I for one am happy with JW passing on his information. I appreciate anything being put out there (as I was with Jimmy seeds stuff on here). As long as someone is passing on info with the beat of intentions it's not their fault if it changes or doesn't happen. That's the point of a rumour it's by definition not a certainty.
Another one who will learn when it's comes to dealing with Roland Duchatelet
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
What info? All he's offered is coulds and shoulds, today he's backtracking.
But what about the tour on the 30th December where the group were introduced as the new owners? Fuck this,its beyond a joke now. I will now only believe what i read when its in black,white and red on the official site. Firmly in the WIOTOS team now.
This happened. Hopefully someone will ask LDT about it at the FF and then we can see if he lies.
I saw JW’s information first-hand on Saturday and it’s neither made up nor gossip. Any tabloid would have run with it.
Not every tabloid has direct access to Roland though. I'd have hoped given the last 5 years of frustration and anger (and to his credit he would know about that better than most journalists) he would have been more thorough and fact checked before putting information out there. Either that, or, at the very least, be more careful about the sensationalism he ran with last week.
I know quite a few people thought / think my stance on this is negative, but I just cannot understand with the facts that have been presented why so many people gobbled up last week that this was a done deal, particularly after the other false dawns.
Absolutely bang on mate. Too many people don't believe that Duchatelet would conspire to (once again) cause us grief by stirring things up! Of course he would; he despises the fan base for the embarrassment it's caused him.
I don't think he's holding off on this deal that could see him net tens of millions of pounds just to spite the fan base. I think that's ridiculous. I think it's far more likely he wants more money, the group involved need time to properly show proof of funds, the EFL paperwork needs to be done. The idea of spiting us, or that the Fans Forum somehow comes in to his consideration, is ludicrous to me.
The price element I'm sure is more or less agreed, otherwise it wouldn't make sense to claim the deal was remotely close in the first place?
Personally I think some people here are over egging Roland's desire to "spite us", I'm sure he's sick of this process as much as we are, there's no benefit for him to stick false rumours out when the club is losing him money anyway
Cos he's a spiteful **** who can afford it.
He was sold a line about who was to blame for his failed project and wants revenge.
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
What info? All he's offered is coulds and shoulds, today he's backtracking.
But what about the tour on the 30th December where the group were introduced as the new owners? Fuck this,its beyond a joke now. I will now only believe what i read when its in black,white and red on the official site. Firmly in the WIOTOS team now.
This happened. Hopefully someone will ask LDT about it at the FF and then we can see if he lies.
I saw JW’s information first-hand on Saturday and it’s neither made up nor gossip. Any tabloid would have run with it.
Not every tabloid has direct access to Roland though. I'd have hoped given the last 5 years of frustration and anger (and to his credit he would know about that better than most journalists) he would have been more thorough and fact checked before putting information out there. Either that, or, at the very least, be more careful about the sensationalism he ran with last week.
It’s not as easy as that if no one is talking. He had good reason to believe what he put out, although I agree he went too far on Friday.
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
What info? All he's offered is coulds and shoulds, today he's backtracking.
The info from his source in writing.
So why the backtracking today? Doesn't really add up, does it?
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
That is assuming there was other GENUINE interested parties.
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
What info? All he's offered is coulds and shoulds, today he's backtracking.
The info from his source in writing.
So why the backtracking today? Doesn't really add up, does it?
What was true on Friday isn’t necessarily true today, is it? That’s the reason he should have been more cautious then, but it doesn’t change what he was told. I don’t think the source was at fault either, FWIW.
Makes you laugh how JW says ‘you can go to tomorrows game knowing it is done’. Anyone wondered whether Duchatalet his told him to say that just to get a few more pounds in his wallet before he leaves? What a w**ker!
I stand by the comment I made Friday... absolute joke of an old Belgian Scrote he is!
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
What info? All he's offered is coulds and shoulds, today he's backtracking.
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
What info? All he's offered is coulds and shoulds, today he's backtracking.
The info from his source in writing.
Oh. Must be legit then.
Point being that if it’s in writing it doesn’t get elaborated or misunderstood in the way a second-hand conversation can easily be.
I doubt very much the price is agreed or finalised, otherwise the deal would be done.
RD is irrational, he turns away some buyers, changes the prices, keeps the Aussies in the picture, he can't be trusted.
But all the evidence points to there being real activity, real buyers and real negotiations.
Some people seem to see it as "if the deal hasn't happened, then the whole story is fake".
The reality is, IMHO, that the story is true, there is serious interest but a deal hasn't been finalised.
People read "It COULD be as soon as 72 hours as "It WILL happen in 72 hours" and then feel cheated when that made up "deadline" passes.
There are no deadlines here. White is talking up his story.
We don't know what the meeting today will produce. It could be that RD plays another of his games and messes about this buyer. It could be they shake hands on the price and other conditions and the lawyers draw up the papers.
I'll believe we've been taken over when it's on the official site, I don't know when that will be so I'm not waiting for any deadline to be reached. I'm not panicking, I'm not blaming anyone other than Roland for any "delay".
I’d suggest dropping the ‘Roland messing around to spite us’ angle.
It is completely unrealistic and unnecessary muddies the waters.
Imo the deal is not completed until RD fully agrees to all aspects of an offer on the table and an interested party signs and delivers on this.
RDs driver will be to minimalise his financial loss or provide some form of commercial interest protection, future dividend to offset the financial loss. None of that will be driven by spite but 100% driven by his desire to not fail in his own mind.
Can only speak for myself but I’m not very happy at the amount of stick JW is getting on here. We don’t have many journos out there who have shown much interest and he ‘has’ gone out of his way to see this saga through to the end. I believe he is genuinely a ‘friend’ of the club and that he sees clearly that we have been so very badly treated over the last 5 horrendous years. I do think he was a little premature with his time scale but he is on our side and I am sure only means us well.....so can I ask you all to chill a bit, no need to make an unnecessary enemy of the guy, after all, he’s just about all we’ve got in the way of a friend on our side with any reasonable info......be it good, bad or indifferent.
I for one am happy with JW passing on his information. I appreciate anything being put out there (as I was with Jimmy seeds stuff on here). As long as someone is passing on info with the beat of intentions it's not their fault if it changes or doesn't happen. That's the point of a rumour it's by definition not a certainty.
Another one who will learn when it's comes to dealing with Roland Duchatelet
At least it put 3,000 on Saturday's attendance.
Which, IF Roland is behind this info to JW (a BIG IF), would provide him with hard evidence, if he is busy telling a prospective buyer that Charlton has great capability for growth! There are more reasons than a one-off increase in ticket income why it might be of benefit to Roland to spread rumours, other than a desire to get his own back on fans who have embarrassed him in his home town.
Can only speak for myself but I’m not very happy at the amount of stick JW is getting on here. We don’t have many journos out there who have shown much interest and he ‘has’ gone out of his way to see this saga through to the end. I believe he is genuinely a ‘friend’ of the club and that he sees clearly that we have been so very badly treated over the last 5 horrendous years. I do think he was a little premature with his time scale but he is on our side and I am sure only means us well.....so can I ask you all to chill a bit, no need to make an unnecessary enemy of the guy, after all, he’s just about all we’ve got in the way of a friend on our side with any reasonable info......be it good, bad or indifferent.
I do have some sympathy with Jim White. You're right, not many people give a monkey's about Charlton and he has made an effort to get some much needed answers for us. When it was said on here (I forget who by) that White found his interview with Roland 'exhausting' I think he's got an inkling of the sort of person he's dealing with but I still don't think he's fully grasped the staggering extent of M. Duchatalet's ignorance and obtuse delusions of what actually goes on with Charlton. He's gone ahead with the takeover news like he would with any other club having received the info he did without factoring in just how difficult, capricious, tight-fisted and deluded our owner is. Roland is well capable of f@cking this takeover all the way back to square one again.
More convinced than ever this 'new interest' was a smoke screen to try and speed up the aussie bid.
Really hope I'm wrong, but it feels like RD has once again played a few people like a fiddle, I really do think he's vindictive enough to play games to embarrass a particular person he blames for the protests.
That wouldn’t really explain the information JW has. I do think we need to ask why RD continues to entertain the Aussies, after 20 months, while turning away other interest.
What info? All he's offered is coulds and shoulds, today he's backtracking.
The info from his source in writing.
Unless is a bank statement showing funds being deposited into RD;s account or a memorandum of sale it means sod all.
Sorry, I stand by what I said last week. We are being played. No idea by whom or why, but a sensible, credible potential owner wouldn't be leaking info to JW.
apt tune now on the radio as I type.............."Ramble on"
I for one am happy with JW passing on his information. I appreciate anything being put out there (as I was with Jimmy seeds stuff on here). As long as someone is passing on info with the beat of intentions it's not their fault if it changes or doesn't happen. That's the point of a rumour it's by definition not a certainty.
Another one who will learn when it's comes to dealing with Roland Duchatelet
At least it put 3,000 on Saturday's attendance.
Which, IF Roland is behind this info to JW (a BIG IF), would provide him with hard evidence, if he is busy telling a prospective buyer that Charlton has great capability for growth! There are more reasons than a one-off increase in ticket income why it might be of benefit to Roland to spread rumours, other than a desire to get his own back on fans who have embarrassed him in his home town.
The truth is, none of us knows.
From what I know you can discount the idea it was about boosting Saturday’s crowd.
Comments
He was sold a line about who was to blame for his failed project and wants revenge.
Lots of baby and the bath water here.
I doubt very much the price is agreed or finalised, otherwise the deal would be done.
RD is irrational, he turns away some buyers, changes the prices, keeps the Aussies in the picture, he can't be trusted.
But all the evidence points to there being real activity, real buyers and real negotiations.
Some people seem to see it as "if the deal hasn't happened, then the whole story is fake".
The reality is, IMHO, that the story is true, there is serious interest but a deal hasn't been finalised.
People read "It COULD be as soon as 72 hours as "It WILL happen in 72 hours" and then feel cheated when that made up "deadline" passes.
There are no deadlines here. White is talking up his story.
We don't know what the meeting today will produce. It could be that RD plays another of his games and messes about this buyer. It could be they shake hands on the price and other conditions and the lawyers draw up the papers.
I'll believe we've been taken over when it's on the official site, I don't know when that will be so I'm not waiting for any deadline to be reached. I'm not panicking, I'm not blaming anyone other than Roland for any "delay".
It is completely unrealistic and unnecessary muddies the waters.
Imo the deal is not completed until RD fully agrees to all aspects of an offer on the table and an interested party signs and delivers on this.
RDs driver will be to minimalise his financial loss or provide some form of commercial interest protection, future dividend to offset the financial loss. None of that will be driven by spite but 100% driven by his desire to not fail in his own mind.
We don’t have many journos out there who have shown much interest and he ‘has’ gone out of his way to see this saga through to the end.
I believe he is genuinely a ‘friend’ of the club and that he sees clearly that we have been so very badly treated over the last 5 horrendous years.
I do think he was a little premature with his time scale but he is on our side and I am sure only means us well.....so can I ask you all to chill a bit, no need to make an unnecessary enemy of the guy, after all, he’s just about all we’ve got in the way of a friend on our side with any reasonable info......be it good, bad or indifferent.
The truth is, none of us knows.
Sorry, I stand by what I said last week. We are being played. No idea by whom or why, but a sensible, credible potential owner wouldn't be leaking info to JW.
apt tune now on the radio as I type.............."Ramble on"