Believe it is more in the region of 15 - 20%. Could put together a serious promotion challenge with that sort of money. Currently 40/1 to win league, with promotion listed at 25/1
Apparently the percentage was meant to be 20% but Wolves negotiated it down to about 10%.
Rumours are they basically said if Maidenhead didn't agree to it they wouldn't sell him. As part of that they apparently agreed to give more up front to Maidenhead rather than splitting it in the way they'll be getting the money from West Ham.
Apparently the percentage was meant to be 20% but Wolves negotiated it down to about 10%.
Rumours are they basically said if Maidenhead didn't agree to it they wouldn't sell him. As part of that they apparently agreed to give more up front to Maidenhead rather than splitting it in the way they'll be getting the money from West Ham.
Disgusting that PL team making millions are stiffing a non-league aide for as much as they can get away with. Wankers
Apparently the percentage was meant to be 20% but Wolves negotiated it down to about 10%.
Rumours are they basically said if Maidenhead didn't agree to it they wouldn't sell him. As part of that they apparently agreed to give more up front to Maidenhead rather than splitting it in the way they'll be getting the money from West Ham.
Wankers.
PL club that bring in about 160m a year in revenue, doing their best to stitch up a non-league club.
There will be some tough decisions for Maidenhead. They may well be able to buy their way into the EFL, but can they sustain it? At present, their crowds are 1400ish, I think. I don't know what potential there is for increasing that and how difficult it would be to expand ground capacity beyond 4,000. If they fail to get promoted at the first or second attempts, will the money run out?
Apparently the percentage was meant to be 20% but Wolves negotiated it down to about 10%.
Rumours are they basically said if Maidenhead didn't agree to it they wouldn't sell him. As part of that they apparently agreed to give more up front to Maidenhead rather than splitting it in the way they'll be getting the money from West Ham.
Sounds awful, but I find it hard to believe that they could have kept Kilman if Maidenhead hasn't agreed. It would be like us refusing to sell May unless Cheltenham changed the sell on clause.
There will be some tough decisions for Maidenhead. They may well be able to buy their way into the EFL, but can they sustain it? At present, their crowds are 1400ish, I think. I don't know what potential there is for increasing that and how difficult it would be to expand ground capacity beyond 4,000. If they fail to get promoted at the first or second attempts, will the money run out?
Are they even full time? I think they might still be semi-pro but i could be wrong.
Apparently the percentage was meant to be 20% but Wolves negotiated it down to about 10%.
Rumours are they basically said if Maidenhead didn't agree to it they wouldn't sell him. As part of that they apparently agreed to give more up front to Maidenhead rather than splitting it in the way they'll be getting the money from West Ham.
Disgusting that PL team making millions are stiffing a non-league aide for as much as they can get away with. Wankers
Wolves are becoming quite unlikable in the way they run the club, with this, and the 'illegal' betting sponsor. All out for as much money as possible without any morals.
There will be some tough decisions for Maidenhead. They may well be able to buy their way into the EFL, but can they sustain it? At present, their crowds are 1400ish, I think. I don't know what potential there is for increasing that and how difficult it would be to expand ground capacity beyond 4,000. If they fail to get promoted at the first or second attempts, will the money run out?
Are they even full time? I think they might still be semi-pro but i could be wrong.
They are part time. Their ground is the oldest continuously used ground in the world. But they're upping sticks I believe, think ground sharing with the rugby club. You can see the stadium as you pull into the station from London direction. Not much to it.
Apparently the percentage was meant to be 20% but Wolves negotiated it down to about 10%.
Rumours are they basically said if Maidenhead didn't agree to it they wouldn't sell him. As part of that they apparently agreed to give more up front to Maidenhead rather than splitting it in the way they'll be getting the money from West Ham.
Disgusting that PL team making millions are stiffing a non-league aide for as much as they can get away with. Wankers
Wolves are becoming quite unlikable in the way they run the club, with this, and the 'illegal' betting sponsor. All out for as much money as possible without any morals.
I've seen quite a lot on socials about the fans getting more and more unhappy with how Fosun are running things , another season ticket price hike for kids it seems this year and just general lack of communication.
Comments
He’s an Addick as well
Andy Pugh also a good CF - nice bloke as well
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/council-votes-down-ridiculous-call-29228469
West Ham have signed Max Kilman from Wolves for £40m. NL side Maidenhead have a 10% sell on clause, so will earn £4m!
Could put together a serious promotion challenge with that sort of money.
Currently 40/1 to win league, with promotion listed at 25/1
Rumours are they basically said if Maidenhead didn't agree to it they wouldn't sell him. As part of that they apparently agreed to give more up front to Maidenhead rather than splitting it in the way they'll be getting the money from West Ham.
PL club that bring in about 160m a year in revenue, doing their best to stitch up a non-league club.
I've seen quite a lot on socials about the fans getting more and more unhappy with how Fosun are running things , another season ticket price hike for kids it seems this year and just general lack of communication.