Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Charlton v Palarse

124»

Comments

  • Hamer 6.5
    Solly 7.5
    Morrison 6.5
    Cort 7.0
    Pritchard 4.5
    Hollands 5.5
    Stephens 6
    Jackson 4.5
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 6.5

    Wilson 6.5
    Fuller 6.5

    Wiggins n/a
    Green 7
  • Hamer 8
    Solly 7
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7
    Pritchard 5.5
    Hollands 5.5
    Stephens 6
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 5.5
    Wright Phillips 6.5

    Wilson 6
    Fuller 7

    Wiggins n/a
    Green n/a
  • Hamer 7.5
    Solly 7
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7.5
    Pritchard 5
    Hollands 5.5
    Stephens 6.5
    Jackson 4.5
    Kermorgant 5.5
    Wright Phillips 6.5

    Wilson 6
    Fuller 7
  • it showed we have brought half a team up from div 1 and CP needs to dip in the loan market as soon as posible. Palace are not a good championship team but they have been in this div for a while and have got a few good players who are championship quality.Jackson,Pritchard,Kermorgant and Hollands are good div 1 players.One good thing to come out of the game was Solly is Championship material but not yet prem so we should be holding on to him for a while.
  • Hamer 8 No chance with the goal an extra mark for his effort at the end ,it would have been a 9 if he had scored
    Solly 8 An extra mark for playing so well out of position .He has laid the ghost of Millwall away the last time he played Left Back.
    Morrison 7 Sound game
    Cort 7 Looks completely comfortable at this level .A real threat going forward
    Pritchard 5 Beginning to look out of his depth
    Hollands 5 Not one of his better games
    Stephens 6 Showed some moments of class
    Jackson 6 Like to see him tried at cm which is his natural position
    Kermorgant 6 Not one of his better games
    Wright Phillips 7 Well taken goal ,shame it was not given .Kept at it.

    Wilson 6 Looked better going forward
    Fuller 7 Showed glimpses of what he is capable of

    Wiggins n/a Hope he is not out for long ,although Zaha murdered him
    Green n/a Looked promising ,I only wish he had a bit more pace
  • Hamer - 7
    Solly - 7
    Morrison - 6.5
    Cort - 6.5
    Pritchard - 5
    Hollands - 5
    Stephens - 4
    Jackson - 5
    Kermorgant - 5
    Wright Phillips - 6

    Wilson - 6
    Fuller - 6.5

    ? You sure ?
  • Yeah, entire midfield was missing all night, not for the first time this season.
    For me Stephens gave the ball away more than the others, always seemed to be passing behind the players making them stop their run and move back, slowing the game down.
    Have kept checking back to see others scores and everyone else seemed to rate Dale as the best of the midfielders, i'm obviously in the minority and missed some of the good work that others noticed.
    Just my honest opinion and thats the great thing about this mass scoring, gives everyones voice an equal level and gives as fair as possible a result. My 4 for Stephens isn't going to change his average much as everyone else has scored him higher than all the other midfielders.
    Also tells me that I must have scored him harshly as its not even 50/50 split, I think i'm the only one that scored him lower. Glad really as it means he wasn't as bad as i thought.
  • Hamer 7
    Solly 7
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7
    Pritchard 5.5
    Hollands 5.5
    Stephens 7
    Jackson 5.5
    Kermorgant 5.5
    Wright Phillips 6.5

    Wilson 5
    Fuller 5.5
  • Yeah, entire midfield was missing all night, not for the first time this season.
    For me Stephens gave the ball away more than the others, always seemed to be passing behind the players making them stop their run and move back, slowing the game down.
    Have kept checking back to see others scores and everyone else seemed to rate Dale as the best of the midfielders, i'm obviously in the minority and missed some of the good work that others noticed.
    Just my honest opinion and thats the great thing about this mass scoring, gives everyones voice an equal level and gives as fair as possible a result. My 4 for Stephens isn't going to change his average much as everyone else has scored him higher than all the other midfielders.
    Also tells me that I must have scored him harshly as its not even 50/50 split, I think i'm the only one that scored him lower. Glad really as it means he wasn't as bad as i thought.

    great reply.
  • Hamer 7
    Solly 7
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7
    Pritchard 4.5
    Hollands 5.5
    Stephens 6
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 5
    Wright Phillips 6

    Wilson 6
    Fuller 6.5
  • Sponsored links:


  • Hamer 7
    Solly 7.5
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7
    Pritchard 5
    Hollands 6.5
    Stephens 7
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 5
    Wright Phillips 6.5

    Wilson 5
    Fuller 6.5
  • edited September 2012
    Hamer 7
    Solly - 8
    Morrison - 7
    Cort - 7
    Pritchard - 6
    Hollands - 6
    Stephens - 8
    Jackson - 5
    Kermorgant - 6
    Wright Phillips - 7

    Wilson - 7
    Fuller - 6.5
  • Hamer - 7 - some decent saves early on
    Solly - 6
    Morrison - 6
    Cort - 7.5 - strong in air, quality goal line clearance
    Pritchard - 5.5 - hasnt adapted well to championship football
    Hollands - 6 - bossed out in midfield
    Stephens - 7 -nice touches, only a few bad passes
    Jackson - 5.5- needs to capitalize on his FK's to be effective. should be whipping crosses in as much as possible. less dribbling.
    Kermorgant - 6
    Wright Phillips - 7 - should hv had a goal allowed.

    Wilson - 6 - started shaky, then came along nicely.
    Fuller - 6

  • Hamer 6
    Solly 6.5
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6
    Pritchard 5
    Hollands 5
    Stephens 6
    Jackson 5.5
    Kermorgant 5
    Wright Phillips 5

    Wilson 5.5
    Fuller 6

  • Hamer 7 (the header/shoulder gains a mark)
    Solly 6
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6
    Pritchard 4.5
    Hollands 5
    Stephens 5
    Jackson 4.5
    Kermorgant 5
    Wright Phillips 7

    Wilson 5
    Fuller 7
  • edited September 2012
    Hamer - 8 Very little to do but oh so unlucky with that header - proved it wasn't our night.
    Solly - 7 Thought he did well playing out of position
    Morrison - 7 Solid
    Cort - 7 His aerial ability is a key part of th eteam-both defensively and offensively
    Pritchard - 5 Worst game I have seen him - chasing shadowsforward or tracking back
    Hollands - 5 Not highly effective
    Stephens - 8.5 MOTM Thought he had a great game- unfortunately those around him had poor ones - good job we still have him.
    Jackson - 5 Pretty anonymous - think he needs th eteam to be playing well to get th ebest from him.
    Kermorgant - 5 Worst game he has had for us - but got little service
    Wright Phillips - 7 Scored a perfectly good goal, again got little service but worked hard and looked sharp - shame th eteam couldn't utilise this.
    Wilson - 6.5 As th egame wore on showed he will be a useful palyer for us
    Fuller - 6.5 Affected the game positively - should have scored though.

    Green seserves a mention - really looked good - vying for a start on Tuesday
  • Dont think Kermogant was as bad as people are painting out. We lumped it up to him and he won it most times, not really much else he could have done. Think he also provided the flick for the goal that wasnt. Main problem was through our midfield. Something needs tweaking, and its Jackson imho

    Hamer 7.5
    Solly 7.5
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7
    Pritchard 5
    Hollands 5
    Stephens 6
    Jackson 4
    Kermorgant 6.5
    Wright Phillips 7

    Wilson 6.5
    Fuller 6.5
  • Hamer 7.5 - Brilliant header!!
    Solly - 7
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7
    Pritchard 5
    Hollands 4.5 - Didn't notice him. At least I noticed Pritchard.
    Stephens - 6.5
    Jackson 4.5
    Kermorgant 5
    Wright Phillips 7

    Wilson 6.5 - Grew with time. .5 deduction for a wild shot at the end.
    Fuller 6.5 - Few of the shots should've at least hit the target. I put that down to fitness.

    Wiggins n/a
    Green n/a
  • Yeah, entire midfield was missing all night, not for the first time this season.
    For me Stephens gave the ball away more than the others, always seemed to be passing behind the players making them stop their run and move back, slowing the game down.
    Have kept checking back to see others scores and everyone else seemed to rate Dale as the best of the midfielders, i'm obviously in the minority and missed some of the good work that others noticed.
    Just my honest opinion and thats the great thing about this mass scoring, gives everyones voice an equal level and gives as fair as possible a result. My 4 for Stephens isn't going to change his average much as everyone else has scored him higher than all the other midfielders.
    Also tells me that I must have scored him harshly as its not even 50/50 split, I think i'm the only one that scored him lower. Glad really as it means he wasn't as bad as i thought.

    I had Stephens down as the best (well actually least bad) of the midfielders as at least he did one or two things, and made a couple of good penetrative passes, whereas the rest of the midield was completely anonymous and overwhelmed.
  • this thread is now closed for marks, stats later
  • Sponsored links:


  • I couldn't give marks for this I was to pissed of that we lost. Sorry LL and I look forward to the stats later.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!