F1 and the Darts getting rid of the girls for 2018...
Comments
-
Or maybe she'll get a job in an office, or become a police woman or go to Uni. Attractive women have prospects beyond grid girl or glamour modelling.palarsehater said:
a good looking girl that wants to do modelling, thats what most pr girls are, they cant earn the money doing sports appearances so will now do glamour modelling.se9addick said:
Only if you think women can only do one kind of job...palarsehater said:pc gone mad, not that there a huge part of either but the women doing it hardly have a gun to there head in theory your actually putting women out of proper work and into more seedy work.
do you seriously think hazel o sullivan would do that work if she didn't want to.
classic example of people being offended on behalf of others, i would put quite good money on that every single walk on girl from the pdc wanted to do the work.2 -
Are all them careers alright with you thense9addick said:
Or maybe she'll get a job in an office, or become a police woman or go to Uni. Attractive women have prospects beyond grid girl or glamour modelling.palarsehater said:
a good looking girl that wants to do modelling, thats what most pr girls are, they cant earn the money doing sports appearances so will now do glamour modelling.se9addick said:
Only if you think women can only do one kind of job...palarsehater said:pc gone mad, not that there a huge part of either but the women doing it hardly have a gun to there head in theory your actually putting women out of proper work and into more seedy work.
do you seriously think hazel o sullivan would do that work if she didn't want to.
classic example of people being offended on behalf of others, i would put quite good money on that every single walk on girl from the pdc wanted to do the work.2 -
police officer is the correct term, and she probably earns 5 times more than that profession sadly.se9addick said:
Or maybe she'll get a job in an office, or become a police woman or go to Uni. Attractive women have prospects beyond grid girl or glamour modelling.palarsehater said:
a good looking girl that wants to do modelling, thats what most pr girls are, they cant earn the money doing sports appearances so will now do glamour modelling.se9addick said:
Only if you think women can only do one kind of job...palarsehater said:pc gone mad, not that there a huge part of either but the women doing it hardly have a gun to there head in theory your actually putting women out of proper work and into more seedy work.
do you seriously think hazel o sullivan would do that work if she didn't want to.
classic example of people being offended on behalf of others, i would put quite good money on that every single walk on girl from the pdc wanted to do the work.1 -
Absolutely - they're all on the approved list!i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Are all them careers alright with you thense9addick said:
Or maybe she'll get a job in an office, or become a police woman or go to Uni. Attractive women have prospects beyond grid girl or glamour modelling.palarsehater said:
a good looking girl that wants to do modelling, thats what most pr girls are, they cant earn the money doing sports appearances so will now do glamour modelling.se9addick said:
Only if you think women can only do one kind of job...palarsehater said:pc gone mad, not that there a huge part of either but the women doing it hardly have a gun to there head in theory your actually putting women out of proper work and into more seedy work.
do you seriously think hazel o sullivan would do that work if she didn't want to.
classic example of people being offended on behalf of others, i would put quite good money on that every single walk on girl from the pdc wanted to do the work.1 -
You're a fucking idiot.palarsehater said:why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
I welcome the flags for this post.4 -
i think i might cry roll on brexitcolthe3rd said:
You're a fucking idiot.palarsehater said:why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
I welcome the flags for this post.0 -
A great move. It keeps the feminists happy and at the same time allows the newly out of work women to spend more time where they belong. The kitchen.*
*Dear those that take offence easily. This is clearly a joke. Feminists are never happy.3 -
It's difficult when the world is changing and you can't understand why isn't it?palarsehater said:why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
3 -
palarsehater said:
why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
5 -
So what about Sky Sports and all the good looking women on there, purely for their looks and for blokes to ogle.
Weather girls, add them to the list. You could go on forever.3 - Sponsored links:
-
Cheerleaders0
-
Think the issue is more the young children that are watching the sports.
They see the men playing the sport and the women stood in their underwear looking pretty.0 -
I'll stick my neck out here and predict that these decsions have absolutely nothing to do with Theresa May or Jeremy Corbyn. That seems pretty clear, but I haven't got a massive chip on my shoulder blocking my view.9
-
Aren't the women on Sky Sports, like their male colleagues, journalists?Covered End said:So what about Sky Sports and all the good looking women on there, purely for their looks and for blokes to ogle.
Weather girls, add them to the list. You could go on forever.
I assumed the same of "weather girls".2 -
Was meant more of a wind up as in there’s a lot more to worry about in the world imo.MuttleyCAFC said:I'll stick my neck out here and predict that these decsions have absolutely nothing to do with Theresa May or Jeremy Corbyn. That seems pretty clear, but I haven't got a massive chip on my shoulder blocking my view.
I didn’t use foul language I just gave my opinion
Music videos are probably more included to be watched by children than the darts at ally pally or f11 -
All the Sky Sports chicks are highly highly shaggable, where as I wouldn't touch a Beeb female journo with Dave'sse9addick said:
Aren't the women on Sky Sports, like their male colleagues, journalists?Covered End said:So what about Sky Sports and all the good looking women on there, purely for their looks and for blokes to ogle.
Weather girls, add them to the list. You could go on forever.
I assumed the same of "weather girls".4 -
.....and that ain't no coincidence2
-
S'alright. There is plenty of other stuff to knock one out over!1
-
You just want me for yourself, don't you handsome?i_b_b_o_r_g said:
All the Sky Sports chicks are highly highly shaggable, where as I wouldn't touch a Beeb female journo with Dave'sse9addick said:
Aren't the women on Sky Sports, like their male colleagues, journalists?Covered End said:So what about Sky Sports and all the good looking women on there, purely for their looks and for blokes to ogle.
Weather girls, add them to the list. You could go on forever.
I assumed the same of "weather girls".2 -
Some people will have read that and are now like......i_b_b_o_r_g said:
All the Sky Sports chicks are highly highly shaggable, where as I wouldn't touch a Beeb female journo with Dave'sse9addick said:
Aren't the women on Sky Sports, like their male colleagues, journalists?Covered End said:So what about Sky Sports and all the good looking women on there, purely for their looks and for blokes to ogle.
Weather girls, add them to the list. You could go on forever.
I assumed the same of "weather girls".
1 - Sponsored links:
-
An excellent post.se9addick said:
It's difficult when the world is changing and you can't understand why isn't it?palarsehater said:why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
2 -
Very rich coming from 2 of the posters who are constantly bleating about world issuesSDAddick said:
An excellent post.se9addick said:
It's difficult when the world is changing and you can't understand why isn't it?palarsehater said:why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
0 -
Find it all a bit pathetic but sadly it’s the way things are going.
Of course the use of ‘glamour girls’ are not necessary to any sporting occasion. But then again nor are MC’s, music, fireworks, mascots, dancers, hospitality, food and drinks, commentators and all other aspects that add to ‘the package’, whether that’s attending ot or watching at home.
We are heading for an age of fear and blandness. Let’s hope equality really is applied. I look forward to watching a prime time family entertainment programme like Take Me Out where a bloke doesn’t have to take his shirt off for 30 women to ogle and pass comment on his body. Or Loose Women where they have the butlers in the buff on.
But that’s all a bit of harmless fun, isn’t it?26 -
Weird as fuck as well, look at which clubs have them.i_b_b_o_r_g said:Cheerleaders
2 -
It's very shit the other way round too, AFKA. The problem is, however, more widespread when it comes to women - and it's also worth considering men would much more easily be able to put a stop to any sexist overtures than women (physical power etc).AFKABartram said:Find it all a bit pathetic but sadly it’s the way things are going.
Of course the use of ‘glamour girls’ are not necessary to any sporting occasion. But then again nor are MC’s, music, fireworks, mascots, dancers, hospitality, food and drinks, commentators and all other aspects that add to ‘the package’, whether that’s attending ot or watching at home.
We are heading for an age of fear and blandness. Let’s hope equality really is applied. I look forward to watching a prime time family entertainment programme like Take Me Out where a bloke doesn’t have to take his shirt off for 30 women to ogle and pass comment on his body. Or Loose Women where they have the butlers in the buff on.
But that’s all a bit of harmless fun, isn’t it?
This is why misogyny is IMO worse - women don't feel powerful enough, in a sort of primal sense, to be able to stop it. It's changing, though, and that can only be a good thing.4 -
Pretty much just America for me these days, and that's a domestic issue for me.palarsehater said:
Very rich coming from 2 of the posters who are constantly bleating about world issuesSDAddick said:
An excellent post.se9addick said:
It's difficult when the world is changing and you can't understand why isn't it?palarsehater said:why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
I just find the "but what about what the big scary Muslims are doing?!?" argument tiresome and disingenuous. You could instead look at domestic violence in the UK, which kills on average around 100 women per year if you want something to contrast with. You can impact this issue, you can lobby your politicians and vote for those who are going to tackle this problem if you are genuinely concerned about violence against women.
http://www.lwa.org.uk/understanding-abuse/statistics.htm
Also, for what it's worth, I don't really care one way or the other on this. I think there's a good argument to be made that women should be allowed to choose their own jobs, and also that exploitation is something that needs to be stamped out. This is realllllly far down the list of problems of inequality.2 -
Ooh - you've got a bite here!palarsehater said:why don't we concentrate on women being stoned for looking at another man, or being MADE to cover there whole body because of some weird ruling in saudi arabia. a lot bigger things to worry about in the world but everything's Theresa may's fault and jeremy corbyn is the second coming.
Yeah you know what? I care deeply about those issues, as does LITERALLY EVERY OTHER FEMINIST I know. But it's easier to effect change on issues closer to home.
It's almost as if you're implying I can't care about more than one thing at once. Fuck sake.2 -
I'm massively offended by the stereotype that as a man I will automatically be 'ogling' at the walk on girls. This is unjust - who do I complain to?2
-
There is a difference though isn't there? One, its not men who have been repressed for centuries. Two, those shows are clearly doing it as 'a bit of fun'. With the grid girls stuff, I'm not so sure is that harmless - there's no joke, or irony there, they are simply being put there for people to look at. It's a subtle distinction, maybe, but I think an important one to make when trying to understand the ways in which women are treated both fairly and unfairly.AFKABartram said:Find it all a bit pathetic but sadly it’s the way things are going.
Of course the use of ‘glamour girls’ are not necessary to any sporting occasion. But then again nor are MC’s, music, fireworks, mascots, dancers, hospitality, food and drinks, commentators and all other aspects that add to ‘the package’, whether that’s attending ot or watching at home.
We are heading for an age of fear and blandness. Let’s hope equality really is applied. I look forward to watching a prime time family entertainment programme like Take Me Out where a bloke doesn’t have to take his shirt off for 30 women to ogle and pass comment on his body. Or Loose Women where they have the butlers in the buff on.
But that’s all a bit of harmless fun, isn’t it?1 -
Already done in bike racing.ForeverAddickted said:Replace them with guys in speedos and see if those same people complain
3
