Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

POST-MATCH THREAD: Preston North End v Charlton Athletic: Saturday 4th October 2025: KO 15:00

123468

Comments

  • Southbank said:
    I see that people are windering why Apter’s not getting a look in. Probably he’s had a disagreement with NJ.

    NJ doesn't like wingers, he always wants to convert them either to a striker (as with TC) a midfielder, or a wingback (as with Apter). Maybe this conversion is not working as NJ demands.
    We play with two wingbacks. He is not one.
    No, but the last game he played was against Millwall which was the same game that Ramsey got sent off. I'm suggesting that maybe NJ wanted to convert him to a wing back for the next match and he wasn't happy about it.

    You can lol me as much as you like but it's a possibility and no-one else seems to have any other explanation for his mysterious absence since.


  • Just got home. What an awful day from start to finish well done to all that made the journey that was a bad one. 
  • Can we send TC and Leaburn down the gym, they both get brushed off the ball so easily. If they could just hold their ground more they would be a real threat.
    I can't work out if Leaburn is weak as piss or just loves to play act, because for a big lump he is always going down so easily
  • Croydon said:
    Can we send TC and Leaburn down the gym, they both get brushed off the ball so easily. If they could just hold their ground more they would be a real threat.
    I can't work out if Leaburn is weak as piss or just loves to play act, because for a big lump he is always going down so easily
    Like a sack of potatoes. 

    I want to see King Godden back ASAP. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • We have a very good squad, and while im a big fan of consistency within a first 11, think we have to make better use of the squad during these 3-game weeks. If Jones can figure that out as season progresses, believe we will remain strong and continue to pick up more than enough points. 
    The point has been made but he does need to learn to rotate a bit. Coventry wasn’t on it yesterday and maybe could have been replaced by Costello or Anderson.
  • Croydon said:
    Can we send TC and Leaburn down the gym, they both get brushed off the ball so easily. If they could just hold their ground more they would be a real threat.
    I can't work out if Leaburn is weak as piss or just loves to play act, because for a big lump he is always going down so easily
    Just a typical modern forward. Looking for free kicks and cards rather than relishing the battle. As he matures, the penny might drop.


  • gringo said:
    It's not that long ago that we worried that some club would come in and nick Leaburn off us. I think at the moment we would struggle to give him away. He doesn't seem to have pushed on (perhaps his injury has affected him longer term) but It seems there is something missing at the moment.
    The thing that is missing affecting Leaburns game is service!!!
    He does look markedly slower than before his injury. Maybe I just have a poor memory but used to think he had a decent 5-10 yard sprint. 
    He's never been that good. Just like his old man. Split opinions although there were/are more for than against. At least his old man could attack the ball in the air (oh yes I forgot, he did get his head to a ball to flick onto Knibbs that set up our winner at Bramall Lane 🙄)

    I'd start with Oloafe & Kelman for the next few games. Try that pairing & see how we fare.
    According to Fotmob Leaburn has won 37 aerial duels this season, which puts him ahead of 92.7% of players in his position. But yeah, if you ignore that and the goal he created then he never wins anything, you're right.
    Out of curiosity,  what is the definition of winning an aerial duel here? Is it simply getting the header in before the opposition player regardless of where it goes, or is it winning the aerial duel AND the ball falling nicely and intentionally for a teammate?

    Also, this 92.7% below: how many duels on the ground have they won? How do they compare?

    Statistics can be twisted to suit an argument.

    By the way, Leaburn senior never ’attacked’ the ball in the air until the 91-92 season. 
  • Just seen the usual 2 min highlights reel. All Preston. Not a single "highlight" from us. How can you play 90 mins of football & not have anything to show for it.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Blucher said:

    I got home shortly before midnight after nearly 16 hours out of the house, most of it on bleedin’ trains - a great way to commemorate 200 years of the railway ! We went up via Manchester and a lady who’s a regular on that line was bemoaning how useless Avanti are. She said they didn’t have enough drivers and because they will almost certainly lose their franchise in a year’s time, they have no incentive to hire any more and train them up. The storm obviously created very real problems but the salvage job across the day as a whole left much to be desired. I was almost moved to respond to their “Tell us what you thought” survey.

    My sons went up Friday afternoon and thoroughly enjoyed exploring Preston’s hostelries as well as the Harris Museum, replete with the Wallace & Gromit Exhibition from Nick Park and Aardman. I had hoped to get to the Grade II listed Black Horse and one other pub en route to the ground, but as we didn’t arrive until about 1:20pm, we were limited to a couple of pints in The Old Vic near the station before hopping on a local bus to Deepdale. 

    As for the game, I thought that Preston were a bit better than us in the first half but a lot better in the second. We became ragged as the game wore on and it felt like one of those games where Charlton could have played until midnight and still not scored. 

    We had a few decent breaks in the first half, but other than a couple of dangerous crosses, didn’t really threaten Preston’s goal. The Doc had a very strong first half but the opposition largely controlled the midfield and we found it hard to create any significant openings. We weren’t helped by continually getting caught offside - I can’t recall that happening before several times in one game. Preston are a well-drilled side, but our players should be capable of looking along the line and timing their runs.

    If there wasn’t much between the teams in the first half, there certainly was in the second and it felt only a matter of time before Preston made the breakthrough. Kaminski made a fine reflex save from a close range header but the goal they had threatened arrived shortly thereafter from Thierry Small, who concentrated in getting his shot on target (as per Nathan's injunction) and had the benefit of a fortunate deflection from Ramsey to loop the ball past the keeper. The guy who put the cross in for the second found himself in acres of space down the left but maybe one of our defenders was playing him onside. Once that went in, the game was effectively done and dusted.

    I thought we looked a bit shaky at the back throughout. Ramsey was not as comfortable as usual at left back, whilst Reece Burke looked a little slow and flat-footed to me. We were unable to  achieve any semblance of control in midfield and the service to our forwards didn’t provide them with much to work with, especially against a very competent rearguard. We didn’t work their goalie at all - zero shots on target -  and, with the exception of one excellent break and cross from Bree - who was impressive again - we didn’t really pose a threat.

    It’s not the end of the world. Preston are a difficult proposition at their place and their manager has done a good job of rebuilding the side, utilising 3 or 4 Premiership loanees. 12 points is a respectable total at this stage and we now have an opportunity to regroup and come out with all guns blazing against Wednesday after the international break. If we can garner 3 points from that game, it will send us into the next two away games at Ipswich and Hull in a positive frame of mind.

    Due to family commitments I couldn't even follow the game yesterday but if there's one poster on here whose views I trust to be objective, balanced and accurate, it's @Blucher
  • I just don’t understand how multiple people thought Kelman had a good game
  • Just switched channels & caught 3 mins of the Derby v Saints match from the ITV highlights. Both keepers called into action countless times. If there had been no keepers the game could have ended 8-8.

    If Preston hadn't played with a keeper today they would have still kept a clean sheet. 0 shots on target in 90 minutes is a disgrace. That will be our downfall. As I bang on year after year, clean sheets only get you so far. You still have to put the ball in the onion bag down the other end. 
    You spent all of last season banging on about that and we seemed to do alright in the end didn’t we?
  • Just seen the usual 2 min highlights reel. All Preston. Not a single "highlight" from us. How can you play 90 mins of football & not have anything to show for it.
    I’m usually pretty negative but think the comments from most are generally a bit over the top. Was very happy at half time with how we’d done given at the very least as good as we’d got, properly actually a better first half performance than the one against Derby overall. Tide changed soon after restart and A slightly fortuitous / scrappy goal but ultimately this is exactly how a lot (possibly even all!) of our games will go, no clear superior team and rely on getting ahead more often than we fall behind. 

    Kelman continues to underwhelm but like most, thought he gave a better account of himself than most games, looked a bit more “up for the fight” trying to use his body a bit more etc 

  • Being the third ‘best’ team to get promoted we have done well to be competitive in every game so far but I do think we have proved we are good enough defensively to be able to play a flat back 4 and have a more attacking minded player in place of Burke for example, do we really need 3 centre backs against Sheff Wed up next? None of our strikers are scoring but nobody’s getting us up the pitch enough to supply them with any chances, TC & Kelman are constantly playing with their backs to goal & chasing shadows, I don’t think they’re exactly the problem & I don’t think it’s as simple as playing Leaburn / Olaofe either
  • At the game, after a stressful journey, and I only travelled from Manchester! Got there in time, even had a pint in Wetherspoons, nicely positioned on the walk from the station to the ground!
    Onto the game, not much to report that other posters have commented on. Our outstanding player was Docherty, his energy throughout the game was immense. I don't know if it's my imagination, but he seems to have gathered a yard extra in pace compared to last season. There was a point late on where he went toe to toe with Small, I was expecting him to be roasted, and he wasn't.
    My concern, and I've stated this over the years, that games are won and lost in midfield. It's not about how good your forward line is, defense has to be sound, that's a taken. our midfield are excellent in protecting the back four, mainly Coventry and Docherty. Sonney Carey has more attacking licence, he is the one trying to bust a gut to support the front two.
    For 60-70 mins this works, but I have noticed in the last 20 mins, we appear to lose midfield numbers. Against Derby, and again against Preston. My arguement in bringing on very attacking subs, today Leaburn, Tanto, and Knibbs, reduce the effectiveness of midfield. Whether it is bringing on Rankin- Costello or even Anderson (I know he wasn't on the bench), but we must retain midfield stability. My tactic does then limit the number of attacking subs, but time and time again, introducing more attacking subs diminishes our midfield strength, so we don't have the ability to create chances.
     My advice to Nathan, a more balanced approach, yes, change up the forward line , but more importantly don't weaken the midfield, because, if you do, you'll never have enough posession to create the chances for the gamechangers to finish.
    Totally agree. For as Good as they are, the middle pair  understandably tail off late on.
    Docs loose clearance lead to the first goal I believe
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!