Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Reebok it is then (new 3rd shirt p51)

1404143454658

Comments

  • stackitsteve
    stackitsteve Posts: 12,102
    dickad1 said:
    Don't mind it. Don't massively care. More interested in who we bring in to wear it.

    However, where was the promo shot?   I think maybe the Golden Chippy in Greenwich, but not sure? 


    Pop’n Pier Fish & Chips - Greenwich Church Street
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,804
    Son showed it to me as he thought it was 'pretty decent', i couldnt see what the pattern was without my glasses on. Put my glasses on and still cant. Thought it might have a bit more blue in it but think its a grower
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,832
    In 21/22 the 3rd kit had just the sword, in 22/23, the 3rd kit again just had the sword, in 23/24 it was the away kit, while in 24/25 it was the 3rd kit, so I'm surprised it's caused much surprise. I think the sword logo looks good personally, and it harks back to some pretty popular kits of the 70s










  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,342
    I really like that black and gold kit tbf.
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    3 black kits in 5 seasons (4 if you include the black Castore goalkeeper top) would suggest another black kit for our 3rd kit this season is extremely unlikely 
  • Nug
    Nug Posts: 4,623
    The ‘inspiration’ stuff gets more and more bollocks each time.

    The kit pays homage to Charlton fan, Floyd Rose, who as a young fan playing in the dusty SE7 streets once kicked a multi-coloured Mitre football over the gates of the East Stand. Undeterred, young Floyd stole his convicted thief of a dad’s bolt cutters and broke his way into the ground to retrieve his ball so his friends could continue playing.

    Floyd’s actions of resilience, determination, sustainability, family focus and community spirit are synonymous of the ethos of Charlton Athletic…



    It is a load of bollocks, I’ve had to write my fair share of it too in my job, but never as bad as this crap!



  • Neil_Heaney
    Neil_Heaney Posts: 368
    We’ve actually had loads of decent designs over recent years, but the material is cheap, shiny and badly stitched on virtually every one so none look that good. It’s a shame because when you feel the weight and thickness of the old Le Coq Sportif and Joma shirts you realise how different they used to be. The sponsor materials and embroidered badges obviously made a big difference too.
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,820
    bobmunro said:
    Away kit is awful - and with that badge nobody will know who it is. I've sent it to a few people and there first response is 'whose kit is that' 

    I take it the few people you've sent it to are not Charlton fans. Every single Charlton fan would recognise the sword emblem as us, and I couldn't give a flying f*ck what non-Charlton fans think.
    Replica shirts are the single most effective advertisement  / recognition for a club so when you purposely attempt to reduce that reach (no non-Charlton fan would know that’s a Charlton shirt) you’ve wasted a clear and obvious opportunity 
  • Lewis Coaches
    Lewis Coaches Posts: 5,408
    What the hell is this shirt and badge doing.

    Trust it’s a wind up.
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,914
    You know things are definitely on the up when one of the only things we have to worry about is the badge on one of the kits. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,212
    What the hell is this shirt and badge doing.

    Trust it’s a wind up.
    Nice to see Johnny Vegas there 
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    If the third is black and gold I hope it’s better than the last two efforts with that combination. The Castore one looked cheap and Joma’s attempt was a monstrosity. Tarnished by relegation as well. 
  • Sage
    Sage Posts: 7,277
    If the fish swam out of the ocean, and grew legs and they started walking 
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,839
    bobmunro said:
    Away kit is awful - and with that badge nobody will know who it is. I've sent it to a few people and there first response is 'whose kit is that' 

    I take it the few people you've sent it to are not Charlton fans. Every single Charlton fan would recognise the sword emblem as us, and I couldn't give a flying f*ck what non-Charlton fans think.
    Replica shirts are the single most effective advertisement  / recognition for a club so when you purposely attempt to reduce that reach (no non-Charlton fan would know that’s a Charlton shirt) you’ve wasted a clear and obvious opportunity 
    I would suggest that league position and success are the single most effective advertisement / recognition for a club. 

    The ability of a non-fan to recognise a shirt, and the subsequent impact of that inability to recognise a shirt, would ultimately amount to about two fifths of fuck all in terms of impact.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,343
    I love that Blue/White top
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    With this morning’s addition of Bell, the 3rd kit might as well be a Jamaican kit 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,023
    Sage said:
    If the fish swam out of the ocean, and grew legs and they started walking 
    Signing an Australian ;) 
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    With this morning’s addition of Bell, the 3rd kit might as well be a Jamaican kit 
    Or Luton 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 10,966
    Mendez said on the Substack pod today that the away kit was meant to be the third kit but was so popular it was bumped up. Guess that means the third kit will be relatively plain in comparison
  • I guess that now we have the same sponsor across home and away, and therefore no obligation to not  wear our home kit unless there's a clash... the difference between away/third is minimal.

    I.e. we just whichever one is best suited 
  • Sponsored links:



  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    fenaddick said:
    Mendez said on the Substack pod today that the away kit was meant to be the third kit but was so popular it was bumped up. Guess that means the third kit will be relatively plain in comparison
    Popular with who?
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 10,966
    fenaddick said:
    Mendez said on the Substack pod today that the away kit was meant to be the third kit but was so popular it was bumped up. Guess that means the third kit will be relatively plain in comparison
    Popular with who?
    It was unclear but I guess staff/fans who were consulted. At least 2 posters on here alluded to having seen it so I'm sure plenty of people had
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,796
    fenaddick said:
    fenaddick said:
    Mendez said on the Substack pod today that the away kit was meant to be the third kit but was so popular it was bumped up. Guess that means the third kit will be relatively plain in comparison
    Popular with who?
    It was unclear but I guess staff/fans who were consulted. At least 2 posters on here alluded to having seen it so I'm sure plenty of people had
    My test for is the shirt any good is my 11 year old, and he likes it, but prefers the keepers top the most at the moment 
  • CL_Phantom
    CL_Phantom Posts: 5,512
    Going through the Instagram photoshoot,  I'm now sold on it!

  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,212
    fenaddick said:
    Mendez said on the Substack pod today that the away kit was meant to be the third kit but was so popular it was bumped up. Guess that means the third kit will be relatively plain in comparison
    Popular with who?
    The committee 


  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    With this morning’s addition of Bell, the 3rd kit might as well be a Jamaican kit 

    Well now ...
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 3,281
    cafc999 said:
    With this morning’s addition of Bell, the 3rd kit might as well be a Jamaican kit 

    Well now ...
    ♥️💛💚
  • northstandsteve
    northstandsteve Posts: 14,327
    edited July 4
    Just had a customer bring in a new home shirt to have a name and number put on it, christ the quality is absymal, more like something a Lookie Lookie man would sell, who bloody signs this stuff off at the club, forget the design that is neither here nor there the actual quality is shit wouldn't pay £15.00 let alone £50
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,582
    Just had a customer bring in a new home shirt to have a name and number put on it, christ the quality is absymal, more like something a Lookie Lookie man would sell, who bloody signs this stuff off at the club, forget the design that is neither here nor there the actual quality is shit wouldn't pay £15.00 let alone £50
    You could see that in the teaser photos that were issued before the release, the seams were coming apart. If they can’t get that right on a sample, what chance on a production run?
  • northstandsteve
    northstandsteve Posts: 14,327
    It is thin as fuck as well no substance to it