Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ULEZ Checker

1404143454664

Comments

  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,380
    Good news 👍
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    seth plum said:
    Don’t forget all those Weapons of Mass Destruction that the Government told us weee in Iraq. 
    Is there a relationship between the Iraq situation and a reduction of pollution in London?

  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,410
    seth plum said:
    seth plum said:
    Don’t forget all those Weapons of Mass Destruction that the Government told us weee in Iraq. 
    Is there a relationship between the Iraq situation and a reduction of pollution in London?

    Yes, they are both made up to suit the narrative. 
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    seth plum said:
    seth plum said:
    Don’t forget all those Weapons of Mass Destruction that the Government told us weee in Iraq. 
    Is there a relationship between the Iraq situation and a reduction of pollution in London?

    Yes, they are both made up to suit the narrative. 
    Oh. So there has been no reduction in air pollution in London in relation to the two stages of the ULEZ introduced so far?
    The ultra low emissions zone has had not the slightest effect so far, and any person or scientific body that says otherwise is making it all up?
    Have you got anything objective that will back that claim up?
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    seth plum said:
    Don’t forget all those Weapons of Mass Destruction that the Government told us weee in Iraq. 




    incontinent WMD's thank god they were in Iraq!
  • seth plum said:
    seth plum said:
    seth plum said:
    Don’t forget all those Weapons of Mass Destruction that the Government told us weee in Iraq. 
    Is there a relationship between the Iraq situation and a reduction of pollution in London?

    Yes, they are both made up to suit the narrative. 
    Oh. So there has been no reduction in air pollution in London in relation to the two stages of the ULEZ introduced so far?
    The ultra low emissions zone has had not the slightest effect so far, and any person or scientific body that says otherwise is making it all up?
    Have you got anything objective that will back that claim up?
    I didn’t think there was yet any data on the second stage? 

    Notwithstanding I would assume some improvement will be evidenced. 
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    Yes, I agree that there will be evidence of improvement.
    If that happens it can be peer reviewed to assess how much improvement there has been.
    It might even turn out to have reduced fatalities due to polluted air.
  • seth plum said:
    Yes, I agree that there will be evidence of improvement.
    If that happens it can be peer reviewed to assess how much improvement there has been.
    It might even turn out to have reduced fatalities due to polluted air.
    The unknown will be how much it would have improved without the penalty fines. 

    I’d like to see some analysis of how many cars registered to inner London addresses changed post the announcement of the expansion of ULEZ in comparison to change in car ownership normally AND how many of the non compliant vehicles still seen are registered outside of London or indeed abroad. 

    I’m curious how much it hastened upgrading vehicles versus reduced volumes of cars versus impact on non residents. 

    It’s a multitude of factors at play including the benefit of the inner London ULEZ already benefitting outer London. 

    My instinct it was a sledge hammer to crack a nut and some detailed analysis will be interesting rather than just headlines. 

    But yes there will be a valid  argument to some degree pollution has improved and therefore beneficial. 

    My concern is still the expense of the scheme may prove to be detrimental in total within a few years whilst council finances remain too tight for comfort. 
  • Huskaris
    Huskaris Posts: 9,844
    edited January 2024
    Some bellends have cut down all the traffic lights in Chislehurst because they have ULEZ cameras on them. 

    These people are nuts....
  • SE10Addick
    SE10Addick Posts: 2,963
    Huskaris said:
    Some bellends have cut down all the traffic lights in Chislehurst because they have ULEZ cameras on them. 

    These people are nuts....
    So many accidents! I'm generally anti ULEZ but these idiots are not going to help their cause.

    On a separate note, the traffic in Chislehurst has never flowed so well (as long as the crashed cars move out of the way!)
  • Sponsored links:



  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,350
    Huskaris said:
    Some bellends have cut down all the traffic lights in Chislehurst because they have ULEZ cameras on them. 

    These people are nuts....
    So many accidents! I'm generally anti ULEZ but these idiots are not going to help their cause.

    On a separate note, the traffic in Chislehurst has never flowed so well (as long as the crashed cars move out of the way!)
    Good news bad news then?
  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,380
    Bad new
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    Hopefully ULEZ is a move towards cleaner air.
    Well done the authorities and especially Ella’s mother and her campaign.
  • If only they had increased the charge this all could have been avoided.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,989
    edited January 2024
    Huskaris said:
    Some bellends have cut down all the traffic lights in Chislehurst because they have ULEZ cameras on them. 

    These people are nuts....
    It's wider spread than Chislehurst.
    Also, Bickley, Grove Park, Downham, Locks Bottom, that I know of and probably more.
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,431
    We heard the explosion from Welling. Drove past the van in that video a few days later after the road had reopened and it was proper fucked. If that van hadn't been there and anyone had been in the path of the debris they would be dead. Whoever is responsible is an absolute moron and needs to be locked up. 
  • Rizzo said:
    We heard the explosion from Welling. Drove past the van in that video a few days later after the road had reopened and it was proper fucked. If that van hadn't been there and anyone had been in the path of the debris they would be dead. Whoever is responsible is an absolute moron and needs to be locked up. 
    They arrested a couple of men from miles away, 60 & 61 years old. They must be seriously unhinged, assuming they did it. At their age, if convicted they are never going to pay a congestion  or ULEZ charge again in their lives. Causing explosions you normally quite righty have the keys thrown away.
  • PopIcon
    PopIcon Posts: 5,970
    There's a bloke called Matt Hardy who pops up on my Insta feed every now and again (i don't follow him). He's an absolute tool, a cretin. He's obsessed with chopping down ulez cameras and generally smelling like a wet dog.
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,805
    I have a non-ulez compliant Campervan. Having done some investigation looks like I can get a ulez compliant retrofit done for about £7k which would not be worth it although also fingers crossed may be able to get Transport for London to pay £6k of that through the scrappage scheme. Applying now. 
  • Rizzo said:
    We heard the explosion from Welling. Drove past the van in that video a few days later after the road had reopened and it was proper fucked. If that van hadn't been there and anyone had been in the path of the debris they would be dead. Whoever is responsible is an absolute moron and needs to be locked up. 
    They arrested a couple of men from miles away, 60 & 61 years old. They must be seriously unhinged, assuming they did it. At their age, if convicted they are never going to pay a congestion  or ULEZ charge again in their lives. Causing explosions you normally quite righty have the keys thrown away.
    There should be some legal repercussions for whoever 'radicalised' these scumbags too.

    Loaded phrase or not, men in their early 60's don't suddenly decide, off their own back, to start making IED's and using them on our streets.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,431
    Rizzo said:
    We heard the explosion from Welling. Drove past the van in that video a few days later after the road had reopened and it was proper fucked. If that van hadn't been there and anyone had been in the path of the debris they would be dead. Whoever is responsible is an absolute moron and needs to be locked up. 
    They arrested a couple of men from miles away, 60 & 61 years old. They must be seriously unhinged, assuming they did it. At their age, if convicted they are never going to pay a congestion  or ULEZ charge again in their lives. Causing explosions you normally quite righty have the keys thrown away.
    There should be some legal repercussions for whoever 'radicalised' these scumbags too.

    Loaded phrase or not, men in their early 60's don't suddenly decide, off their own back, to start making IED's and using them on our streets.
    There is a LOT of online nonsense about ULEZ, 15-minutes cities etc. Lots of misinformation which, as it circulates, gradually transmutes into 'facts' in the minds of the recipients. 
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,079
    edited January 2024
    Rizzo said:
    We heard the explosion from Welling. Drove past the van in that video a few days later after the road had reopened and it was proper fucked. If that van hadn't been there and anyone had been in the path of the debris they would be dead. Whoever is responsible is an absolute moron and needs to be locked up. 
    They arrested a couple of men from miles away, 60 & 61 years old. They must be seriously unhinged, assuming they did it. At their age, if convicted they are never going to pay a congestion  or ULEZ charge again in their lives. Causing explosions you normally quite righty have the keys thrown away.
    There should be some legal repercussions for whoever 'radicalised' these scumbags too.

    Loaded phrase or not, men in their early 60's don't suddenly decide, off their own back, to start making IED's and using them on our streets.
    Very hard to prove but social media is full of radicalising material. Especially Twitter/x and Facebook.

    Look at the comments on this.

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/972110790038394/permalink/1476418362940965/
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 4,885
    We haven't seen any more MI (I don't believe) yet on fines issued/ income received (not just billed)  - where the non compliant cars are registered , # of repeat offenders etc.

    I think this analysis will be interesting to see the impact it is having whilst we must necessarily wait longer for any material change confirmed in air quality.
  • Rizzo said:
    We heard the explosion from Welling. Drove past the van in that video a few days later after the road had reopened and it was proper fucked. If that van hadn't been there and anyone had been in the path of the debris they would be dead. Whoever is responsible is an absolute moron and needs to be locked up. 
    They arrested a couple of men from miles away, 60 & 61 years old. They must be seriously unhinged, assuming they did it. At their age, if convicted they are never going to pay a congestion  or ULEZ charge again in their lives. Causing explosions you normally quite righty have the keys thrown away.
    There should be some legal repercussions for whoever 'radicalised' these scumbags too.

    Loaded phrase or not, men in their early 60's don't suddenly decide, off their own back, to start making IED's and using them on our streets.
    I'd say they weren't very good at being urban terrorists, they got caught PDQ. So anyone radicalising wasn't very good at it or they they did this off their own planning, for the want of a better phrase. They've probably been angry at most things most of their lives and jumped on the bandwagon of hating anything and everything that Khan has passed the smallest of comments on. Its not hard to make bombs and plant them, its the level of sophistication that's the clever bit and I seriously doubt they are either clever or sophisticated. 

  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,909
    We haven't seen any more MI (I don't believe) yet on fines issued/ income received (not just billed)  - where the non compliant cars are registered , # of repeat offenders etc.

    I think this analysis will be interesting to see the impact it is having whilst we must necessarily wait longer for any material change confirmed in air quality.
    There is data I saw a while back about the take up of the scrappage scheme which showed people making the choices the ULEZ is there to incentivise.
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 4,885
    We haven't seen any more MI (I don't believe) yet on fines issued/ income received (not just billed)  - where the non compliant cars are registered , # of repeat offenders etc.

    I think this analysis will be interesting to see the impact it is having whilst we must necessarily wait longer for any material change confirmed in air quality.
    There is data I saw a while back about the take up of the scrappage scheme which showed people making the choices the ULEZ is there to incentivise.
    I remain nervous it wont be cash positive for very long - that's my interest - and in todays world of 'big data' I'm surprised MI isn't shared more frequently
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,431
    Rizzo said:
    We heard the explosion from Welling. Drove past the van in that video a few days later after the road had reopened and it was proper fucked. If that van hadn't been there and anyone had been in the path of the debris they would be dead. Whoever is responsible is an absolute moron and needs to be locked up. 
    They arrested a couple of men from miles away, 60 & 61 years old. They must be seriously unhinged, assuming they did it. At their age, if convicted they are never going to pay a congestion  or ULEZ charge again in their lives. Causing explosions you normally quite righty have the keys thrown away.
    There should be some legal repercussions for whoever 'radicalised' these scumbags too.

    Loaded phrase or not, men in their early 60's don't suddenly decide, off their own back, to start making IED's and using them on our streets.
    I'd say they weren't very good at being urban terrorists, they got caught PDQ. So anyone radicalising wasn't very good at it or they they did this off their own planning, for the want of a better phrase. They've probably been angry at most things most of their lives and jumped on the bandwagon of hating anything and everything that Khan has passed the smallest of comments on. Its not hard to make bombs and plant them, its the level of sophistication that's the clever bit and I seriously doubt they are either clever or sophisticated. 

    If anything, the lack of sophistication is the problem here. It was pure luck nobody was injured or killed when they planted a bomb on a public road and (almost certainly) had no control over its detonation. 
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,909
    We haven't seen any more MI (I don't believe) yet on fines issued/ income received (not just billed)  - where the non compliant cars are registered , # of repeat offenders etc.

    I think this analysis will be interesting to see the impact it is having whilst we must necessarily wait longer for any material change confirmed in air quality.
    There is data I saw a while back about the take up of the scrappage scheme which showed people making the choices the ULEZ is there to incentivise.
    I remain nervous it wont be cash positive for very long - that's my interest - and in todays world of 'big data' I'm surprised MI isn't shared more frequently
    Uptake of the scrappage scheme make it more likely that it won't be cash positive.

    It's stated aims aren't around being cash positive but around air quality. That's what we should be measuring it against. If it loses money but improves air quality to safer levels then that's still a win in my view.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,668
    Just driven past the junction of Court Road and Spur Road in Orpington. 
    Both ULEZ cameras lying in the road.
    Looks like someone has taken an angle grinder to them.
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    Those who destroy the cameras seem to believe that money is more important than the lives of the people, especially children.
    I wonder if those camera activists hate the activity of the Just Stop Oil activists.