Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Phil Parkinson

edited January 2011 in General Charlton
The Club has, in my opinion made a gigantic mistake in sacking Phil.

I have known the man for 26 years and was involved in his transfer from Bury to Reading in the 80's.

The man was the finest example of a pro that I ever came across and he took those qualities with him into management.

Shame on the new Board for throwing him out.

Yes, Phil was generous to a fault and at times rejected cash incentives to pursue his desire to be totally professional. But, as we are all becoming aware, good character and loyalty have little place in the modern game.

To the new board I would say this.

Take someone off the managerial roundabout as you probably have had your eyes on someone long before sacking Phil and watch with dismay as you question your judgement.

He will re-emerge and come to haunt you of that I have no doubt.

You have a great Club and it has always been a great occasion to visit.

The 'knee jerk' reaction from your new board of directors suggest that the near future is full of pitfalls.

I wish you well but fear for you.
«13

Comments

  • Great post. Nice insight, unfortunately I agree with you in terms of sacking him.
  • thanks for the post but im afraid mr parkinson is not a good manager from what ive witnessed in the last two years.

    professional?....yes

    i nice man?...seems it

    tactical knowledge?..at times like a confused child playing football manager, and his style of football is atrocious.

    footballs a harsh world and im sure PP knows this. wish him all the best, but in my opinion he just isnt good enough.
  • You seen many of our games this season Michael?

    For the record, nobody - or at least very very few people as far as I can tell - are questioning the mans character commitment or integrity.

    But sometimes that just isn't enough on it's own.
  • glad you liked him glad his your mate



    if you were me you wouldnt think its a mistake but footballs about opinions and he certainly divided them
  • edited January 2011
    By all accounts Dowie was a good egg too.
  • [cite]Posted By: Gaerkid8[/cite]The Club has, in my opinion made a gigantic mistake in sacking Phil.

    I have known the man for 26 years and was involved in his transfer from Bury to Reading in the 80's.

    The man was the finest example of a pro that I ever came across and he took those qualities with him into management.

    Shame on the new Board for throwing him out.

    Yes, Phil was generous to a fault and at times rejected cash incentives to pursue his desire to be totally professional. But, as we are all becoming aware, good character and loyalty have little place in the modern game.

    To the new board I would say this.

    Take someone off the managerial roundabout as you probably have had your eyes on someone long before sacking Phil and watch with dismay as you question your judgement.

    He will re-emerge and come to haunt you of that I have no doubt.

    You have a great Club and it has always been a great occasion to visit.

    The 'knee jerk' reaction from your new board of directors suggest that the near future is full of pitfalls.

    I wish you well but fear for you.

    good post totally agree.

    im very disappointed that he's been given the boot, should have had until the end of the season.
  • Phil Parkinson won me over (up to a point) after a very poor start and he seemed to be turning things around towards the end of 09/10 had a solid 09/10 and missed out narrowly- this season we are up there again thanks in part to PP but I have to say as sorry as I feel for him I can only really think that ultimately Charlton were not good enough to go up with him as manager- as a team we need to be a little less loveable and a little less toothless, in short we need to get hungry and aggressive and ultimately relatively successful and sadly PP was never going to really achieve that however hard working or well intentioned he was and however much we willed him to do it, football is not sentimental and PP will move on and so will Charlton.
    I don't really think that it was a knee jerk reaction from the board as I feel ultimately everyone has been aware for a long time that we are not quite firing on all cylinders and that a fresh perspective was needed and really it's only been because of the financial restrictions that PP has survived so long. I don't really see PP coming back to bite us tbh, he will probably be a decent tier 3 or 4 boss but not really the man to move Charlton in the direction that the fans and the board need, sad but true. I and many others thank him for his dignity and effort as he was arguably dealt one of the poorer hands that a Charlton manager could have and I feel he gave it his best- sadly it was not good enough.
  • I'm sure Parky is a decent chap, but he's hardly come back to haunt Colchester or Hull has he!
  • If you had seen us play the last couple of seasons you would realise this wasn't knee jerk. And as for shame on the current board, well the last one wanted rid too and told us so but at the end of the day were too cash strapped to get rid. Nice bloke and I wish him well and sincerely hope he gets another job soon. Professional, certainly. Good manager, no way.
  • edited January 2011
    You're right he's a good guy. Arguably he was lucky to get the job in the first place though after an abysmal relegation in which we went dow without a whimper under him. We stuck by him.

    Last year he did do very well all in all but should he have done that little bit better? A great start held up a very poor middle in which we dropped right away from the promotion pack and almost lost the play offs. Then we lost in them anyway through possibly no-fault of his own in the penalty shoot out but should we have beaten 10 man swindon when 2-1 up?? All this with possibly THE best first eleven in the league (Bailey/Sam/Richardson/Burton)

    This year agreed he's done well with a poor squad (he did well with signings) but already (and it's only Xmas) we've had two VERY poor spells playing very poor football and getting beaten properly in return.

    Bit sad he's gone and it depends who they replace him with really as to whether we will regret it.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Fair points made and I accept them all in the spirit.

    I just worry that the game is losing managers with integrity and directors are looking at a 'three game scenario' instead of looking at the longer term haul.

    Wasn't Mr Ferguson one match away from the sack some time back?
  • edited January 2011
    [cite]Posted By: Gaerkid8[/cite]The Club has, in my opinion made a gigantic mistake in sacking Phil.

    I have known the man for 26 years and was involved in his transfer from Bury to Reading in the 80's.

    The man was the finest example of a pro that I ever came across and he took those qualities with him into management.

    Shame on the new Board for throwing him out.

    Yes, Phil was generous to a fault and at times rejected cash incentives to pursue his desire to be totally professional. But, as we are all becoming aware, good character and loyalty have little place in the modern game.

    To the new board I would say this.

    Take someone off the managerial roundabout as you probably have had your eyes on someone long before sacking Phil and watch with dismay as you question your judgement.

    He will re-emerge and come to haunt you of that I have no doubt.

    You have a great Club and it has always been a great occasion to visit.

    The 'knee jerk' reaction from your new board of directors suggest that the near future is full of pitfalls.

    I wish you well but fear for you.

    It's a shame Mr Gaerkid8 hasn't sat with me for the last two years so we could analyse what has gone on in games, the tactics that PP uses, the players that PP has brought in, then maybe you could argue that he is a fine example of a pro, blah, blah ... blah.

    Has anyone here ever had to make the decision to sack/ fire someone? Would you say that the person was a fine example of a human being, a great lad/ lass etc, but the decision had to be made.

    Last night was the final straw. the removal of a centre half, the quote that he couldnt motivate the players, the fact that he played mccormack as the most forward midfielder. only a few examples. A few weeks ago i watched walsall totally outplay us. they have hardly set the world on fire, in fact they sacked their manager today. The team against walsall was set up wrongly, but thats my opinion. We got lucky earlier in the season when Reid got injured. we went on our good run at that point, then before you can blink reid is back in and we are one dimensional again. i have watched barnet perform wonders at the valley, and luton ... come on we have to be a real here. if we want to compete this season the decision needs to be made. otherwise another year goes by.
  • mate do you no why we played such awful football being you no him?
  • his integreity was never in doubt in my mind he seems a nice enough guy


    but his football philosophy seems to be hoof and run and his ability to change things around were lacking

    its a results business and i have heard he was close to the sack after brighton but the chairman at the time backed him fair play to the chairman and parky but he leaves with the outside world looking in thinking its harsh so it wont do him no harm, if he had left after a second season of failure he would be more tranished


    and parky would never have taken us up with a squad worse than last year
  • Directly this takeover was in place this was going to happen.Never met parky but for me he was never the correct man for this job.Murray should have had the balls to say amistake was made after parky had been made caretaker manager and not won a game.this is all water under the bridge now.
    Parky all the best in finding new work .
    To the man that is coming in you have a job to do the board must have a name and do your best for Charlton and the fans.
  • i have to agree that he is a nice bloke and a professional and there are too many managers being sacked in the game who shouldn't be. Hughton and Allardyce to name but two. But i don't think this is a knee jerk reaction. I just don't think he's got the commanding presence to be a manager at the level the board want to reach. If he did would he truly accept some of the recent performances from the team? If anything the team has let him down with their poor performances not the board or the fans. He had the players i believe (one or two exceptions), but they just didn't seem interested lately and he couldn't get them interested. If they were then they have definitely let him down, all of them.

    I don't think Parkinson is the right man to take us out this league and beyond, which is why i feel his removal from the role is the right decision.

    I do honestly wish him all the best as a manager in the future. I have nothing against him as a person. Some of his business considering his limitations has been good.

    I pray the board hire a good enough manager for us otherwise it makes his sacking pointless. Time will tell on that front.

    As you are his friend you can pass on a majority of the fans best wishes to him. Mine included.
  • When you consider the utter mess he inherited, I think he did okay. The new manager will have the benefit of money to spend - something Phil never had.
  • edited January 2011
    .
  • [cite]Posted By: Godstone[/cite]When you consider the utter mess he inherited, I think he did okay. The new manager will have the benefit of money to spend - something Phil never had.

    Maybe not but Parky had the benefit of inheriting the best team in the league by far at the start of last season but he just didn't know what to do with them.
  • [cite]Posted By: Godstone[/cite]The new manager will have the benefit of money to spend - something Phil never had.

    not a lot but £250,000 on Benson and his tactic was to smash it as hard and as high up to him. The players got talent, the manager didnt know how to tap into it.

    fancy the new man will get a lot more out of Benson yet people will be saying how PP found him!!
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited January 2011
    [cite]Posted By: ValleyGary[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Godstone[/cite]The new manager will have the benefit of money to spend - something Phil never had.

    not a lot but £250,000 on Benson and his tactic was to smash it as hard and as high up to him. The players got talent, the manager didnt know how to tap into it.

    fancy the new man will get a lot more out of Benson yet people will be saying how PP found him!!

    If the 'new man' is even a half-decent manager, Benson will be back to re-training as an accountant.

    Here's a question:

    If Parkinson had never been our manager, but had done what he has done with another Club ... based on that track record, would we be clamouring to have him installed as our 'new man'?
  • [cite]Posted By: Dave Rudd[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: ValleyGary[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Godstone[/cite]The new manager will have the benefit of money to spend - something Phil never had.

    not a lot but £250,000 on Benson and his tactic was to smash it as hard and as high up to him. The players got talent, the manager didnt know how to tap into it.

    fancy the new man will get a lot more out of Benson yet people will be saying how PP found him!!

    If the 'new man' is even a half-decent manager, Benson will be back to re-training as an accountant.

    Here's a question:

    If Parkinson had never been our manager, but had done what he has done with another Club ... based on that track record, would we be clamouring to have him installed as our 'new man'?

    I don't think so Dave. I think too much is happening too quickly for a lot of people.Whether that's good or not i don't know.
  • [quote][cite]Posted By: Gaerkid8[/cite]Wasn't Mr Ferguson one match away from the sack some time back?[/quote]

    No, that appears to have been a myth.

    Man U at that time only sacked managers once the gates fell below a certain level, they weren't interested in success and winning trophies as an end in itself - that meant investing in a bigger squad and buying the best players which meant spending money, what motivated the Edwards family was the amount of money they could make through the turnstiles.
  • [quote][cite]Posted By: Gaerkid8[/cite]The Club has, in my opinion made a gigantic mistake in sacking Phil.

    I have known the man for 26 years and was involved in his transfer from Bury to Reading in the 80's.

    The man was the finest example of a pro that I ever came across and he took those qualities with him into management.

    Shame on the new Board for throwing him out.

    Yes, Phil was generous to a fault and at times rejected cash incentives to pursue his desire to be totally professional. But, as we are all becoming aware, good character and loyalty have little place in the modern game.

    To the new board I would say this.

    Take someone off the managerial roundabout as you probably have had your eyes on someone long before sacking Phil and watch with dismay as you question your judgement.

    He will re-emerge and come to haunt you of that I have no doubt.

    You have a great Club and it has always been a great occasion to visit.

    The 'knee jerk' reaction from your new board of directors suggest that the near future is full of pitfalls.

    I wish you well but fear for you.[/quote]

    Look mate, it is well documented that Parky is a nice bloke, not up for discussion, however he is a shite manager, I dont give a rats arse how long you have known him, he is a shite manager, I agree we have a great club, infortunately Parky is a shite manager and great clubs do not have shite managers. I wish Parky well, all ex CAFC players score against us when they come back, I expect Parky to turn up at the Valley in the future as boss of non league or league two Port-Crew-Burton Town and beat us in a cup. Its what happens, but he is a shite manager. BTW keep your scaremongering, Vincent Price posts to yourself, have a nice night!
  • [cite]Posted By: Dave Rudd[/cite]Here's a question:

    If Parkinson had never been our manager, but had done what he has done with another Club ... based on that track record, would we be clamouring to have him installed as our 'new man'?

    Not clamouring, no, but I think his name would come up in the discussions, a bit like Eddie Howe, Paul Tisdale, Steve Tilson and John Still have all been mentioned as possible Charlton managers.
  • [cite]Posted By: BlackForestReds[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Gaerkid8[/cite]Wasn't Mr Ferguson one match away from the sack some time back?

    No, that appears to have been a myth.

    Man U at that time only sacked managers once the gates fell below a certain level, they weren't interested in success and winning trophies as an end in itself - that meant investing in a bigger squad and buying the best players which meant spending money, what motivated the Edwards family was the amount of money they could make through the turnstiles.

    Not strictly true that, is it?

    For example, Ron Atkinson spent £1.75 million on Bryan Robson - a British record at the time - and got the tin tack because they were third or fourth from bottom at the time and had just been dumped out of one of the cups (League cup?).
  • I thought Atkinson got the sack because we had the temerity to beat them at Old Trafford. Or was it getting dumped out of the cup AND getting beaten by us that did it?
  • Wikipedia is my friend!
    ;o)

    I don't think he got bulletted immediately after we beat them - but it wasn't long.
  • Atkinson was sacked the same day after Mark Stuart scored Charlton's winner at Old Trafford.
  • [cite]Posted By: bibble[/cite]I expect Parky to turn up at the Valley in the future as boss of non league or league two Port-Crew-Burton Town and beat us in a cup. Its what happens, but he is a shite manager.

    But, by your own definition, Bibble ..... wouldn't that make the new Charlton boss a shite manager?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!