Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

1102810291031103310342265

Comments

  • 51 days now since they were seen in the directors box v Shrewsbury
  • cabbles said:

    shirty5 said:

    51 days now since they were seen in the directors box v Shrewsbury

    Just another example of how shit a football club owner Roland is. Can’t even sell the club properly. Making a pig’s ear of this like he’s made a pig’s ear of everything else
    Has he not heard of the expression "to cut your losses".
  • cabbles said:

    shirty5 said:

    51 days now since they were seen in the directors box v Shrewsbury

    Just another example of how shit a football club owner Roland is. Can’t even sell the club properly. Making a pig’s ear of this like he’s made a pig’s ear of everything else
    Has he not heard of the expression "to cut your losses".
    No, and nor "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"

    Or

    "Tony Jimenez and Kevin Cash are well dodgy Spivs"
  • Who said there was a deadline? Wasn't that just invented on here?
  • cabbles said:

    shirty5 said:

    51 days now since they were seen in the directors box v Shrewsbury

    Just another example of how shit a football club owner Roland is. Can’t even sell the club properly. Making a pig’s ear of this like he’s made a pig’s ear of everything else
    Has he not heard of the expression "to cut your losses".
    If only, but as Katrien Miere once said..."Mr Duchatelet has a different kind of passion for Charlton".
  • clb74 said:


    This is what I can't understand.
    If the total of money owed the directors is 7 million that is a small amount when you think of the cost of buying the club.

    Why not come to an agreement where Roland and the buyers pay half each.

    That's 3.5 million each and if that is what is causing the hold up ups fuckin pathetic tbh.

    You could always release £3.5million out your pension pot.
    Fuck off
    That would only leave me with £15 million
    Ooh, £15mn plus £3.5mn - some £17.47mn over the pension lifetime allowance. HMRC are coming for you.......
  • Scoham said:
    So deadline for proof of funds set by Roland was yesterday. Deadline for the deal to be done is two weeks time. If you believe Roland won't change his mind again.
  • Sponsored links:


  • joeaddick said:

    cabbles said:

    shirty5 said:

    51 days now since they were seen in the directors box v Shrewsbury

    Just another example of how shit a football club owner Roland is. Can’t even sell the club properly. Making a pig’s ear of this like he’s made a pig’s ear of everything else
    Has he not heard of the expression "to cut your losses".
    If only, but as Katrien Miere once said..."Mr Duchatelet has a different kind of passion for Charlton".
    Not heard that one before, that adds to the catalogue.
  • Any chance someone who’s place it is can share some details of the new info and good vibes?...
  • edited June 2018
    JamesSeed said:

    Chizz said:

    Who knows whether the deadline (if there was one) was missed (if it was, as rumoured, yesterday)?

    That deadline was to prove that the Aussies had funding. Presumably in the form of documentation to RD. But not to the media. Not via a press release. Not in a post on CL.

    Whether that information was made public wouldn't be down to the Aussies. They, by word and action, have demonstrated clearly that they do indeed have the money. They've told @JamesSeed that they have replaced investor(s) that have exited the consortium. And they've continued - at significant expense - to participate in the purchase. These aren't the actions of a consortium unable to meet its financial obligations.

    No, we won't be hearing from that side of the equation to confirm what they've already demonstrated. (Lewis Hamilton doesn't hold a press conference after every GP win to re-establish that yes, in fact, he does have a driving licence).

    If we are going to hear anything it should come from the stumbling, bumbling wreck that's been trying to sell the club for so long. It's the owner that should confirm whether his artificial deadline was a help or a hindrance to the sales process. It is from RD that we should hear if his deadline was met.

    Of course, communication isn't the arrogant thicko's best trait. (It's not his worst, but certainly isn't his best). The shady has-been's attempts at dialogue with the most important people in the club have been consistently embarrassing. From inarticulate ramblings turned into web posts to hand-picked, hidden, secret meetings with tiny groups of friendly, gullible, malleable fans, his attempts at keeping the vital congregation onside have been abject lessons in "how not to do PR".

    But now, finally, the time has arrived to clear up the monumental mountain of nonsense he has created.

    Roland, if you're reading this, I have two requests of you.

    Please Roland, for your own sake and for everyone else's, tell us what the fucking hell is going on.

    But get someone to proofread it first.

    Thanks.

    No it wasn't chizzy.

    A lot of new info has surfaced in the last couple of days, and it's not my place to mention what it is, but you're right about the monumental mountain, but not necessarily all created by Roland.
    Good vibes for next week. GM's mentioning 'beer soon', which may mean good news is coming, because he's been telling me nothing (other than 'it's still on') and wouldn't meet me for a beer while deal was being done. Not that he doesn't trust me or anything ;-)
    I took the piece by @Airman Brown stating "We understand that Duchatelet has set a deadline of this Friday [ie 29 June] for the Aussies to prove they have the funds" to mean what I posted.

    Have I misunderstood It? Or misinterpreted it by posting "that deadline was to prove that the Aussies had funding"?

    And the "monumental mountain" refers to the mess he's made of Charlton. And that very much is down to Roland, exclusively.

    Good to hear that you should be having beers soon with your contact. Sounds like a binary conversation will take place..!
  • Just so I'm clear. The Aussies have taken the best part of a YEAR to get the capital together for this.
    Two major investers have walked/been refused in the past couple of weeks.
    Worry not. Within DAYS new investors have been found that can cover the missing funds?


    Time will tell but can't see it myself.

    Some, but not all, of those are facts.
  • Sponsored links:



  • RD is like an animal that has got itself caught in a trap and then has to gnaw off the trapped leg in order to escape. Self-inflicted.

    Imagine how long that takes, and how painful .... my sympathies are entirely with the animal.

  • joeaddick said:

    cabbles said:

    shirty5 said:

    51 days now since they were seen in the directors box v Shrewsbury

    Just another example of how shit a football club owner Roland is. Can’t even sell the club properly. Making a pig’s ear of this like he’s made a pig’s ear of everything else
    Has he not heard of the expression "to cut your losses".
    If only, but as Katrien Miere once said..."Mr Duchatelet has a different kind of passion for Charlton".
    Not heard that one before, that adds to the catalogue.
    Came from one of those fan meetings she set up with various fan/forum groups...
  • I hope it will be, but , it seems it's always next week , doesn't it ?
  • JamesSeed said:

    Chizz said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Chizz said:

    Who knows whether the deadline (if there was one) was missed (if it was, as rumoured, yesterday)?

    That deadline was to prove that the Aussies had funding. Presumably in the form of documentation to RD. But not to the media. Not via a press release. Not in a post on CL.

    Whether that information was made public wouldn't be down to the Aussies. They, by word and action, have demonstrated clearly that they do indeed have the money. They've told @JamesSeed that they have replaced investor(s) that have exited the consortium. And they've continued - at significant expense - to participate in the purchase. These aren't the actions of a consortium unable to meet its financial obligations.

    No, we won't be hearing from that side of the equation to confirm what they've already demonstrated. (Lewis Hamilton doesn't hold a press conference after every GP win to re-establish that yes, in fact, he does have a driving licence).

    If we are going to hear anything it should come from the stumbling, bumbling wreck that's been trying to sell the club for so long. It's the owner that should confirm whether his artificial deadline was a help or a hindrance to the sales process. It is from RD that we should hear if his deadline was met.

    Of course, communication isn't the arrogant thicko's best trait. (It's not his worst, but certainly isn't his best). The shady has-been's attempts at dialogue with the most important people in the club have been consistently embarrassing. From inarticulate ramblings turned into web posts to hand-picked, hidden, secret meetings with tiny groups of friendly, gullible, malleable fans, his attempts at keeping the vital congregation onside have been abject lessons in "how not to do PR".

    But now, finally, the time has arrived to clear up the monumental mountain of nonsense he has created.

    Roland, if you're reading this, I have two requests of you.

    Please Roland, for your own sake and for everyone else's, tell us what the fucking hell is going on.

    But get someone to proofread it first.

    Thanks.

    No it wasn't chizzy.

    A lot of new info has surfaced in the last couple of days, and it's not my place to mention what it is, but you're right about the monumental mountain, but not necessarily all created by Roland.
    Good vibes for next week. GM's mentioning 'beer soon', which may mean good news is coming, because he's been telling me nothing (other than 'it's still on') and wouldn't meet me for a beer while deal was being done. Not that he doesn't trust me or anything ;-)
    I took the piece by @Airman Brown stating "We understand that Duchatelet has set a deadline of this Friday [ie 29 June] for the Aussies to prove they have the funds" to mean what I posted.

    Have I misunderstood It? Or misinterpreted it by posting "that deadline was to prove that the Aussies had funding"?

    And the "monumental mountain" refers to the mess he's made of Charlton. And that very much is down to Roland, exclusively.

    Good to hear that you should be having beers soon with your contact. Sounds like a binary conversation will take place..!
    The monumental mountain was, according to GM, not of RDs making, but part of problem was that he didn’t even know about it. The Aussies could have walked when they found out about it. We’re lucky they didn’t, especially with no one else waiting in the wings.
    I’m off on the bike that I’ve had cobbled together from two other bikes I owned. Eight bikes in one house is too many apparently. I’ve only got three now which is a bit sad.

    We’re all on the same side. We all want Roland gone, and I think we’re nearly there.
    Lets bloody hope so !!!
  • PopIcon said:

    Scoham said:
    Self-indulgent nonsense. VOTV revealed what? That it was happening, that it was a done deal. Trust is earned not given, I stopped believing a long time ago.
    Not saying I believe it or that it’s 100% fact, I was just answering the question on where the talk of a deadline this week came from.
  • vff said:

    JamesSeed said:

    There's no way the Aussies didn't know about the multiple ownerships rules. From what we know there were 2 issues raised by the EFL, we don't know if that was with one investor or with 2 investors. We do know from James Seed that one investor stepped out as a result and has now been replaced.

    The most likely reason being that they knew about the issue, but thought it would be resolved before the fit and proper tests were completed. It wasn't resolved, and isn't going to be resolved imminently, so they stepped away from the deal. That fits all the facts we know and makes logical sense. Of course there are lots of other possibilities, but them not know about that rule seems by far the least likely, yet people keep saying it and using as some sort of stick to beat the Aussies with.

    Pretty sure, but didn't hear this from GM, but from another source.
    I agree with Airman that it's the directors loans issue that is holding things up.
    If the directors loans are holding things up, would they consider rolling over the loans to the Aussies, if the Aussies bid is credible to reach the Premiership (easy for me to propose I know, over what is a large sum of not my money). If the Aussies plan is solid then there may be a better chance to get their money back than with Duchatelet ?

    Or is Duchatelet trying to pay them off, so he can do his own rolling on money owed with keeping hold of the ground ?

    (Apologies if this has been covered in the last 200 pages of this sometimes difficult to follow thread : puns / fighting / out & out BS with the occasional relevant bit of news).
    I don't believe the Aussies want to pay the over valuation, AND another £7M later if they reach they're objective.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!