin said:

    Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    Chizz said:

    McBobbin said:

    I hardly think it's crickets darkest day. I think people were desperate to stick it to this team though

    Is there a worse case of cheating - ie a captain transgressing the laws in order to improve his chances of winning - any time since, say, the war?

    I can't think of any.
    Atherton?

    And match fixing is worse. Cronje for example

    Wasn't there an incident between England and India with jelly beans? Weren't they for the same reason
    Match fixing is deplorable, but it falls outside the definition I gave. Atherton's dirt-in-pocket was wrong, but is a lesser offence (in my opinion) than what Smith and co did in this match.
    I agree, this was a root and branch senior team decision to cheat, and lump it on the least experienced batsman.

    Who used the bottle top to damage the ball?
    Imran khan admitted to using a bottle top in a county match in 1981, playing for Sussex. He's further demonstrated how untrustworthy he is since then, by taking up a career in politics.
    Typical Sussex, can't be trusted
  • http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22908218/steven-smith-david-warner-face-life-ban-ca

    "Smith, Warner could face life ban from CA

    An ICC suspension from the final Test against South Africa may be just the start of sanctions for Australia's captain Steven Smith, who alongside his deputy David Warner faces anything up to a life ban for cheating under Cricket Australia's code of behaviour."
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!