Are "peak times" just 6-10am northbound & 4-7pm southbound ? And "off peak" is all other times. Thus, if you travel southbound between 6 & 10 am you are only charged "off peak" rates.
If so that is discrimateray and needs to be challenged in the Courts
Come on Golfie, it doesn’t take much to work out that the peak period is people traveling into London in the morning midweek and people traveling out of London in the afternoon midweek.
if the toll costs are £1.50 at all other times (and free 10pm - 6am), then it’s a little friendlier than I was fearing
But a "peak period" is a peak period. Like on the trains - you pay more during certain hours and it's not any cheaper coming out of London than going in.
Only applying the additional charge in one direction is effectively a tax on those coming from south-east London, which stinks.
"We want better public services and transport routes but we dont want to have to pay for them"
Said absolutely nobody
People have literally been complaining for years about the lack of infrastructure south of the river, lets not revise history. A simple google will show you its true. Why has the new crossing been worked on for 20 years now if there was not any demand
Said everyone…
it’s the bit about not wanting to pay that is amusing.
This is literally a thread of people complaining.....................
People are complaining that those of us in the Southeast have to pay to cross the river whereas those further West do not. Start charging everywhere if you must but don't single out a particular region.
For me it's not even about people further West not having to pay to cross the Thames.....its about people in one community having to pay an excess charge to use the crossings & people in another community only having to pay the standard charge even though both sets of people are going to & from the same places.
Person A lives in Bromley & goes to Finchley at 9am.
Person B lives in Finchley and goes to Bromley at 9am
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
Leroy is growing back into this place. Delighted to see it, boss!
Charging people to use the tunnel will ease congestion just like the congestion charge has done which means London isn't the most congested city 4 years running.
Charging people to use the tunnel will ease congestion just like the congestion charge has done which means London isn't the most congested city 4 years running.
I’d be very surprised if that is the outcome.
If that logic were correct surely you’d have introduced the charge regardless of the new tunnel?
I suggest the majority (not all) that use the tunnel don’t have a viable (cost or time) alternative.
Charging people to use the tunnel will ease congestion just like the congestion charge has done which means London isn't the most congested city 4 years running.
I’d be very surprised if that is the outcome.
If that logic were correct surely you’d have introduced the charge regardless of the new tunnel?
I suggest the majority (not all) that use the tunnel don’t have a viable (cost or time) alternative.
Tongue in cheek. TFL charge £15 a day to enter the congestion zone and we are still the most congested city in Europe.
Charging people to use the tunnel will ease congestion just like the congestion charge has done which means London isn't the most congested city 4 years running.
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
People drive because the public transport is NOT an adequate alternative.
For real? 🤣🤣🤣
Go literally anywhere in the country other than the Southeast if you want to see 'inadequate' public transport. From West Lancashire (an area with a population of around 600,000 people) there is ONE train line into Manchester - at least 30% of trains are cancelled in rush hour in either direction, and 70% are delayed. Most trains are completely full by the time they reach Bolton - still 20 miles away from Manchester. If you're lucky, from most towns there is a bus service - around 1 an hour (and you'll need to change at least once from most destinations, twice if you live further out than Bolton/Warrington/Wigan.
You have no idea what 'inadequate public transport' means - until I moved up here I didn't believe it either.
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
Leroy is growing back into this place. Delighted to see it, boss!
Need my fix of pointless rowing since I quit Twatter 🤣
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
Leroy is growing back into this place. Delighted to see it, boss!
Need my fix of pointless rowing since I quit Twatter 🤣
Charging people to use the tunnel will ease congestion just like the congestion charge has done which means London isn't the most congested city 4 years running.
On the upside apparently when the Silvertown Tunnel is opened the Superloop Four will start going from Grove Park to Canary Wharf. Landing in a pot of jam living in Lee.
On the upside apparently when the Silvertown Tunnel is opened the Superloop Four will start going from Grove Park to Canary Wharf. Landing in a pot of jam living in Lee.
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
People drive because the public transport is NOT an adequate alternative.
For real? 🤣🤣🤣
Go literally anywhere in the country other than the Southeast if you want to see 'inadequate' public transport. From West Lancashire (an area with a population of around 600,000 people) there is ONE train line into Manchester - at least 30% of trains are cancelled in rush hour in either direction, and 70% are delayed. Most trains are completely full by the time they reach Bolton - still 20 miles away from Manchester. If you're lucky, from most towns there is a bus service - around 1 an hour (and you'll need to change at least once from most destinations, twice if you live further out than Bolton/Warrington/Wigan.
You have no idea what 'inadequate public transport' means - until I moved up here I didn't believe it either.
Not the point though. It may be better than rural or other metropolitan centres but that doesn’t make it sufficient for Londoners to give up their cars.
Also being in London doesn’t mean I don’t travel elsewhere and why I might be on the road using the tunnel !
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
It's nothing to do with "thinking it through" but to do with penalizing 1 sector of the public just because of where they live.
In your first paragraph you talk about peak fares & people working shifts. That is also true for the new Blackwall Tunnel charge where people working late shifts will be charged differently to those working "days". But that's not my point. My point is that people working the same shifts are being charged differently just because of where they live.
Would you think it's fair if only people commutimg into London from Dartford on SouthEastern trains were charged peak fares & those travelling into London from Essex on C2C were charged off peak, even though they were travelling in at the same time.
On the upside apparently when the Silvertown Tunnel is opened the Superloop Four will start going from Grove Park to Canary Wharf. Landing in a pot of jam living in Lee.
What a place
Drove through there the other day. The newsagents by the train station looked a but run down, there was a decent looking one on the opposite side of the road though.
Does anyone know the figures for people travelling from south to north vs north to south west of the Rotherhithe tunnel? I see that some people are suggesting that the fact that they cross for free is what is discriminatory, rather than the south v north charges in the new tunnel? Just wondering if there is any validity in the argument?
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
It's nothing to do with "thinking it through" but to do with penalizing 1 sector of the public just because of where they live.
In your first paragraph you talk about peak fares & people working shifts. That is also true for the new Blackwall Tunnel charge where people working late shifts will be charged differently to those working "days". But that's not my point. My point is that people working the same shifts are being charged differently just because of where they live.
Would you think it's fair if only people commutimg into London from Dartford on SouthEastern trains were charged peak fares & those travelling into London from Essex on C2C were charged off peak, even though they were travelling in at the same time.
Perhaps it is me after all 🤷♂️.
So by your logic, train companies are discriminating if Southeastern fine people who dont pay for tickets or if the council fines people who park without a ticket ?
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
It's nothing to do with "thinking it through" but to do with penalizing 1 sector of the public just because of where they live.
In your first paragraph you talk about peak fares & people working shifts. That is also true for the new Blackwall Tunnel charge where people working late shifts will be charged differently to those working "days". But that's not my point. My point is that people working the same shifts are being charged differently just because of where they live.
Would you think it's fair if only people commutimg into London from Dartford on SouthEastern trains were charged peak fares & those travelling into London from Essex on C2C were charged off peak, even though they were travelling in at the same time.
I thought that the charging was to pay for the new tunnel, not a 'congestion charge', so why shouldn't all journeys at any time, regardless of direction not cost the same?
I thought that the charging was to pay for the new tunnel, not a 'congestion charge', so why shouldn't all journeys at any time, regardless of direction not cost the same?
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
It's nothing to do with "thinking it through" but to do with penalizing 1 sector of the public just because of where they live.
In your first paragraph you talk about peak fares & people working shifts. That is also true for the new Blackwall Tunnel charge where people working late shifts will be charged differently to those working "days". But that's not my point. My point is that people working the same shifts are being charged differently just because of where they live.
Would you think it's fair if only people commutimg into London from Dartford on SouthEastern trains were charged peak fares & those travelling into London from Essex on C2C were charged off peak, even though they were travelling in at the same time.
Perhaps it is me after all 🤷♂️.
It’s only peak time in one direction though.
That is my point.
Peak time happens twice a day. Going north in the morning & south in the evenings.
On the upside apparently when the Silvertown Tunnel is opened the Superloop Four will start going from Grove Park to Canary Wharf. Landing in a pot of jam living in Lee.
What a place
Drove through there the other day. The newsagents by the train station looked a but run down, there was a decent looking one on the opposite side of the road though.
Doesn't bother me as I don't use it, I think it will have quite an impact on many commuters from South London though.
My guess is it will definitely change a fair few people's behaviour. Some will decide to get public transport, some will look for another job closer to home/where they can avoid the tunnel etc. Which I suppose is exactly the point!
I thought that the charging was to pay for the new tunnel, not a 'congestion charge', so why shouldn't all journeys at any time, regardless of direction not cost the same?
To balance the responsibility to those who use it more frequently and ensure that it doesn't become unmanageable during peak times.
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
It's nothing to do with "thinking it through" but to do with penalizing 1 sector of the public just because of where they live.
In your first paragraph you talk about peak fares & people working shifts. That is also true for the new Blackwall Tunnel charge where people working late shifts will be charged differently to those working "days". But that's not my point. My point is that people working the same shifts are being charged differently just because of where they live.
Would you think it's fair if only people commutimg into London from Dartford on SouthEastern trains were charged peak fares & those travelling into London from Essex on C2C were charged off peak, even though they were travelling in at the same time.
Perhaps it is me after all 🤷♂️.
It’s only peak time in one direction though.
That is my point.
Peak time happens twice a day. Going north in the morning & south in the evenings.
Makes no sense.
Yea when the majority of cars are on the road travelling ? It's really not difficult to understand.
I've heard it all now. It's discriminatory to implement a congestion charge in one direction (the congested one) because people who travel in that direction are going to be charged, whilst people who travel in the opposite (uncongested) one aren't.
Do you hear yourself? 🤣
Of course its discrimination. What do you call it if one set of people are treated differently to another just because of where they live.
If all you are trying to do is reduce the congestion then perhaps it might be better to get rid of the road completely & make people walk !!
You don't call peak fares on public transport 'discrimination' based on the fact that people who work afternoons or nights don't have to pay them. Measures are being put in place to try and cut the use of cars to ease congestion and pollution, ffs - London has arguably the most extensive public transport system in the world and people STILL won't guve up their sodding cars. What do you propose is done about the absolute gridlock caused on the roads when we the Blackwall Tunnel is shut? How do you propose new crossings are funded? Charging people to drive AWAY from congestion would be a monumentally stupid idea as it would be counterproductive.
You've not thought this through...
It's nothing to do with "thinking it through" but to do with penalizing 1 sector of the public just because of where they live.
In your first paragraph you talk about peak fares & people working shifts. That is also true for the new Blackwall Tunnel charge where people working late shifts will be charged differently to those working "days". But that's not my point. My point is that people working the same shifts are being charged differently just because of where they live.
Would you think it's fair if only people commutimg into London from Dartford on SouthEastern trains were charged peak fares & those travelling into London from Essex on C2C were charged off peak, even though they were travelling in at the same time.
Perhaps it is me after all 🤷♂️.
It’s only peak time in one direction though.
That is my point.
Peak time happens twice a day. Going north in the morning & south in the evenings.
Makes no sense.
Yea when the majority of cars are on the road travelling ? It's really not difficult to understand.
I think it is for you.
Its got nothing to do with the amount of traffic.
There will now be a charge for using the Blackwall Tunnel. The charge is increased at peak times.......FOR TRAVEL IN ONE DIRECTION ONLY.
I give up. I suspect I'm being trolled so this will be my last say on the matter.
Comments
I suggest the majority (not all) that use the tunnel don’t have a viable (cost or time) alternative.
It was cute you thought you had a point though.
Go literally anywhere in the country other than the Southeast if you want to see 'inadequate' public transport. From West Lancashire (an area with a population of around 600,000 people) there is ONE train line into Manchester - at least 30% of trains are cancelled in rush hour in either direction, and 70% are delayed. Most trains are completely full by the time they reach Bolton - still 20 miles away from Manchester. If you're lucky, from most towns there is a bus service - around 1 an hour (and you'll need to change at least once from most destinations, twice if you live further out than Bolton/Warrington/Wigan.
You have no idea what 'inadequate public transport' means - until I moved up here I didn't believe it either.
Landing in a pot of jam living in Lee.
In your first paragraph you talk about peak fares & people working shifts. That is also true for the new Blackwall Tunnel charge where people working late shifts will be charged differently to those working "days". But that's not my point. My point is that people working the same shifts are being charged differently just because of where they live.
Would you think it's fair if only people commutimg into London from Dartford on SouthEastern trains were charged peak fares & those travelling into London from Essex on C2C were charged off peak, even though they were travelling in at the same time.
Perhaps it is me after all 🤷♂️.
One for TFL to answer.
Peak time happens twice a day. Going north in the morning & south in the evenings.
Makes no sense.
My guess is it will definitely change a fair few people's behaviour. Some will decide to get public transport, some will look for another job closer to home/where they can avoid the tunnel etc. Which I suppose is exactly the point!
£8 a day is a fair whack.
Its got nothing to do with the amount of traffic.
There will now be a charge for using the Blackwall Tunnel. The charge is increased at peak times.......FOR TRAVEL IN ONE DIRECTION ONLY.
I give up. I suspect I'm being trolled so this will be my last say on the matter.