Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

How do the Tories need to change?

1110111113115116

Comments

  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,598

    Rob7Lee said:

    Croydon said:

    Chaz Hill said:

    It gets worse. Esther McFester fancying her chances now!

    I thought Andrew Marr pulled Johnson apart pretty well yday. He certainly didn't look too happy as the programme faded out.

    Any of our Conservative minded contributors got any preferences for their next leader?

    Ruth Davidson
    Good one, I was struggling to come up with anyone but she’d be pretty good I reckon.
    image

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/16/ruth-davidson-rules-out-bid-become-conservative-leader-scottish-tory
    Oh Well, Boris it is then :wink:
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,257
    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,598
    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,257
    Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
    I struggle to see any other credible candidates

  • Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
    Well if there are 48 letters she will be forced to resign as PM. She could certainly stand and fight for re election and she might win but it’s a massive blow that she might not recover from.

  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,598
    cabbles said:

    Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
    I struggle to see any other credible candidates

    After tonight only one choice...... Bowyer, he'd have Brexit sorted within the week!
  • mcgrandall
    mcgrandall Posts: 932
    edited December 2018

    Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
    Well if there are 48 letters she will be forced to resign as PM. She could certainly stand and fight for re election and she might win but it’s a massive blow that she might not recover from.

    There is a secret confidence ballot by the MPs first and if she loses she will be forced to resign.
  • Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
    Well if there are 48 letters she will be forced to resign as PM. She could certainly stand and fight for re election and she might win but it’s a massive blow that she might not recover from.

    I think you've been misled, that's not how it works at all.
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,598

    Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
    Well if there are 48 letters she will be forced to resign as PM. She could certainly stand and fight for re election and she might win but it’s a massive blow that she might not recover from.

    I think you've been misled, that's not how it works at all.
    Looks like a vote tonight, needs 100 plus I would think to oust her, god knows who’ll we’ll get after that.

    Interesting times, what a mess.

  • Sponsored links:



  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,475
    Will need a big rabbit out of the hat from the EU today to survive I would think.
  • Trying to think of the most ridiculous replacement?

    JRM
    Bojo
    Gove?
  • Would it be wrong to say that it breaks my heart to see the Tories tearing themselves apart?
  • IA said:
    ...how apt that there's even a typo in the statement announcing it.
  • Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    Murmurings of 48 tubes putting in their letters of no confidence to remove their Chief Tube

    Great, get to see more self indulgent wank from this shit stain of a party whilst the country potentially goes down the plug hole

    Don't think she's going anywhere, I thought 48 had to send in the letters to force a vote then a ballot of all Tory MP's, so you need about 160 to vote her out still, not sure there is that strength of feeling if they've struggled to get the 48 letters.
    Well if there are 48 letters she will be forced to resign as PM. She could certainly stand and fight for re election and she might win but it’s a massive blow that she might not recover from.

    48 votes forces a vote of confidence, she would then need 158 votes to not be forced out but a number near that might make her resign.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,813
    Party First, Country Second, always the Tory way
  • ken_shabby
    ken_shabby Posts: 6,259
    I don't care if May gets ousted - she's a loathesome human being and a perfect example of why I would never vote Tory. But this just shows how utterly inept and useless they are as a government. Who are they possibly going to bring in who would unite the party? I'm not discussing the political merits of any of those who fancy having Prime Minister on their CV - it's a simple question of who could bring some sort of order to the chaos in their party over Brexit, and then bring some sort of recognisable order to their ongoing plan to have Brexit at whatever cost to the nation.

    My initial view was that logically, for something this big some sort of cross party Alliance might have been an idea, but I'd be the first to admit that if neither of the big two can get any semblance of unity within their own ranks (Labour seems to have done this better by allowing Momentum to shove out anyone not prepared to worship Corbyn) there is no chance they could unite together to achieve an orderly Brexit. At the moment I'm not sure if the government is in danger as Labour, SNP and other bits don't have the numbers to contrive a no confidence vote. Maybe if the Tories elect someone like Boris whose naked ambition beyond any sort of ability makes him a real threat to the nation, some of the remainers might jump ship. But they know they may be letting Corbyn into power. Would they really risk that?

    Just to add to what @Muttley said earlier, while I feel May is getting a kicking from her own side which says more about their self importance than the deal she bought back, this mess is hers. She bought back this deal, and pfaffed around for weeks knowing full well her collegues would vote it down, and at the last minute, with the time rapidly running out, she kicked the can down the road in order to save herself. Like Cameron, who delivered this mess, another Tory PM who puts self above party, and party above country. It'll be exciting today, but if May gets thrown out, it'll be well deserved, and she will go down as the most useless PM in the history of our democracy.
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    Rothko said:

    Party First, Country Second, always the Tory way

    Themselves first methinks
  • Rothko said:

    Party First, Country Second, always the Tory way

    Always the politicians way, I think you'll find. Also I think you are wrong in another way. It should read self first, party second, country third.

  • Sponsored links:



  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    I think Cameron should come back. Make the fucker clear up the mess and sink with the ship
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,853

    image

    Curbs 16/1
  • McBobbin said:

    I think Cameron should come back. Make the fucker clear up the mess and sink with the ship

    Not sure whether to Lol, like or flag that.

    So I went for quote.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,742
    The problem for the Tories is that May has played this badly. But May has had a foot in both camps. Her replacement would have to do that. But given where we are in the Brexit process, you can't really do that! Probably Javid or Hunt would be the best bet for them, but it is a nightmare for them and ultimately the country.

    Sadly for May, the option she always had was to say, if parliament can't accept the deal, I'll let the people who voted for Brexit do so. She has resisted the thing that would have helped her.
  • The problem for the Tories is that May has played this badly. But May has had a foot in both camps. Her replacement would have to do that. But given where we are in the Brexit process, you can't really do that! Probably Javid or Hunt would be the best bet for them, but it is a nightmare for them and ultimately the country.

    Sadly for May, the option she always had was to say, if parliament can't accept the deal, I'll let the people who voted for Brexit do so. She has resisted the thing that would have helped her.

    You're assuming May is going to lose the vote.

    I just can't see that happening.
  • The problem for the Tories is that May has played this badly. But May has had a foot in both camps. Her replacement would have to do that. But given where we are in the Brexit process, you can't really do that! Probably Javid or Hunt would be the best bet for them, but it is a nightmare for them and ultimately the country.

    Sadly for May, the option she always had was to say, if parliament can't accept the deal, I'll let the people who voted for Brexit do so. She has resisted the thing that would have helped her.

    You're assuming May is going to lose the vote.

    I just can't see that happening.
    The real question is about how big is the vote against her.

    There has been a reasonably stable consensus (among the political opinion pieces I have been reading over the last 6 months or so) that, in the event of a leadership challenge, her position would be untenable if much more than 100 MPs voted for the no-confidence motion (for all that she would be safe from another challenge for 12 months).

    Admittedly, she has demonstrated a determination to cling on, no matter how unattractive the option, until now, and she may flout the "rules" of thumb...
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,056

    The problem for the Tories is that May has played this badly. But May has had a foot in both camps. Her replacement would have to do that. But given where we are in the Brexit process, you can't really do that! Probably Javid or Hunt would be the best bet for them, but it is a nightmare for them and ultimately the country.

    Sadly for May, the option she always had was to say, if parliament can't accept the deal, I'll let the people who voted for Brexit do so. She has resisted the thing that would have helped her.

    You're assuming May is going to lose the vote.

    I just can't see that happening.
    The real question is about how big is the vote against her.

    There has been a reasonably stable consensus (among the political opinion pieces I have been reading over the last 6 months or so) that, in the event of a leadership challenge, her position would be untenable if much more than 100 MPs voted for the no-confidence motion (for all that she would be safe from another challenge for 12 months).

    Admittedly, she has demonstrated a determination to cling on, no matter how unattractive the option, until now, and she may flout the "rules" of thumb...
    She won’t quit, even if she only wins by one vote she won’t quit.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,018
    se9addick said:

    The problem for the Tories is that May has played this badly. But May has had a foot in both camps. Her replacement would have to do that. But given where we are in the Brexit process, you can't really do that! Probably Javid or Hunt would be the best bet for them, but it is a nightmare for them and ultimately the country.

    Sadly for May, the option she always had was to say, if parliament can't accept the deal, I'll let the people who voted for Brexit do so. She has resisted the thing that would have helped her.

    You're assuming May is going to lose the vote.

    I just can't see that happening.
    The real question is about how big is the vote against her.

    There has been a reasonably stable consensus (among the political opinion pieces I have been reading over the last 6 months or so) that, in the event of a leadership challenge, her position would be untenable if much more than 100 MPs voted for the no-confidence motion (for all that she would be safe from another challenge for 12 months).

    Admittedly, she has demonstrated a determination to cling on, no matter how unattractive the option, until now, and she may flout the "rules" of thumb...
    She won’t quit, even if she only wins by one vote she won’t quit.
    I think you are right
  • sralan
    sralan Posts: 2,031
    |She is one nasty self opinionated bitch who thinks she can walk on water. Well, the truth be told, she struggles to walk on tarmac!! I've seen ironing boards with more grace.
    Never thought I'd say it but she is worse than Thatcher!!
  • Chaz Hill
    Chaz Hill Posts: 5,217
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46237174

    The list of those who have confirmed they have sent their ‘letter’.

    A complete shower of talentless shit.
This discussion has been closed.