Sounds about right. Some of the grounds will be new as well they and others will have minimum away allocation so yes away games should be allocated to season ticket holders first. Why is that wrong?
First is fine, only isn't
So what you are saying that it is ok for people that do not go to home games to buy tickets to away games when they go on sale even though fars who buy season tickets and go to home games will not get first refusal ?
That's not what Henry said.
Quite clearly STHolders should get first dibs.
And as I state in my first post there are grounds next season that fans will want to go to in which the away allocation is not as big as previous seasons. I can now see come what September people morning that they can't get tickets for away games as they are sold out or they should go on general sale blah blah blah . Well I ain't got a problem with that, I want to go to a see my team with my friends and our sons and get behind the boys and Russel Slade. I have had four generations of my family supporting this club and I am chessed off as well as a lot of others of people going to games and spending the whole game slagging off the board and not getting behind the team. So when Wimbeldon, Gillingham, Millwall , Fleetwood, Oxford, Swindon, etc go on sale yes the fans there will be the season ticket holders and even better not such a shitty toxic atmosphere in which has spoilt it over the last season or so.
Think you've missed the point mate. The rumour is that ST holders ONLY will be allowed to buy tickets not, as is the norm, ST holders having first dibs. Are you saying that ST holders aren't protesters btw ?
To clarify NO I have not missed the point. 1: As you have stated "It's a rumour" nothing more nothing less so why this forum gets its knickers in a twist over a "rumour" God only knows. 2. I would also suggest that this "rumour" if true has been only half told. The probability and reality is that ST holders will get first refusal and non season ticket holders will have to wait until general sale as has always been the case. 3. At no point have I said that season ticket holders are not protesters, if you read my quote what I stated is that it will be refreshing to go to home and away games without hearing the continued anti songs and get behind the team and new manager for 90 minutes. There is a time and a place for everything in life and how to get messages across without it becoming the norm. I would argue that the fans over the last season have spent a high percentage of matches focusing their vocal chords,on the board rather than the team.
1. I know it's a rumour. That's why I used the word "rumour".
2. The process you describe is the norm at Charlton and probably every other club. However, this thread is about a rumour which suggests an alternative process.
3. If the rumour proves to be true and you and fellow ST holders attend away games, how exactly does that negate any so called anti songs unless, as I stated earlier, you are suggesting that all ST holders at next season's away games, aren't protesters ??
Sounds about right. Some of the grounds will be new as well they and others will have minimum away allocation so yes away games should be allocated to season ticket holders first. Why is that wrong?
First is fine, only isn't
So what you are saying that it is ok for people that do not go to home games to buy tickets to away games when they go on sale even though fars who buy season tickets and go to home games will not get first refusal ?
That's not what Henry said.
Quite clearly STHolders should get first dibs.
And as I state in my first post there are grounds next season that fans will want to go to in which the away allocation is not as big as previous seasons. I can now see come what September people morning that they can't get tickets for away games as they are sold out or they should go on general sale blah blah blah . Well I ain't got a problem with that, I want to go to a see my team with my friends and our sons and get behind the boys and Russel Slade. I have had four generations of my family supporting this club and I am chessed off as well as a lot of others of people going to games and spending the whole game slagging off the board and not getting behind the team. So when Wimbeldon, Gillingham, Millwall , Fleetwood, Oxford, Swindon, etc go on sale yes the fans there will be the season ticket holders and even better not such a shitty toxic atmosphere in which has spoilt it over the last season or so.
Think you've missed the point mate. The rumour is that ST holders ONLY will be allowed to buy tickets not, as is the norm, ST holders having first dibs. Are you saying that ST holders aren't protesters btw ?
To clarify NO I have not missed the point. 1: As you have stated "It's a rumour" nothing more nothing less so why this forum gets its knickers in a twist over a "rumour" God only knows. 2. I would also suggest that this "rumour" if true has been only half told. The probability and reality is that ST holders will get first refusal and non season ticket holders will have to wait until general sale as has always been the case. 3. At no point have I said that season ticket holders are not protesters, if you read my quote what I stated is that it will be refreshing to go to home and away games without hearing the continued anti songs and get behind the team and new manager for 90 minutes. There is a time and a place for everything in life and how to get messages across without it becoming the norm. I would argue that the fans over the last season have spent a high percentage of matches focusing their vocal chords,on the board rather than the team.
Show me anywhere on this thread where someone has claimed Season Tickets should not get first refusal.
What is being said is the idea is plain daft. For about 5 games next season non season ticket holders may struggle to get a ticket. For the other 18 there will be so many other tickets available these will at least be sold on the days by the opposition clubs. It is what happens now and will happen next season irrespective of what the interim senior management at Charlton think
Think it maybe more than 5 games as stated that the allocation will be far less than what we are used to and given the majority of fans would have already been to the grounds couple that where the team is under performing or in mid table is hard to justify the expense of an away game. Then factor in the team are going for a top six place and there are 6 to 8 games remaining I would suggest that demand from fans would be high and not the hard-core of 400. This has proven in cup games over the years and football fans will continue to see a team that is pushing for promotion or on some form of cup run.
I have just been speaking to someone who does some casual work down at The Valley now and then, and he tells me that only season ticket holders will be allowed to buy tickets for away games next season.
He wasn't sure of the reason (whether it was a drive to sell more season tickets or whether they were worried about games being abandoned and they would want to identify any culprits)?
I argued that that just wasn't possible due to teams like Sheffield United (where you can get an allocation of up to 5,000) being able to sell for cash on the day, but he was adamant they were bringing this rule in for the next campaign.
The thing that surprised me most about this was that he reckons this wasn't Meire's idea, it was limp wristed Tony's brainchild.
I'm yet to be convinced as I just can't see it being possible, but nothing would surprise me with how low they would stoop.
Sounds about right. Some of the grounds will be new as well they and others will have minimum away allocation so yes away games should be allocated to season ticket holders first. Why is that wrong?
First is fine, only isn't
So what you are saying that it is ok for people that do not go to home games to buy tickets to away games when they go on sale even though fars who buy season tickets and go to home games will not get first refusal ?
I'm confident this is a non story. Away tickets will be offered in priority to VG & S/T holders as usual.
This will mean that at possibly 6-8 games, they will sell out to VG & S/T holders.
Possibly a game or two more than usual.
4 pages of guff methinks.
You really believe that 6-8 games will sell out to VG & ST holders, CE ?
Without knowing the allocation for away fans at L1 grounds, I can't comment with any certainty but I feel it's highly unlikely based on my previous experience of attending away games in the top 3 divisions.
You also need to take into consideration that most VG members will ALSO be ST holders....
Be interested to hear Airman's thoughts on this one.
I'm not impressed with your views on our away fans. I understand where you're coming from but as a non ST holder next season who attended 90% of aways for the past 20+ years, I can assure you that I won't be contributing to the toxic, shitty atmosphere when I "somehow " manage to blag a ticket for Bolton in the frozen north next January.
I have just been speaking to someone who does some casual work down at The Valley now and then, and he tells me that only season ticket holders will be allowed to buy tickets for away games next season.
He wasn't sure of the reason (whether it was a drive to sell more season tickets or whether they were worried about games being abandoned and they would want to identify any culprits)?
I argued that that just wasn't possible due to teams like Sheffield United (where you can get an allocation of up to 5,000) being able to sell for cash on the day, but he was adamant they were bringing this rule in for the next campaign.
The thing that surprised me most about this was that he reckons this wasn't Meire's idea, it was limp wristed Tony's brainchild.
I'm yet to be convinced as I just can't see it being possible, but nothing would surprise me with how low they would stoop.
I have just been speaking to someone who does some casual work down at The Valley now and then, and he tells me that only season ticket holders will be allowed to buy tickets for away games next season.
He wasn't sure of the reason (whether it was a drive to sell more season tickets or whether they were worried about games being abandoned and they would want to identify any culprits)?
I argued that that just wasn't possible due to teams like Sheffield United (where you can get an allocation of up to 5,000) being able to sell for cash on the day, but he was adamant they were bringing this rule in for the next campaign.
The thing that surprised me most about this was that he reckons this wasn't Meire's idea, it was limp wristed Tony's brainchild.
I'm yet to be convinced as I just can't see it being possible, but nothing would surprise me with how low they would stoop.
I'll just sit in the home end, doesn't bother me.
As I said earlier, those want to watch their team will do, come what may.
Tickets for Welling Utd now on sale. Is there anyone with an ST who can get me a ticket please?
Sales restricted to those with season ticket, valley gold membership and a personal letter from Katie saying they can have a ticket. Alternatively get down to Park View Road, they will sell to anyone.
Are many of the north upper renewing for next season? was searching the tickets to check on available spaces just out of interest to see how well Meire's better than expected season ticket sales really are doing, looks like its harder to find a taken seat than available ones. Or are the vocal group moving closer to where the protests are needed?
Sounds about right. Some of the grounds will be new as well they and others will have minimum away allocation so yes away games should be allocated to season ticket holders first. Why is that wrong?
First is fine, only isn't
So what you are saying that it is ok for people that do not go to home games to buy tickets to away games when they go on sale even though fars who buy season tickets and go to home games will not get first refusal ?
That's not what Henry said.
Quite clearly STHolders should get first dibs.
And as I state in my first post there are grounds next season that fans will want to go to in which the away allocation is not as big as previous seasons. I can now see come what September people morning that they can't get tickets for away games as they are sold out or they should go on general sale blah blah blah . Well I ain't got a problem with that, I want to go to a see my team with my friends and our sons and get behind the boys and Russel Slade. I have had four generations of my family supporting this club and I am chessed off as well as a lot of others of people going to games and spending the whole game slagging off the board and not getting behind the team. So when Wimbeldon, Gillingham, Millwall , Fleetwood, Oxford, Swindon, etc go on sale yes the fans there will be the season ticket holders and even better not such a shitty toxic atmosphere in which has spoilt it over the last season or so.
Think you've missed the point mate. The rumour is that ST holders ONLY will be allowed to buy tickets not, as is the norm, ST holders having first dibs. Are you saying that ST holders aren't protesters btw ?
To clarify NO I have not missed the point. 1: As you have stated "It's a rumour" nothing more nothing less so why this forum gets its knickers in a twist over a "rumour" God only knows. 2. I would also suggest that this "rumour" if true has been only half told. The probability and reality is that ST holders will get first refusal and non season ticket holders will have to wait until general sale as has always been the case. 3. At no point have I said that season ticket holders are not protesters, if you read my quote what I stated is that it will be refreshing to go to home and away games without hearing the continued anti songs and get behind the team and new manager for 90 minutes. There is a time and a place for everything in life and how to get messages across without it becoming the norm. I would argue that the fans over the last season have spent a high percentage of matches focusing their vocal chords,on the board rather than the team.
1. I know it's a rumour. That's why I used the word "rumour".
2. The process you describe is the norm at Charlton and probably every other club. However, this thread is about a rumour which suggests an alternative process.
3. If the rumour proves to be true and you and fellow ST holders attend away games, how exactly does that negate any so called anti songs unless, as I stated earlier, you are suggesting that all ST holders at next season's away games, aren't protesters ??
You have mugged yourself right off there mate. The fact you are believing a bloke that is not even employed by the club and how would he know.
Secondly all in our lot don't subscribe to the anti songs or the Chris Powell Red and White army.
Sounds about right. Some of the grounds will be new as well they and others will have minimum away allocation so yes away games should be allocated to season ticket holders first. Why is that wrong?
First is fine, only isn't
So what you are saying that it is ok for people that do not go to home games to buy tickets to away games when they go on sale even though fars who buy season tickets and go to home games will not get first refusal ?
That's not what Henry said.
Quite clearly STHolders should get first dibs.
And as I state in my first post there are grounds next season that fans will want to go to in which the away allocation is not as big as previous seasons. I can now see come what September people morning that they can't get tickets for away games as they are sold out or they should go on general sale blah blah blah . Well I ain't got a problem with that, I want to go to a see my team with my friends and our sons and get behind the boys and Russel Slade. I have had four generations of my family supporting this club and I am chessed off as well as a lot of others of people going to games and spending the whole game slagging off the board and not getting behind the team. So when Wimbeldon, Gillingham, Millwall , Fleetwood, Oxford, Swindon, etc go on sale yes the fans there will be the season ticket holders and even better not such a shitty toxic atmosphere in which has spoilt it over the last season or so.
Think you've missed the point mate. The rumour is that ST holders ONLY will be allowed to buy tickets not, as is the norm, ST holders having first dibs. Are you saying that ST holders aren't protesters btw ?
To clarify NO I have not missed the point. 1: As you have stated "It's a rumour" nothing more nothing less so why this forum gets its knickers in a twist over a "rumour" God only knows. 2. I would also suggest that this "rumour" if true has been only half told. The probability and reality is that ST holders will get first refusal and non season ticket holders will have to wait until general sale as has always been the case. 3. At no point have I said that season ticket holders are not protesters, if you read my quote what I stated is that it will be refreshing to go to home and away games without hearing the continued anti songs and get behind the team and new manager for 90 minutes. There is a time and a place for everything in life and how to get messages across without it becoming the norm. I would argue that the fans over the last season have spent a high percentage of matches focusing their vocal chords,on the board rather than the team.
1. I know it's a rumour. That's why I used the word "rumour".
2. The process you describe is the norm at Charlton and probably every other club. However, this thread is about a rumour which suggests an alternative process.
3. If the rumour proves to be true and you and fellow ST holders attend away games, how exactly does that negate any so called anti songs unless, as I stated earlier, you are suggesting that all ST holders at next season's away games, aren't protesters ??
You have mugged yourself right off there mate. The fact you are believing a bloke that is not even employed by the club and how would he know.
Secondly all in our lot don't subscribe to the anti songs or the Chris Powell Red and White army.
No I haven't actually, mate. Nowhere have I said that this process is a definite starter. Which is why I called it a rumour. It couldn't be enforced anyway. I'm saying the idea of it is wrong. Nowhere have I said your lot sing anti songs. I was answering your point where you insinuate that if the process did start and only ST holders went to away games, no anti songs would be sung. As Fanny stated above, you are slating off a lot of fans who attend away games.
The only mug in all this is you. Compounded by wanting to have half a ton at 12s on the title. Better off donating £50 to CARD. Mate.
I'm confident this is a non story. Away tickets will be offered in priority to VG & S/T holders as usual.
This will mean that at possibly 6-8 games, they will sell out to VG & S/T holders.
Possibly a game or two more than usual.
4 pages of guff methinks.
You really believe that 6-8 games will sell out to VG & ST holders, CE ?
Without knowing the allocation for away fans at L1 grounds, I can't comment with any certainty but I feel it's highly unlikely based on my previous experience of attending away games in the top 3 divisions.
I'd be surprised if 6-8 sell out, never mind just to VG and ST holders. Especially as a lot of the games up miles away up north. Millwall, Gillingham, Wimbledon, Oxford and Southend probably will but after that it depends on how well we're doing come March/April.
I'm confident this is a non story. Away tickets will be offered in priority to VG & S/T holders as usual.
This will mean that at possibly 6-8 games, they will sell out to VG & S/T holders.
Possibly a game or two more than usual.
4 pages of guff methinks.
You really believe that 6-8 games will sell out to VG & ST holders, CE ?
Without knowing the allocation for away fans at L1 grounds, I can't comment with any certainty but I feel it's highly unlikely based on my previous experience of attending away games in the top 3 divisions.
You also need to take into consideration that most VG members will ALSO be ST holders....
Be interested too hear Airman's thoughts on this one.
I'm not impressed with your views on our away fans. I understand where you're coming from but as a non ST holder next season who attended 90% of aways for the past 20+ years, I can assure you that I won't be contributing to the toxic, shitty atmosphere when I "somehow " manage to blag a ticket for Bolton in the frozen north next January.
That's your decision....are the fixtures out already?? Who we got Boxing Day??
Sounds about right. Some of the grounds will be new as well they and others will have minimum away allocation so yes away games should be allocated to season ticket holders first. Why is that wrong?
First is fine, only isn't
So what you are saying that it is ok for people that do not go to home games to buy tickets to away games when they go on sale even though fars who buy season tickets and go to home games will not get first refusal ?
That's not what Henry said.
Quite clearly STHolders should get first dibs.
And as I state in my first post there are grounds next season that fans will want to go to in which the away allocation is not as big as previous seasons. I can now see come what September people morning that they can't get tickets for away games as they are sold out or they should go on general sale blah blah blah . Well I ain't got a problem with that, I want to go to a see my team with my friends and our sons and get behind the boys and Russel Slade. I have had four generations of my family supporting this club and I am chessed off as well as a lot of others of people going to games and spending the whole game slagging off the board and not getting behind the team. So when Wimbeldon, Gillingham, Millwall , Fleetwood, Oxford, Swindon, etc go on sale yes the fans there will be the season ticket holders and even better not such a shitty toxic atmosphere in which has spoilt it over the last season or so.
Think you've missed the point mate. The rumour is that ST holders ONLY will be allowed to buy tickets not, as is the norm, ST holders having first dibs. Are you saying that ST holders aren't protesters btw ?
To clarify NO I have not missed the point. 1: As you have stated "It's a rumour" nothing more nothing less so why this forum gets its knickers in a twist over a "rumour" God only knows. 2. I would also suggest that this "rumour" if true has been only half told. The probability and reality is that ST holders will get first refusal and non season ticket holders will have to wait until general sale as has always been the case. 3. At no point have I said that season ticket holders are not protesters, if you read my quote what I stated is that it will be refreshing to go to home and away games without hearing the continued anti songs and get behind the team and new manager for 90 minutes. There is a time and a place for everything in life and how to get messages across without it becoming the norm. I would argue that the fans over the last season have spent a high percentage of matches focusing their vocal chords,on the board rather than the team.
1. I know it's a rumour. That's why I used the word "rumour".
2. The process you describe is the norm at Charlton and probably every other club. However, this thread is about a rumour which suggests an alternative process.
3. If the rumour proves to be true and you and fellow ST holders attend away games, how exactly does that negate any so called anti songs unless, as I stated earlier, you are suggesting that all ST holders at next season's away games, aren't protesters ??
You have mugged yourself right off there mate. The fact you are believing a bloke that is not even employed by the club and how would he know.
Secondly all in our lot don't subscribe to the anti songs or the Chris Powell Red and White army.
No I haven't actually, mate. Nowhere have I said that this process is a definite starter. Which is why I called it a rumour. It couldn't be enforced anyway. I'm saying the idea of it is wrong. Nowhere have I said your lot sing anti songs. I was answering your point where you insinuate that if the process did start and only ST holders went to away games, no anti songs would be sung. As Fanny stated above, you are slating off a lot of fans who attend away games.
The only mug in all this is you. Compounded by wanting to have half a ton at 12s on the title. Better off donating £50 to CARD. Mate.
Don't worry about him. He was going to storm the boardroom a couple of months ago and was excited about ushering in the 'right wing protests'.
Sounds about right. Some of the grounds will be new as well they and others will have minimum away allocation so yes away games should be allocated to season ticket holders first. Why is that wrong?
First is fine, only isn't
So what you are saying that it is ok for people that do not go to home games to buy tickets to away games when they go on sale even though fars who buy season tickets and go to home games will not get first refusal ?
That's not what Henry said.
Quite clearly STHolders should get first dibs.
And as I state in my first post there are grounds next season that fans will want to go to in which the away allocation is not as big as previous seasons. I can now see come what September people morning that they can't get tickets for away games as they are sold out or they should go on general sale blah blah blah . Well I ain't got a problem with that, I want to go to a see my team with my friends and our sons and get behind the boys and Russel Slade. I have had four generations of my family supporting this club and I am chessed off as well as a lot of others of people going to games and spending the whole game slagging off the board and not getting behind the team. So when Wimbeldon, Gillingham, Millwall , Fleetwood, Oxford, Swindon, etc go on sale yes the fans there will be the season ticket holders and even better not such a shitty toxic atmosphere in which has spoilt it over the last season or so.
Think you've missed the point mate. The rumour is that ST holders ONLY will be allowed to buy tickets not, as is the norm, ST holders having first dibs. Are you saying that ST holders aren't protesters btw ?
To clarify NO I have not missed the point. 1: As you have stated "It's a rumour" nothing more nothing less so why this forum gets its knickers in a twist over a "rumour" God only knows. 2. I would also suggest that this "rumour" if true has been only half told. The probability and reality is that ST holders will get first refusal and non season ticket holders will have to wait until general sale as has always been the case. 3. At no point have I said that season ticket holders are not protesters, if you read my quote what I stated is that it will be refreshing to go to home and away games without hearing the continued anti songs and get behind the team and new manager for 90 minutes. There is a time and a place for everything in life and how to get messages across without it becoming the norm. I would argue that the fans over the last season have spent a high percentage of matches focusing their vocal chords,on the board rather than the team.
1. I know it's a rumour. That's why I used the word "rumour".
2. The process you describe is the norm at Charlton and probably every other club. However, this thread is about a rumour which suggests an alternative process.
3. If the rumour proves to be true and you and fellow ST holders attend away games, how exactly does that negate any so called anti songs unless, as I stated earlier, you are suggesting that all ST holders at next season's away games, aren't protesters ??
You have mugged yourself right off there mate. The fact you are believing a bloke that is not even employed by the club and how would he know.
Secondly all in our lot don't subscribe to the anti songs or the Chris Powell Red and White army.
No I haven't actually, mate. Nowhere have I said that this process is a definite starter. Which is why I called it a rumour. It couldn't be enforced anyway. I'm saying the idea of it is wrong. Nowhere have I said your lot sing anti songs. I was answering your point where you insinuate that if the process did start and only ST holders went to away games, no anti songs would be sung. As Fanny stated above, you are slating off a lot of fans who attend away games.
The only mug in all this is you. Compounded by wanting to have half a ton at 12s on the title. Better off donating £50 to CARD. Mate.
Don't worry about him. He was going to storm the boardroom a couple of months ago and was excited about ushering in the 'right wing protests'.
So fans didn't go to the directors box against Brighton and made people think in which lead to them leaving the match before it ended or at half time. Worked better than masks or stickers
I'm confident this is a non story. Away tickets will be offered in priority to VG & S/T holders as usual.
This will mean that at possibly 6-8 games, they will sell out to VG & S/T holders.
Possibly a game or two more than usual.
4 pages of guff methinks.
You really believe that 6-8 games will sell out to VG & ST holders, CE ?
Without knowing the allocation for away fans at L1 grounds, I can't comment with any certainty but I feel it's highly unlikely based on my previous experience of attending away games in the top 3 divisions.
You also need to take into consideration that most VG members will ALSO be ST holders....
Be interested to hear Airman's thoughts on this one.
I'm not impressed with your views on our away fans. I understand where you're coming from but as a non ST holder next season who attended 90% of aways for the past 20+ years, I can assure you that I won't be contributing to the toxic, shitty atmosphere when I "somehow " manage to blag a ticket for Bolton in the frozen north next January.
I doubt we'll sell out hardly any aways tbh.
It was said rather tongue in cheek, based on the hundreds on here who say they won't be going to home games, but will be going to away games instead.
I suspect the truth is, instead of doing a few aways, many will do a few plus one or two more.
A few will do a fair few more aways and some will do hardly any.
Are many of the north upper renewing for next season? was searching the tickets to check on available spaces just out of interest to see how well Meire's better than expected season ticket sales really are doing, looks like its harder to find a taken seat than available ones. Or are the vocal group moving closer to where the protests are needed?
weve moved from the upper north to the covered end. £175 to go back to the real spiritual home end is a bargain no matter what other shit is going on
I know there are a lot of Train Ticket threads at the moment in anticipation for the first away games this season.
What will people do with their travel if the club were to enforce this?
Write to the other 23 CEO's in the division plus Cheltenham and the FSF re the lack of turnover coming into your coffers due to the narrow-minded people at Charlton Athletic.
Comments
2. The process you describe is the norm at Charlton and probably every other club. However, this thread is about a rumour which suggests an alternative process.
3. If the rumour proves to be true and you and fellow ST holders attend away games, how exactly does that negate any so called anti songs unless, as I stated earlier, you are suggesting that all ST holders at next season's away games, aren't protesters ??
Then factor in the team are going for a top six place and there are 6 to 8 games remaining I would suggest that demand from fans would be high and not the hard-core of 400.
This has proven in cup games over the years and football fans will continue to see a team that is pushing for promotion or on some form of cup run.
This will mean that at possibly 6-8 games, they will sell out to VG & S/T holders.
Possibly a game or two more than usual.
4 pages of guff methinks.
Fine if ST holders get first dibs but not fine that ONLY ST holders can buy away tickets
Without knowing the allocation for away fans at L1 grounds, I can't comment with any certainty but I feel it's highly unlikely based on my previous experience of attending away games in the top 3 divisions.
You also need to take into consideration that most VG members will ALSO be ST holders....
Be interested to hear Airman's thoughts on this one.
And @WhenIwasLittleBoy ....
I'm not impressed with your views on our away fans. I understand where you're coming from but as a non ST holder next season who attended 90% of aways for the past 20+ years, I can assure you that I won't be contributing to the toxic, shitty atmosphere when I "somehow " manage to blag a ticket for Bolton in the frozen north next January.
Secondly all in our lot don't subscribe to the anti songs or the Chris Powell Red and White army.
Nowhere have I said your lot sing anti songs. I was answering your point where you insinuate that if the process did start and only ST holders went to away games, no anti songs would be sung.
As Fanny stated above, you are slating off a lot of fans who attend away games.
The only mug in all this is you. Compounded by wanting to have half a ton at 12s on the title.
Better off donating £50 to CARD. Mate.
I'd be surprised if 6-8 sell out, never mind just to VG and ST holders. Especially as a lot of the games up miles away up north.
Millwall, Gillingham, Wimbledon, Oxford and Southend probably will but after that it depends on how well we're doing come March/April.
But in the end you decided everything was okay?
Another great idea from Tony Cahones that bites the dust
It was said rather tongue in cheek, based on the hundreds on here who say they won't be going to home games, but will be going to away games instead.
I suspect the truth is, instead of doing a few aways, many will do a few plus one or two more.
A few will do a fair few more aways and some will do hardly any.
What will people do with their travel if the club were to enforce this?
Then go in the home end