Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sheffield Wednesday - players and staff paid late 2 months in a row (p7)

1212224262743

Comments

  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,612
    Serious question because I genuinely don’t know. What grounds are there for points to be deducted.
    Continual breaches over time such as not paying players, not paying HMRC. Similar stuff to when Reading were deducted points.
    So all of those things have already taken place but no points deduction ?
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,760
    Saw a post on Owls talk that with the players they lost this summer they:

    - have lost 80% of the goals and 75% of assists from last season

    - have just 11 goals and 11 assists from last season still at the club

    - have just 6 players left who registered a Championship goal or assist last season

    Im no mathematician, but if they’ve have 11 goals and 11 assists left from last season;

    surely the percentage of the goals and the percentage of the assists left from last season would also be the same figure and not 80 and 75 as you mention? 
    Clearly not! 😂
    If they have 11 goals left and lost 80% from last year, that suggests they had 55 goals last year and have lost 44.
    If they have 11 assists left and lost 75% from last year, that suggests they had 44 assists last year and have lost 33.

    You’re welcome! 😎
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,987
    Serious question because I genuinely don’t know. What grounds are there for points to be deducted.
    Continual breaches over time such as not paying players, not paying HMRC. Similar stuff to when Reading were deducted points.
    So all of those things have already taken place but no points deduction ?
    I think they will eventually. They've been given an embargo, but i think if it continues then it'll be points deductions next. When Reading were deducted points it wasn't straight away.
  • Out of interest, if they are unable to fulfill their fixtures and get kicked out, do only two teams get relegated or is it the three lowest teams still? 
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,217
    Out of interest, if they are unable to fulfill their fixtures and get kicked out, do only two teams get relegated or is it the three lowest teams still? 
    Can't see it happening. After Bury that would have to be an absolute last resort. They're too big a club to get kicked out, the EFL will keep kicking it down the road like they did with Reading with points deductions the most likely punishments until the club changes hands.
  • Swindon_Addick
    Swindon_Addick Posts: 1,620
    Out of interest, if they are unable to fulfill their fixtures and get kicked out, do only two teams get relegated or is it the three lowest teams still? 
    It's a long time since it last happened in the League, so it's not certain that the EFL would definitely follow precedent, but in the past the club going bust has always been treated as one of the relegated sides and one less goes down. Where it gets tricker is in league 1, with 1 fewer coming down from the Championship but the usual 3 going up, League 1 then has a vacancy. In non-league they'd solve that by having only 3 down from League 1 and only 1 from League 2 so as to get back to the right numbers, but I don't think there's anything in the rules that says they would have to do that.
  • jose
    jose Posts: 615
    This all feels like it might end up like the Bolton Wanderers situation of a few years ago, 2019 I believe, in terms of fielding a team of youngsters who at the time were called ‘Junior Whites’.
  • Out of interest, if they are unable to fulfill their fixtures and get kicked out, do only two teams get relegated or is it the three lowest teams still? 
    It's a long time since it last happened in the League, so it's not certain that the EFL would definitely follow precedent, but in the past the club going bust has always been treated as one of the relegated sides and one less goes down. Where it gets tricker is in league 1, with 1 fewer coming down from the Championship but the usual 3 going up, League 1 then has a vacancy. In non-league they'd solve that by having only 3 down from League 1 and only 1 from League 2 so as to get back to the right numbers, but I don't think there's anything in the rules that says they would have to do that.
    As long as it doesn’t result in an extra relegation place in the champ then they can do what they wish. It would be typical that issues at Sheffield Wednesday mean we go down because we finished above the relegation place but as they’d been kicked out we go down as well 
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,987
    There's no way they'll get kicked out, they're too big for that. They'll just play with free transfers/loans/kids until they either get taken over or go into administration and then get taken over.

    It's definitely going to be an advantage for the clubs who play them early on in the season though, same as it was with the teams who played Bolton. They're going to start the season with a mish-mash of players who've played hardly any pre-season friendlies together.
  • There's no way they'll get kicked out, they're too big for that. They'll just play with free transfers/loans/kids until they either get taken over or go into administration and then get taken over.

    It's definitely going to be an advantage for the clubs who play them early on in the season though, same as it was with the teams who played Bolton. They're going to start the season with a mish-mash of players who've played hardly any pre-season friendlies together.
    Hopefully they EFL decide that no one is too big to be kicked out, otherwise I would think that Bury have a case to pursue legal action against the EFL. No use kicking out the smaller teams that won’t really fight it if you’re scared of having the fight with the larger ones
  • Sponsored links:



  • The Prince-e-Paul
    The Prince-e-Paul Posts: 6,688
    AndyG said:
    I don’t want them to fold either but there comes a point when somebody (other than a minnow) has to be held to account to show other clubs they can’t behave in this way. Most clubs are run in the correct manner but some are flying close to the wind an example of Sheffield Wednesday is we like other clubs are atm trying to sign players on our agreed budget, these bastards sign players (to the detriment of other clubs getting relegated) and don’t even pay for them !! 
    They can't buy anyone for three windows now, so no issues with paying for players for the foreseeable. 

    I imagine they will now struggle to attract free transfers, as the precarious nature of their salaries getting paid would likely put off quite a few decent players. Those without a club or of poorer quality will likely fill the void.

    Sad times at Hillsborough. They are a great club and their fans are entitled to feel aggrieved. As fickle as fans can be, like we have endured, poor owners can ruin a club and cause significant distress to those that invest their lives following their team through the good and the bad on the pitch. 

    As a home town club, my sense of rivalry with Wednesday is equal to that of some 'other' London teams. Without our fiercest and most disliked rivals football loses it's passion and purpose. I hope they sort their shit out and continue give us a good game (but not too good). The thought of there being no Wednesday is unthinkable. 
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,612
    edited July 18
    There's no way they'll get kicked out, they're too big for that. They'll just play with free transfers/loans/kids until they either get taken over or go into administration and then get taken over.

    It's definitely going to be an advantage for the clubs who play them early on in the season though, same as it was with the teams who played Bolton. They're going to start the season with a mish-mash of players who've played hardly any pre-season friendlies together.
    Loans are also tricky. They can only sign loans where they don’t pay any loan fee or wages above that paid to the player by the parent club. 

  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,023
    They'll probably end up with a chunk of that PFA Free Agents squad that's been going around. Which is very League 1 level. 
  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,754
    MarcusH26 said:
    They'll probably end up with a chunk of that PFA Free Agents squad that's been going around. Which is very League 1 level. 
    If you’re a free agent at league one level, may be a great opportunity to try and showcase yourself at a higher level.
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,942
    MarcusH26 said:
    They'll probably end up with a chunk of that PFA Free Agents squad that's been going around. Which is very League 1 level. 
    Maybe if they get taken over - even those without a club likely won't want to sign if they're in danger of never getting paid.
  • gringo
    gringo Posts: 564
    Do they consult Don Goodman on every football related matter?, when did he become the font of all knowledge?
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 592
    gringo said:
    Do they consult Don Goodman on every football related matter?, when did he become the font of all knowledge?
    Old Don must be raking it in 💰💰
  • Swindon_Addick
    Swindon_Addick Posts: 1,620
    The reports of the Mansfield friendly being cancelled don't seem to be correct - the local paper says it was played behind closed doors and the club seems to have had a full squad for it. 
    https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/sheffield-wednesday-mansfield-town-friendly-preseason-hillsborough-5243536
  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,455
    Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Barry Bannan is set to miss the start of the season after a hair transplant went wrong?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,987
    The reports of the Mansfield friendly being cancelled don't seem to be correct - the local paper says it was played behind closed doors and the club seems to have had a full squad for it. 
    https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/sheffield-wednesday-mansfield-town-friendly-preseason-hillsborough-5243536
    Surprised they have that many players left, i assume a lot of them were kids.
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,612
    Wednesday fans although still worried are far more positive that a sale is very likely and local itk’s are saying there’s strong interest from multiple parties.
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,839
    edited July 27
    IdleHans said:
    JaShea99 said:
    Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Barry Bannan is set to miss the start of the season after a hair transplant went wrong?
    If that's true, there will be hell toupée
    I understand that Barnet are interested.
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,839
    JaShea99 said:
    Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Barry Bannan is set to miss the start of the season after a hair transplant went wrong?
    Thought this was a piss take but have just seen the suggestion online.
  • paulsturgess
    paulsturgess Posts: 3,794
    Saw a post on Owls talk that with the players they lost this summer they:

    - have lost 80% of the goals and 75% of assists from last season

    - have just 11 goals and 11 assists from last season still at the club

    - have just 6 players left who registered a Championship goal or assist last season

    Im no mathematician, but if they’ve have 11 goals and 11 assists left from last season;

    surely the percentage of the goals and the percentage of the assists left from last season would also be the same figure and not 80 and 75 as you mention? 
    Clearly not! 😂
    If they have 11 goals left and lost 80% from last year, that suggests they had 55 goals last year and have lost 44.
    If they have 11 assists left and lost 75% from last year, that suggests they had 44 assists last year and have lost 33.

    You’re welcome! 😎
    Fair play. In my haste hadn’t remembered the fact that not every goal has an assist 
  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,455
    JaShea99 said:
    Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Barry Bannan is set to miss the start of the season after a hair transplant went wrong?
    Thought this was a piss take but have just seen the suggestion online.
    Someone was saying he hasn’t been in training either so could be true.
  • Acab
    Acab Posts: 724
    but now hearing it could be one of their fringe players.
    He’s not parting then.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,987
    JaShea99 said:
    Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Barry Bannan is set to miss the start of the season after a hair transplant went wrong?
    Bannan is out of contract and is not officially Sheffield Wednesday's player right now, but from what i've read he has been training with them so i doubt it's him.