Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

1144414451447144914502264

Comments

  • Peninsula is back on the menu, ladies and gentlemen.

    Washed down with Red Bull.
  • JamesSeed said:

    Aussies out!

    My last post on here was on page 1244 and I’m not sure what’s changed since then :-(

    Part of the reason for my return is that I wanted to send you all a message about prostate cancer:

    https://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/comment/3416267#Comment_3416267

    Glad to have you back @JamesSeed , and to read your good news.

    When you say the Aussies are out, do you mean they are out out? Or did you mean that in a "Roland Out!" kinda way?

    If they are out of the picture, hopefully this leads Roland to revise his asking price, and other buyers are found ASAP.

    Couldn't agree more with the terminal decline comments. It may not happen instantly, but we will continue to slide under RD's ownership, and relegation to League 2 and beyond beckons.
  • Worried about 2 parties being involved IMO those deals always end in tears!
  • bobmunro said:

    Let's look at a hypothetical example of how a separate Valley/Club deal might work.

    Total takeover cost £30 million - made up of £15 million real estate and £15 million good will, EFL licence, squad value etc...

    Americans pay £15 mill for the real estate and Aussies buy the rest. Americans charge a rent of £600k per year for a secure 99 year term thereby getting a 4% return, but retain ownership of the ground. Escape clause from the lease with an option for the Aussies to buy the freehold for say £20 million at any point in the future. Americans play no part whatsoever in running the club.

    Ignore the actual figures above but that might work.

    What about maintenance and repairs, is that down to the landlord? Remember Glikstein wouldn't sort the east terrace when Hulyer owned the football club.
  • Ferryman said:

    bobmunro said:

    Let's look at a hypothetical example of how a separate Valley/Club deal might work.

    Total takeover cost £30 million - made up of £15 million real estate and £15 million good will, EFL licence, squad value etc...

    Americans pay £15 mill for the real estate and Aussies buy the rest. Americans charge a rent of £600k per year for a secure 99 year term thereby getting a 4% return, but retain ownership of the ground. Escape clause from the lease with an option for the Aussies to buy the freehold for say £20 million at any point in the future. Americans play no part whatsoever in running the club.

    Ignore the actual figures above but that might work.

    What about maintenance and repairs, is that down to the landlord? Remember Glikstein wouldn't sort the east terrace when Hulyer owned the football club.
    That’s the whole point of negotiations. It could be as good or as bad as you can imagine and anything in between.

  • Ferryman said:

    bobmunro said:

    Let's look at a hypothetical example of how a separate Valley/Club deal might work.

    Total takeover cost £30 million - made up of £15 million real estate and £15 million good will, EFL licence, squad value etc...

    Americans pay £15 mill for the real estate and Aussies buy the rest. Americans charge a rent of £600k per year for a secure 99 year term thereby getting a 4% return, but retain ownership of the ground. Escape clause from the lease with an option for the Aussies to buy the freehold for say £20 million at any point in the future. Americans play no part whatsoever in running the club.

    Ignore the actual figures above but that might work.

    What about maintenance and repairs, is that down to the landlord? Remember Glikstein wouldn't sort the east terrace when Hulyer owned the football club.
    Gordon Bennett - it was only an example.

    Now if the Americans/Aussies pay me handsomely I'll structure a deal beneficial to me both!!
  • Sorry, I was wrong. On Friday I posted that JW was speaking bollox & he was being played by RD. Having just listened to that 1.40 min snippet I concur he is just plain talking bollox. Conference call from the US & Oz.......it could only happen to us. Rather have Mike Ashley if I'm honest.

    "Unlocking the money" in investment terms is more likely to mean dis-investing already held assetts or waiting for certain fixed rate bonds to become available. This could mean weeks or even months.

    The Aussies have been around for almost 12 months & they still don't have enough money to buy the club, let alone fund it for their magical 5 year "plan". Tell them to do one & come back when they are sensible.
  • I wonder if a separation could be challen
    Uboat said:

    James Seed strolls back into thread.

    Eastenders drums. Roll credits.


    I'll take 1 day if its still available..

    ;)

    welcome back @JamesSeed !
  • Sorry, I was wrong. On Friday I posted that JW was speaking bollox & he was being played by RD. Having just listened to that 1.40 min snippet I concur he is just plain talking bollox. Conference call from the US & Oz.......it could only happen to us. Rather have Mike Ashley if I'm honest.

    "Unlocking the money" in investment terms is more likely to mean dis-investing already held assetts or waiting for certain fixed rate bonds to become available. This could mean weeks or even months.

    The Aussies have been around for almost 12 months & they still don't have enough money to buy the club, let alone fund it for their magical 5 year "plan". Tell them to do one & come back when they are sensible.

    Isn’t proving funds for 5 years part of the efl fit and proper persons test?
  • Sponsored links:


  • 2 years I think
  • I think the meet and greet at the training ground on a Sunday as championed by Airman may have been with 'POTENTIAL new owners'. Not 'THE new owners.'
    Chinese whispers play a f****** huge part in a lot that goes on here.
  • JamesSeed said:

    Aussies out!

    My last post on here was on page 1244 and I’m not sure what’s changed since then :-(

    Part of the reason for my return is that I wanted to send you all a message about prostate cancer:

    https://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/comment/3416267#Comment_3416267

    Wrong thread for prostate cancer.
    Oh. The ride is to raise funds for prostate cancer though.
  • I just don't get how this tallies with the 'being introduced as the new owners at the training ground' when they've not even submitted there offer.
  • J BLOCK said:

    I just don't get how this tallies with the 'being introduced as the new owners at the training ground' when they've not even submitted there offer.

    As I said. Potential new owners.
    There's a huge difference.
  • I think a lot of the posts suggesting no price has been agreed, no bid on the table and not having the money are wide of the mark. FWIW I think something is going down and it’s reaching a conclusion. That’s not the same as reaching a positive conclusion because too much can go wrong at any point especially when dealing with someone like Duchatelet. I do think the two “buying” parties involved are getting their ducks in a row and it will either work out or not in the next week or so.
  • If the rumours of Americans potentially looking to purchase the Valley and training facilities are true then I assume they would have to pay off the existing Director loans in order to achieve this?

    Can't see this being part of the deal to be honest.
  • I think a lot of the posts suggesting no price has been agreed, no bid on the table and not having the money are wide of the mark. FWIW I think something is going down and it’s reaching a conclusion. That’s not the same as reaching a positive conclusion because too much can go wrong at any point especially when dealing with someone like Duchatelet. I do think the two “buying” parties involved are getting their ducks in a row and it will either work out or not in the next week or so.

    It will happen in the next two weeks, I seem to have heard that before somewhere :smiley:
  • ross1 said:

    I think a lot of the posts suggesting no price has been agreed, no bid on the table and not having the money are wide of the mark. FWIW I think something is going down and it’s reaching a conclusion. That’s not the same as reaching a positive conclusion because too much can go wrong at any point especially when dealing with someone like Duchatelet. I do think the two “buying” parties involved are getting their ducks in a row and it will either work out or not in the next week or so.

    It will happen in the next two weeks, I seem to have heard that before somewhere :smiley:
    Difference being I said it will be resolved. That can be either positive or negative

  • Sponsored links:


  • Page 1905 looking good
  • edited January 2019

    J BLOCK said:

    I just don't get how this tallies with the 'being introduced as the new owners at the training ground' when they've not even submitted there offer.

    As I said. Potential new owners.
    There's a huge difference.
    No. I'm referring to the posts people have made when they say they referred to them as the new owners, not potential.
  • I think a lot of the posts suggesting no price has been agreed, no bid on the table and not having the money are wide of the mark. FWIW I think something is going down and it’s reaching a conclusion. That’s not the same as reaching a positive conclusion because too much can go wrong at any point especially when dealing with someone like Duchatelet. I do think the two “buying” parties involved are getting their ducks in a row and it will either work out or not in the next week or so.

    The way it's gone it could easily drag on another year.
  • Think Roland wants to sell to Aussies because they haven’t got enough money behind them.wants to throw us from cooking pot onto the barbie.

    Fixed.

    :smile:
  • Scoham said:

    I think a lot of the posts suggesting no price has been agreed, no bid on the table and not having the money are wide of the mark. FWIW I think something is going down and it’s reaching a conclusion. That’s not the same as reaching a positive conclusion because too much can go wrong at any point especially when dealing with someone like Duchatelet. I do think the two “buying” parties involved are getting their ducks in a row and it will either work out or not in the next week or so.

    The way it's gone it could easily drag on another year.
    We know that the Aussies are serious because they’ve been chipping away at this for a long time. They obviously didn’t have the means to secure the club and have at this point arrived with partners or perhaps just finance from America. Now that may collapse if the Americans pull out and then indeed we might see a long time before any group gets as close as we currently are. I would guess that should the Americans pull the plug then the Aussies might call it a day but that’s just my view. They might well seek partners elsewhere.

    Tomorrow LdT will have to answer some searching questions and we might all know a lot more by midnight tomorrow. I’m keen to know if @Airman Brown is correct that RD has been turning away interest. That to me seems very odd for someone keen to find a buyer.

    I doubt we’ll hear very much now until tomorrow at the FF.
  • edited January 2019

    I think the meet and greet at the training ground on a Sunday as championed by Airman may have been with 'POTENTIAL new owners'. Not 'THE new owners.'
    Chinese whispers play a f****** huge part in a lot that goes on here.

    What happened is that the group was described to those who happened to be there when they went round. Whether the original language or the retelling of it is imprecise probably isn’t meaningful.

    Good to see confirmation from JW of the American angle.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!