Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

What is our Managerial situation? **Andy Hughes Has His Say - Page 3**

124

Comments

  • Andy Hughes' said exactly what many of us have been saying for some time. I wish I could just say 'let's wait and see' but I can't. The current situation looks really worrying.
  • Riga is going up north to manage Leeds after Hughesy told him how great it was up there.

    With Stephens
  • Andy Hughes' said exactly what many of us have been saying for some time. I wish I could just say 'let's wait and see' but I can't. The current situation looks really worrying.

    I'm not worried yet but I'd like a new manager in by next week.

  • I just want to see some evidence that what I think is going to happen isn't. But I accept that it doesn't have to happen this minute - although the sooner it does, the sooner I will sleep easier.
  • edited May 2014
    MrLargo said:


    Next week would be fine by me. If it's not Riga then it's because RD thinks the alternative is better. I don't believe he has invested in Charlton to see us fail. Let's wait and see what happens. Even if we have never heard of him let's not go into meltdown. How many of us had heard of Jose ?

    What do you class as failing? Cos I reckon, from what I've seen so far, that Charlton scraping to survival in the Championship with a team of Network players would be deemed as reasonably successful by Duchatelet - he would, after all, not be incurring any significant extra costs as he's already paying these players' wages elsewhere anyway. I think most supporters would class that as a failure - certainly I can't imagine that any Charlton fan would class that as a success.
    Hand picking a cheap option squad that could guarantee championship survival would be an achievement in itself. The Championship is a tough league. Scraping survival year on year would mean losses year on year. Do you really think that RD based on his unbelievable business success would view that as anything but failure. He has bought the club and has a plan. He wants the value of that investment to rise. That means adding value to the football club. I don't think for one minute think he will splash cash for which I am happy but I think there will be a plan to grow year on year.

  • Don't get the not playing the network players argument. Surely players playing for Charlton are now network players too
  • I just want to see some evidence that what I think is going to happen isn't. But I accept that it doesn't have to happen this minute - although the sooner it does, the sooner I will sleep easier.

    Is it seriously causing you sleep issues ?
  • Yann897 said:

    MrLargo said:


    Next week would be fine by me. If it's not Riga then it's because RD thinks the alternative is better. I don't believe he has invested in Charlton to see us fail. Let's wait and see what happens. Even if we have never heard of him let's not go into meltdown. How many of us had heard of Jose ?

    What do you class as failing? Cos I reckon, from what I've seen so far, that Charlton scraping to survival in the Championship with a team of Network players would be deemed as reasonably successful by Duchatelet - he would, after all, not be incurring any significant extra costs as he's already paying these players' wages elsewhere anyway. I think most supporters would class that as a failure - certainly I can't imagine that any Charlton fan would class that as a success.
    On the budget we had it was a success we stayed up last season .
    On the budget we had under the previous ownership, which left us with a paper thin squad, it was certainly a success that we stayed up last season. Whilst I certainly have no interest in defending Jiminez and Slater, the reason for that low budget seemed to be because they ran out of cash and needed to sell.

    If Duchatelet has bought us with the intention of sustaining us on the same low budget as the previous owners then surely that can only be a bad thing?
  • To be fair Riga managed the first two games without signing a contract as far as we're aware he might have already agreed to take the job and going through player recruitment with rd.
    or he's signed and the comms team have just not let us know like everything else at the moment ;)

    Of failing that he's just not getting the job .
  • Why would not having a manager be an issue to signing players. There are many posters on here, far more qualified than Hughes, who have long since put my mind at rest that having a manager is irrelevant to us as they will not be signing the players anyway and Man Utd bid on a player when they did not have a manager and we are comparable to them!

    You don't need a manger to sign players, but players do want to know who will be manager before they sign. We're not like Utd, where players will sign because it's Manchester United. At lower league clubs players are going to want assurances.
  • Sponsored links:


  • vffvff
    edited May 2014
    Rob62 said:

    vff said:

    Crawley on twitter replied to someone as below on Riga.

    @DiscoEnergy 1h
    @RichCawleySLP you heard anything about Rigas contract?


    Richard Cawley ‏@RichCawleySLP 34m
    @DiscoEnergy Expectation is that he won't be back.


    From the renowned and reliable source DiscoEnergy (who is very welcome at parties).
    The source is Richard Cawley not DiscoEnergy
    Thanks Rob62for pointing that out - the renowned and reliable source of RichCawleySLP (who is I am sure is very welcome at partes as well !)

    I wonder who's expectations are those ? BTW.
  • I like Riga and hope he gets the job. That being said if he doesn't, I wont be panicking just yet. I was not happy when Powell got the sack but it turns out that was probably the right decision. Let's just see what happens before we worry too much.
  • tom- k said:

    I like Riga and hope he gets the job. That being said if he doesn't, I wont be panicking just yet.

    I won't be panicking, but i'll be peed off and scratching my head like a nit victim. If he is not our manager it will be for one of three reasons:

    1. He's been offered late in the day a much better job than Charlton.
    2. Duchatelet doesn't rate him
    3. Duchatelet is impressed by him, and wants him now to manage his 'main team'

    If the first one happens, then that's life, even though it could possibly have been avoided by striking quickly when he started going public that he wants the job (and it would be an educated guess that he had already made that clear in private).

    If its 2, then that's just plain bizarre as he clearly could not have done any better than he did.

    If its 3, then it will simply slam home exactly the pitfalls of this 'network relationship'.


    You can't overestimate just how grateful Duchatelet should be to Riga. He helped save the club from relegation, replaced one of the most popular with his own fans* managers in game, and come out of it smelling of roses and everyone's affections. He helped RD swerve a massive curveball and potential supporter unrest.

    Rocking the apple cart again simply wouldn't make sense? If he is going to be our manager why create such unecessary uncertainty?

  • Of one thing I am 100% certain: we will not be appointing the likes of Dowie, Pardew or Parkinson! I both hope and expect the next head coach to be Riga or someone equal or better. Why go backwards? What I saw of Riga leads me to suggest he could take us to the top ten or even top six over the next 18 months.
    No pressure Roland ;)

    What, you mean as high as 9th???

    Why 9th? Is that because you wish to look forwards to next season or look back to 2012-13 and CAFC under Powell?

    Let's not be afraid of the future and enjoy the season to come. Personally I'm looking forward to the announcement of the head coach, the retained list and next season's fixtures.

    You were also SR last summer praising the good business that had been done, and expected us to finish higher than the 9th of the previous season.

    No offence, but no everyone always sees things as positive as you do. And just because they don't, it doesn't make them perrenial doom-mongers or permanent posters of 'negative shit'.

    exactly , remember him dismissing the concerns of myself and a few others with his over the top ridiculously optimistic view on all things Charlton
  • mrbligh said:

    It's taken approximately four months but Yann is showing early signs of being charltonised

    Yeah CharltonLifeised , I'm not worried / panicking or whatever yet but I do agree it is a bit strange that Riga hasn't been appointed yet , but rd got it right with Riga before maybe he thinks he can do better who knows.
  • Of one thing I am 100% certain: we will not be appointing the likes of Dowie, Pardew or Parkinson! I both hope and expect the next head coach to be Riga or someone equal or better. Why go backwards? What I saw of Riga leads me to suggest he could take us to the top ten or even top six over the next 18 months.
    No pressure Roland ;)

    What, you mean as high as 9th???

    Why 9th? Is that because you wish to look forwards to next season or look back to 2012-13 and CAFC under Powell?

    Let's not be afraid of the future and enjoy the season to come. Personally I'm looking forward to the announcement of the head coach, the retained list and next season's fixtures.

    You were also SR last summer praising the good business that had been done, and expected us to finish higher than the 9th of the previous season.

    No offence, but no everyone always sees things as positive as you do. And just because they don't, it doesn't make them perrenial doom-mongers or permanent posters of 'negative shit'.

    exactly , remember him dismissing the concerns of myself and a few others with his over the top ridiculously optimistic view on all things Charlton
    And repeatedly telling us how not signing up key first teamers was all part of a cunning plan by TJ and MS.
  • tom- k said:

    I like Riga and hope he gets the job. That being said if he doesn't, I wont be panicking just yet.

    I won't be panicking, but i'll be peed off and scratching my head like a nit victim. If he is not our manager it will be for one of three reasons:

    1. He's been offered late in the day a much better job than Charlton.
    2. Duchatelet doesn't rate him
    3. Duchatelet is impressed by him, and wants him now to manage his 'main team'

    If the first one happens, then that's life, even though it could possibly have been avoided by striking quickly when he started going public that he wants the job (and it would be an educated guess that he had already made that clear in private).

    If its 2, then that's just plain bizarre as he clearly could not have done any better than he did.

    If its 3, then it will simply slam home exactly the pitfalls of this 'network relationship'.


    You can't overestimate just how grateful Duchatelet should be to Riga. He helped save the club from relegation, replaced one of the most popular with his own fans* managers in game, and come out of it smelling of roses and everyone's affections. He helped RD swerve a massive curveball and potential supporter unrest.

    Rocking the apple cart again simply wouldn't make sense? If he is going to be our manager why create such unecessary uncertainty?

    There are clearly other alternatives.

    RD already had someone lined up for the job at the end of the season and never envisaged Riga being at Charlton.

    Riga wants to explore all the options open to him.

    Riga and RD can't agree a package or are still working on it ?

    I'm sure there are more.

  • tom- k said:

    I like Riga and hope he gets the job. That being said if he doesn't, I wont be panicking just yet.

    I won't be panicking, but i'll be peed off and scratching my head like a nit victim. If he is not our manager it will be for one of three reasons:

    1. He's been offered late in the day a much better job than Charlton.
    2. Duchatelet doesn't rate him
    3. Duchatelet is impressed by him, and wants him now to manage his 'main team'

    If the first one happens, then that's life, even though it could possibly have been avoided by striking quickly when he started going public that he wants the job (and it would be an educated guess that he had already made that clear in private).

    If its 2, then that's just plain bizarre as he clearly could not have done any better than he did.

    If its 3, then it will simply slam home exactly the pitfalls of this 'network relationship'.


    You can't overestimate just how grateful Duchatelet should be to Riga. He helped save the club from relegation, replaced one of the most popular with his own fans* managers in game, and come out of it smelling of roses and everyone's affections. He helped RD swerve a massive curveball and potential supporter unrest.

    Rocking the apple cart again simply wouldn't make sense? If he is going to be our manager why create such unecessary uncertainty?

    There are clearly other alternatives.

    RD already had someone lined up for the job at the end of the season and never envisaged Riga being at Charlton.

    Riga wants to explore all the options open to him.

    Riga and RD can't agree a package or are still working on it ?

    I'm sure there are more.

    Maybe Riga has said that he wants to be able to choose the players he wants and play who he wants. Maybe RD would be against this.

  • Sponsored links:


  • tom- k said:

    I like Riga and hope he gets the job. That being said if he doesn't, I wont be panicking just yet.

    I won't be panicking, but i'll be peed off and scratching my head like a nit victim. If he is not our manager it will be for one of three reasons:

    1. He's been offered late in the day a much better job than Charlton.
    2. Duchatelet doesn't rate him
    3. Duchatelet is impressed by him, and wants him now to manage his 'main team'

    If the first one happens, then that's life, even though it could possibly have been avoided by striking quickly when he started going public that he wants the job (and it would be an educated guess that he had already made that clear in private).

    If its 2, then that's just plain bizarre as he clearly could not have done any better than he did.

    If its 3, then it will simply slam home exactly the pitfalls of this 'network relationship'.


    You can't overestimate just how grateful Duchatelet should be to Riga. He helped save the club from relegation, replaced one of the most popular with his own fans* managers in game, and come out of it smelling of roses and everyone's affections. He helped RD swerve a massive curveball and potential supporter unrest.

    Rocking the apple cart again simply wouldn't make sense? If he is going to be our manager why create such unecessary uncertainty?

    There are clearly other alternatives.

    RD already had someone lined up for the job at the end of the season and never envisaged Riga being at Charlton.

    Riga wants to explore all the options open to him.

    Riga and RD can't agree a package or are still working on it ?

    I'm sure there are more.

    Fair enough, though (i personally) don't see any of those options as being true.

    Riga and RD have worked together before, known each other years, and was jettisoned in here at short notice without even a contract in place. 1 if true could easily be worked around given how things have panned out, 2 and 3 are simply unlikely imo given the relationship.

  • My worry is that Riga is his own man and whilst that was fine when we were desperate, his approach may not be compatible with the network plan. Note his preference for existing players over network players when he managed us. Note also the frustration the network had with Chrissy over not rating/picking the players they had brought in. I have said all along - the first sign of things getting better will be the signing of Riga. I have never thought this would be a certainty though for the potential reasons above. We all know RD has a vision - we have to pray that it isn't boll***s.

    Think you may have hit the nail firmly on its head, Mutts.

  • tom- k said:

    I like Riga and hope he gets the job. That being said if he doesn't, I wont be panicking just yet.

    I won't be panicking, but i'll be peed off and scratching my head like a nit victim. If he is not our manager it will be for one of three reasons:

    1. He's been offered late in the day a much better job than Charlton.
    2. Duchatelet doesn't rate him
    3. Duchatelet is impressed by him, and wants him now to manage his 'main team'

    If the first one happens, then that's life, even though it could possibly have been avoided by striking quickly when he started going public that he wants the job (and it would be an educated guess that he had already made that clear in private).

    If its 2, then that's just plain bizarre as he clearly could not have done any better than he did.

    If its 3, then it will simply slam home exactly the pitfalls of this 'network relationship'.


    You can't overestimate just how grateful Duchatelet should be to Riga. He helped save the club from relegation, replaced one of the most popular with his own fans* managers in game, and come out of it smelling of roses and everyone's affections. He helped RD swerve a massive curveball and potential supporter unrest.

    Rocking the apple cart again simply wouldn't make sense? If he is going to be our manager why create such unecessary uncertainty?

    There are clearly other alternatives.

    RD already had someone lined up for the job at the end of the season and never envisaged Riga being at Charlton.

    Riga wants to explore all the options open to him.

    Riga and RD can't agree a package or are still working on it ?

    I'm sure there are more.

    Fair enough, though (i personally) don't see any of those options as being true.

    Riga and RD have worked together before, known each other years, and was jettisoned in here at short notice without even a contract in place. 1 if true could easily be worked around given how things have panned out, 2 and 3 are simply unlikely imo given the relationship.

    To be fair my second point should state RD wants to explore all his options.

  • So many comments, just same people repeating themselves over and over - you may as well exchange phone number and text each other.
  • edited May 2014
    Hughes: "They [Charlton] are going to miss recruitment. Other clubs are moving on players. They [Charlton] are missing out."

    What recruitment, exactly? Duchatelet made it perfectly clear months ago that he won't pay transfer fees and instead we must rely on our own academy and second-rate loans from his absurd 'network'.
  • Hughes: "They [Charlton] are going to miss recruitment. Other clubs are moving on players. They [Charlton] are missing out."

    What recruitment, exactly? Duchatelet made it perfectly clear months ago that he won't pay transfer fees and instead we must rely on our own academy and second-rate loans from the absurd 'network'.

    Please find me where he said this ?
  • Hughes: "They [Charlton] are going to miss recruitment. Other clubs are moving on players. They [Charlton] are missing out."

    What recruitment, exactly? Duchatelet made it perfectly clear months ago that he won't pay transfer fees and instead we must rely on our own academy and second-rate loans from his absurd 'network'.

    Now that's a big fib !

    I reckon he had someone else in mind maybe promised them the job & now has a dilemna.

    Either that or it's a manager still working, because their season hasn't finished (probably Belgian).
  • RD only ever saw him as a short term fix and wants a specific type of person to fill the role longer term?
  • edited May 2014
    razil said:

    RD only ever saw him as a short term fix and wants a specific type of person to fill the role longer term?

    image
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!