Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Squad Numbers up

2456

Comments

  • So disrespectful to Elliot, unless he's going.
    Not exactly disrespectful, I think, as it's entirely the manager's decision, but certainly tough, ruthless.  He's a hard man that Chris Powell.  ;-)
  • Chris Powell is definitely fecking ruthless.
  • Not really that important, but Evina 3 ahead of Wiggins... Is this an indication of Wiggins' numerical preference or possible conspiracy theory that Evina is first choice...
    Wiggins preferred number, he wore it at Bournemouth. Same with Benson who is now 14 rather than 17.
    So it was a conspiracy theory! 

    Shows that fools like me can read too much into things, thought Robbie 44 surely has its implications.
  • 23. Mikel Alonso??????
  • About time i can get Green on the back of my shirt now :D
  • 23. Mikel Alonso??????
    Wore it throughout his career
  • im not sure why its so disrespectful? its a number...Powell see's Hamer as his number 1. give elliot 13, 2, 145, 44...it doesnt really matter. if he stays, impresses in training and gets a chance and does well, then he'll get his spot back inbetween the sticks regardless of his number.

    plus how do we know elliot hasnt requested 44 if he's been told he cant have 1.

    Fair points and yes I would imagine he had requested it otherwise surely he'd just be dumped with the highest number next in the chain
  • i didnt realise people were this interested in a players number. maybe when the numbers 1-11 meant you were playing.

    just because alonso is 23 doesnt mean he's considered the 23rd in the pecking order!!

     

  • I'd be worried to see a goalkeeper with the number 13 turn up, albeit as first/second/last choice...
  • I know squad numbers dont mean everything but Elliott 44, WOW!!  He must be off.  Wouldn't be suprised if he is not at the club come saturday
  • Sponsored links:


  • If he was off, then we wouldn't have given him a number, just like Moutaouakil a couple of seasons ago, and Youga last season
  • These squad numbers say alot really. I heard hamer is hamer only 21, bit risky aint it?

  • edited August 2011
    You can see Powell is ruthless but only a few days ago he was saying about negotiating new deal for Robbie. Big kick in the teeth while your down for Robbie imo think he deserves a little better than that.
  • These squad numbers say alot really. I heard hamer is hamer only 21, bit risky aint it?

    I thought Bover was 21?
  • edited August 2011

    im not sure why its so disrespectful? its a number...Powell see's Hamer as his number 1. give elliot 13, 2, 145, 44...it doesnt really matter. if he stays, impresses in training and gets a chance and does well, then he'll get his spot back inbetween the sticks regardless of his number.

    plus how do we know elliot hasnt requested 44 if he's been told he cant have 1.

    Agree, still think he'll be leaving if a deal can be done.



  • You can see Powell is ruthless but only a few days ago he was saying about negotiating new deal for Robbie. Big kick in the teeth while your down for Robbie imo think he deserves a little better than that.
    I get the impression Elliott rejected the latest offer & now Powell has given up on negotiations & lost patience.  Ruthless yes but Powell obviously thinks its best for everyone if Elliott now moves on rather than let it drag on.  That's my take on it anyway!
  • You can see Powell is ruthless but only a few days ago he was saying about negotiating new deal for Robbie. Big kick in the teeth while your down for Robbie imo think he deserves a little better than that.
    I think a few things have gone on that we don't and will more never know about. Example Robbie may said he does not wnat to commit now as to see how the team fairs, club cant take the risk ofl etting him run his contract down so need to sell him.
  • We don't need three first choice keepers - not when we have Gough.

    I suspect Robbie is off once the deal has been negotiated, until then he's a first team player and has a contract so gets a number.

  • I might have got confused with hamer, i hope so too. 21 is far too young to be in goal for us.

    Elliots off, no doubt about it.

  • Robbie: Can't say too much tweeps!!!don't want to leave the club and still want to be no1 even with 44 on my back
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited August 2011
    RichCawleySLP Richard Cawley Rob Elliot handed squad number 44 by #cafc. Had heard he was going to lose the number one spot yesterday.


    Hindsight man back in action...
    If he'd told us yesterday, we might take his comments seriously! 
  • if only parky had given randy the no.1
  • Robbie 44 squad number is even higher than the two young keepers at 29 and 30 so on paper he is 5th choice, he must of told the club he was not renewing his contract because it comes so soon after the announcement that they were in contract talks. Other than that he has had a major fall out with manager or an offer has come in from elsewhere.

  • Elliot has just said on twitter he wants to stay regardless Good man.
  • that Cawley tweet is priceless LOL
  • Hamer is 23? Not 21

  • Elliot has just said on twitter he wants to stay regardless Good man.
    Think he has to say that really.  Think he will be off within a week to be honest!
  • Hamer is 23? Not 21

    Bover is 21 though
  • edited August 2011
    that Cawley tweet is priceless LOL
    He also says: 

    Also told that it looks highly unlikely Christian Dailly will be back in a #cafc shirt again.

    Perhaps given away by the fact that he has not been allocated a squad number...
  • edited August 2011
    he'll be telling us the Pope is a Catholic next.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!