Pardew Sacked (pg 1)/De Boer Sacked (pg 25)
Comments
-
Because Zaha was making all the difference before the ANC8
-
Still can't see it , 6/4 they are to go down , just think the chuff down there won't have the goals that palace will get
We live in hope though0 -
Enough difference to not be a bottom 3 team though...ForeverAddickted said:Because Zaha was making all the difference before the ANC
0 -
The other concern would be another team getting dragged into the mire as there usually is one - and at the moment it's looking like being the current Premier League title holders.
Assuming they do get nothing from today's game, Leicester will have picked up just 10 points from their last 13 matches. Mahrez (away at the ANC but may be back soon) and Vardy haven't performed to the same level but, there again, the other Clubs now know how they play anyway so there is no surprise element. They are also badly missing Williams, one, if not their most influential player.
The biggest issue, however, is that, unlike last season, where they were only fighting on one front, they do have Champions League and potential FA Cup additional games to play.
I know some will say that "Leicester have too many players to go down" but that's been said many times before and it can be difficult to rectify a poor run. They are still about 12/1 to go down but were double that price this time last year - and we know what happened then.0 -
And during, by the sounds of it.ForeverAddickted said:Because Zaha was making all the difference before the ANC
1 -
Don't know who Williams is unless you're getting mixed up with Swansea? Watford are in free fall so may aid their escape.Addick Addict said:The other concern would be another team getting dragged into the mire as there usually is one - and at the moment it's looking like being the current Premier League title holders.
Assuming they do get nothing from today's game, Leicester will have picked up just 10 points from their last 13 matches. Mahrez (away at the ANC but may be back soon) and Vardy haven't performed to the same level but, there again, the other Clubs now know how they play anyway so there is no surprise element. They are also badly missing Williams, one, if not their most influential player.
The biggest issue, however, is that, unlike last season, where they were only fighting on one front, they do have Champions League and potential FA Cup additional games to play.
I know some will say that "Leicester have too many players to go down" but that's been said many times before and it can be difficult to rectify a poor run. They are still about 12/1 to go down but were double that price this time last year - and we know what happened then.1 -
2014 Fa cup runners up: Hull city
2015: Hull relegated.
2015 Fa cup runners up: Aston Villa
2016: Aston villa relegated
2016: Fa cup runners up: Nigel's
2017: Nigel's relegated?
23 -
Indeed I am - and YOU could say I was talking a load of Bollox. The back four is exactly the same as last year.bolloxbolder said:
Don't know who Williams is unless you're getting mixed up with Swansea? Watford are in free fall so may aid their escape.Addick Addict said:The other concern would be another team getting dragged into the mire as there usually is one - and at the moment it's looking like being the current Premier League title holders.
Assuming they do get nothing from today's game, Leicester will have picked up just 10 points from their last 13 matches. Mahrez (away at the ANC but may be back soon) and Vardy haven't performed to the same level but, there again, the other Clubs now know how they play anyway so there is no surprise element. They are also badly missing Williams, one, if not their most influential player.
The biggest issue, however, is that, unlike last season, where they were only fighting on one front, they do have Champions League and potential FA Cup additional games to play.
I know some will say that "Leicester have too many players to go down" but that's been said many times before and it can be difficult to rectify a poor run. They are still about 12/1 to go down but were double that price this time last year - and we know what happened then.0 -
They did lose Kante though.0
-
The guy is a penalty / free-kick machine, with his constant diving antics.ForeverAddickted said:Because Zaha was making all the difference before the ANC
They are a considerably more dangerous with him in the team and, IMHO, the longer he stays in Africa, the better.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
another week and about the only thing football wise that is bringing any joy.palarsehater said:
so far so good, and they are proper in it now.palarsehater said:palaces next league 6 are
watford a
arsenal a
swansea h
west ham a
everton h
bournemouth a
cant see them winning any of them.0 -
... and holders Ivory Coast go out at the group stage.mid_life_crisis said:
The guy is a penalty / free-kick machine, with his constant diving antics.ForeverAddickted said:Because Zaha was making all the difference before the ANC
They are a considerably more dangerous with him in the team and, IMHO, the longer he stays in Africa, the better.
This is a disaster.
0 -
It's really not. He was available all 2016 and they averaged 0.71 points per game. He might be their best player, but that's like being the world's tallest midget.15
-
Bad news. He's a good player.
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11661/10744375/patrick-van-aanholt-set-for-crystal-palace-move-after-sunderland-accept-14m-bid
He's having a medical.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/387694550 -
More debt for them when they get relegated.12
-
yep another good player but then again zaha is a decent player and he cant help there defence is shocking 2 massive games for them sunderland and bournemouth if they fail to win both of them then i think they are staring at relegation.0
-
Why are the likes of Sunderland and Hull selling their best players? It's almost as if they don't expect to stay up.3
-
behave van aanholt's shocking. Sunderland fans on twitter are wetting themselves.8
-
I wish him all the worst stinking out that red n blue pyjama kit!1
-
Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?1
- Sponsored links:
-
Schlupp can play wide left midfield but also played up front in the early part of his career.North Lower Neil said:Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?
0 -
What did Charlton sell their top goal scorer, it's as if they don't want to get promoted.rananegra said:Why are the likes of Sunderland and Hull selling their best players? It's almost as if they don't expect to stay up.
3 -
And should they go down not a chance they'll recoup anything near the amount of money paid for these two.North Lower Neil said:Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?
With all the spending they've done in the summer and this window they can't be far off breaching FFP now surely?0 -
Palace are trying to stay up by spending money on rejects from the clubs doing as badly as them. It's delicious.10
-
They're both pretty similar players, 2 left sided players in one window is a bit curiousAddick Addict said:
Schlupp can play wide left midfield but also played up front in the early part of his career.North Lower Neil said:Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?
I've no idea what's going on at Hull selling Livermore and Snodgrass. It's not as if they spent much in the summer eitherrananegra said:Why are the likes of Sunderland and Hull selling their best players? It's almost as if they don't expect to stay up.
0 -
Hull are assuming that they are going down and taking what money they can now - or get nothing like that by way of transfer money when they do. Owners won't back the manager and the Sky money will disappear.killerandflash said:
They're both pretty similar players, 2 left sided players in one window is a bit curiousAddick Addict said:
Schlupp can play wide left midfield but also played up front in the early part of his career.North Lower Neil said:Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?
I've no idea what's going on at Hull selling Livermore and Snodgrass. It's not as if they spent much in the summer eitherrananegra said:Why are the likes of Sunderland and Hull selling their best players? It's almost as if they don't expect to stay up.
Has this ever happened before?0 -
You can understand a team not spending much after promotion, but a team not spending much then selling their best players in January is bizarre. At this rate they'll go down with a worse team than the one that got them promoted!Addick Addict said:
Hull are assuming that they are going down and taking what money they can now - or get nothing like that by way of transfer money when they do. Owners won't back the manager and the Sky money will disappear.killerandflash said:
They're both pretty similar players, 2 left sided players in one window is a bit curiousAddick Addict said:
Schlupp can play wide left midfield but also played up front in the early part of his career.North Lower Neil said:Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?
I've no idea what's going on at Hull selling Livermore and Snodgrass. It's not as if they spent much in the summer eitherrananegra said:Why are the likes of Sunderland and Hull selling their best players? It's almost as if they don't expect to stay up.
Has this ever happened before?0 -
14 million!?!? For Van Aanholt? Ridiculously over the odds1
-
It's especially mad since they took the trouble/cost to bring in a new manager.killerandflash said:
You can understand a team not spending much after promotion, but a team not spending much then selling their best players in January is bizarre. At this rate they'll go down with a worse team than the one that got them promoted!Addick Addict said:
Hull are assuming that they are going down and taking what money they can now - or get nothing like that by way of transfer money when they do. Owners won't back the manager and the Sky money will disappear.killerandflash said:
They're both pretty similar players, 2 left sided players in one window is a bit curiousAddick Addict said:
Schlupp can play wide left midfield but also played up front in the early part of his career.North Lower Neil said:Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?
I've no idea what's going on at Hull selling Livermore and Snodgrass. It's not as if they spent much in the summer eitherrananegra said:Why are the likes of Sunderland and Hull selling their best players? It's almost as if they don't expect to stay up.
Has this ever happened before?0 -
Especially as it's not as if they're stranded. In a season with several poor teams at the bottom, they have a realistic chance of coming 4th bottomPowell Is Pleasant said:
It's especially mad since they took the trouble/cost to bring in a new manager.killerandflash said:
You can understand a team not spending much after promotion, but a team not spending much then selling their best players in January is bizarre. At this rate they'll go down with a worse team than the one that got them promoted!Addick Addict said:
Hull are assuming that they are going down and taking what money they can now - or get nothing like that by way of transfer money when they do. Owners won't back the manager and the Sky money will disappear.killerandflash said:
They're both pretty similar players, 2 left sided players in one window is a bit curiousAddick Addict said:
Schlupp can play wide left midfield but also played up front in the early part of his career.North Lower Neil said:Bit weird spending £12m on Schlupp and £14m on Van Aanholt about two weeks later - aren't they both left backs?
I've no idea what's going on at Hull selling Livermore and Snodgrass. It's not as if they spent much in the summer eitherrananegra said:Why are the likes of Sunderland and Hull selling their best players? It's almost as if they don't expect to stay up.
Has this ever happened before?0
