Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Investment or Powell

As it's been mentioned in the thread for Powell's contract renewal, for arguments sake, IF we was taken over by a wealthy foreign investor who was prepared to spend big and clear all debts etc but wanted to get rid of Powell and team and install a new manager (like Southampton for example) who would be happy? Football fans are a fickle bunch, for example, who care's about Nigel Atkins at Southampton now that the team are doing good.

Although it may seem ridiculous sadly it is a serious question in today's football.

VOTE:
POWELL
INVESTMENT AND NO POWELL

Obviously in an ideal world we would have both. For me if I had to choose I'd vote Powell, as I really do believe we can be successful with him and his team at the helm. Although it's a tough one as the long term future of the club is bigger than any man. Then again we are Charlton, Charlton without a Charlton connection would make us boring and the same as any other team.
«134

Comments

  • POWELL every day of the week
  • Powell, no brainer.
  • Reality is that if Powell was replaced and we went on a winning run, a large proportion of the crowd would end up saying Powell who. No one is bigger than the club and Powell won't be around forever. Investment.
  • edited September 2013
    Sorry if this isn't a popular view but it would depend entirely on the replacement. I love Powell and hope he stays at the club for years to come but in this hypothetical situation I think I'd sway towards investment if we were guaranteed success / clearing of all debts etc.
  • This is all ifs ands buts and maybes, however as much as I have the greatest respect and gratitude to CP for giving us our pride back and will always be indebted to him, we cannot go on losing £6m a year and if investment without CP is the only answer to the long term survival of the club for our younger fans to enjoy as I have done down the years, then sadly it has to be investment. In CP I trust and may his reign continue for as long as possible.
  • If I say Powell then investment might never come along again and we eventually go down the pan. If I say investment then it's goodbye Chrissy and I don't want that. However, the Club is bigger than any one person so reluctantly, if pushed, I'd have to say investment.
  • RedChaser said:

    This is all ifs ands buts and maybes, however as much as I have the greatest respect and gratitude to CP for giving us our pride back and will always be indebted to him, we cannot go on losing £6m a year and if investment without CP is the only answer to the long term survival of the club for our younger fans to enjoy as I have done down the years, then sadly it has to be investment. In CP I trust and may his reign continue for as long as possible.

    reluctantly agreed
  • Powell.
    Who needs investement when you've got a gaffer who can give HT team talks like our powelly?!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Investment is key, but I would desperately hope that new investors would see the potential and realise we have a gem of a manager we should keep.
  • I want both.

    Powell with a warchest.
    If we got a black multi-squillionnaire investor he would show solidarity with his brother and just pump money into the club. So what if the money comes from blood diamonds or ripping off old biddies - we deserve success
  • Investment. But with the job he has done there is no reason we can't have both.
  • This content has been removed.
  • If I were buying the club the one person who I'd keep would be CP - you need continuity.
  • colin1961 said:

    No Brainer....Investment everyday of the week.
    The club has to survive and there are better managers then Powell who can take this club further....

    Better available ones?

  • edited September 2013
    WSS said:

    colin1961 said:

    No Brainer....Investment everyday of the week.
    The club has to survive and there are better managers then Powell who can take this club further....

    Better available ones?

    Of course there are, surely no one can seriously suggest that Chris Powell is better than every available manager on earth ?

    Tough decision, I love Chris Powell but I'm not sure how long the club can continue to lose this much money. That's not Chris' fault in the slightest but if the choice was secure the club for generations to come or keep the manager it has to be the club. But hopefully we can have both, I think any new investor would see the benefit of keeping such a wonderful asset to the club.
  • Powell only had a transfer budget for one summer, in that summer he put together a record breaking side. That should speak for itself to any potential moneybags investor. Plus, wouldn't you like to own a successful company that did things "the right way" with a club legend manager signing the right players. Rather than owning a company hemmorhaging money buy buying overpriced overpaid employees?

    Investment but doubt they'd sack him right away
  • Powell, 100%.

    Investment really can mean sod all in terms of success if the people investing it are clueless. Venkys are a classic example of that.
  • Sponsored links:


  • cafctom said:

    Powell, 100%.

    Investment really can mean sod all in terms of success if the people investing it are clueless. Venkys are a classic example of that.


    Exactly, Tom.

    If their track record is anything to go by, we'd have 4 managers in a year - and still go down the pan.

    Being taken over may well solve one set of problems, but create a whole new load more.



  • se9addick said:

    WSS said:

    colin1961 said:

    No Brainer....Investment everyday of the week.
    The club has to survive and there are better managers then Powell who can take this club further....

    Better available ones?

    Of course there are, surely no one can seriously suggest that Chris Powell is better than every available manager on earth ?

    Tough decision, I love Chris Powell but I'm not sure how long the club can continue to lose this much money. That's not Chris' fault in the slightest but if the choice was secure the club for generations to come or keep the manager it has to be the club. But hopefully we can have both, I think any new investor would see the benefit of keeping such a wonderful asset to the club.
    That's what I mean. A better manager for OUR club.

    Chuck some names about, lets see if we agree. Reams wants Paul Hart over CP - people agree?

  • Powell OUT!

    Is Michael Appleton still available ....?



    ;o)
  • WSS said:

    se9addick said:

    WSS said:

    colin1961 said:

    No Brainer....Investment everyday of the week.
    The club has to survive and there are better managers then Powell who can take this club further....

    Better available ones?

    Of course there are, surely no one can seriously suggest that Chris Powell is better than every available manager on earth ?

    Tough decision, I love Chris Powell but I'm not sure how long the club can continue to lose this much money. That's not Chris' fault in the slightest but if the choice was secure the club for generations to come or keep the manager it has to be the club. But hopefully we can have both, I think any new investor would see the benefit of keeping such a wonderful asset to the club.
    That's what I mean. A better manager for OUR club.

    Chuck some names about, lets see if we agree. Reams wants Paul Hart over CP - people agree?

    It's hilarious when I see Paul harts named mentioned with any managers job. Look at the guy's record, he's a terrible football manager. Up there with Les Reed in my opinion. Great, great coach but hopeless manager.
  • Investment = Survival.......................bankrupt Charlton with Powell is no good to either us or him. Let's hope that 'both' would be seen as achievable with any new owners.

  • Reams wants Paul Hart over CP - people agree?

    Does Paul Hart want to be Chris Powell's manager though? Or even manage a football club again?

    His record as a manager, albeit taking on a few hospital jobs at Portsmouth, Palace etc was not good and I doubt he'd want the stress or hassle, especially when he has a good and much less stressful job at the moment. On the otherhand we have an excellent young manager who took a moribund squad, rebuilt it using a fair amount of acumen and ruthlessness and in two years has achieved a promotion and finished 9th in the Championship on the way he hasn't broken the bank and people are doubting whether CP has the credentials to take the club on to the next stage.

    Utterly ridiculous debate. If you sack CP after what he's done in less than three years at the club then we'll get a results first manager in, someone who'll pump the ball up to the forward line and play route one football. Meanwhile the team ethos that CP has carefully built would be destroyed.
  • Heart: Powell
    Head: Investment
  • Ok so lets put the NOT FOR SALE signs up then and slide into oblivion with the terrible twins at the helm and CP with no team to manage...........hang on a minute we could always get promotion to the promised land, yeh stuff the investment :-)
  • Investment = Survival.......................bankrupt Charlton with Powell is no good to either us or him. Let's hope that 'both' would be seen as achievable with any new owners
  • An investor who removes Powell from the helm isn't the sort of person I'd want associated with our club. Yes we need money coming in, but we also need someone with a good footballing/business brain. Take QPR & Blackburn as examples of how money doesn't buy you everything and how the managerial merry-go-rounds at their club have befallen them. The clubs with the best foreign investors usually have a very hands off approach and leave it down to shrewd Chief Executives with a good understand of English football.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!