Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
POST-MATCH THREAD: Preston North End v Charlton Athletic: Saturday 4th October 2025: KO 15:00
Comments
-
anyone that wouldn’t take that in such a competitive league is lyingRonnieMoore said:
That’s what he saying and that’s his job to build a positive feeling around the club .. but deep down he would take 4th from bottom now if offered ..Rob said:All this talk about “our aim is to stay up this season”. Of course that’s true but I’m glad that isn’t Nathan Jones philosophy. He wants us to do better than that and I’m glad about that.0 -
how can you possibly know that. I am going to make a bold, unsubstantiated claim. Nathan jones would not settle for 4th from bottom now if there was a chance of doing better than 4th from bottom (which is true as of now).RonnieMoore said:
That’s what he saying and that’s his job to build a positive feeling around the club .. but deep down he would take 4th from bottom now if offered ..Rob said:All this talk about “our aim is to stay up this season”. Of course that’s true but I’m glad that isn’t Nathan Jones philosophy. He wants us to do better than that and I’m glad about that.2 -
Don’t think he would actually…RonnieMoore said:
That’s what he saying and that’s his job to build a positive feeling around the club .. but deep down he would take 4th from bottom now if offered ..Rob said:All this talk about “our aim is to stay up this season”. Of course that’s true but I’m glad that isn’t Nathan Jones philosophy. He wants us to do better than that and I’m glad about that.1 -
You would think it was obvious but there's been a lot of comments on here that he doesn't win enough headers based on his height. That's factually not true but people still say it until they're met with the reality. And then it's the wrong kind of headers he's winning or he's not doing it while kissing the badge.sam3110 said:
6'7" lad in "wins Ariel duels" shocker.Garrymanilow said:jimmymelrose said:
Out of curiosity, what is the definition of winning an aerial duel here? Is it simply getting the header in before the opposition player regardless of where it goes, or is it winning the aerial duel AND the ball falling nicely and intentionally for a teammate?Garrymanilow said:
According to Fotmob Leaburn has won 37 aerial duels this season, which puts him ahead of 92.7% of players in his position. But yeah, if you ignore that and the goal he created then he never wins anything, you're right.golfaddick said:
He's never been that good. Just like his old man. Split opinions although there were/are more for than against. At least his old man could attack the ball in the air (oh yes I forgot, he did get his head to a ball to flick onto Knibbs that set up our winner at Bramall Lane 🙄)SELR_addicks said:
He does look markedly slower than before his injury. Maybe I just have a poor memory but used to think he had a decent 5-10 yard sprint.Todds_right_hook said:
The thing that is missing affecting Leaburns game is service!!!gringo said:It's not that long ago that we worried that some club would come in and nick Leaburn off us. I think at the moment we would struggle to give him away. He doesn't seem to have pushed on (perhaps his injury has affected him longer term) but It seems there is something missing at the moment.
I'd start with Oloafe & Kelman for the next few games. Try that pairing & see how we fare.
Also, this 92.7% below: how many duels on the ground have they won? How do they compare?
Statistics can be twisted to suit an argument.
By the way, Leaburn senior never ’attacked’ the ball in the air until the 91-92 season.Fotmob get their data from Opta, who define an aerial duel as 'where two players challenge in the air against each other. The player that wins the ball is deemed to have won the duel. When more than two players are involved the player closest to the duel winner is given an Aerial Duel lost'. So no, nothing about it also falling beautifully at a teammate's feet but then that's a different stat.Miles has won 49 duels apparently, better than 83.6% of others in his position but even with the definition it's not clear what exactly a duel is; they say any 50:50 contest but he's also only won 3 tackles so it's evidently a very broad category and not really that useful except to show he's quite strong. He has won possession in the final third 9 times though, which is above 94.5% of others.Statistics can be twisted to suit an argument sure but these have just been presented as they are on the stats page, and they're presented in response to that claim that Leaburn can't attack the ball in the air, which is provably untrue and a silly thing to say; just goes to show that football fans see what they want to see a lot of the time, not what's actually happening.
Next thing you'll know people will be telling us Kaminski has saved more shots than anyone else in our starting XI....0 -
Or smiling.Garrymanilow said:
You would think it was obvious but there's been a lot of comments on here that he doesn't win enough headers based on his height. That's factually not true but people still say it until they're met with the reality. And then it's the wrong kind of headers he's winning or he's not doing it while kissing the badge.sam3110 said:
6'7" lad in "wins Ariel duels" shocker.Garrymanilow said:jimmymelrose said:
Out of curiosity, what is the definition of winning an aerial duel here? Is it simply getting the header in before the opposition player regardless of where it goes, or is it winning the aerial duel AND the ball falling nicely and intentionally for a teammate?Garrymanilow said:
According to Fotmob Leaburn has won 37 aerial duels this season, which puts him ahead of 92.7% of players in his position. But yeah, if you ignore that and the goal he created then he never wins anything, you're right.golfaddick said:
He's never been that good. Just like his old man. Split opinions although there were/are more for than against. At least his old man could attack the ball in the air (oh yes I forgot, he did get his head to a ball to flick onto Knibbs that set up our winner at Bramall Lane 🙄)SELR_addicks said:
He does look markedly slower than before his injury. Maybe I just have a poor memory but used to think he had a decent 5-10 yard sprint.Todds_right_hook said:
The thing that is missing affecting Leaburns game is service!!!gringo said:It's not that long ago that we worried that some club would come in and nick Leaburn off us. I think at the moment we would struggle to give him away. He doesn't seem to have pushed on (perhaps his injury has affected him longer term) but It seems there is something missing at the moment.
I'd start with Oloafe & Kelman for the next few games. Try that pairing & see how we fare.
Also, this 92.7% below: how many duels on the ground have they won? How do they compare?
Statistics can be twisted to suit an argument.
By the way, Leaburn senior never ’attacked’ the ball in the air until the 91-92 season.Fotmob get their data from Opta, who define an aerial duel as 'where two players challenge in the air against each other. The player that wins the ball is deemed to have won the duel. When more than two players are involved the player closest to the duel winner is given an Aerial Duel lost'. So no, nothing about it also falling beautifully at a teammate's feet but then that's a different stat.Miles has won 49 duels apparently, better than 83.6% of others in his position but even with the definition it's not clear what exactly a duel is; they say any 50:50 contest but he's also only won 3 tackles so it's evidently a very broad category and not really that useful except to show he's quite strong. He has won possession in the final third 9 times though, which is above 94.5% of others.Statistics can be twisted to suit an argument sure but these have just been presented as they are on the stats page, and they're presented in response to that claim that Leaburn can't attack the ball in the air, which is provably untrue and a silly thing to say; just goes to show that football fans see what they want to see a lot of the time, not what's actually happening.
Next thing you'll know people will be telling us Kaminski has saved more shots than anyone else in our starting XI....4 -
Disagree, I’ve done every game this season and haven’t seen a better team. Can’t see any team running away with it this season, wouldn’t be surprised if they sneak top 6.Braziliance said:
Top 6 side for now, with all respect to Preston fans, I can't see them finishing anywhere near the top 6 by the end of the season.bromleyjohn said:Was there. Disappointed but not too sad at a top 6 side. The problem ,like the start ,of last season is the final finish and chances created. No shots on target is the main stat.
It looks like they will comfortably finish above lower mid-table, which is where most people expected them to be, but I don't see them having enough for that top6.
They won't get many more comfortable afternoons at home than that, and their fans will tell you that themselves3 -
I’m certainly not having a dig at Miles here but whatever anyone says he so far this season has been a disappointment. It wouldn’t surprise me if his previous injury has had more effect than we realise. With his physique he should be absolutely bossing defences. Some were saying we should be asking £10m before he signed his new contract but honestly (forget for a second he is one of our own) what have we seen so far this season that he deserves to even be in the match day squad ?Garrymanilow said:
You would think it was obvious but there's been a lot of comments on here that he doesn't win enough headers based on his height. That's factually not true but people still say it until they're met with the reality. And then it's the wrong kind of headers he's winning or he's not doing it while kissing the badge.sam3110 said:
6'7" lad in "wins Ariel duels" shocker.Garrymanilow said:jimmymelrose said:
Out of curiosity, what is the definition of winning an aerial duel here? Is it simply getting the header in before the opposition player regardless of where it goes, or is it winning the aerial duel AND the ball falling nicely and intentionally for a teammate?Garrymanilow said:
According to Fotmob Leaburn has won 37 aerial duels this season, which puts him ahead of 92.7% of players in his position. But yeah, if you ignore that and the goal he created then he never wins anything, you're right.golfaddick said:
He's never been that good. Just like his old man. Split opinions although there were/are more for than against. At least his old man could attack the ball in the air (oh yes I forgot, he did get his head to a ball to flick onto Knibbs that set up our winner at Bramall Lane 🙄)SELR_addicks said:
He does look markedly slower than before his injury. Maybe I just have a poor memory but used to think he had a decent 5-10 yard sprint.Todds_right_hook said:
The thing that is missing affecting Leaburns game is service!!!gringo said:It's not that long ago that we worried that some club would come in and nick Leaburn off us. I think at the moment we would struggle to give him away. He doesn't seem to have pushed on (perhaps his injury has affected him longer term) but It seems there is something missing at the moment.
I'd start with Oloafe & Kelman for the next few games. Try that pairing & see how we fare.
Also, this 92.7% below: how many duels on the ground have they won? How do they compare?
Statistics can be twisted to suit an argument.
By the way, Leaburn senior never ’attacked’ the ball in the air until the 91-92 season.Fotmob get their data from Opta, who define an aerial duel as 'where two players challenge in the air against each other. The player that wins the ball is deemed to have won the duel. When more than two players are involved the player closest to the duel winner is given an Aerial Duel lost'. So no, nothing about it also falling beautifully at a teammate's feet but then that's a different stat.Miles has won 49 duels apparently, better than 83.6% of others in his position but even with the definition it's not clear what exactly a duel is; they say any 50:50 contest but he's also only won 3 tackles so it's evidently a very broad category and not really that useful except to show he's quite strong. He has won possession in the final third 9 times though, which is above 94.5% of others.Statistics can be twisted to suit an argument sure but these have just been presented as they are on the stats page, and they're presented in response to that claim that Leaburn can't attack the ball in the air, which is provably untrue and a silly thing to say; just goes to show that football fans see what they want to see a lot of the time, not what's actually happening.
Next thing you'll know people will be telling us Kaminski has saved more shots than anyone else in our starting XI....2 -
I got killed for saying it after the Millwall game, but Leaburn just doesn’t look interested. We’ll see what happens in January.0
-
I've also done every Charlton game and watched the highlights of every Championship game (my Dad's arder' than your Dad) and I still don't think they're the best team we have played or that I have seen.J BLOCK said:
Disagree, I’ve done every game this season and haven’t seen a better team. Can’t see any team running away with it this season, wouldn’t be surprised if they sneak top 6.Braziliance said:
Top 6 side for now, with all respect to Preston fans, I can't see them finishing anywhere near the top 6 by the end of the season.bromleyjohn said:Was there. Disappointed but not too sad at a top 6 side. The problem ,like the start ,of last season is the final finish and chances created. No shots on target is the main stat.
It looks like they will comfortably finish above lower mid-table, which is where most people expected them to be, but I don't see them having enough for that top6.
They won't get many more comfortable afternoons at home than that, and their fans will tell you that themselves
Currently 18th favourites to secure a top6 finish with most bookies and joint 9/1 with us, lump on, money to be made.1 -
He just signed a new contract.The Red Robin said:I got killed for saying it after the Millwall game, but Leaburn just doesn’t look interested. We’ll see what happens in January.
I personally think Miles is bothered. You don't get in the top 5% in the Championship for pressing when you're not. Even more impressive considering he hasn't played that many minutes.5 - Sponsored links:
-
I do agree, and it did work in League 1, and has worked so far, but, I do feel at some point we are going to hit a wall.Crispywood said:
Whilst I get why a 4231 would make us better going forward. To me to suddenly tear up the system, formation and style the only thing that has given us any sort of success in the last 6 years whilst we’re also currently exceeding expectations just isn’t worth it.Braziliance said:
This is what me and my mate were saying on the way back.SheedyCAFC said:Being the third ‘best’ team to get promoted we have done well to be competitive in every game so far but I do think we have proved we are good enough defensively to be able to play a flat back 4 and have a more attacking minded player in place of Burke for example, do we really need 3 centre backs against Sheff Wed up next? None of our strikers are scoring but nobody’s getting us up the pitch enough to supply them with any chances, TC & Kelman are constantly playing with their backs to goal & chasing shadows, I don’t think they’re exactly the problem & I don’t think it’s as simple as playing Leaburn / Olaofe either
5 defenders and 2 defensive minded midfielders is excessive and not always necessary.
I would like to see a 433/4231 against Wednesday. TC/Kelman/Apter up top with Carey behind them. Give Apter and TC more freedom out wide and let them do what they do best.
2nd lowest for succesful dribbles when we have two talented wingers just seems a waste.We’ve only got 2 CB’s who would work in a flat 4 being Burke and Jones. In addition, Whether it’s a 352 or 4231 the formation isn’t going to suddenly teach TC how to have end product or teach Leaburn how to outmuscle a cb or Kelman how to have Godden level positioning. The only player who would really benefit from a change is Apter.Something does need to change to make us better going forward but I’d rather experiment with personnel like going Carey/TC Apter just in behind a striker, or Knibbs/Carey in the 8 instead of Docherty when we want to be more attacking, even maybe TC as a LWB and have 2 natural strikers. We have options to try different combos then tearing apart everything that brought us success in the first place
You get away with it in League 1 more as it's such a poor league for quality, Stevenage currently top and Bradford 2nd, says it all for me, they'd be eaten alive in this league. What works in League 1 might not work over the course of a 46 game championship season.
Jones came in to stop the rot, and he did. I now believe we have competent enough defenders to play 4 at the back at all times to get more attackers on the pitch.0 -
I'll attach all these stats as images, but as highlighted before, defensively we are sound, past that first third of the pitch, we really ain't up to much, and I am a bit worried that will creep up on us in results soon.
The Derby & Preston performances were concerning, not being 'doom and gloom' or panicking. Just observing the game as a fan.
Look how low our attacking/offensive numbers are:
3 -
Parker signed a new contract in August and left in the January. All contracts do is boost the transfer fee.Chunes said:
He just signed a new contract.The Red Robin said:I got killed for saying it after the Millwall game, but Leaburn just doesn’t look interested. We’ll see what happens in January.
I personally think Miles is bothered. You don't get in the top 5% in the Championship for pressing when you're not. Even more impressive considering he hasn't played that many minutes.1 -
@Braziliance nice to meet you yesterday - my pre-match hope for a point didn’t look so bad afterall.1
-
i didn't see the game but i think you have hit the nail on the head here - last year, if we didn't have 2 pacy attacking threats on the pitch, we were too easy to contain and teams pushed onto us - that happened second half at derby and i'm guessing that happened yesterday - not blaming anybody or saying we wouldn't have lost if we had say apter or the norwich fella on the other wing but i'd bet we would have created more - i said against blackburn at half time that NJ has got his dream here - we had 2 defenders playing wing back , 2 defensive midfielders and 3 centre halfs. It worked but not sure its the way forward - u have to threaten the opposition rather than just defend your way to wins - anyway, overall, been a good start to the season but we do need to adjust the balance a bitScoham said:I’ll just copy over what I said in the TC thread. I was happy enough with the first half.
We need pace and width on at least one wing, as good as Bree is he won’t be doubled up on by the opposition and that creates space. Not unlike Jones to revert back to solid consistent players, but at this level we need more creativity and flair in the final third on top of throwing on height, pace and power.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
The problem for me wasn’t bringing TC off, it was not bringing Apter and/or Hernandez on.
NJ must understand what those 3 offer having so much faith in TC and signing the other two recently.
We need to evolve in the final third and just putting more height, pace and strength on hasn’t been as successful as it was last season.
Combine it with a wide player or two who loves taking players on - even if the end product isn’t there, it can also create more space for others, and make a team sit back more to avoid being countered.
Having Small and TC on either wing was arguably the most important factor in our improvement last season. As good as Bree is, he doesn’t offer a those strengths, and if you don’t start with that on both wings, at least end the game that way when you’re losing.0 -
It's quite simple.....he's missing his mummy.The Red Robin said:I got killed for saying it after the Millwall game, but Leaburn just doesn’t look interested. We’ll see what happens in January.1 -
🙄 That’s a crappily 💩 written commentgolfaddick said:
It's quite simple.....he's missing his mummy.The Red Robin said:I got killed for saying it after the Millwall game, but Leaburn just doesn’t look interested. We’ll see what happens in January.1 -
Cheers mate, nice to put a face to a name as well and meet you.The Red Robin said:@Braziliance nice to meet you yesterday - my pre-match hope for a point didn’t look so bad afterall.
Vlog is up now for anyone interested,
https://youtu.be/xvkX6-WzNvU?si=we-lmzhorTuEf9Xu
My last video with subtitles as it's genuinely far too much effort and adds about an hour to a video render0 -
Unfortunately whenever we do replace Campbell we look more vulnerable because our other forwards do not press in the way he does. This is a real conundrum for NJ. We are better defensively with TC on the pitch, but our goals are not coming from strikers. Does it matter if we are getting results anyway? Can anybody hand on heart say that if we had started Olaofe or Leaburn this season so far instead of TC we would have been better off? Can't see it myself1
-
Nice video mate, that's a serious barnet job you had there mate, did you get the guy who did it...😉Braziliance said:
Cheers mate, nice to put a face to a name as well and meet you.The Red Robin said:@Braziliance nice to meet you yesterday - my pre-match hope for a point didn’t look so bad afterall.
Vlog is up now for anyone interested,https://youtu.be/xvkX6-WzNvU?si=we-lmzhorTuEf9Xu
My last video with subtitles as it's genuinely far too much effort and adds about an hour to a video render1 - Sponsored links:
-
No it isn’t!!!!Redrobo said:I think some have forgotten that the aim this season is staying up.
Kelman and Campbell help us keep games very tight. Finishers are to help us keep what we’ve got or to nick a goal.
Jones came into the Club to keep us from going down to league 2, which he did by sorting the defence.He then addressed the forward play and got us promoted.
Too early for me to try and be clever.
2 points a game is promotion form. We have taken four from three very difficult games, two of which were away. That is staying up form.
We are also good at home.
That is staying up form.
Going up is our aim and should always be so every season until we do so…..this one included.
I ‘never’ accept any other possibility until it’s mathematically impossible.0 -
eastterrace6168 said:
Nice video mate, that's a serious barnet job you had there mate, did you get the guy who did it...😉Braziliance said:
Cheers mate, nice to put a face to a name as well and meet you.The Red Robin said:@Braziliance nice to meet you yesterday - my pre-match hope for a point didn’t look so bad afterall.
Vlog is up now for anyone interested,https://youtu.be/xvkX6-WzNvU?si=we-lmzhorTuEf9Xu
My last video with subtitles as it's genuinely far too much effort and adds about an hour to a video render
0 -
It's ok, we can understand what you are saying.Braziliance said:
Cheers mate, nice to put a face to a name as well and meet you.The Red Robin said:@Braziliance nice to meet you yesterday - my pre-match hope for a point didn’t look so bad afterall.
Vlog is up now for anyone interested,https://youtu.be/xvkX6-WzNvU?si=we-lmzhorTuEf9Xu
My last video with subtitles as it's genuinely far too much effort and adds about an hour to a video render0 -
I think the real problem might be that he just isn't as good as we think he is.The Red Robin said:I got killed for saying it after the Millwall game, but Leaburn just doesn’t look interested. We’ll see what happens in January.0 -
The game plan has been to press and wear down the opposition then we make subs and nick a goal, problem is with the games closer together lately the players are knackered.Southbank said:Unfortunately whenever we do replace Campbell we look more vulnerable because our other forwards do not press in the way he does. This is a real conundrum for NJ. We are better defensively with TC on the pitch, but our goals are not coming from strikers. Does it matter if we are getting results anyway? Can anybody hand on heart say that if we had started Olaofe or Leaburn this season so far instead of TC we would have been better off? Can't see it myself0
